ClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT03472833VITdCUTUpdated Feb 15, 2022

High-dose Vitamin D3 in Pancreas Cancer

A Phase 3 interventional study of High-dose and Standard dose in Pancreas Cancer, Vitamin D Deficiency and Quality of Life, sponsored by Medical University of Graz. Terminated at 1 site in Austria. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 99 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-02-15.

Sponsored by Medical University of Graz · Phase 3, Interventional, and Supportive care

Why this study was terminated
slow recruitment, patients lost to follow-up due to Covid-19 pandemic.
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
25
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 99 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Different studies have shown that a deficiency in vitamin D (≤20ng/mL) results in higher rates in morbidity and mortality rates in cancer patients. Clinical studies investigated and demonstrated altered vitamin d tissue in pancreatic cancer. But there is no prospective study evaluating the beneficiary effects of oral supplementation of vitamin d in altered vitamin d tissue from pancreatic cancer. We want to examine the effect of a high dose vitamin D3 therapy vs. a standard base dose vitamin D3 therapy in pancreas cancer patients with a vitamin D deficiency. In case of benefit in our results we could implement vitamin D3 as a supportive standard therapy in pancreatic cancer patients.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pancreas Cancer
  • Vitamin D Deficiency
  • Quality of Life

Keywords

  • V
03

In context

Pancreatic Neoplasms

3,310 studies on the registry are indexed under Pancreatic Neoplasms; 910 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 25 is below the median of 46 across 2,480 interventional studies indexed under Pancreatic Neoplasms.

Browse Pancreatic Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Medical University of Graz is the lead sponsor of 470 studies on the registry; 98 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 99 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

both sexes

  • vitamin D deficiency(≤20ng/ml)
  • patients>18 years of age
  • pancreatic cancer
  • surgical intervention/non-surgical intervention
  • signed written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients\<18 years of age
  • pregnancy
  • contraindication for oral vitamin D intake
  • hypercalcemia (> 2.65 mmol/l total calcium and/or > 1.35 mmol/l ionized calcium at screening)
  • other ongoing vitamin D conducted trial
  • known kidney stones, active tuberculosis or sarcoidosis (in the last 12 months)
  • metastasized pancreatic cancer
  • normal vitamin D serum levels
  • missing written informed consent
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
25 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    High-dose

    Intervention with high dose oral vitamin D3 supplementation. 1 drop equals 400 I.U. This group will get 180.000 I.U. on day 1, and then 4000 I.U. per day for 60 days.

    Drug: High-dose

  • Active comparator
    Standard-dose

    Intervention with standard dose oral vitamin D3 supplementation. 1 drop equals 400 I.U. This group will get 800 I.U. per day for 60 days.

    Drug: Standard dose

Interventions

  • DrugHigh-dose

    Patients will receive a high dose - 180.000 I.U. (1 drop equals 400 I.U.) of Vitamin D3 orally on day 1, and then 4000 I.U. for 60 days

  • DrugStandard dose

    Patients will receive a standard dose - 800 I.U. (equals 2 drops) of Vitamin D3 orally for 60 days

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. 25(OH) vitamin D

    Blood level of Vitamin D3

    Time frame: Day 60

Secondary outcomes

  1. 25(OH) vitamin D

    Blood level of Vitamin D3

    Time frame: Day 30

  2. 1,25(OH)2D vitamin D

    Blood level of 1,25(OH)2D vitamin D

    Time frame: Day 30

  3. 1,25(OH)2D vitamin D

    Blood level of 1,25(OH)2D vitamin D

    Time frame: Day 60

  4. Urine Calcium

    Calcium level in urine

    Time frame: Day 30

  5. Urine Calcium

    Calcium level in urine

    Time frame: Day 60

  6. Osteocalcin

    Bone marker measured in blood

    Time frame: Day 30

  7. Osteocalcin

    Bone marker measured in blood

    Time frame: Day 60

  8. Beta-crosslaps

    Bone marker measured in blood

    Time frame: Day 30

  9. Beta-crosslaps

    Bone marker measured in blood

    Time frame: Day 60

  10. Calcium

    blood measurement

    Time frame: Day 60

  11. Calcium

    blood measurement

    Time frame: Day 30

  12. ionized calcium

    blood measurement

    Time frame: Day 30

  13. ionized calcium

    blood measurement

    Time frame: Day 60

  14. creatinine

    blood measurement

    Time frame: Day 30

  15. creatinine

    blood measurement

    Time frame: Day 60

  16. phosphate

    blood measurement

    Time frame: Day 60

  17. phosphate

    blood measurement

    Time frame: Day 30

  18. 60-day mortality

    Number of patients who die in the specified timeframe

    Time frame: Day 60

  19. hospital stay

    Hospital stay in days

    Time frame: Day 60

  20. hospital readmission

    Number of readmissions

    Time frame: Day 60

  21. hepcidin

    blood level marker for iron status

    Time frame: Day 30

  22. hepcidin

    blood level marker for iron status

    Time frame: Day 60

  23. Quality of Life questionnaire

    evaluated by EORTC questionnaire

    Time frame: Day 30

  24. Quality of Life questionnaire

    evaluated by EORTC questionnaire

    Time frame: Day 60

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Medical University of Graz
    Graz, Styria 8010, Austria
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Apr 2018 to primary completion in Apr 2021, 36 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 14, 2018
First posted
Mar 21, 2018
StartActual
Apr 1, 2018
Primary completionActual
Apr 20, 2021
CompletionActual
Apr 20, 2021
Last update
Feb 15, 2022
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 15, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03472833
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 21, 2018
Start date
Apr 1, 2018
Primary completion
Apr 20, 2021
Completion
Apr 20, 2021
Last update
Feb 15, 2022

Study contacts

Peter Kornprat, Prof. Dr.
principal investigator · Medical University of Graz, Departement for General Surgery

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Jan 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion