CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03470545EXPLORER-HCMUpdated Oct 4, 2021Results posted

Clinical Study to Evaluate Mavacamten (MYK-461) in Adults With Symptomatic Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

A Phase 3 interventional study of mavacamten and Placebo in Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy, sponsored by MyoKardia, Inc.. Completed at 71 sites in 13 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-10-04.

Sponsored by MyoKardia, Inc. · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
251
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a multicenter, international, double-blind study of the administration of mavacamten in participants with symptomatic obstructive HCM (oHCM). Approximately 220 participants will be randomized to receive placebo or mavacamten.

02

Conditions studied

  • Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

Keywords

  • Symptomatic, left ventricular outflow tract gradient
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18 and greater, body weight ≥ 45kg
  • Has adequate acoustic windows to enable accurate transthoracic echocardiograms (TTEs)
  • Diagnosed with oHCM consistent with current American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association and European Society of Cardiology guidelines and satisfy both criteria:
  • Has documented left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥55%
  • NYHA Class II or III
  • Has documented oxygen saturation at rest ≥90% at Screening
  • Is able to perform an upright CPET and has a respiratory exchange ratio (RER) ≥1.0 at Screening per central reading

Key Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known infiltrative or storage disorder causing cardiac hypertrophy that mimics oHCM, such as Fabry disease, amyloidosis, or Noonan syndrome with LV hypertrophy
  • History of syncope or sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmia with exercise within 6 months prior to Screening
  • History of resuscitated sudden cardiac arrest (at any time) or known history of appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) discharge for life-threatening ventricular arrhythmia within 6 months prior to Screening
  • Paroxysmal, intermittent atrial fibrillation with atrial fibrillation present at Screening
  • Persistent or permanent atrial fibrillation not on anticoagulation for at least 4 weeks prior to Screening and/or not adequately rate controlled within 6 months prior to Screening
  • Treatment (within 14 days prior to Screening) or planned treatment during the study with disopyramide or ranolazine
  • Treatment (within 14 days prior to Screening) or planned treatment during the study with a combination of β-blockers and calcium channel blockers
  • LVOT gradient with Valsalva maneuver \<30 mmHg at Screening
  • Has been successfully treated with invasive septal reduction (surgical myectomy or percutaneous alcohol septal ablation [ASA]) within 6 months prior to Screening or plans to have either of these treatments during the study
  • ICD placement within 2 months prior to Screening or planned ICD placement during the study
  • Has a history or evidence of any other clinically significant disorder, condition, or disease that, in the opinion of the investigator, would pose a risk to participant safety or interfere with the study evaluation, procedures, or completion
  • Prior treatment with cardiotoxic agents such as doxorubicin or similar
04

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
251 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    mavacamten (MYK-461)

    Drug: mavacamten

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • Drugmavacamten

    mavacamten capsules

    Also known as: MYK-461

  • DrugPlacebo

    placebo oral capsule

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants Achieving A Clinical Response

    A positive clinical response (value="YES") is defined as having achieved either an improvement of at least 1.5 mL/kg/min in peak oxygen consumption (pVO2) as determined by cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) and a reduction of one or more class in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification (e.g.I, II, III, or IV) -OR- an improvement of 3.0 mL/kg/min or more in pVO2 with no worsening in NYHA Functional Class.

    Time frame: 30 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Changes From Baseline to Week 30 in Post Exercise in LVOT Peak Gradient.

    The post-exercise LVOT gradient was measured from echocardiograms obtained at baseline and week 30 following a study-specified exercise protocol and read by the Cardiovascular Imaging Core Laboratory (CICL, Boston MA). Change from baseline was determined as per the study statistical analysis plan and compared between treatment arms.

    Time frame: 30 weeks

  2. Change From Baseline to Week 30 in pVO2 as Assessed by CPET

    Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) was performed at baseline and week 30 following a study-specified protocol and peak oxygen consumption (pVO2) was determined by the Cardiovascular Metabolic Disease Research Institute (CMDRI, Palo Alto, CA). Change from baseline was determined as per the study statistical analysis plan and compared between treatment arms.

    Time frame: 30 weeks

  3. Proportion of Participants With at Least 1 Class Improvement in NYHA Functional Class From Baseline to Week 30

    New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification was determined by the principal investigator at baseline and at specified timepoints in the study. At baseline, all subjects were NYHA Class II or III. For the secondary outcome, NYHA class at Week 30 was compared to baseline and the proportion of subjects with an improvement of at least one class was determined, and the difference between treatment groups was analyzed. The proportion was also multiplied by 100 to provide the result as a percent.

    Time frame: 30 weeks

  4. Change From Baseline to Week 30 in Participant-reported Health-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the KCCQ Score

    The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) is a patient reported outcome instrument with minimum score = 0 and maximum score = 100 where higher score indicates better health status. There are no units to the score. The instrument utilizes a recall period of 2 weeks over which patients describe the frequency and severity of their symptoms, their physical and social limitations, and how they perceive their heart failure symptoms to affect their quality of life. The KCCQ clinical summary (KCCQ-CS) score, a prespecified secondary outcome of EXPLORER-HCM, combines the physical limitation and total symptom scores.

    Time frame: 30 weeks

  5. Change From Baseline to Week 30 in Participant-reported Severity of HCM Symptoms as Assessed by the HCMSQ Score

    The Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Symptom Questionnaire (HCMSQ) is a patient reported outcome instrument that is a daily self-administered 11-item questionnaire. The HCMSQ assesses the core symptoms of HCM (tiredness/fatigue, heart palpitations, chest pain, dizziness, and shortness of breath). The Shortness of Breath domain score, a pre-specified secondary outcome of EXPLORER-HCM, assesses the frequency and severity of shortness of breath. The minimum score = 0 and maximum score = 18 where lower score indicates better health status. There are no units to the score.

    Time frame: 30 weeks

06

Results

Posted Oct 4, 2021

Participant flow

Subjects who met all of the inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria were enrolled into the study and were randomized 1:1 to receive mavacamten (2.5, 5, 10, or 15 mg capsule) or placebo once daily for 30 weeks, followed by an 8 week post-treatment period. In total, 429 participants were assessed for eligibility and 251 were enrolled from 68 sites in the United States and EMEA.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneMavacamten (MYK-461)Placebo
Started123128
Completed119125
Not completed43
Withdrew: Death01
Withdrew: Did not complete week 30 assessments due to scheduling conflict10
Withdrew: Adverse event20
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject11
Withdrew: Week 30 not completed due to circumstances surrounding the covid-19 pandemic01

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage of Participants Achieving A Clinical Response

A positive clinical response (value="YES") is defined as having achieved either an improvement of at least 1.5 mL/kg/min in peak oxygen consumption (pVO2) as determined by cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) and a reduction of one or more class in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification (e.g.I, II, III, or IV) -OR- an improvement of 3.0 mL/kg/min or more in pVO2 with no worsening in NYHA Functional Class.

Time frame:
30 weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving A Clinical Response
ParticipantsMavacamten (MYK-461)Placebo
Percentage of Participants Achieving A Clinical Response4522
SecondaryChanges From Baseline to Week 30 in Post Exercise in LVOT Peak Gradient.

The post-exercise LVOT gradient was measured from echocardiograms obtained at baseline and week 30 following a study-specified exercise protocol and read by the Cardiovascular Imaging Core Laboratory (CICL, Boston MA). Change from baseline was determined as per the study statistical analysis plan and compared between treatment arms.

Time frame:
30 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · mmHg
Changes From Baseline to Week 30 in Post Exercise in LVOT Peak Gradient.
mmHgMavacamten (MYK-461)Placebo
Changes From Baseline to Week 30 in Post Exercise in LVOT Peak Gradient.-47 ± 40.3-10 ± 29.6
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 30 in pVO2 as Assessed by CPET

Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) was performed at baseline and week 30 following a study-specified protocol and peak oxygen consumption (pVO2) was determined by the Cardiovascular Metabolic Disease Research Institute (CMDRI, Palo Alto, CA). Change from baseline was determined as per the study statistical analysis plan and compared between treatment arms.

Time frame:
30 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · mL/kg/min
Change From Baseline to Week 30 in pVO2 as Assessed by CPET
mL/kg/minMavacamten (MYK-461)Placebo
Change From Baseline to Week 30 in pVO2 as Assessed by CPET1.4 ± 3.12-0.05 ± 3.02
SecondaryProportion of Participants With at Least 1 Class Improvement in NYHA Functional Class From Baseline to Week 30

New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification was determined by the principal investigator at baseline and at specified timepoints in the study. At baseline, all subjects were NYHA Class II or III. For the secondary outcome, NYHA class at Week 30 was compared to baseline and the proportion of subjects with an improvement of at least one class was determined, and the difference between treatment groups was analyzed. The proportion was also multiplied by 100 to provide the result as a percent.

Time frame:
30 weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Proportion of Participants With at Least 1 Class Improvement in NYHA Functional Class From Baseline to Week 30
ParticipantsMavacamten (MYK-461)Placebo
Proportion of Participants With at Least 1 Class Improvement in NYHA Functional Class From Baseline to Week 308040
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 30 in Participant-reported Health-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the KCCQ Score

The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) is a patient reported outcome instrument with minimum score = 0 and maximum score = 100 where higher score indicates better health status. There are no units to the score. The instrument utilizes a recall period of 2 weeks over which patients describe the frequency and severity of their symptoms, their physical and social limitations, and how they perceive their heart failure symptoms to affect their quality of life. The KCCQ clinical summary (KCCQ-CS) score, a prespecified secondary outcome of EXPLORER-HCM, combines the physical limitation and total symptom scores.

Time frame:
30 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · Scores on Scale
Change From Baseline to Week 30 in Participant-reported Health-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the KCCQ Score
Scores on ScaleMavacamten (MYK-461)Placebo
Change From Baseline to Week 30 in Participant-reported Health-related Quality of Life as Assessed by the KCCQ Score13.6 ± 14.424.2 ± 13.68
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 30 in Participant-reported Severity of HCM Symptoms as Assessed by the HCMSQ Score

The Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Symptom Questionnaire (HCMSQ) is a patient reported outcome instrument that is a daily self-administered 11-item questionnaire. The HCMSQ assesses the core symptoms of HCM (tiredness/fatigue, heart palpitations, chest pain, dizziness, and shortness of breath). The Shortness of Breath domain score, a pre-specified secondary outcome of EXPLORER-HCM, assesses the frequency and severity of shortness of breath. The minimum score = 0 and maximum score = 18 where lower score indicates better health status. There are no units to the score.

Time frame:
30 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · Scores on Scale
Change From Baseline to Week 30 in Participant-reported Severity of HCM Symptoms as Assessed by the HCMSQ Score
Scores on ScaleMavacamten (MYK-461)Placebo
Change From Baseline to Week 30 in Participant-reported Severity of HCM Symptoms as Assessed by the HCMSQ Score-2.8 ± 2.68-0.9 ± 2.41

Adverse events

Collected over Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) were summarized for the on-treatment period (Day 1 to Week 30) and for the treatment-emergent period (Day 1 to Week 38).. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Mavacamten (MYK-461)0/123 (0%)14/123 (11.4%)108/123 (87.8%)
Placebo1/128 (0.8%)12/128 (9.4%)104/128 (81.3%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 29
Most frequent serious events
EventMavacamten (MYK-461)Placebo
Atrial FibrillationCardiac disorders3/1235/128
SyncopeNervous system disorders3/1231/128
Stress cardiomyopathyCardiac disorders2/1230/128
Urinary Tract InfectionInfections and infestations0/1232/128
Cardiac FailureCardiac disorders1/1230/128
Cardiogenic shockCardiac disorders1/1230/128
Pericardial effusionCardiac disorders1/1230/128
Systolic dysfunctionCardiac disorders1/1230/128
Atrial septal defectCongenital, familial and genetic disorders1/1230/128
Abdominal PainGastrointestinal disorders1/1230/128
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 15
Most frequent other events
EventMavacamten (MYK-461)Placebo
DizzinessNervous system disorders26/12317/128
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations15/12319/128
DyspnoeaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders18/12313/128
HeadacheNervous system disorders15/12310/128
Atrial FibrillationCardiac disorders10/12310/128
CoughRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders10/1234/128
Back painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders10/1238/128
Upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations10/1236/128
PalpitationsCardiac disorders7/12310/128
SyncopeNervous system disorders7/1232/128

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Mavacamten (MYK-461)PlaceboTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years7888166
>=65 years454085
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Mavacamten (MYK-461)PlaceboTotal
Median60 (26 to 82)60 (18 to 81)60 (18 to 82)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Mavacamten (MYK-461)PlaceboTotal
Female5745102
Male6683149
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Mavacamten (MYK-461)PlaceboTotal
Hispanic or Latino8412
Not Hispanic or Latino114119233
Unknown or Not Reported156
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Mavacamten (MYK-461)PlaceboTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native011
Asian426
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American156
White115114229
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported369
07

Study locations

71 sites
  • Mayo Clinic Arizona
    Scottsdale, Arizona 85259, United States
  • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (Smidt Heart Institute)
    Los Angeles, California 90048, United States
  • UCSF School of Medicine
    San Francisco, California 94143, United States
  • Stanford University
    Stanford, California 94305, United States
  • Yale New Haven Hospital
    New Haven, Connecticut 16511, United States
  • Mayo Clinic Jacksonville - PPDS
    Jacksonville, Florida 32224, United States
  • Northwestern University
    Chicago, Illinois 60611, United States
  • University Of Iowa Hospitals And Clinics
    Iowa City, Iowa 52242, United States
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital
    Boston, Massachusetts 02115, United States
  • University of Michigan
    Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States
  • Spectrum Health
    Grand Rapids, Michigan 49512, United States
  • Washington University School of Medicine
    Saint Louis, Missouri 63110, United States
  • NYU Langone Medical Center
    New York, New York 10017, United States
  • Columbia University Medical Center
    New York, New York 10032, United States
  • Carolinas Medical Center
    Charlotte, North Carolina 28203, United States
  • Duke Cardiology at Southpoint
    Durham, North Carolina 27710, United States
  • Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
    Cincinnati, Ohio 45229, United States
  • Oregon Health & Science University
    Portland, Oregon 97239, United States
  • St. Luke's Cardiology Associates
    Bethlehem, Pennsylvania 18018, United States
  • University of Pennsylvania (Penn Heart and Vascular Center)
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States
  • University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Presbyterian
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, United States
  • Methodist University Hospital
    Memphis, Tennessee 38163, United States
  • University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
    Dallas, Texas 75235, United States
  • Houston Methodist Hospital
    Houston, Texas 77030, United States
  • University of Texas Houston Medical School
    Houston, Texas 77030, United States
  • Intermountain Medical Center
    Salt Lake City, Utah 84107, United States
  • University of Utah
    Salt Lake City, Utah 84132, United States
  • University of Virginia Health System
    Charlottesville, Virginia 22903, United States
  • University of Washington Medical Center
    Seattle, Washington 98195, United States
  • UZ Antwerpen
    Edegem, Antwerpen 2650, Belgium
  • Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis
    Aalst, Oost-Vlaanderen 9300, Belgium
  • Hôpital Erasme
    Brussels, 1070, Belgium
  • Institut Klinicke a Experimentalni Mediciny
    Prague, Czechia
  • Vseobecna fakultni nemocnice v Praze
    Praha 2, 128 08, Czechia
  • Aarhus Universitetshospital
    Aarhus N, 8200, Denmark
  • Bispebjerg Hospital
    København NV, 2400, Denmark
  • Odense Universitetshospital
    Odense, 5000, Denmark
  • CHRU Nantes
    Nantes, Loire-Atlantique 44805, France
  • Groupe Hospitalier Pitié Salpétrière
    Paris, 75013, France
  • Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou
    Paris, 75015, France
  • Hôpital de Rangueil
    Toulouse, 31403, France
  • University Medicine Göttingen
    Göttingen, Neidersachsen, Germany
  • Kerckhoff-Klinik-Forschungs-GmbH
    Bad Nauheim, 61231, Germany
  • Charité Campus Buch - Experimental and Clinical Research Center
    Berlin, 13125, Germany
  • Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
    Berlin, 13353, Germany
  • Cardiologicum Dresden und Pirna
    Dresden, 01277, Germany
  • University Clinic Heidelberg - PPDS
    Heidelberg, 69120, Germany
  • Universitatsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein
    Kiel, 24105, Germany
  • Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center
    Tel Aviv, Tel-Aviv 62431, Israel
  • Barzilai Medical Center
    Ashkelon, 78278, Israel
  • Hadassah Medical Center PPDS -
    Jerusalem, 91120, Israel
  • Rabin Medical Center - PPDS
    Petach Tikva, 49100, Israel
  • The Chaim Sheba Medical Center - The Edmond and Lily Safra Children's Hospital
    Ramat-Gan, 52621, Israel
  • Kaplan Medical Center
    Reẖovot, 76100, Israel
  • ZIV Medical Center
    Safed, 13100, Israel
  • Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi
    Firenze, Italy
  • Maastricht University Medical Center
    Maastricht, Limburg 6229 HX, Netherlands
  • Erasmus MC
    Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland 3015GD, Netherlands
  • Collegium Medicum Uniwersytetu Jagiellonskiego
    Kraków, Malopolskie 31-501, Poland
  • Kardio Klinika Brynów
    Katowice, Slaskie, Poland
  • Szpital Kliniczny Przemienienia Panskiego Uniwesytetu Medycznego im. Karola Marcinkowskiego
    Poznań, 61-848, Poland
  • Instytut Kardiologii im Prymasa Tysiaclecia Kardynala Stefana Wyszynskiego
    Warsaw, 04-628, Poland
  • Hospital Garcia de Orta
    Almada, 2805-267, Portugal
  • Hospital da Luz
    Lisboa, 1500-650, Portugal
  • Hospital Universitario Virgen de La Arrixaca
    El Palmar, Murcia 30120, Spain
  • Hospital Universitario A Coruña
    La Coruña, Spain
  • Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro - Majadahonda
    Madrid, Spain
  • Hospital Universitario Ramon y Cajal
    Madrid, Spain
  • Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena
    Sevilla, 41009, Spain
  • University Hospital of Wales
    Cardiff, South Glamergon CF14 4XW, United Kingdom
  • St Bartholomew's Hospital
    London, W1G 8PH, United Kingdom
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Nassif M, Fine JT, Dolan C, Reaney M, Addepalli P, Allen VD, Sehnert AJ, Gosch K, Spertus JA. Validation of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire in Symptomatic Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy. JACC Heart Fail. 2022 Aug;10(8):531-539. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2022.03.002. Epub 2022 May 4. PubMed 35902155 ↗
  • Reaney M, Addepalli P, Allen V, Spertus JA, Dolan C, Sehnert AJ, Fine JT. Longitudinal Psychometric Analysis of the Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Symptom Questionnaire (HCMSQ) Using Outcomes from the Phase III EXPLORER-HCM Trial. Pharmacoecon Open. 2022 Jul;6(4):575-586. doi: 10.1007/s41669-022-00340-8. Epub 2022 Jun 20. PubMed 35718845 ↗
  • Hegde SM, Lester SJ, Solomon SD, Michels M, Elliott PM, Nagueh SF, Choudhury L, Zemanek D, Zwas DR, Jacoby D, Wang A, Ho CY, Li W, Sehnert AJ, Olivotto I, Abraham TP. Effect of Mavacamten on Echocardiographic Features in Symptomatic Patients With Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Dec 21;78(25):2518-2532. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.09.1381. PubMed 34915982 ↗
  • Xie J, Wang Y, Xu Y, Fine JT, Lam J, Garrison LP. Assessing health-related quality-of-life in patients with symptomatic obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: EQ-5D-based utilities in the EXPLORER-HCM trial. J Med Econ. 2022 Jan-Dec;25(1):51-58. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2021.2011301. PubMed 34907813 ↗
  • Burstein Waldman C, Owens A. A plain language summary of the EXPLORER-HCM study: mavacamten for obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Future Cardiol. 2021 Oct;17(7):1269-1275. doi: 10.2217/fca-2021-0044. Epub 2021 May 21. PubMed 34018809 ↗
  • Spertus JA, Fine JT, Elliott P, Ho CY, Olivotto I, Saberi S, Li W, Dolan C, Reaney M, Sehnert AJ, Jacoby D. Mavacamten for treatment of symptomatic obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (EXPLORER-HCM): health status analysis of a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2021 Jun 26;397(10293):2467-2475. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00763-7. Epub 2021 May 15. PubMed 34004177 ↗
  • Olivotto I, Oreziak A, Barriales-Villa R, Abraham TP, Masri A, Garcia-Pavia P, Saberi S, Lakdawala NK, Wheeler MT, Owens A, Kubanek M, Wojakowski W, Jensen MK, Gimeno-Blanes J, Afshar K, Myers J, Hegde SM, Solomon SD, Sehnert AJ, Zhang D, Li W, Bhattacharya M, Edelberg JM, Waldman CB, Lester SJ, Wang A, Ho CY, Jacoby D; EXPLORER-HCM study investigators. Mavacamten for treatment of symptomatic obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (EXPLORER-HCM): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2020 Sep 12;396(10253):759-769. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31792-X. Epub 2020 Aug 29. Erratum In: Lancet. 2020 Sep 12;396(10253):758. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31872-9. PubMed 32871100 ↗
  • Ho CY, Olivotto I, Jacoby D, Lester SJ, Roe M, Wang A, Waldman CB, Zhang D, Sehnert AJ, Heitner SB. Study Design and Rationale of EXPLORER-HCM: Evaluation of Mavacamten in Adults With Symptomatic Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy. Circ Heart Fail. 2020 Jun;13(6):e006853. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.120.006853. Epub 2020 Jun 5. PubMed 32498620 ↗

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Oct 4, 2019
  • Statistical analysis plan · Apr 21, 2020

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03470545
Lead sponsor
MyoKardia, Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 20, 2018
Start date
May 29, 2018
Primary completion
Mar 14, 2020
Completion
May 6, 2020
Results posted
Oct 4, 2021
Last update
Oct 4, 2021

Study contacts

Medical Information Team
study director · MyoKardia, Inc.

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion