ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03464266Updated Jun 17, 2024

The Kampala Women's Bone Study

A Phase 4 interventional study of FTC/TDF and DMPA and FTC/TDF in Bone Demineralization, Hypoestrogenism and Subclinical Kidney Injury, sponsored by University of Washington. Completed at 1 site in Uganda. Open to female participants aged 16 Years to 25 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-06-17.

Sponsored by University of Washington · Phase 4, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
500
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
16 Years to 25 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The primary objective of this study is to address critical safety questions with concurrent TDF-based PrEP and DMPA use. We hypothesize that young women using TDF-based PrEP and DMPA will have lower bone acquisition and altered bone metabolism. Bone mineral metabolism is in part regulated by the kidney, and we hypothesize that bone effects from concurrent PrEP and DMPA use will be driven by subclinical kidney injury, a known side effect of TDF, as well as DMPA-induced hypoestrogenism. To investigate our hypothesis, we will enroll a prospective cohort of approximately 500 HIV-uninfected women ages 16-25 years in Kampala, Uganda who have substantial HIV risk and are initiating DMPA or barrier method contraception. Over a 24-month period, we will offer TDF-based PrEP. We will use state-of-the-art radiologic, biochemical, and epidemiologic methods to test the hypothesis that concurrent TDF-based PrEP and DMPA use results in compounding adverse effects on bone health.

Read the detailed description

The proposed research will investigate the hypothesis that TDF-based PrEP and DMPA initiated concurrently by HIV-uninfected women will enhance each other's effects on bone metabolism. The investigators will conduct an open-label prospective study of approximately 500 HIV-uninfected women at substantial risk for HIV-infection who are newly initiating DMPA or using condoms as their only contraceptive in Kampala, Uganda. The investigators will offer PrEP to all of these women and determine the joint effect of PrEP and DMPA on changes in bone mass (Aim 1), bone turnover, subclinical kidney injury, and hypoestrogenism (Aim 2), and conduct mediation analysis to assess the contribution of each pathway to overall losses in bone mass (Aim 3).

  1. The investigators will assess whether young women using TDF-based PrEP and DMPA concurrently attain lower peak bone mass over a 24-month period and have evidence of disrupted microarchitecture, relative to women using either agent singly or neither agent The investigators will use dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans to measure BMD annually at 3 anatomical sites (lumbar spine, total hip, and wrist). Additionally, the investigators will derive the trabecular bone score (TBS), an index of lumbar spine trabecular microarchitecture.
  2. The investigators will investigate whether young women concurrently using TDF-based PrEP and DMPA experience: 1) higher rates of bone turnover, a direct precursor to bone loss and 2) subclinical kidney injury and hypoestrogenism, markers of two mechanistic pathways between TDF and DMPA use and bone mass

At baseline and 24 months, the investigators will measure:

  1. Markers of bone formation and resorption (e.g. NTX, P1NP, serum intact parathyroid hormone, total and bioavailable 25-OH-vitamin D)
  2. Markers of kidney function (phosphate, glucose, creatinine, total protein, albumin) and
  3. Markers of estrogen (serum estradiol, sex hormone binding protein, and the occurrence of amenorrhea) Hypothesis: Relative to women using DMPA only and PrEP only, women concurrently using TDF-based PrEP and DMPA will have increased bone turnover markers and PTH. In addition, women concurrently using TDF-based PrEP and DMPA will have more frequent subclinical kidney injury (relative to women without tenofovir exposure) and reduced serum estrogen (relative to women without DMPA exposure).
  1. Using mediation analysis, the investigators will identify the degree to which the pathways through subclinical kidney injury and hypoestrogenism account for changes in bone density among women concurrently using TDF-based PrEP and DMPA The investigators will conduct mediation analysis to determine the degree to which changes in the pathways through subclinical kidney injury, hypoestrogenism and the combination of these pathways account for changes in bone density.

Over a 24-month period, the investigators will follow women quarterly with HIV rapid testing, PrEP adherence counseling and refills, DMPA injections, and provision of other contraceptives as desired. At enrollment and quarterly visits, the investigators will assess physical activity, sexual behavior, and menstrual cycle characteristics. Annually, the investigators will conduct physical exams and anthropometric readings. Sexually transmitted infections will be routinely assessed syndromically, according to national guidelines. Women will be encouraged to consider their HIV risk and fertility desires at every visit and counseled about contraception and PrEP accordingly. Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans will be performed at baseline and annually thereafter. Blood and urine samples will be obtained quarterly, aliquoted, and archived at minus 80o Celsius.

DXA and TBS assessments:

DXA scans will be conducted at study enrollment (within 1 week of contraceptive initiation), 12, and 24 months after enrollment. DXA is the clinical standard for measuring BMD. It is painless and non-invasive. Women will be exposed to a relatively low level of radiation which is \<1/10 the dose of a standard chest x-ray, and less than a day's exposure to natural radiation. BMD by DXA of the hip and spine is generally considered the most reliable way to classify osteoporosis, assess changes in BMD, and predict fracture risk. The investigators will measure areal BMD of the lumbar spine (L1-4), hip, and wrist, and body composition (total and % fat and lean mass) using a DXA machine. For the TBS analysis, no additional image acquisition is required. TBS will be performed as a re-analysis of the lumbar spine taken as part of the standard DXA procedure with specialized software.

Contraceptive provision:

Women will initiate contraception at the study clinic or a family planning clinic, as they are seeking services. Throughout study follow up, the study will assume responsibility for contraceptive provision, including DMPA injections, and care of all other methods desired by women. The staff at the IDI-Kasangati research clinic have extensive experience with the provision of contraception and contraceptive counseling during previous HIV prevention studies.

PrEP provision and adherence monitoring

Co-formulated emtricitabine FTC/TDF will be provided as PrEP by the study. PrEP counseling and provision will follow WHO guidelines, or Ugandan clinical guidelines when they are available. The investigators will measure adherence using three different methods:

  1. Pill counts will be conducted by the pharmacist during study visits to determine the percentage of expected pills that were used
  2. Real time monitoring will be conducted using an electronic monitoring system that captures a date-time stamp each time the pill container is opened
  3. The primary circulating form of TDF, tenofovir (TFV), will be quantified in blood archives from 1) a random sample of up to 15% of women who initiate PrEP to characterize the adherence in the cohort overall and 2) a targeted group of women who have no BMD change and women who experience a fracture.

Laboratory processing to measure markers of bone turnover, subclinical kidney injury, and hypoestrogenism.

Using state-of-the-art assay techniques on archival samples, the investigators will measure 1) established markers of bone turnover and bone health, 2) markers of subclinical kidney injury, and 3) markers of hypoestrogenism. Archived samples will be batch-analyzed.

02

Conditions studied

  • Bone Demineralization
  • Hypoestrogenism
  • Subclinical Kidney Injury
  • Bone Microarchitecture
03

In context

Lead sponsor

University of Washington is the lead sponsor of 1,433 studies on the registry; 225 are open to participants now.

Of its 158 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 136 (86%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
16 Years to 25 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Inclusion criteria:
  • Age 16-25

If age 16-17:

  • qualification as an emancipated minor (due to past pregnancy, being married, having a child, or catering for their own livelihood) or a mature minor (due to having a sexually transmitted infection) or able to have a parent/guardian provide
  • -uninfected
  • Initiated DMPA within the past 90 days or using condoms only for
  • Willing and able to provide written informed consent
  • Not planning to get pregnant in the next 24 months
  • Sexually active
  • Planning to remain in the study area for the next 2 years

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Exclusion criteria:
  • Currently enrolled in a biomedical HIV-1 prevention study
  • Current or prior use of PrEP consecutively in the last 3 months
  • Abnormal renal function ( \<60 min/ml)
  • infection
  • Currently pregnant or breastfeeding
  • Current DMPA use for longer than 90 days
  • Use of implant, IUD, or oral contraceptives
  • Past hysterectomy, oophorectomy, or tubal ligation
  • Current or recent history of primary or secondary amenorrhea
  • Taking medications known to interfere with bone metabolism (, anti-convulsants, bisphosphonates, cancer drugs).
  • Has any other condition that would preclude the ability to provide informed consent, make study participation unsafe, complicate the interpretation of study findings or otherwise interfere with achievement of the study objectives, in the investigator's discretion.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(6)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Creatinine clearance (CrCl)

How quickly the kidneys clear creatinine, a waste product, from the blood. A study may estimate it from a blood test with age, weight and sex (often by the Cockcroft–Gault formula), or measure it using blood and urine collected over a set time. Given in mL/min; higher is better.

Hepatitis B tests

Hepatitis B is a virus that infects the liver. These are separate tests: HBsAg positive usually means a current infection (a recent vaccination can briefly cause it too); total anti-HBc (HBcAb) positive means an infection now or in the past; HBV DNA measures how much virus is in the blood.

Some studies accept a past infection if HBV DNA is undetectable, sometimes with antiviral medicine during the study. Check what this study allows.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Factorial assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
500 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    DMPA and PrEP

    Combination Product: FTC/TDF and DMPA

  • Active comparator
    DMPA and no PrEP

    Drug: DMPA

  • Active comparator
    Condoms only and PrEP

    Drug: FTC/TDF

  • Active comparator
    Condoms only and no PrEP

    Other: Neither DMPA nor FTC/TDF

Interventions

  • Combination productFTC/TDF and DMPA

    Drug pages: Emtricitabine · Tenofovir · Medroxyprogesterone Acetate

    The primary analysis will be separate comparisons of the annualized rates of change in BMD and TBS of the spine and hip between women using PrEP and DMPA concurrently versus women using DMPA only (comparison 1), women using PrEP only (comparison 2), and women using neither (comparison 3). Analyses will account for baseline BMD.

  • DrugFTC/TDF

    The primary analysis will be separate comparisons of the annualized rates of change in BMD and TBS of the spine and hip between women using PrEP and DMPA concurrently versus women using DMPA only (comparison 1), women using PrEP only (comparison 2), and women using neither (comparison 3). Analyses will account for baseline BMD.

  • DrugDMPA

    The primary analysis will be separate comparisons of the annualized rates of change in BMD and TBS of the spine and hip between women using PrEP and DMPA concurrently versus women using DMPA only (comparison 1), women using PrEP only (comparison 2), and women using neither (comparison 3). Analyses will account for baseline BMD.

  • OtherNeither DMPA nor FTC/TDF

    The primary analysis will be separate comparisons of the annualized rates of change in BMD and TBS of the spine and hip between women using PrEP and DMPA concurrently versus women using DMPA only (comparison 1), women using PrEP only (comparison 2), and women using neither (comparison 3). Analyses will account for baseline BMD.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The investigators will assess whether young women using TDF-based PrEP and DMPA concurrently attain lower peak bone mass over a 24-month relative to women using either agent singly or neither agent.

    The investigators will use dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans to measure BMD annually at 3 anatomical sites (lumbar spine, total hip, and wrist). Hypothesis: Relative to women using DMPA only (without tenofovir exposure) and women using PrEP only (without DMPA exposure), women concurrently using TDF-based PrEP and DMPA will have lower bone mass.

    Time frame: 24 months

  2. The investigators will assess whether young women using TDF-based PrEP and DMPA concurrently have evidence of disrupted microarchitecture, relative to women using either agent singly or neither agent.

    The investigators will use dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans to derive the trabecular bone score (TBS), an index of lumbar spine trabecular microarchitecture. Hypothesis: Relative to women using DMPA only (without tenofovir exposure) and women using PrEP only (without DMPA exposure), women concurrently using TDF-based PrEP and DMPA will have more disruptions in bone microarchitecture.

    Time frame: 24 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. The investigators will investigate whether young women concurrently using TDF-based PrEP and DMPA experience higher rates of bone turnover.

    At baseline and 24 months, the investigators will measure: Markers of bone formation and resorption (e.g. NTX, P1NP, serum intact parathyroid hormone, total and bioavailable 25-OH-vitamin D). Hypothesis: Relative to women using DMPA only and PrEP only, women concurrently using TDF-based PrEP and DMPA will have increased bone turnover markers and PTH.

    Time frame: Change from Baseline at 24 months

  2. The investigators will investigate whether young women concurrently using TDF-based PrEP and DMPA experience higher rates of subclinical kidney injury.

    At baseline and 24 months, the investigators will measure: Markers of kidney function (phosphate, glucose, creatinine, total protein, albumin). Hypothesis: Relative to women using DMPA only and PrEP only, women concurrently using TDF-based PrEP and DMPA will have more frequent subclinical kidney injury (relative to women without tenofovir exposure)

    Time frame: Change from Baseline at 24 months

  3. The investigators will investigate whether young women concurrently using TDF-based PrEP and DMPA experience higher rates of hypoestrogenism.

    At baseline and 24 months, the investigators will measure: Markers of estrogen (serum estradiol, sex hormone binding protein, and the occurrence of amenorrhea). Hypothesis: Relative to women using DMPA only and PrEP only, women concurrently using TDF-based PrEP and DMPA will have reduced serum estrogen (relative to women without DMPA exposure).

    Time frame: Change from Baseline at 24 months

  4. Using mediation analysis, the investigators will identify the degree to which the pathways through subclinical kidney injury and hypoestrogenism account for changes in bone density among women concurrently using TDF-based PrEP and DMPA

    The investigators will conduct mediation analysis to determine the degree to which changes in the pathways through subclinical kidney injury, hypoestrogenism and the combination of these pathways account for changes in bone density. Hypothesis: The pathway through hypoestrogenism will be a stronger link between concurrent TDF-based PrEP and DMPA use and bone density changes.

    Time frame: 24 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Infectious Disease Institute
    Kampala, Uganda
08

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from May 2018 to primary completion in Dec 2023, 67 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 25, 2018
First posted
Mar 14, 2018
StartActual
May 15, 2018
Primary completionActual
Dec 21, 2023
CompletionActual
Dec 21, 2023
Last update
Jun 17, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 17, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03464266
Responsible party
Renee Heffron (Assistant Professor, Global Health and Epidemiology, University of Washington) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 14, 2018
Start date
May 15, 2018
Primary completion
Dec 21, 2023
Completion
Dec 21, 2023
Last update
Jun 17, 2024

Study contacts

Renee Heffron, PhD, MPH
principal investigator · University of Washington

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drugs tested here: Emtricitabine · Tenofovir · Medroxyprogesterone Acetate

Start the discussion