ClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT03464097Updated Oct 9, 2025Results posted

A Placebo-Controlled Study of Oral Ozanimod as Maintenance Therapy for Moderately to Severely Active Crohn's Disease

A Phase 3 interventional study of Ozanimod and Placebo in Crohn Disease, sponsored by Celgene. Terminated at 765 sites in 49 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-10-09.

Sponsored by Celgene (part of Bristol-Myers Squibb) · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
The study has terminated due to non-safety reasons; Business Objectives have changed.
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
550
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a study to demonstrate the effect of oral ozanimod as maintenance therapy in participants with moderately to severely active Crohn's Disease.

02

Conditions studied

  • Crohn Disease

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Crohn's Disease
  • Crohn Disease
  • Oral
  • Ozanimod
  • Moderately active
  • Severely active
  • RPC01
  • RPC01-3203
03

In context

Crohn Disease

1,992 studies on the registry are indexed under Crohn Disease; 478 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 550 is above the median of 67 across 1,260 interventional studies indexed under Crohn Disease.

Browse Crohn Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

Celgene is the lead sponsor of 428 studies on the registry; 12 are open to participants now.

Of its 104 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 30 (29%) have results posted.

First submitted before Celgene became part of Bristol-Myers Squibb.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

For more information regarding Bristol-Myers Squibb Clinical Trial participation, please visit: www.BMSStudyConnect.com

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Fulfilled the inclusion criteria at time of entry into the induction study and completed the week 12 efficacy assessments of the induction study
  • In clinical response and/or clinical remission and/or an average daily stool frequency score ≤ 3 and an average abdominal pain score ≤ 1 with abdominal pain and stool frequency no worse than baseline at Week 12 of the Induction Study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Partial or total colectomy, small bowel resection, or an ostomy since day 1 of the induction studies or has developed a symptomatic fistula
  • Had a rectal therapy, rectal 5-aminosalicylates, parenteral corticosteroids, immunomodulatory agents, agents or apheresis

Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria apply

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
550 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Ozanimod

    Drug: Ozanimod

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Other: Placebo

Interventions

  • Specified dose on specified days

  • OtherPlacebo

    Specified dose on specified days

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants Who Achieve Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score < 150 at Week 52 as Observed

    The CDAI is a composite score that is used to measure the clinical activity of Crohn's disease (CD). The CDAI uses a questionnaire with 8 disease activity variables: number of soft/liquid stools, severity of abdominal pain, general well-being, presence of complications, need for antidiarrheal drugs, presence of an abdominal mass, hematocrit, and deviation in body weight. The sub scores of number of soft/liquid stool, severity of abdominal pain (0 \\\[none\\\] to 3 \\\[Severe\\\]), general well-being (0 \\\[well\\\] to 4 \\\[terrible\\\] were summed over the 7 days prior to each visit. Additionally, the remaining predictors were also noted and weighted to create the total CDAI score which ranged from 0-600 with a higher score indicating a worse outcome.

    Time frame: Week 52

  2. Percentage of Participants With a Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease (SES-CD) Score Decrease From Baseline ≥ 50% Based on Observed Cases and Robarts Observed Scores

    The SES-CD assessed the degree of inflammation. The SES-CD assesses the following 4 components: size of ulcers, ulcerated surface, affected surface, and presence of narrowing. Each of these components was scored on a scale of 0 (none/unaffected) to 3 (worst). In the SES-CD, each of these 4 components are assessed in the five segments: ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, and rectum. The SES-CD was the sum of the individual scores of each of the components across the five segments. The range of SES-CD scores was 0 - 12 for each segment, and 0 - 60 for the overall SES-CD score, with larger scores indicating greater degree of inflammation. Baseline was defined as the last assessment prior to the start time of the first drug administration if time of measurement is available else the last assessment prior to or on the date of the first drug administration.

    Time frame: Week 52

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With CDAI Reduction From Baseline ≥ 100 Points or CDAI Score <150 at Week 52 as Observed

    The CDAI is a composite score that is used to measure the clinical activity of Crohn's disease (CD). The CDAI uses a questionnaire with 8 disease activity variables: number of soft/liquid stools, severity of abdominal pain, general well-being, presence of complications, need for antidiarrheal drugs, presence of an abdominal mass, hematocrit, and deviation in body weight. The sub scores of number of soft/liquid stool, severity of abdominal pain (0 \\\[none\\\] to 3 \\\[Severe\\\]), general well-being (0 \\\[well\\\] to 4 \\\[terrible\\\] were summed over the 7 days prior to each visit. Additionally, the remaining predictors were also noted and weighted to create the total CDAI score which ranged from 0-600 with a higher score indicating a worse outcome.

    Time frame: Week 52

  2. Percentage of Participants With Average Daily Abdominal Pain Score ≤1point and Average Daily Stool Frequency ≤ 3 Points With Abdominal Pain and Stool Frequency no Worse Than Baseline at Week 52

    Abdominal pain (AP) and stool frequency (SF) clinical remission was defined as average daily abdominal pain score ≤ 1 point, and average daily stool frequency ≤3 times with AP and SF no worse than baseline at Week 12. Participants entered responses in diaries daily. The 7 days entries prior to visit were considered for calculating average AP score and SF. The AP was graded on severity of 0 (none) to 3 (severe) scale and SF was defined number of liquid or soft stools per day.

    Time frame: Week 52

  3. Percentage of Participants With With CDAI Score < 150 at Week 52, While Remaining Corticosteroid Free in the 12 Weeks Prior to Week 52 Among All Participants at Maintenance Day 1

    Abdominal pain (AP) and stool frequency (SF) clinical remission was defined as average daily abdominal pain score ≤ 1 point, and average daily stool frequency ≤3 times with AP and SF no worse than baseline at Week 12. Participants entered responses in diaries daily. The 7 days entries prior to visit were considered for calculating average AP score and SF. The AP was graded on severity of 0 (none) to 3 (severe) scale and SF was defined number of liquid or soft stools per day.

    Time frame: Week 52

  4. Percentage of Participants With CDAI Score < 150 at Week 52 in Participants With CDAI Score <150 at Maintenance Day 1

    The CDAI is a composite score that is used to measure the clinical activity of Crohn's disease (CD). The CDAI uses a questionnaire with 8 disease activity variables: number of soft/liquid stools, severity of abdominal pain, general well-being, presence of complications, need for antidiarrheal drugs, presence of an abdominal mass, hematocrit, and deviation in body weight. The sub scores of number of soft/liquid stool, severity of abdominal pain (0 \\\[none\\\] to 3 \\\[Severe\\\]), general well-being (0 \\\[well\\\] to 4 \\\[terrible\\\] were summed over the 7 days prior to each visit. Additionally, the remaining predictors were also noted and weighted to create the total CDAI score which ranged from 0-600 with a higher score indicating a worse outcome.

    Time frame: Week 52

  5. Percentage of Participants With Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease (SES-CD) ≤ 4 Points and SES-CD Decrease From Baseline ≥ 2points With no SES-CD Subscore > 1 Point at Week 52 Based on Observed Cases

    The SES-CD score is a way to measure how severe a person's bowel disease is. It looks at five different parts of the bowel and checks for ulcer size, ulcerated surface, inflamed surface, and stenosis. Each is given a score from 0 to 3 based on how bad the disease is. These scores are then added together for a total score ranging from 0 to 60. Higher scores indicate more severe disease.

    Time frame: Week 52

  6. Percentage of Participants With CDAI Score < 150 and SES-CD Decrease From Baseline ≥50% at Week 52 Based on Observed Cases and Robarts Observed Scores

    CDAI is a composite score used to measure the clinical activity of Crohn's disease (CD). It assess 8 disease activity variables: number of soft/liquid stools, severity of abdominal pain, general well-being, presence of complications, need for antidiarrheal drugs, presence of an abdominal mass, hematocrit, and deviation in body weight. Sub scores of number of soft/liquid stool, severity of abdominal pain (0 \\\[none\\\] to 3 \\\[Severe\\\]), general well-being (0 \\\[well\\\] to 4 \\\[terrible\\\] were summed over the 7 days prior to each visit. Remaining predictors were also noted and weighted to create the total CDAI score which ranged from 0-600 with a higher score indicating a worse outcome. SES-CD score is a way to measure how severe a person's bowel disease is. It looks at five different parts of the bowel. Each is given a score from 0 to 3 based on how bad the disease is. These scores are then added together for a total score ranging from 0 to 60. Higher scores indicate more severe disease.

    Time frame: Week 52

  7. Percentage of Participants With Average Daily AP Score ≤ 1 Point, and Average Daily Stool Frequency Score ≤ 3 Points With AP and SF no Worse Than Baseline and SES-CD ≤ 4 Points and SES-CD Decrease ≥2 Points With no SES-CD Subscore >1 Point at Week 52

    Abdominal pain (AP) and stool frequency (SF) clinical remission was defined as average daily abdominal pain score ≤ 1 point, and average daily stool frequency ≤ 3 times with AP and SF no worse than baseline at Week 12. Participants entered responses in diaries daily. The 7 days entries prior to visit were considered for calculating average AP score and SF. The AP was graded on severity of 0 (none) to 3 (severe) scale and SF was defined number of liquid or soft stools per day. The SES-CD has 4 components size of ulcers, ulcerated surface, affected surface, presence of narrowing. Each component was scored on scale of 0 (none) to 3 (worst). In SES-CD, each of 4 components are assessed in the five segments: ileum, right, transverse, left colon, and rectum. The SES-CD was the sum of the individual scores of each of the components across the five segments. The range of SES-CD scores was 0 - 12 for each segment, and 0 - 60 for overall, with larger scores show greater degree of inflammation.

    Time frame: Week 52

  8. Percentage of Participants With CDAI Reduction From Baseline ≥ 100 Points or CDAI Score <150 and SES-CD Decrease From Baseline ≥ 50% at Week 52

    CDAI is a composite score used to measure the clinical activity of Crohn's disease (CD). It assess 8 disease activity variables: number of soft/liquid stools, severity of abdominal pain, general well-being, presence of complications, need for antidiarrheal drugs, presence of an abdominal mass, hematocrit, and deviation in body weight. Sub scores of number of soft/liquid stool, severity of abdominal pain (0 \\\[none\\\] to 3 \\\[Severe\\\]), general well-being (0 \\\[well\\\] to 4 \\\[terrible\\\] were summed over the 7 days prior to each visit. Remaining predictors were also noted and weighted to create the total CDAI score which ranged from 0-600 with a higher score indicating a worse outcome. SES-CD score is a way to measure how severe a person's bowel disease is. It looks at five different parts of the bowel. Each is given a score from 0 to 3 based on how bad the disease is. These scores are then added together for a total score ranging from 0 to 60. Higher scores indicate more severe disease.

    Time frame: Week 52

  9. Percentage of Participants With CDAI Reduction From Baseline ≥ 70 Points at Week 52 Based on Observed Cases

    CDAI is a composite score used to measure the clinical activity of Crohn's disease (CD). It assess 8 disease activity variables: number of soft/liquid stools, severity of abdominal pain, general well-being, presence of complications, need for antidiarrheal drugs, presence of an abdominal mass, hematocrit, and deviation in body weight. Sub scores of number of soft/liquid stool, severity of abdominal pain (0 \\\[none\\\] to 3 \\\[Severe\\\]), general well-being (0 \\\[well\\\] to 4 \\\[terrible\\\] were summed over the 7 days prior to each visit. Remaining predictors were also noted and weighted to create the total CDAI score which ranged from 0-600 with a higher score indicating a worse outcome.

    Time frame: Week 52

  10. Percentage of Participants With With CDAI Score < 150 at Week 52, While Remaining Corticosteroid Free in the 12 Weeks Prior to Week 52 Among Subjects Using Corticosteroids at Maintenance Day 1

    CDAI is a composite score used to measure the clinical activity of Crohn's disease (CD). It assess 8 disease activity variables: number of soft/liquid stools, severity of abdominal pain, general well-being, presence of complications, need for antidiarrheal drugs, presence of an abdominal mass, hematocrit, and deviation in body weight. Sub scores of number of soft/liquid stool, severity of abdominal pain (0 \\\[none\\\] to 3 \\\[Severe\\\]), general well-being (0 \\\[well\\\] to 4 \\\[terrible\\\] were summed over the 7 days prior to each visit. Remaining predictors were also noted and weighted to create the total CDAI score which ranged from 0-600 with a higher score indicating a worse outcome.

    Time frame: Week 52

  11. Percentage of Participants With Mucosal Healing (SES-CD ≤ 4 Points and SES-CD Decrease ≥2 Points With no SES-CD Subscore > 1 Point) and Histologic Improvement Based on Robarts Histologic Index (RHI) at Week 52

    The SES-CD assessed the degree of inflammation. The SES-CD assesses the following 4 components: size of ulcers, ulcerated surface, affected surface, and presence of narrowing. Each of these components was scored on a scale of 0 (none/unaffected) to 3 (worst). In the SES-CD, each of these 4 components are assessed in the five segments: ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, and rectum. The SES-CD was the sum of the individual scores of each of the components across the five segments. The range of SES-CD scores was 0 - 12 for each segment, and 0 - 60 for the overall SES-CD score, with larger scores indicating greater degree of inflammation. Baseline was defined as the last assessment prior to the start time of the first drug administration if time of measurement is available else the last assessment prior to or on the date of the first drug administration.

    Time frame: Week 52

  12. Time to Relapse (an Increase in CDAI Score From Maintenance Day 1 ≥100 Points and CDAI Score >220, SES-CD ≥ 6 [or ≥4 if Isolated Ileal Disease]), and Exclusion of Other Causes of an Increase in Disease Activity Unrelated to Underlying CD

    CDAI is a composite score used to measure the clinical activity of Crohn's disease (CD). It assess 8 disease activity variables: number of soft/liquid stools, severity of abdominal pain, general well-being, presence of complications, need for antidiarrheal drugs, presence of an abdominal mass, hematocrit, and deviation in body weight. Sub scores of number of soft/liquid stool, severity of abdominal pain (0 \\\[none\\\] to 3 \\\[Severe\\\]), general well-being (0 \\\[well\\\] to 4 \\\[terrible\\\] were summed over the 7 days prior to each visit. Remaining predictors were also noted and weighted to create the total CDAI score which ranged from 0-600 with a higher score indicating a worse outcome. SES-CD score is a way to measure how severe a person's bowel disease is. It looks at five different parts of the bowel. Each is given a score from 0 to 3 based on how bad the disease is. These scores are then added together for a total score ranging from 0 to 60. Higher scores indicate more severe disease.

    Time frame: Week 52

  13. Percentage of Participants With a Crohn's Disease Endoscopic Index of Severity (CDEIS) Decrease From Baseline ≥ 50% at Week 52

    CDEIS is an index for determining the severity of Crohn's disease with endoscopic localization to ileum and colon. The CDEIS divides the intestine into 5 segments: rectum, sigmoid and left colon, transverse colon, right colon, and ileum. Four variables are assessed in each segment: the presence of deep ulceration, the presence of superficial ulceration, the percentage of ulcerated surface, and the percentage of surface affected by CD, indicated on 10-cm visual analogue scales. In addition, the presence of ulcerated stenosis and the presence of nonulcerated stenosis are also assessed over the entire intestine. These factors are weighted and summed to calculate the total score ranging from 0- 44, with higher scores indicating more severe disease.

    Time frame: Week 52

  14. Percentage of Participants With CDAI Score < 150 at Week 52 and at ≥ 80% of Visits Between Week 8 and Week 52, Inclusive, in Participants With CDAI Score < 150 at Maintenance Day 1

    The CDAI is a composite score that is used to measure the clinical activity of Crohn's disease (CD). The CDAI uses a questionnaire with 8 disease activity variables: number of soft/liquid stools, severity of abdominal pain, general well-being, presence of complications, need for antidiarrheal drugs, presence of an abdominal mass, hematocrit, and deviation in body weight. The sub scores of number of soft/liquid stool, severity of abdominal pain (0 \\\[none\\\] to 3 \\\[Severe\\\]), general well-being (0 \\\[well\\\] to 4 \\\[terrible\\\] were summed over the 7 days prior to each visit. Additionally, the remaining predictors were also noted and weighted to create the total CDAI score which ranged from 0-600 with a higher score indicating a worse outcome.

    Time frame: Week 52

  15. Percentage of Participants With Average Daily Abdominal Pain Score ≤ 1 Point and Average Daily Stool Frequency Score ≤3 Points With Abdominal Pain and Stool Frequency no Worse Than Baseline and SES-CD Decrease From Baseline ≥ 50% at Week 52

    Abdominal pain (AP) and stool frequency (SF) clinical remission was defined as average daily abdominal pain score ≤ 1 point, and average daily stool frequency ≤3 times with AP and SF no worse than baseline. Participants entered responses in diaries daily. The 7 days entries prior to visit were considered for calculating average AP score and SF. The AP was graded on severity of 0 (none) to 3 (severe) scale and SF was defined number of liquid or soft stools per day. SES-CD score is a way to measure how severe a person's bowel disease is. It looks at five different parts of the bowel. Each is given a score from 0 to 3 based on how bad the disease is. These scores are then added together for a total score ranging from 0 to 60. Higher scores indicate more severe disease.

    Time frame: Week 52

07

Results

Posted Oct 9, 2025

Participant flow

This study was a maintenance study.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneOzanimod 0.92 mg / Ozanimod 0.92 mgOzanimod 0.92 mg / PlaceboPlacebo / Placebo
Started188188174
Safety population188188174
Completed969370
Not completed9295104
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject151311
Withdrew: Study terminated by sponsor474440
Withdrew: Pregnancy010
Withdrew: Other reasons51214
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up011
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy111830
Withdrew: Death100
Withdrew: Adverse event1368

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage of Participants Who Achieve Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score < 150 at Week 52 as Observed

The CDAI is a composite score that is used to measure the clinical activity of Crohn's disease (CD). The CDAI uses a questionnaire with 8 disease activity variables: number of soft/liquid stools, severity of abdominal pain, general well-being, presence of complications, need for antidiarrheal drugs, presence of an abdominal mass, hematocrit, and deviation in body weight. The sub scores of number of soft/liquid stool, severity of abdominal pain (0 \\\[none\\\] to 3 \\\[Severe\\\]), general well-being (0 \\\[well\\\] to 4 \\\[terrible\\\] were summed over the 7 days prior to each visit. Additionally, the remaining predictors were also noted and weighted to create the total CDAI score which ranged from 0-600 with a higher score indicating a worse outcome.

Time frame:
Week 52
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Achieve Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score < 150 at Week 52 as Observed
percentage of participantsOzanimod 0.92 mg / Ozanimod 0.92 mgOzanimod 0.92 mg / PlaceboPlacebo / Placebo
Percentage of Participants Who Achieve Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score < 150 at Week 52 as Observed44.233.135.5
Statistical analysis
  • Ozanimod 0.92 mg / Ozanimod 0.92 mg vs Ozanimod 0.92 mg / Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.0539 · Odds ratio (or): 1.59 · 95% CI 0.99 to 2.55
PrimaryPercentage of Participants With a Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease (SES-CD) Score Decrease From Baseline ≥ 50% Based on Observed Cases and Robarts Observed Scores

The SES-CD assessed the degree of inflammation. The SES-CD assesses the following 4 components: size of ulcers, ulcerated surface, affected surface, and presence of narrowing. Each of these components was scored on a scale of 0 (none/unaffected) to 3 (worst). In the SES-CD, each of these 4 components are assessed in the five segments: ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, and rectum. The SES-CD was the sum of the individual scores of each of the components across the five segments. The range of SES-CD scores was 0 - 12 for each segment, and 0 - 60 for the overall SES-CD score, with larger scores indicating greater degree of inflammation. Baseline was defined as the last assessment prior to the start time of the first drug administration if time of measurement is available else the last assessment prior to or on the date of the first drug administration.

Time frame:
Week 52
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With a Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease (SES-CD) Score Decrease From Baseline ≥ 50% Based on Observed Cases and Robarts Observed Scores
percentage of participantsOzanimod 0.92 mg / Ozanimod 0.92 mgOzanimod 0.92 mg / PlaceboPlacebo / Placebo
Percentage of Participants With a Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease (SES-CD) Score Decrease From Baseline ≥ 50% Based on Observed Cases and Robarts Observed Scores24.317.516.4
Statistical analysis
  • Ozanimod 0.92 mg / Ozanimod 0.92 mg vs Ozanimod 0.92 mg / Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.1503 · Odds ratio (or): 1.51 · 95% CI 0.86 to 2.65
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With CDAI Reduction From Baseline ≥ 100 Points or CDAI Score <150 at Week 52 as Observed

The CDAI is a composite score that is used to measure the clinical activity of Crohn's disease (CD). The CDAI uses a questionnaire with 8 disease activity variables: number of soft/liquid stools, severity of abdominal pain, general well-being, presence of complications, need for antidiarrheal drugs, presence of an abdominal mass, hematocrit, and deviation in body weight. The sub scores of number of soft/liquid stool, severity of abdominal pain (0 \\\[none\\\] to 3 \\\[Severe\\\]), general well-being (0 \\\[well\\\] to 4 \\\[terrible\\\] were summed over the 7 days prior to each visit. Additionally, the remaining predictors were also noted and weighted to create the total CDAI score which ranged from 0-600 with a higher score indicating a worse outcome.

Time frame:
Week 52
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With CDAI Reduction From Baseline ≥ 100 Points or CDAI Score <150 at Week 52 as Observed
percentage of participantsOzanimod 0.92 mg / Ozanimod 0.92 mgOzanimod 0.92 mg / PlaceboPlacebo / Placebo
Percentage of Participants With CDAI Reduction From Baseline ≥ 100 Points or CDAI Score <150 at Week 52 as Observed51.041.741.1
Statistical analysis
  • Ozanimod 0.92 mg / Ozanimod 0.92 mg vs Ozanimod 0.92 mg / Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.1121 · Odds ratio (or): 1.45 · 95% CI 0.92 to 2.29
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Average Daily Abdominal Pain Score ≤1point and Average Daily Stool Frequency ≤ 3 Points With Abdominal Pain and Stool Frequency no Worse Than Baseline at Week 52

Abdominal pain (AP) and stool frequency (SF) clinical remission was defined as average daily abdominal pain score ≤ 1 point, and average daily stool frequency ≤3 times with AP and SF no worse than baseline at Week 12. Participants entered responses in diaries daily. The 7 days entries prior to visit were considered for calculating average AP score and SF. The AP was graded on severity of 0 (none) to 3 (severe) scale and SF was defined number of liquid or soft stools per day.

Time frame:
Week 52
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Average Daily Abdominal Pain Score ≤1point and Average Daily Stool Frequency ≤ 3 Points With Abdominal Pain and Stool Frequency no Worse Than Baseline at Week 52
percentage of participantsOzanimod 0.92 mg / Ozanimod 0.92 mgOzanimod 0.92 mg / PlaceboPlacebo / Placebo
Percentage of Participants With Average Daily Abdominal Pain Score ≤1point and Average Daily Stool Frequency ≤ 3 Points With Abdominal Pain and Stool Frequency no Worse Than Baseline at Week 5241.532.531.9
Statistical analysis
  • Ozanimod 0.92 mg / Ozanimod 0.92 mg vs Ozanimod 0.92 mg / Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.1163 · Odds ratio (or): 1.46 · 95% CI 0.91 to 2.35
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With With CDAI Score < 150 at Week 52, While Remaining Corticosteroid Free in the 12 Weeks Prior to Week 52 Among All Participants at Maintenance Day 1

Abdominal pain (AP) and stool frequency (SF) clinical remission was defined as average daily abdominal pain score ≤ 1 point, and average daily stool frequency ≤3 times with AP and SF no worse than baseline at Week 12. Participants entered responses in diaries daily. The 7 days entries prior to visit were considered for calculating average AP score and SF. The AP was graded on severity of 0 (none) to 3 (severe) scale and SF was defined number of liquid or soft stools per day.

Time frame:
Week 52
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With With CDAI Score < 150 at Week 52, While Remaining Corticosteroid Free in the 12 Weeks Prior to Week 52 Among All Participants at Maintenance Day 1
percentage of participantsOzanimod 0.92 mg / Ozanimod 0.92 mgOzanimod 0.92 mg / PlaceboPlacebo / Placebo
Percentage of Participants With With CDAI Score < 150 at Week 52, While Remaining Corticosteroid Free in the 12 Weeks Prior to Week 52 Among All Participants at Maintenance Day 148.434.445.9
Statistical analysis
  • Ozanimod 0.92 mg / Ozanimod 0.92 mg vs Ozanimod 0.92 mg / Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.0561 · Odds ratio (or): 1.78 · 95% CI 0.98 to 3.20
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With CDAI Score < 150 at Week 52 in Participants With CDAI Score <150 at Maintenance Day 1

The CDAI is a composite score that is used to measure the clinical activity of Crohn's disease (CD). The CDAI uses a questionnaire with 8 disease activity variables: number of soft/liquid stools, severity of abdominal pain, general well-being, presence of complications, need for antidiarrheal drugs, presence of an abdominal mass, hematocrit, and deviation in body weight. The sub scores of number of soft/liquid stool, severity of abdominal pain (0 \\\[none\\\] to 3 \\\[Severe\\\]), general well-being (0 \\\[well\\\] to 4 \\\[terrible\\\] were summed over the 7 days prior to each visit. Additionally, the remaining predictors were also noted and weighted to create the total CDAI score which ranged from 0-600 with a higher score indicating a worse outcome.

Time frame:
Week 52
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With CDAI Score < 150 at Week 52 in Participants With CDAI Score <150 at Maintenance Day 1
percentage of participantsOzanimod 0.92 mg / Ozanimod 0.92 mgOzanimod 0.92 mg / PlaceboPlacebo / Placebo
Percentage of Participants With CDAI Score < 150 at Week 52 in Participants With CDAI Score <150 at Maintenance Day 137.031.019.6
Statistical analysis
  • Ozanimod 0.92 mg / Ozanimod 0.92 mg vs Ozanimod 0.92 mg / Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.5061 · Odds ratio (or): 1.31 · 95% CI 0.60 to 2.86
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease (SES-CD) ≤ 4 Points and SES-CD Decrease From Baseline ≥ 2points With no SES-CD Subscore > 1 Point at Week 52 Based on Observed Cases

The SES-CD score is a way to measure how severe a person's bowel disease is. It looks at five different parts of the bowel and checks for ulcer size, ulcerated surface, inflamed surface, and stenosis. Each is given a score from 0 to 3 based on how bad the disease is. These scores are then added together for a total score ranging from 0 to 60. Higher scores indicate more severe disease.

Time frame:
Week 52
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease (SES-CD) ≤ 4 Points and SES-CD Decrease From Baseline ≥ 2points With no SES-CD Subscore > 1 Point at Week 52 Based on Observed Cases
percentage of participantsOzanimod 0.92 mg / Ozanimod 0.92 mgOzanimod 0.92 mg / PlaceboPlacebo / Placebo
Percentage of Participants With Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease (SES-CD) ≤ 4 Points and SES-CD Decrease From Baseline ≥ 2points With no SES-CD Subscore > 1 Point at Week 52 Based on Observed Cases9.04.58.6
Statistical analysis
  • Ozanimod 0.92 mg / Ozanimod 0.92 mg vs Ozanimod 0.92 mg / Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.1179 · Odds ratio (or): 2.11 · 95% CI 0.82 to 5.44
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With CDAI Score < 150 and SES-CD Decrease From Baseline ≥50% at Week 52 Based on Observed Cases and Robarts Observed Scores

CDAI is a composite score used to measure the clinical activity of Crohn's disease (CD). It assess 8 disease activity variables: number of soft/liquid stools, severity of abdominal pain, general well-being, presence of complications, need for antidiarrheal drugs, presence of an abdominal mass, hematocrit, and deviation in body weight. Sub scores of number of soft/liquid stool, severity of abdominal pain (0 \\\[none\\\] to 3 \\\[Severe\\\]), general well-being (0 \\\[well\\\] to 4 \\\[terrible\\\] were summed over the 7 days prior to each visit. Remaining predictors were also noted and weighted to create the total CDAI score which ranged from 0-600 with a higher score indicating a worse outcome. SES-CD score is a way to measure how severe a person's bowel disease is. It looks at five different parts of the bowel. Each is given a score from 0 to 3 based on how bad the disease is. These scores are then added together for a total score ranging from 0 to 60. Higher scores indicate more severe disease.

Time frame:
Week 52
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With CDAI Score < 150 and SES-CD Decrease From Baseline ≥50% at Week 52 Based on Observed Cases and Robarts Observed Scores
percentage of participantsOzanimod 0.92 mg / Ozanimod 0.92 mgOzanimod 0.92 mg / PlaceboPlacebo / Placebo
Percentage of Participants With CDAI Score < 150 and SES-CD Decrease From Baseline ≥50% at Week 52 Based on Observed Cases and Robarts Observed Scores19.411.912.9
Statistical analysis
  • Ozanimod 0.92 mg / Ozanimod 0.92 mg vs Ozanimod 0.92 mg / Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.0769 · Odds ratio (or): 1.78 · 95% CI 0.94 to 3.39
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Average Daily AP Score ≤ 1 Point, and Average Daily Stool Frequency Score ≤ 3 Points With AP and SF no Worse Than Baseline and SES-CD ≤ 4 Points and SES-CD Decrease ≥2 Points With no SES-CD Subscore >1 Point at Week 52

Abdominal pain (AP) and stool frequency (SF) clinical remission was defined as average daily abdominal pain score ≤ 1 point, and average daily stool frequency ≤ 3 times with AP and SF no worse than baseline at Week 12. Participants entered responses in diaries daily. The 7 days entries prior to visit were considered for calculating average AP score and SF. The AP was graded on severity of 0 (none) to 3 (severe) scale and SF was defined number of liquid or soft stools per day. The SES-CD has 4 components size of ulcers, ulcerated surface, affected surface, presence of narrowing. Each component was scored on scale of 0 (none) to 3 (worst). In SES-CD, each of 4 components are assessed in the five segments: ileum, right, transverse, left colon, and rectum. The SES-CD was the sum of the individual scores of each of the components across the five segments. The range of SES-CD scores was 0 - 12 for each segment, and 0 - 60 for overall, with larger scores show greater degree of inflammation.

Time frame:
Week 52
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Average Daily AP Score ≤ 1 Point, and Average Daily Stool Frequency Score ≤ 3 Points With AP and SF no Worse Than Baseline and SES-CD ≤ 4 Points and SES-CD Decrease ≥2 Points With no SES-CD Subscore >1 Point at Week 52
percentage of participantsOzanimod 0.92 mg / Ozanimod 0.92 mgOzanimod 0.92 mg / PlaceboPlacebo / Placebo
Percentage of Participants With Average Daily AP Score ≤ 1 Point, and Average Daily Stool Frequency Score ≤ 3 Points With AP and SF no Worse Than Baseline and SES-CD ≤ 4 Points and SES-CD Decrease ≥2 Points With no SES-CD Subscore >1 Point at Week 528.33.37.9
Statistical analysis
  • Ozanimod 0.92 mg / Ozanimod 0.92 mg vs Ozanimod 0.92 mg / Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.0623 · Odds ratio (or): 2.71 · 95% CI 0.92 to 7.98
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With CDAI Reduction From Baseline ≥ 100 Points or CDAI Score <150 and SES-CD Decrease From Baseline ≥ 50% at Week 52

CDAI is a composite score used to measure the clinical activity of Crohn's disease (CD). It assess 8 disease activity variables: number of soft/liquid stools, severity of abdominal pain, general well-being, presence of complications, need for antidiarrheal drugs, presence of an abdominal mass, hematocrit, and deviation in body weight. Sub scores of number of soft/liquid stool, severity of abdominal pain (0 \\\[none\\\] to 3 \\\[Severe\\\]), general well-being (0 \\\[well\\\] to 4 \\\[terrible\\\] were summed over the 7 days prior to each visit. Remaining predictors were also noted and weighted to create the total CDAI score which ranged from 0-600 with a higher score indicating a worse outcome. SES-CD score is a way to measure how severe a person's bowel disease is. It looks at five different parts of the bowel. Each is given a score from 0 to 3 based on how bad the disease is. These scores are then added together for a total score ranging from 0 to 60. Higher scores indicate more severe disease.

Time frame:
Week 52
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With CDAI Reduction From Baseline ≥ 100 Points or CDAI Score <150 and SES-CD Decrease From Baseline ≥ 50% at Week 52
percentage of participantsOzanimod 0.92 mg / Ozanimod 0.92 mgOzanimod 0.92 mg / PlaceboPlacebo / Placebo
Percentage of Participants With CDAI Reduction From Baseline ≥ 100 Points or CDAI Score <150 and SES-CD Decrease From Baseline ≥ 50% at Week 5220.813.916.4
Statistical analysis
  • Ozanimod 0.92 mg / Ozanimod 0.92 mg vs Ozanimod 0.92 mg / Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.1162 · Odds ratio (or): 1.63 · 95% CI 0.89 to 3.00
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With CDAI Reduction From Baseline ≥ 70 Points at Week 52 Based on Observed Cases

CDAI is a composite score used to measure the clinical activity of Crohn's disease (CD). It assess 8 disease activity variables: number of soft/liquid stools, severity of abdominal pain, general well-being, presence of complications, need for antidiarrheal drugs, presence of an abdominal mass, hematocrit, and deviation in body weight. Sub scores of number of soft/liquid stool, severity of abdominal pain (0 \\\[none\\\] to 3 \\\[Severe\\\]), general well-being (0 \\\[well\\\] to 4 \\\[terrible\\\] were summed over the 7 days prior to each visit. Remaining predictors were also noted and weighted to create the total CDAI score which ranged from 0-600 with a higher score indicating a worse outcome.

Time frame:
Week 52
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With CDAI Reduction From Baseline ≥ 70 Points at Week 52 Based on Observed Cases
percentage of participantsOzanimod 0.92 mg / Ozanimod 0.92 mgOzanimod 0.92 mg / PlaceboPlacebo / Placebo
Percentage of Participants With CDAI Reduction From Baseline ≥ 70 Points at Week 52 Based on Observed Cases50.343.043.3
Statistical analysis
  • Ozanimod 0.92 mg / Ozanimod 0.92 mg vs Ozanimod 0.92 mg / Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.2143 · Odds ratio (or): 1.34 · 95% CI 0.85 to 2.11
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With With CDAI Score < 150 at Week 52, While Remaining Corticosteroid Free in the 12 Weeks Prior to Week 52 Among Subjects Using Corticosteroids at Maintenance Day 1

CDAI is a composite score used to measure the clinical activity of Crohn's disease (CD). It assess 8 disease activity variables: number of soft/liquid stools, severity of abdominal pain, general well-being, presence of complications, need for antidiarrheal drugs, presence of an abdominal mass, hematocrit, and deviation in body weight. Sub scores of number of soft/liquid stool, severity of abdominal pain (0 \\\[none\\\] to 3 \\\[Severe\\\]), general well-being (0 \\\[well\\\] to 4 \\\[terrible\\\] were summed over the 7 days prior to each visit. Remaining predictors were also noted and weighted to create the total CDAI score which ranged from 0-600 with a higher score indicating a worse outcome.

Time frame:
Week 52
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With With CDAI Score < 150 at Week 52, While Remaining Corticosteroid Free in the 12 Weeks Prior to Week 52 Among Subjects Using Corticosteroids at Maintenance Day 1
percentage of participantsOzanimod 0.92 mg / Ozanimod 0.92 mgOzanimod 0.92 mg / PlaceboPlacebo / Placebo
Percentage of Participants With With CDAI Score < 150 at Week 52, While Remaining Corticosteroid Free in the 12 Weeks Prior to Week 52 Among Subjects Using Corticosteroids at Maintenance Day 139.729.330.5
Statistical analysis
  • Ozanimod 0.92 mg / Ozanimod 0.92 mg vs Ozanimod 0.92 mg / Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.0663 · Odds ratio (or): 1.58 · 95% CI 0.97 to 2.57
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Mucosal Healing (SES-CD ≤ 4 Points and SES-CD Decrease ≥2 Points With no SES-CD Subscore > 1 Point) and Histologic Improvement Based on Robarts Histologic Index (RHI) at Week 52

The SES-CD assessed the degree of inflammation. The SES-CD assesses the following 4 components: size of ulcers, ulcerated surface, affected surface, and presence of narrowing. Each of these components was scored on a scale of 0 (none/unaffected) to 3 (worst). In the SES-CD, each of these 4 components are assessed in the five segments: ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, and rectum. The SES-CD was the sum of the individual scores of each of the components across the five segments. The range of SES-CD scores was 0 - 12 for each segment, and 0 - 60 for the overall SES-CD score, with larger scores indicating greater degree of inflammation. Baseline was defined as the last assessment prior to the start time of the first drug administration if time of measurement is available else the last assessment prior to or on the date of the first drug administration.

Time frame:
Week 52
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Mucosal Healing (SES-CD ≤ 4 Points and SES-CD Decrease ≥2 Points With no SES-CD Subscore > 1 Point) and Histologic Improvement Based on Robarts Histologic Index (RHI) at Week 52
percentage of participantsOzanimod 0.92 mg / Ozanimod 0.92 mgOzanimod 0.92 mg / PlaceboPlacebo / Placebo
Percentage of Participants With Mucosal Healing (SES-CD ≤ 4 Points and SES-CD Decrease ≥2 Points With no SES-CD Subscore > 1 Point) and Histologic Improvement Based on Robarts Histologic Index (RHI) at Week 524.91.32.2
Statistical analysis
  • Ozanimod 0.92 mg / Ozanimod 0.92 mg vs Ozanimod 0.92 mg / Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.0774 · Odds ratio (or): 3.81 · 95% CI 0.78 to 18.64
SecondaryTime to Relapse (an Increase in CDAI Score From Maintenance Day 1 ≥100 Points and CDAI Score >220, SES-CD ≥ 6 [or ≥4 if Isolated Ileal Disease]), and Exclusion of Other Causes of an Increase in Disease Activity Unrelated to Underlying CD

CDAI is a composite score used to measure the clinical activity of Crohn's disease (CD). It assess 8 disease activity variables: number of soft/liquid stools, severity of abdominal pain, general well-being, presence of complications, need for antidiarrheal drugs, presence of an abdominal mass, hematocrit, and deviation in body weight. Sub scores of number of soft/liquid stool, severity of abdominal pain (0 \\\[none\\\] to 3 \\\[Severe\\\]), general well-being (0 \\\[well\\\] to 4 \\\[terrible\\\] were summed over the 7 days prior to each visit. Remaining predictors were also noted and weighted to create the total CDAI score which ranged from 0-600 with a higher score indicating a worse outcome. SES-CD score is a way to measure how severe a person's bowel disease is. It looks at five different parts of the bowel. Each is given a score from 0 to 3 based on how bad the disease is. These scores are then added together for a total score ranging from 0 to 60. Higher scores indicate more severe disease.

Time frame:
Week 52
Reported as:
Median · days
Time to Relapse (an Increase in CDAI Score From Maintenance Day 1 ≥100 Points and CDAI Score >220, SES-CD ≥ 6 [or ≥4 if Isolated Ileal Disease]), and Exclusion of Other Causes of an Increase in Disease Activity Unrelated to Underlying CD
daysOzanimod 0.92 mg / Ozanimod 0.92 mgOzanimod 0.92 mg / PlaceboPlacebo / Placebo
Time to Relapse (an Increase in CDAI Score From Maintenance Day 1 ≥100 Points and CDAI Score >220, SES-CD ≥ 6 [or ≥4 if Isolated Ileal Disease]), and Exclusion of Other Causes of an Increase in Disease Activity Unrelated to Underlying CDNA (NA to NA)NA (NA to NA)NA (NA to NA)
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With a Crohn's Disease Endoscopic Index of Severity (CDEIS) Decrease From Baseline ≥ 50% at Week 52

CDEIS is an index for determining the severity of Crohn's disease with endoscopic localization to ileum and colon. The CDEIS divides the intestine into 5 segments: rectum, sigmoid and left colon, transverse colon, right colon, and ileum. Four variables are assessed in each segment: the presence of deep ulceration, the presence of superficial ulceration, the percentage of ulcerated surface, and the percentage of surface affected by CD, indicated on 10-cm visual analogue scales. In addition, the presence of ulcerated stenosis and the presence of nonulcerated stenosis are also assessed over the entire intestine. These factors are weighted and summed to calculate the total score ranging from 0- 44, with higher scores indicating more severe disease.

Time frame:
Week 52
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With a Crohn's Disease Endoscopic Index of Severity (CDEIS) Decrease From Baseline ≥ 50% at Week 52
percentage of participantsOzanimod 0.92 mg / Ozanimod 0.92 mgOzanimod 0.92 mg / PlaceboPlacebo / Placebo
Percentage of Participants With a Crohn's Disease Endoscopic Index of Severity (CDEIS) Decrease From Baseline ≥ 50% at Week 5225.715.619.3
Statistical analysis
  • Ozanimod 0.92 mg / Ozanimod 0.92 mg vs Ozanimod 0.92 mg / Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.0308 · Odds ratio (or): 1.88 · 95% CI 1.06 to 3.33
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With CDAI Score < 150 at Week 52 and at ≥ 80% of Visits Between Week 8 and Week 52, Inclusive, in Participants With CDAI Score < 150 at Maintenance Day 1

The CDAI is a composite score that is used to measure the clinical activity of Crohn's disease (CD). The CDAI uses a questionnaire with 8 disease activity variables: number of soft/liquid stools, severity of abdominal pain, general well-being, presence of complications, need for antidiarrheal drugs, presence of an abdominal mass, hematocrit, and deviation in body weight. The sub scores of number of soft/liquid stool, severity of abdominal pain (0 \\\[none\\\] to 3 \\\[Severe\\\]), general well-being (0 \\\[well\\\] to 4 \\\[terrible\\\] were summed over the 7 days prior to each visit. Additionally, the remaining predictors were also noted and weighted to create the total CDAI score which ranged from 0-600 with a higher score indicating a worse outcome.

Time frame:
Week 52
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With CDAI Score < 150 at Week 52 and at ≥ 80% of Visits Between Week 8 and Week 52, Inclusive, in Participants With CDAI Score < 150 at Maintenance Day 1
percentage of participantsOzanimod 0.92 mg / Ozanimod 0.92 mgOzanimod 0.92 mg / PlaceboPlacebo / Placebo
Percentage of Participants With CDAI Score < 150 at Week 52 and at ≥ 80% of Visits Between Week 8 and Week 52, Inclusive, in Participants With CDAI Score < 150 at Maintenance Day 132.331.240.0
Statistical analysis
  • Ozanimod 0.92 mg / Ozanimod 0.92 mg vs Ozanimod 0.92 mg / Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.8745 · Odds ratio (or): 1.05 · 95% CI 0.57 to 1.95
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Average Daily Abdominal Pain Score ≤ 1 Point and Average Daily Stool Frequency Score ≤3 Points With Abdominal Pain and Stool Frequency no Worse Than Baseline and SES-CD Decrease From Baseline ≥ 50% at Week 52

Abdominal pain (AP) and stool frequency (SF) clinical remission was defined as average daily abdominal pain score ≤ 1 point, and average daily stool frequency ≤3 times with AP and SF no worse than baseline. Participants entered responses in diaries daily. The 7 days entries prior to visit were considered for calculating average AP score and SF. The AP was graded on severity of 0 (none) to 3 (severe) scale and SF was defined number of liquid or soft stools per day. SES-CD score is a way to measure how severe a person's bowel disease is. It looks at five different parts of the bowel. Each is given a score from 0 to 3 based on how bad the disease is. These scores are then added together for a total score ranging from 0 to 60. Higher scores indicate more severe disease.

Time frame:
Week 52
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Average Daily Abdominal Pain Score ≤ 1 Point and Average Daily Stool Frequency Score ≤3 Points With Abdominal Pain and Stool Frequency no Worse Than Baseline and SES-CD Decrease From Baseline ≥ 50% at Week 52
percentage of participantsOzanimod 0.92 mg / Ozanimod 0.92 mgOzanimod 0.92 mg / PlaceboPlacebo / Placebo
Percentage of Participants With Average Daily Abdominal Pain Score ≤ 1 Point and Average Daily Stool Frequency Score ≤3 Points With Abdominal Pain and Stool Frequency no Worse Than Baseline and SES-CD Decrease From Baseline ≥ 50% at Week 5220.111.312.9
Statistical analysis
  • Ozanimod 0.92 mg / Ozanimod 0.92 mg vs Ozanimod 0.92 mg / Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.0361 · Odds ratio (or): 1.98 · 95% CI 1.04 to 3.78

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse events were collected from first dose of Maintenance Study and 90 days after the last dose (up to 731 days). All-cause mortality was collected until 327 weeks.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Ozanimod 0.92 mg / Ozanimod 0.92 mg1/188 (0.5%)12/188 (6.4%)27/188 (14.4%)
Ozanimod 0.92 mg / Placebo0/189 (0%)17/189 (9%)43/189 (22.8%)
Placebo / Placebo0/173 (0%)19/173 (11%)34/173 (19.7%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 38
Most frequent serious events
EventOzanimod 0.92 mg / Ozanimod 0.92 mgOzanimod 0.92 mg / PlaceboPlacebo / Placebo
Crohn's diseaseGastrointestinal disorders5/1883/1898/173
Small intestinal obstructionGastrointestinal disorders0/1881/1892/173
Anal abscessInfections and infestations0/1880/1892/173
COVID-19 pneumoniaInfections and infestations1/1882/1891/173
Atrioventricular block second degreeCardiac disorders0/1880/1891/173
Microvascular coronary artery diseaseCardiac disorders0/1880/1891/173
Ventricular extrasystolesCardiac disorders0/1880/1891/173
Intestinal obstructionGastrointestinal disorders0/1881/1891/173
Electrocardiogram QT prolongedInvestigations0/1880/1891/173
Intervertebral disc protrusionMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0/1880/1891/173
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventOzanimod 0.92 mg / Ozanimod 0.92 mgOzanimod 0.92 mg / PlaceboPlacebo / Placebo
Crohn's diseaseGastrointestinal disorders14/18823/18925/173
COVID-19Infections and infestations11/18814/1898/173
ArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders4/18812/1894/173

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Ozanimod 0.92 mg / Ozanimod 0.92 mgOzanimod 0.92 mg / PlaceboPlacebo / PlaceboTotal
Mean40.46 ± 13.62338.71 ± 13.91638.68 ± 13.74439.30 ± 13.762
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Ozanimod 0.92 mg / Ozanimod 0.92 mgOzanimod 0.92 mg / PlaceboPlacebo / PlaceboTotal
Female919183265
Male979791285
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Ozanimod 0.92 mg / Ozanimod 0.92 mgOzanimod 0.92 mg / PlaceboPlacebo / PlaceboTotal
Hispanic or Latino771428
Not Hispanic or Latino180175157512
Unknown or Not Reported16310
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Ozanimod 0.92 mg / Ozanimod 0.92 mgOzanimod 0.92 mg / PlaceboPlacebo / PlaceboTotal
WHITE170166153489
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN3115
AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE1012
ASIAN10131639
OTHER44210
Unknown or Not Reported0415
08

Study locations

765 sites
  • Holland Center for Family Health
    Peoria, Arizona 85381, United States
  • Local Institution - 202
    Scottsdale, Arizona 85258, United States
  • Local Institution - 026
    North Little Rock, Arkansas 72117, United States
  • Local Institution - 284
    Camarillo, California 93012, United States
  • Sharp Chula Vista Medical Center
    Chula Vista, California 91911, United States
  • Local Institution - 039
    Garden Grove, California 92843, United States
  • Ucsd Medical Center
    La Jolla, California 92037, United States
  • San Diego Clinical Trials
    La Mesa, California 91942, United States
  • Local Institution - 010
    Lancaster, California 93534, United States
  • Local Institution - 061
    Los Angeles, California 90027, United States
  • Southern California Research Institute Medical Group, Inc.
    Los Angeles, California 90045, United States
  • Matrix Clinical Research Inc
    Los Angeles, California 90048, United States
  • Local Institution - 110
    Los Angeles, California 90067, United States
  • Facey Medical Foundation (Parent)
    Mission Hills, California 91345, United States
  • ABS Health, LLC
    Mission Viejo, California 92691, United States
  • Alliance Clinical Research
    Oceanside, California 92056, United States
  • Local Institution - 027
    Orange, California 92868, United States
  • Palo Alto Center-Palo Alto Medical Foundation Research Institute
    Palo Alto, California 94304, United States
  • Havana Research Institute LLC
    Pasadena, California 91105, United States
  • Local Institution - 006
    Rialto, California 92377, United States
  • Sutter Medical Group
    Roseville, California 95661, United States
  • Local Institution - 280
    Sacramento, California 95817, United States
  • Local Institution - 003
    San Diego, California 92123, United States
  • Local Institution - 281
    San Francisco, California 94158, United States
  • New Hope Research Development
    West Covina, California 91790, United States
  • Local Institution - 065
    Colorado Springs, Colorado 80907, United States
  • Local Institution - 297
    Lakewood, Colorado 80228, United States
  • Local Institution - 182
    Bristol, Connecticut 06010, United States
  • Local Institution - 225
    Bristol, Connecticut 06010, United States
  • Local Institution - 091
    New Haven, Connecticut 06510, United States
  • Local Institution - 062
    Clearwater, Florida 33756-3839, United States
  • Clinical Research of West Florida
    Clearwater, Florida 33765, United States
  • South Lake Pain Institute
    Clermont, Florida 34711, United States
  • American Research Institute Inc
    Cutler Bay, Florida 33157, United States
  • Universal Axon Clinical Research
    Doral, Florida 33166, United States
  • Riverside Clinical Research
    Edgewater, Florida 32132, United States
  • Local Institution - 218
    Gainesville, Florida 32608, United States
  • Local Institution - 203
    Hialeah, Florida 33010, United States
  • Floridian Clinical Research LLC
    Hialeah, Florida 33016, United States
  • Harmony Medical Research Institute
    Hialeah, Florida 33016, United States
  • Local Institution - 179
    Hollywood, Florida 33021, United States
  • Vista Health Research
    Homestead, Florida 33033, United States
  • SIH Research
    Kissimmee, Florida 34759, United States
  • Local Institution - 016
    Largo, Florida 33777, United States
  • Local Institution - 067
    Lighthouse PT, Florida 33064, United States
  • Center For Advanced Gastroenterology
    Maitland, Florida 32751, United States
  • LMG Research
    Miami, Florida 33125, United States
  • Local Institution - 199
    Miami, Florida 33125, United States
  • LCC Medical Research Institute, LLC
    Miami, Florida 33126, United States
  • Local Institution - 169
    Miami, Florida 33156, United States
  • Local Institution - 175
    Miami, Florida 33166, United States
  • Vista Health Research
    Miami, Florida 33176, United States
  • Local Institution - 044
    Miami Springs, Florida 33166, United States
  • Advanced Research for Health Improvement
    Naples, Florida 34109, United States
  • Local Institution - 192
    New Port Richey, Florida 34655, United States
  • Local Institution - 214
    New Smyrna Beach, Florida 32168, United States
  • Local Institution - 200
    Orlando, Florida 32810, United States
  • Local Institution - 076
    Orlando, Florida 32819, United States
  • Local Institution - 002
    Palmetto Bay, Florida 33157, United States
  • Theia Clinical Research, LLC
    Pinellas Park, Florida 33781, United States
  • Local Institution - 098
    Port Orange, Florida 32127, United States
  • Precision Clinical Research, LLC.
    Sunrise, Florida 33351, United States
  • Local Institution - 183
    Tampa, Florida 33612-4799, United States
  • Apex Clinical Research
    Tampa, Florida 33612, United States
  • Local Institution - 226
    Tampa, Florida 33612, United States
  • Local Institution - 107
    Tampa, Florida 33614, United States
  • Local Institution - 149
    Tampa, Florida 33614, United States
  • Local Institution - 114
    Weeki Wachee, Florida 34607, United States
  • Consultative Gastroenterology
    Atlanta, Georgia 30308, United States
  • Local Institution - 037
    Atlanta, Georgia 30322, United States
  • Local Institution - 220
    Atlanta, Georgia 30322, United States
  • Local Institution - 222
    Atlanta, Georgia 30322, United States
  • Local Institution - 019
    Atlanta, Georgia 30342, United States
  • Local Institution - 063
    Atlanta, Georgia 30342, United States
  • Local Institution - 074
    Columbus, Georgia 31904, United States
  • Local Institution - 143
    Decatur, Georgia 30030, United States
  • Local Institution - 028
    Macon, Georgia 31201, United States
  • Local Institution - 115
    Idaho Falls, Idaho 83404, United States
  • Local Institution - 194
    Chicago, Illinois 60612, United States
  • Local Institution - 036
    Chicago, Illinois 60622, United States
  • Local Institution - 022
    Chicago, Illinois 60637, United States
  • Carle Foundation Hospital
    Urbana, Illinois 61801, United States
  • Local Institution - 092
    Evansville, Indiana 47714, United States
  • Local Institution - 033
    Indianapolis, Indiana 46202, United States
  • Iowa Digestive Disease Center
    Clive, Iowa 50325, United States
  • Local Institution - 070
    Topeka, Kansas 66606, United States
  • Local Institution - 155
    Lexington, Kentucky 40536-0298, United States
  • Local Institution - 020
    Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70809, United States
  • CroNOLA LLC
    Houma, Louisiana 70360, United States
  • Centex Studies, Inc.
    Lake Charles, Louisiana 70601, United States
  • Clinical Trials of SW Louisiana LLC
    Lake Charles, Louisiana 70601, United States
  • Tandem Clinical Research, LLC
    Marrero, Louisiana 70072, United States
  • Nola Research Works
    New Orleans, Louisiana 70125, United States
  • Local Institution - 278
    Baltimore, Maryland 21224, United States
  • Local Institution - 129
    Catonsville, Maryland 21228, United States
  • Local Institution - 282
    Glen Burnie, Maryland 21061, United States
  • Local Institution - 142
    Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts 02467, United States
  • Local Institution - 228
    North Worcester, Massachusetts 01655, United States
  • Local Institution - 286
    Springfield, Massachusetts 01199, United States
  • Local Institution - 024
    Worcester, Massachusetts 01655, United States

Showing the first 100 of 765 sites across 49 countries. Choose a country and city above to see the rest.

09

References and documents

Publications

  • Feagan BG, Schreiber S, Afzali A, Rieder F, Hyams J, Kollengode K, Pearlman J, Son V, Marta C, Wolf DC, D'Haens GG. Ozanimod as a novel oral small molecule therapy for the treatment of Crohn's disease: The YELLOWSTONE clinical trial program. Contemp Clin Trials. 2022 Nov;122:106958. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.106958. Epub 2022 Oct 5. PubMed 36208720 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 9, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03464097
Lead sponsor
Celgene
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 13, 2018
Start date
Jun 27, 2018
Primary completion
Oct 3, 2024
Completion
Oct 3, 2024
Results posted
Oct 9, 2025
Last update
Oct 9, 2025

Study contacts

Bristol-Myers Squibb
study director · Bristol-Myers Squibb

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Sep 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Ozanimod

Start the discussion