CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT03475355ACTIONPARKUpdated Mar 23, 2018

Action Observation Theraphy in Parkinson's Disease

An interventional study of Live movement observation (Upper Limbs) and Video Observation (Upper Limbs) in Parkinson Disease, sponsored by IRCCS San Camillo, Venezia, Italy. Status unknown at 1 site in Italy. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-03-23.

Sponsored by IRCCS San Camillo, Venezia, Italy · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Mar 2018), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
90
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The main objective of this project is to evaluate the effectiveness of Observation of Action (Action Observation, AO) both in increasing the speed of movement of the upper limbs, agility and locomotion, and in improving the activities and quality of life in people with Parkinson's disease (PD) during a 4-6 month follow-up. The second objective is to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of a tele-rehabilitation protocol using home-based AO therapy. The telecommunication technology will provide a complete training through a low-cost software run on a touch-screen device, which will show the actions to be imitated several times by people with PD. This project will be the first attempt to implement AO-based treatment at home and, if successful, will be highly translational to clinical practice thanks to the advanced development and broad accessibility of information technology and telecommunications in our country. Furthermore, continuous exercise will reduce the risks of complications and the frequency of hospital admissions, thus reducing costs for the National Health System.

Read the detailed description

The main objective of this project is to evaluate the effectiveness of Observation of Action (AO) both in increasing the speed of movement of the upper limbs, agility and locomotion, and in improving activities and quality of life in people with Parkinson's disease (PD) during a 4-6 month follow-up. The second objective is to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of a tele-rehabilitation protocol using home-based AO therapy. The telecommunication technology will provide a complete training through a low-cost software run on a touch-screen device, which will show the actions to be imitated several times by people with PD. This project will be the first attempt to implement AO-based treatment at home and, if successful, will be highly translational to clinical practice thanks to the advanced development and broad accessibility of information technology and telecommunications in our country. Furthermore, continuous exercise will reduce the risks of complications and the frequency of hospital admissions, thus reducing costs for the National Health System.

Parkinson's disease (PD) should impose a growing social and economic burden on our country. In fact, even with optimal medical management, people with PD experience a worsening of mobility and independence in daily activities, with a consequent reduction in quality of life. In the last ten years there has been a growing demand to consider rehabilitation as an essential adjunct to pharmacological treatment. However, the reference rates for physiotherapy for people with Parkinson's disease have been historically low, both because of poor compliance by patients with the therapies of the movement and because of the scarce availability of physiotherapy services. Action Observation Therapy (AO) has recently been described as an effective strategy in stroke rehabilitation (Sale 2011, 2012), since it can shape the reorganization of the neural circuit, promote neural plasticity and motor learning. . The purpose of this study is to verify the efficacy of AO therapy on PD-related disability and to verify the feasibility of a home-based AO protocol.

The first specific objective of this project is to evaluate the effectiveness of action observation as an additional rehabilitative tool to improve upper limb function in terms of bradykinesia and dexterity and to investigate the stability of treatment effects after 4 / 6 months of follow-up regarding functional improvement and quality of life (QoL). The second specific objective of this project is to evaluate the effectiveness of the observation of the action as an additional rehabilitative tool to improve the balance , gait and, consequently, to reduce falls, and to investigate the stability of treatment effects at 4/6 months of follow-up in terms of functional improvement and quality of life (QoL). The third objective is to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of a home telerehabilitation protocol (TR) based on AO therapy to improve dexterity and ambulation in people with Parkinson's disease.

02

Conditions studied

  • Parkinson Disease

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • action observation
  • parkinson's disease
  • physical therapy
  • home-based
  • neural plasticity
  • telerehabilitation
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosis of idiopathic PD according to the UK BRAIN BANK criteria;
  • Age between 18 and 80 years;
  • Able to walk 25 meters without help or with minimal assistance and sufficient strength to remain standing for at least 20 minutes without assistance for patient report; Stability of drug therapy for Parkinson's disease for at least 4 weeks before the start of the study;
  • Mini-Mental State Examination> 25/30;
  • HAM-D (Hamilton Depression Scale) \<17.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • comorbidity with other neurological disorders;
  • heart or orthopedic problems;
  • Chronic alcohol abuse.
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
90 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    EG1

    Each patient will be instructed to carefully observe the finalized movement of the upper limb of an experimenter seated in front (the experimenter's left hand is right in front of the patient's right hand), without moving or imagining the movement.

    Behavioral: Live movement observation (Upper Limbs)

  • Experimental
    EG2

    Each patient will be instructed to look at a computer screen that is in front of him that will show a daily routine task (actions).

    Behavioral: Video Observation (Upper Limbs)

  • Experimental
    EG3

    Each patient will be instructed to carefully observe the finalized movement performed by an experimenter standing in front of him (the examiner's left leg will be in front of the patient's right leg).

    Behavioral: Live Movement Observation (Lowe Limbs)

  • Experimental
    EG4

    Each patient will be instructed to look at a computer screen that is in front of him that will show a daily routine task (actions).

    Behavioral: Video Observation (Lower Limbs)

  • Active comparator
    CG1

    Participants will be shown for 3 minutes 5 static images that expose objects, none will represent animals or people. The participant's attention will be kept high through a cognitive task. For each CGail patient condition a sequence of images will be presented for 3 minutes, the images will be displayed separately, each for 30 seconds, and then during the last 30 seconds, will be displayed together with an intrusive image (intruder) that the patient will be asked to identify so that his attention span can be controlled in real time. Participants will then be invited to perform movements of the limbs as far as possible for 2 minutes according to a standard sequence that involves articular mobilizations of upper limbs and simulates that performed by the experimental groups.

    Behavioral: Static Picture Observation and Upper Limbs Exercise

  • Active comparator
    CG2

    Participants will be shown for 3 minutes 5 static images that expose objects, none will represent animals or people. The participant's attention will be kept high through a cognitive task. For each CGail patient condition a sequence of images will be presented for 3 minutes, the images will be displayed separately, each for 30 seconds, and then during the last 30 seconds, will be displayed together with an intrusive image (intruder) that the patient will be asked to identify so that his attention span can be controlled in real time. Participants will then be invited to perform movements of the limbs as far as possible for 2 minutes according to a standard sequence that involves articular mobilizations of lower limbs and simulates that performed by the experimental groups.

    Behavioral: Static Picture Observation and Lower Limbs Exercise

Interventions

  • BehavioralLive movement observation (Upper Limbs)

    All participants will be subjected to two 15-minute sessions per day of the Live movement observation of the upper limbs. The activities of the upper limbs will be based on some relevant activities of daily life such as drinking from a glass, combing, opening a box or eating an apple. The tasks will be both unimanual and bimanual. Every day, before starting the physical training, the patient will be asked to look carefully at the therapist who shows 20 different daily routine activities (actions) performed with the upper limb.

  • BehavioralVideo Observation (Upper Limbs)

    All participants will be subjected to two 15-minute sessions per day of the video observation of upper limbs movements. The activities of the upper limbs will be based on some relevant activities of daily life such as drinking from a glass, combing, opening a box or eating an apple. The tasks will be both unimanual and bimanual. Every day, before starting the physical training, the patient will be asked to carefully watch a video showing 20 different daily routine activities (actions) performed with the upper limb.

  • BehavioralLive Movement Observation (Lowe Limbs)

    All participants will be subjected to two 15-minute sessions per day of the Live movement observation of the lower limbs. Tasks to avoid freezing will be based on strategies such as touching the thigh, taking side or back steps, counting out loud while walking. Every day, before starting the physical training, the patient will be asked to carefully watch the therapist who will show 20 different movement strategies to avoid episodes of freezing the pace (FOG).

  • BehavioralVideo Observation (Lower Limbs)

    All participants will be subjected to two 15-minute sessions per day of the video observation of lower limbs movements. Tasks to avoid freezing will be based on strategies such as touching the thigh, taking side or back steps, counting out loud while walking. Every day, before starting the physical training, the patient will be asked to carefully watch a video that will show 20 different movement strategies to avoid episodes of freezing the pace (FOG).

  • BehavioralStatic Picture Observation and Upper Limbs Exercise

    Participants will watch for 3 minutes 5 static images that expose objects, none will represent animals or people. The participant's attention will be kept high through a cognitive task. The patient will be presented a sequence of images for 3 minutes, the images will be displayed separately, each for 30 seconds, and then during the last 30 seconds, they will be displayed together with an intrusive image (intruder) that the patient you will be asked to identify so that your attention span can be controlled in real time. Participants will then be invited to perform limb movements as far as possible for 2 minutes according to a standard sequence involving joint mobilisations of upper limbs, and simulating that performed by the experimental groups.

  • BehavioralStatic Picture Observation and Lower Limbs Exercise

    Participants will watch for 3 minutes 5 static images that expose objects, none will represent animals or people. The participant's attention will be kept high through a cognitive task. The patient will be presented a sequence of images for 3 minutes, the images will be displayed separately, each for 30 seconds, and then during the last 30 seconds, they will be displayed together with an intrusive image (intruder) that the patient you will be asked to identify so that your attention span can be controlled in real time. Participants will then be invited to perform limb movements as far as possible for 2 minutes according to a standard sequence involving joint mobilisations of lower limbs, and simulating that performed by the experimental groups.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Box and Block test

    The Box and Block Test (BBT) measures unilateral gross manual dexterity. It is a quick, simple and inexpensive test. It can be used with a wide range of populations, including clients with stroke.

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  2. Nine Hole Peg Test

    The Nine-Hole Peg Test (9HPT) is used to measure finger dexterity in patients with various neurological diagnoses. Administered by asking the client to take the pegs from a container, one by one, and place them into the holes on the board, as quickly as possible

    Time frame: 4 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. MDS-UPDRS part II

    13 items scale focusing on the self-evaluation of the activities of daily life (ADLs) including speech, swallowing, handwriting, dressing, hygiene, falling, salivating, turning in bed, walking, and cutting food. Each subscale now has 0-4 ratings, where 0 = normal, 1 = slight, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, and 4 = severe.

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  2. MDS-UPDRS part III

    18 items scale based on clinician-scored monitored motor evaluation. Each subscale now has 0-4 ratings, where 0 = normal, 1 = slight, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, and 4 = severe.

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  3. PDQ-39

    PDQ-39 There are 39 questions in the long form Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire, with 8 discrete scales: mobility (10 items); activities of daily living (6 items); emotional well-being (6 items); stigma (4 items); social support (3 items); cognitions (4 items); communication (3 items); bodily discomfort (3 items). Patients are asked to think about their health and general well-being and to consider how often in the last month they have experienced certain events (e.g. difficulty walking 100 yards). Patients are asked to indicate the frequency of each event by selecting one of 5 options (likert Scale): never/occasionally/sometimes/often/always or cannot do at all.

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  4. Small Coin Rotation Test

    The coin rotation task (CRT) is a simple, convenient, and cost-effective measure of psychomotor processing speed. In the CRT, participants rotate a coin through serial 180-degree turns using the thumb, index, and middle fingers for 10 seconds.

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  5. Small Lock Rotation Test

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  6. Clinical Global Impression Scale

    The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) rating scales are measures of symptom severity, treatment response and the efficacy of treatments in treatment studies

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  7. 3D Movement Analysis

    Time frame: 4 weeks

06

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Franceschini M, Ceravolo MG, Agosti M, Cavallini P, Bonassi S, Dall'Armi V, Massucci M, Schifini F, Sale P. Clinical relevance of action observation in upper-limb stroke rehabilitation: a possible role in recovery of functional dexterity. A randomized clinical trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2012 Jun;26(5):456-62. doi: 10.1177/1545968311427406. Epub 2012 Jan 10. PubMed 22235059 ↗
  • Pelosin E, Bove M, Ruggeri P, Avanzino L, Abbruzzese G. Reduction of bradykinesia of finger movements by a single session of action observation in Parkinson disease. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2013 Jul-Aug;27(6):552-60. doi: 10.1177/1545968312471905. Epub 2013 Feb 7. PubMed 23392919 ↗
  • Cross ES, Liepelt R, Hamilton AF, Parkinson J, Ramsey R, Stadler W, Prinz W. Robotic movement preferentially engages the action observation network. Hum Brain Mapp. 2012 Sep;33(9):2238-54. doi: 10.1002/hbm.21361. Epub 2011 Sep 6. PubMed 21898675 ↗
  • Alegre M, Guridi J, Artieda J. The mirror system, theory of mind and Parkinson's disease. J Neurol Sci. 2011 Nov 15;310(1-2):194-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2011.07.030. Epub 2011 Aug 11. PubMed 21839480 ↗
  • Buccino G, Gatti R, Giusti MC, Negrotti A, Rossi A, Calzetti S, Cappa SF. Action observation treatment improves autonomy in daily activities in Parkinson's disease patients: results from a pilot study. Mov Disord. 2011 Aug 15;26(10):1963-4. doi: 10.1002/mds.23745. Epub 2011 May 5. No abstract available. PubMed 21547952 ↗
  • Pelosin E, Avanzino L, Bove M, Stramesi P, Nieuwboer A, Abbruzzese G. Action observation improves freezing of gait in patients with Parkinson's disease. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010 Oct;24(8):746-52. doi: 10.1177/1545968310368685. Epub 2010 May 7. PubMed 20453155 ↗
  • Sale P, Franceschini M. Action observation and mirror neuron network: a tool for motor stroke rehabilitation. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2012 Jun;48(2):313-8. Epub 2012 Apr 20. PubMed 22522432 ↗
  • Alegre M, Rodriguez-Oroz MC, Valencia M, Perez-Alcazar M, Guridi J, Iriarte J, Obeso JA, Artieda J. Changes in subthalamic activity during movement observation in Parkinson's disease: is the mirror system mirrored in the basal ganglia? Clin Neurophysiol. 2010 Mar;121(3):414-25. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.11.013. Epub 2009 Dec 16. PubMed 20006544 ↗
  • Franceschini M, Agosti M, Cantagallo A, Sale P, Mancuso M, Buccino G. Mirror neurons: action observation treatment as a tool in stroke rehabilitation. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2010 Dec;46(4):517-23. Epub 2010 Apr 23. PubMed 20414184 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03475355
Lead sponsor
IRCCS San Camillo, Venezia, Italy
Collaborators
University of Genova, Università Politecnica delle Marche
Responsible party
Patrizio Sale (PM&R physician, MD, PhD, University of Padova) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 23, 2018
Start date
Apr 22, 2015
Primary completion
Jul 31, 2018 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 31, 2018 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 23, 2018

Study contacts

Francesco Infarinato, PhD
Contact
francesco.infarinato@sanraffaele.it
+39 06 5225 3788
Francesco Infarinato, PhD
study director · IRCCS San Raffaele
Patrizio Sale, PhD
principal investigator · Univesity of Padua

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Mar 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion