CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03459079Updated Sep 19, 2024Results posted

Lanifibranor in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes & Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

A Phase 2 interventional study of Lanifibranor and Placebo in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) and Type 2 Diabetes (T2DM), sponsored by University of Florida. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 21 Years to 75 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-09-19.

Sponsored by University of Florida · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
128
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
21 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The primary aim is to establish the safety, efficacy and mechanism of action of lanifibranor in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Specifically, to determine if lanifibranor decreases intrahepatic triglycerides (IHTG) (primary endpoint), improves hepatic insulin sensitivity, endogenous (hepatic) glucose production, de novo lipogenesis (DNL), HbA1c and lipid profiles. In addition, exploratory analysis with surrogate plasma biomarkers and imaging on liver fibrosis changes on with treatment will be performed.

Read the detailed description

The study is a two-arm (placebo, lanifibranor 800 mg/day), randomized (1:1), double-blind, placebo-controlled, 24-week treatment study. Thirty four (n=34)patients with T2DM will be randomized, allowing for a 10% drop-out rate. The diagnosis of NAFLD on imaging will be done by measuring IHTG using the gold-standard magnetic resonance and spectroscopy (¹H-MRS) technique. Ten non-diabetic subjects without NAFLD will also serve as a control group for the metabolic and imaging procedures. The study will last 34-36 weeks (\~6-8 weeks for run-in, 24 weeks of treatment and 4 weeks post-study follow-up), with an estimated recruitment period of \~9 months. Patients with uncontrolled T2DM and a diagnosis of "fatty liver" per history (elevated AST/ALT and/or liver fat on liver ultrasound or ¹H-MRS and/or other appropriate imaging technique - see below). Participants may be treated by diet only, or be on a stable dose of metformin and/or a sulfonylurea and/or a DPP-IV inhibitor for ≥ 2 months prior to enrollment. If the HbA1c is ≤8.0% on any of these diabetes medications, the dose of these medications will be kept stable throughout the study and baseline studies performed as outlined below. If the HbA1c is > 8.0% but ≤ 9.5%, metformin (minimum dose required: 1,000 mg/day for metformin) and/or a sulfonylurea (minimum dose required: glimepiride 2 mg once daily) will be added, or doses maximized, during the first 2 weeks of the lead-in period. Afterwards, patient's metformin or sulfonylurea dose will be maintained at the new dose stable for 4 weeks before baseline metabolic and study-specific liver imaging.

After patients sign the informed consent and meet eligibility criteria, baseline imaging and metabolic studies will be performed. These will include measurement of IHTG by 1H-MRS, liver fibrosis by VCTE (Fibroscan) and MRE, and additional imaging by T1 MRI mapping. Metabolic testing will be done with the patient being admitted to the CRC (clinical research unit) for an overnight stay. Assessment of insulin sensitivity and DNL will be done with the administration of stable isotopes of glucose (intravenously) and deuterium labeled water (orally) to measure glucose and lipid turnover and substrate oxidation (with indirect calorimetry) during a euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp.

After all baseline tests are completed, patients will be asked to take a therapeutic dose of 800 mg lanifibranor (QD), or placebo, for 24 weeks. They will be closely followed by study staff every 4 weeks with visits to the CRC and interim phone calls. At 24 weeks, all baseline tests will be repeated and treatment considered completed. There will be a final, off-drug, safety follow-up visit 4 weeks after treatment at week 28. After this the participant will have completed all study procedures.

Note: The investigators recalculated the sample size for the primary endpoint of change in intrahepatic triglyceride (IHTG) measured by 1H-MRS with lanifibranor (800 mg/day) vs. placebo based on the data from the population with diabetes from the Phase IIb NATIVE (NCT03008070: NAsh Trial to Validate IVA337 Efficacy; liver histology results) and comparing to prior studies by Dr. Cusi et al that had simultaneous liver histology and liver fat measured by 1H-MRS (Belfort et al, NEJM 2006; Cusi et al, Annals Int Med 2016). From this analysis, the required sample size per group calls for 15 patients in each arm (lanifibranor vs. placebo) to complete treatment. Conservatively assuming that 10 % of the randomized patients will not complete the trial (dropouts), the total number of patients to be randomized is 33-34 patients.

02

Conditions studied

03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Be able to communicate meaningfully with the investigator and legally competent to provide written informed consent
  • Have an age between 21 to 75 years inclusive
  • Subjects should be on stable standard of care and background therapy for ongoing chronic conditions, including stable doses of anti-diabetic medications, for at least two (2) months prior to trial entry
  • Have uncontrolled diabetes with a fasting plasma glucose (FPG) ≥ 100 mg/dL but ≤ 250 mg/dL and HbA1c ≥ 6.0% but ≤ 9.5%, on diet alone, or on metformin (≥1,000 mg/day), and/or sulfonylurea and/or DPP-IV therapy, SGLT2 inhibitors or GLP1RA. These medicines will be continued at stable doses during the entire study.

    1. Subjects with an HbA1c > 8.0% but ≤ 9.5% will have their metformin (minimum dose required: 1,000 mg/day) maximized to 1,000 mg BID and/or glimepiride 2 mg once daily added during the first 2 weeks of the run-in period. The baseline visit to initiate lanifibranor (V4; Time 0 or randomization visit) will be not sooner than 8 weeks from diabetes medication titration and the patient should have an HbA1c ≤9.0% to proceed to randomization (V4).
    2. In addition, if both metformin and glimepiride (or another sulfonylurea) are already maximized at study entry (or the patient is intolerant to either) and the HbA1c ≥ 9.0% but ≤9.5%, we will add sitagliptin 100 mg daily (or an equivalent dose of another DPP-IV inhibitor) to reach an HbA1c ≤9.0% to proceed to randomization (V4).
  • Presence of hepatic steatosis (Intrahepatic Triglycerides IHTG) > 10 % determined by Magnetic Resonance and Spectroscopy (1H-MRS).
  • Have no new symptoms associated with decompensated diabetes in the previous 3 months.
  • Compensated liver disease with the following hematologic and biochemical criteria on entry into protocol:

    • Hemoglobin > 11 g/dL for females and > 12 g/dL for males
    • White blood cell (WBC) > 2.5 K/µL
    • Neutrophil count > 1.5 K/µL
    • Total bilirubin ≤ 1.3 mg/dL (≤ 22.2 µmol/L). Patients with bilirubin ≤ 1.3 mg/dL can be included if non-conjugated bilirubin in the setting of a Gilbert's syndrome.
    • Albumin > 36 g/L
  • No other causes of chronic liver disease (autoimmune, primary biliary cholangitis, HBV, HCV, Wilson's, α-1-antitrypsin deficiency, hemochromatosis, other).
  • Negative pregnancy test or at least two-year post-menopausal. Women with childbearing potential (i.e. fertile, following menarche and until becoming post- menopausal unless permanently sterile) must be using a highly effective method of contraception (i.e. combined (estrogen and progesterone containing) hormonal/ progesterone-only hormonal contraception associated with inhibition of ovulation, intrauterine device, intrauterine hormone-releasing system, bilateral tubal occlusion, vasectomized partner). The contraceptive method will have to be followed for at least one menstruation cycle after the end of the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Evidence of liver disease other than NAFLD.
  • History of excessive alcohol intake, defined by ≥ 21 units of alcohol per week in males and ≥14 units of alcohol per week in females for two years prior to enrollment, where a "unit" of alcohol is equivalent to 12-ounce beer, 4-ounce glass of wine, or 1 ounce shot of hard liquor.
  • Unstable metabolic condition: Weight change > 5 kg in the 3 months prior to enrollment, diabetes with poor glycemic control (HgbA1c > 9.5% or FPG > 250 mg/dl), introduction of an anti-obesity drug/malabsorptive or restrictive bariatric (weight loss) surgery in the past 6 months prior to screening.
  • History of gastrointestinal malabsorptive bariatric surgery within less than 5 years or ingestion of drugs known to produce hepatic steatosis including corticosteroids, high-dose estrogens, methotrexate, tetracycline or amiodarone in the previous 6 months.
  • Subjects on sulfonylureas, metformin, GLP-1RA or DPP-IV unless the dose and body weight (within 5%) have been stable for at least two (2) months prior to study entry.
  • Patients on insulin, pioglitazone (or prior use in the past 12 months).
  • Patients on any of the following medications unless the patient has been on stable doses of such agents for the past two (2) months before entry into the study: thiazide or furosemide diuretics, beta- blockers, or other chronic medications with known adverse effects on glucose tolerance levels. Patients may be taking stable doses of estrogens or other hormonal replacement therapy if the patient has been on these agents for the prior two (2) months. Patients taking systemic glucocorticoids will be excluded.

Treatment with strong inducers or inhibitors of CYP2C8, or treatment with substrates of CYP2B6 or CYP2C8. When administered chronically, they should be replaced 2 months before trial entry (See Inclusion criterion #3). If not administered chronically, they should be stopped at least 7 days before first dosing.

-Patients with:

  1. History of myopathies or evidence of active muscle diseases
  2. Unstable cardiovascular disease, including:

i. Unstable angina (i.e., new or worsening symptoms of coronary heart disease within the past 3 months), acute coronary syndrome within the past 6 months, acute myocardial infarction in the past 3 months or heart failure of New York Heart Association class (III-IV) or worsening congestive heart failure, or coronary artery intervention, within the past 6 months ii. History of (within prior 3 months) or current unstable cardiac dysrhythmias iii. Uncontrolled hypertension (systolic blood pressure > 160 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure > 100 mmHg.

iv. Stroke or transient ischemic attack within the prior 6 months c. History of malignancy in the past 5 years and/or active neoplasm with the exception of resolved superficial nonmelanoma skin cancer d. History of bladder disease and/or hematuria or has current hematuria unless due to a urinary tract infection e. Any of the following laboratory values: ii. Serum bilirubin > 1.3 mg/dL (or > 22.2 µmol/L). Patients with bilirubin >1.3 mg/dL can be included if non-conjugated bilirubin in the setting of a Gilbert's syndrome.

iii. Serum ALT > 3X ULN iv. INR > 1.2 v. Platelets \< 150,000 per microliter of blood vi. Renal impairment as demonstrated by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) \< 60 mL/min/1.73m2 vii. Total creatinine kinase > 1.5 X ULN viii. Lipase > 1.3X ULN or >2.0X ULN if on a DPP-IV inhibitor. *(if abnormal values are confirmed when repeated within 3 weeks) ix. Hemoglobin A1c > 9.5%

  • Significant systemic or major illnesses other than liver disease, including those listed in exclusion criteria #8 and pulmonary disease, organ transplantation, serious psychiatric disease, that, in the opinion of the investigator, would preclude treatment with lanifibranor and/or adequate follow up.
  • HB antigen > 0, HCV > 0 (patients with a history of HCV infection can be included if HCV PCR is negative since more than 3 years), prior history of HIV infection.
  • Pregnancy/lactation or inability to adhere to adequate contraception in women of child-bearing potential.
  • Any other condition which, in the opinion of the investigator would impede competence or compliance or possibly hinder completion of the study.
  • Body mass index (BMI) > 45 kg/m2.
  • Type 1 diabetes and type 2 diabetic patient on insulin.
  • Diabetic ketoacidosis.
  • Fasting plasma triglycerides > 500 mg/dL.
  • Hemostasis disorders or current treatment with anticoagulants.
  • Participation in any other investigational drug study within the previous 3 months.
  • Have a known hypersensitivity to any of the ingredients or excipients of the IMP including: Lactose monohydrate, hypromellose, sodium lauryl sulphate, sodium starch glycolate, magnesium stearate, Opadry™ II 85F18422, DSS Granular, cellulose microcrystalline, maize starch.
  • Be possibly dependent on the Investigator (e.g., including, but not limited to, affiliated employee).
  • Osteopenia or any other well documented bone disease. Patient without well documented osteopenia treated with vitamin D and/or calcium based supplements for preventive reasons can be included.
  • Claustrophobia to a degree that prevents tolerance of MRI scanning procedure. Sedation is permitted at discretion of investigator.
  • Metallic implant of any sort that prevents MRI examination including, but not limited to: aneurysm clips, metallic foreign body, vascular grafts or cardiac implants, neural stimulator, metallic contraceptive device, tattoo, body piercing that cannot be removed, cochlear implant; or any other contraindication to MRI examination.
04

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
128 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    lanifibranor arm

    Two arm, randomized (1:1), double-blind, placebo-controlled, 24-week treatment study receiving lanifibranor 800 mg/day.

    Drug: Lanifibranor

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Two arm, randomized (1:1), double-blind, placebo-controlled, 24-week treatment study receiving placebo.

    Other: Placebo

Interventions

  • DrugLanifibranor

    The film-coated tablet contains 400 mg of the active ingredient lanifibranor (IVA337) for an immediate release formulation. Participants receive 800mg/ day

    Also known as: IVA 337

  • OtherPlacebo

    Film-coated tablets with a core containing 900 mg of a physical mixture of lactose monohydrate, microcrystalline cellulose, pre-gelatinized starch and magnesium stearate serve as placebo.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Intrahepatic Triglycerides (IHTG) Quantified by Proton Magnetic Resonance and Spectroscopy (¹H-MRS)

    Changes from baseline (Adjusted LS means) in absolute percent for change in intrahepatic triglycerides (IHTG) quantified by proton magnetic resonance and spectroscopy (¹H-MRS)are reported in each arms.

    Time frame: 24 weeks of treatment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Patients With a Decrease From Baseline in IHTG (Quantified by ¹H-MRS) to Week 24 of ≥ 30%.

    Percentage of patients with a decrease from baseline in IHTG (quantified by ¹H-MRS) to week 24 of ≥ 30% in each group.

    Time frame: 24 weeks of treatment.

  2. Percentage of Patients With NAFLD Resolution, Defined as Having ≤ 5.5% IHTG (Quantified by 1H- MRS).

    Percentage of patients with NAFLD resolution, defined as having ≤ 5.5% IHTG (quantified by 1H- MRS) in both arms.

    Time frame: 24 weeks of treatment.

  3. Improvement in Hepatic Insulin Sensitivity (Hepatic Insulin Resistance Index Reported as Relative Percent Change)

    Changes from baseline in hepatic insulin sensitivity (Hepatic Insulin Resistance Index) as a relative percent change is presented (i.e. \[24 week result- baseline result\]/baseline result \*100).

    Time frame: 24 weeks of treatment.

  4. Improvement in Adipose Tissue Insulin Sensitivity.

    Changes from baseline in absolute value of adipose tissue insulin resistance (ADIPO-IR) index will be compared between both arms. This is calculated using the formula below: Adipo-IR index = fasting serum free fatty acid concentration x fasting plasma insulin level. A higher value indicated higher insulin resistance.

    Time frame: 24 weeks of treatment.

  5. Improvement in Muscle Insulin Sensitivity (Rd).

    Relative percent changes from baseline in insulin-stimulated muscle glucose disposal (%) will be compared between both arms (i.e. \[24 week result- baseline result\]/baseline result \*100).

    Time frame: 24 weeks of treatment.

  6. Absolute Change in Glycemic Control (Hemoglobin A1c).

    Absolute changes from baseline will be compared between both arms (i.e., percentage at 24 weeks subtracted from the percentage at baseline).

    Time frame: 24 weeks of treatment.

  7. Change in Plasma HDL-C (mg/dl).

    Changes from baseline will be compared between both arms.

    Time frame: 24 weeks of treatment.

  8. Changes in Hepatic Fibrosis (Liver Stiffness Measurement by Vibration Controlled Transient Elastography in kPa) on Imaging.

    Changes from baseline in liver stiffness measurement in kPa by vibration controlled transient elastography measured in both arms.

    Time frame: 24 weeks of treatment.

  9. Change in Plasma Biomarkers of Liver Fibrosis (Plasma Cytokeratin 18 Measured in IU/L).

    Absolute change (Mean ± SD) changes from baseline in plasma cytokeratin 18 (IU/L) levels in both arms.

    Time frame: 24 weeks of treatment.

  10. Changes in Hepatic Fibrosis (Liver Stiffness Measurement by Magnetic Resonance Elastography in kPa) on Imaging.

    Changes from baseline in liver stiffness measurement by magnetic resonance elastography is measured in both arms (absolute change in kPa from baseline).

    Time frame: 24 weeks of treatment.

  11. Hepatic Fibrosis (Liver Stiffness Measurement by Magnetic Resonance Elastography) on Imaging.

    Baseline liver stiffness measurement (LSM) by magnetic resonance elastography (in kPa) in both arms.

    Time frame: Baseline measurement of liver stiffness by magnetic resonance elastography is reported in each arm.

06

Results

Posted Sep 19, 2024
Limitations and caveats
The original number of patients to be recruited was reduced during the trial based on the results of the NATIVE study (Francque et al, N Engl J Med. 2021 Oct 21;385(17):1547-1558. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2036205), as explained in the study protocol.

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneLanifibranor ArmPlaceboHealthy Control Group (Not a Treatment Arm)
Started201810
Completed141410
Not completed640
Withdrew: Adverse event420
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject220

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange in Intrahepatic Triglycerides (IHTG) Quantified by Proton Magnetic Resonance and Spectroscopy (¹H-MRS)

Changes from baseline (Adjusted LS means) in absolute percent for change in intrahepatic triglycerides (IHTG) quantified by proton magnetic resonance and spectroscopy (¹H-MRS)are reported in each arms.

Time frame:
24 weeks of treatment
Reported as:
Least squares mean · percentage decrease from baseline
Change in Intrahepatic Triglycerides (IHTG) Quantified by Proton Magnetic Resonance and Spectroscopy (¹H-MRS)
percentage decrease from baselineLanifibranor ArmPlacebo
Change in Intrahepatic Triglycerides (IHTG) Quantified by Proton Magnetic Resonance and Spectroscopy (¹H-MRS)-8.7 (-11.3 to -6.0)-3.0 (-5.9 to -0.2)
SecondaryPercentage of Patients With a Decrease From Baseline in IHTG (Quantified by ¹H-MRS) to Week 24 of ≥ 30%.

Percentage of patients with a decrease from baseline in IHTG (quantified by ¹H-MRS) to week 24 of ≥ 30% in each group.

Time frame:
24 weeks of treatment.
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Patients With a Decrease From Baseline in IHTG (Quantified by ¹H-MRS) to Week 24 of ≥ 30%.
percentage of participantsLanifibranor ArmPlacebo
Percentage of Patients With a Decrease From Baseline in IHTG (Quantified by ¹H-MRS) to Week 24 of ≥ 30%.65 (41 to 85)22 (6 to 48)
SecondaryPercentage of Patients With NAFLD Resolution, Defined as Having ≤ 5.5% IHTG (Quantified by 1H- MRS).

Percentage of patients with NAFLD resolution, defined as having ≤ 5.5% IHTG (quantified by 1H- MRS) in both arms.

Time frame:
24 weeks of treatment.
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Patients With NAFLD Resolution, Defined as Having ≤ 5.5% IHTG (Quantified by 1H- MRS).
percentage of participantsLanifibranor ArmPlacebo
Percentage of Patients With NAFLD Resolution, Defined as Having ≤ 5.5% IHTG (Quantified by 1H- MRS).25 (9 to 49)0 (0 to 19)
SecondaryImprovement in Hepatic Insulin Sensitivity (Hepatic Insulin Resistance Index Reported as Relative Percent Change)

Changes from baseline in hepatic insulin sensitivity (Hepatic Insulin Resistance Index) as a relative percent change is presented (i.e. \[24 week result- baseline result\]/baseline result \*100).

Time frame:
24 weeks of treatment.
Reported as:
Least squares mean · percentage of baseline value
Improvement in Hepatic Insulin Sensitivity (Hepatic Insulin Resistance Index Reported as Relative Percent Change)
percentage of baseline valueLanifibranor ArmPlacebo
Improvement in Hepatic Insulin Sensitivity (Hepatic Insulin Resistance Index Reported as Relative Percent Change)-26 (-37 to -14)-7 (-19 to 4)
SecondaryImprovement in Adipose Tissue Insulin Sensitivity.

Changes from baseline in absolute value of adipose tissue insulin resistance (ADIPO-IR) index will be compared between both arms. This is calculated using the formula below: Adipo-IR index = fasting serum free fatty acid concentration x fasting plasma insulin level. A higher value indicated higher insulin resistance.

Time frame:
24 weeks of treatment.
Reported as:
Least squares mean · index
Improvement in Adipose Tissue Insulin Sensitivity.
indexLanifibranor ArmPlacebo
Improvement in Adipose Tissue Insulin Sensitivity.-2.7 (-4.3 to -1.2)-0.7 (-2.4 to 0.9)
SecondaryImprovement in Muscle Insulin Sensitivity (Rd).

Relative percent changes from baseline in insulin-stimulated muscle glucose disposal (%) will be compared between both arms (i.e. \[24 week result- baseline result\]/baseline result \*100).

Time frame:
24 weeks of treatment.
Reported as:
Least squares mean · percentage change from baseline
Improvement in Muscle Insulin Sensitivity (Rd).
percentage change from baselineLanifibranor ArmPlacebo
Improvement in Muscle Insulin Sensitivity (Rd).30 (13 to 46)0 (-17 to 18)
SecondaryAbsolute Change in Glycemic Control (Hemoglobin A1c).

Absolute changes from baseline will be compared between both arms (i.e., percentage at 24 weeks subtracted from the percentage at baseline).

Time frame:
24 weeks of treatment.
Reported as:
Least squares mean · absolute percent change from baseline
Absolute Change in Glycemic Control (Hemoglobin A1c).
absolute percent change from baselineLanifibranor ArmPlacebo
Absolute Change in Glycemic Control (Hemoglobin A1c).-0.7 (-1.0 to -0.5)-0.1 (-0.3 to 0.2)
SecondaryChange in Plasma HDL-C (mg/dl).

Changes from baseline will be compared between both arms.

Time frame:
24 weeks of treatment.
Reported as:
Least squares mean · absolute change in mg/dl from baseline
Change in Plasma HDL-C (mg/dl).
absolute change in mg/dl from baselineLanifibranor ArmPlacebo
Change in Plasma HDL-C (mg/dl).7.6 (4.4 to 10.7)0.9 (-2.4 to 4.3)
SecondaryChanges in Hepatic Fibrosis (Liver Stiffness Measurement by Vibration Controlled Transient Elastography in kPa) on Imaging.

Changes from baseline in liver stiffness measurement in kPa by vibration controlled transient elastography measured in both arms.

Time frame:
24 weeks of treatment.
Reported as:
Least squares mean · absolute change in kPa from baseline
Changes in Hepatic Fibrosis (Liver Stiffness Measurement by Vibration Controlled Transient Elastography in kPa) on Imaging.
absolute change in kPa from baselineLanifibranor ArmPlacebo
Changes in Hepatic Fibrosis (Liver Stiffness Measurement by Vibration Controlled Transient Elastography in kPa) on Imaging.-1.49 (-2.66 to -0.31)-0.34 (-1.57 to 0.9)
SecondaryChange in Plasma Biomarkers of Liver Fibrosis (Plasma Cytokeratin 18 Measured in IU/L).

Absolute change (Mean ± SD) changes from baseline in plasma cytokeratin 18 (IU/L) levels in both arms.

Time frame:
24 weeks of treatment.
Reported as:
Mean · absolute change in from baseline in IU/L
Change in Plasma Biomarkers of Liver Fibrosis (Plasma Cytokeratin 18 Measured in IU/L).
absolute change in from baseline in IU/LLanifibranor ArmPlacebo
Change in Plasma Biomarkers of Liver Fibrosis (Plasma Cytokeratin 18 Measured in IU/L).-130.71 ± 164.28-70.21 ± 230.39
SecondaryChanges in Hepatic Fibrosis (Liver Stiffness Measurement by Magnetic Resonance Elastography in kPa) on Imaging.

Changes from baseline in liver stiffness measurement by magnetic resonance elastography is measured in both arms (absolute change in kPa from baseline).

Time frame:
24 weeks of treatment.
Reported as:
Least squares mean · kPa
Changes in Hepatic Fibrosis (Liver Stiffness Measurement by Magnetic Resonance Elastography in kPa) on Imaging.
kPaLanifibranor ArmPlacebo
Changes in Hepatic Fibrosis (Liver Stiffness Measurement by Magnetic Resonance Elastography in kPa) on Imaging.0.23 (0.03 to 0.42)-0.06 (-0.25 to 0.13)
SecondaryHepatic Fibrosis (Liver Stiffness Measurement by Magnetic Resonance Elastography) on Imaging.

Baseline liver stiffness measurement (LSM) by magnetic resonance elastography (in kPa) in both arms.

Time frame:
Baseline measurement of liver stiffness by magnetic resonance elastography is reported in each arm.
Reported as:
Mean · kPa
Hepatic Fibrosis (Liver Stiffness Measurement by Magnetic Resonance Elastography) on Imaging.
kPaLanifibranor ArmPlacebo
Hepatic Fibrosis (Liver Stiffness Measurement by Magnetic Resonance Elastography) on Imaging.2.8 ± 0.82.5 ± 1.1

Adverse events

Collected over 28 weeks. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Lanifibranor Arm0/20 (0%)1/20 (5%)18/20 (90%)
Placebo0/18 (0%)0/18 (0%)17/18 (94.4%)
Healthy Control Group (Not a Treatment Arm)0/10 (0%)0/10 (0%)3/10 (30%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventLanifibranor ArmPlaceboHealthy Control Group (Not a Treatment Arm)
COVID-19 pneumonia and pulmonary embolismRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/200/180/10
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 32
Most frequent other events
EventLanifibranor ArmPlaceboHealthy Control Group (Not a Treatment Arm)
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders5/193/180/10
Elevated lipase levelGastrointestinal disorders5/203/181/10
AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders4/202/180/10
ArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0/203/180/10
LeukopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders3/201/180/10
HeadacheNervous system disorders3/201/180/10
Decrease in eGFRRenal and urinary disorders1/202/180/10
HyperglycemiaEndocrine disorders0/202/180/10
Abnormal urinalysisRenal and urinary disorders0/202/180/10
DermatologicalSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders2/201/180/10

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Lanifibranor ArmPlaceboHealthy Control Group (Not a Treatment Arm)Total
Mean61 ± 758 ± 1143 ± 1860 ± 8
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Lanifibranor ArmPlaceboHealthy Control Group (Not a Treatment Arm)Total
Female1113630
Male95418
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Lanifibranor ArmPlaceboHealthy Control Group (Not a Treatment Arm)Total
American Indian or Alaska Native0000
Asian0011
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0000
Black or African American0202
White1815942
More than one race1102
Unknown or Not Reported1001
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Lanifibranor ArmPlaceboHealthy Control Group (Not a Treatment Arm)Total
United States20181048
Intrahepatic triglyceride content
Intrahepatic triglyceride content(%)Lanifibranor ArmPlaceboHealthy Control Group (Not a Treatment Arm)Total
Mean21 ± 718 ± 73 ± 119.5 ± 7.1
07

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Florida
    Gainesville, Florida 32610, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Belfort R, Harrison SA, Brown K, Darland C, Finch J, Hardies J, Balas B, Gastaldelli A, Tio F, Pulcini J, Berria R, Ma JZ, Dwivedi S, Havranek R, Fincke C, DeFronzo R, Bannayan GA, Schenker S, Cusi K. A placebo-controlled trial of pioglitazone in subjects with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. N Engl J Med. 2006 Nov 30;355(22):2297-307. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa060326. PubMed 17135584 ↗
  • Cusi K, Orsak B, Bril F, Lomonaco R, Hecht J, Ortiz-Lopez C, Tio F, Hardies J, Darland C, Musi N, Webb A, Portillo-Sanchez P. Long-Term Pioglitazone Treatment for Patients With Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis and Prediabetes or Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Randomized Trial. Ann Intern Med. 2016 Sep 6;165(5):305-15. doi: 10.7326/M15-1774. Epub 2016 Jun 21. PubMed 27322798 ↗
  • Cusi K. Role of obesity and lipotoxicity in the development of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: pathophysiology and clinical implications. Gastroenterology. 2012 Apr;142(4):711-725.e6. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.02.003. Epub 2012 Feb 8. PubMed 22326434 ↗
  • Lomonaco R, Bril F, Portillo-Sanchez P, Ortiz-Lopez C, Orsak B, Biernacki D, Lo M, Suman A, Weber MH, Cusi K. Metabolic Impact of Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis in Obese Patients With Type 2 Diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2016 Apr;39(4):632-8. doi: 10.2337/dc15-1876. Epub 2016 Feb 9. PubMed 26861926 ↗
  • Bril F, Cusi K. Management of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Call to Action. Diabetes Care. 2017 Mar;40(3):419-430. doi: 10.2337/dc16-1787. PubMed 28223446 ↗
  • Boubia B, Poupardin O, Barth M, Binet J, Peralba P, Mounier L, Jacquier E, Gauthier E, Lepais V, Chatar M, Ferry S, Thourigny A, Guillier F, Llacer J, Amaudrut J, Dodey P, Lacombe O, Masson P, Montalbetti C, Wettstein G, Luccarini JM, Legendre C, Junien JL, Broqua P. Design, Synthesis, and Evaluation of a Novel Series of Indole Sulfonamide Peroxisome Proliferator Activated Receptor (PPAR) alpha/gamma/delta Triple Activators: Discovery of Lanifibranor, a New Antifibrotic Clinical Candidate. J Med Chem. 2018 Mar 22;61(6):2246-2265. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.7b01285. Epub 2018 Feb 27. PubMed 29446942 ↗
  • Wettstein G, Luccarini JM, Poekes L, Faye P, Kupkowski F, Adarbes V, Defrene E, Estivalet C, Gawronski X, Jantzen I, Philippot A, Tessier J, Tuyaa-Boustugue P, Oakley F, Mann DA, Leclercq I, Francque S, Konstantinova I, Broqua P, Junien JL. The new-generation pan-peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor agonist IVA337 protects the liver from metabolic disorders and fibrosis. Hepatol Commun. 2017 Jun 19;1(6):524-537. doi: 10.1002/hep4.1057. eCollection 2017 Aug. PubMed 29404476 ↗
  • Avouac J, Konstantinova I, Guignabert C, Pezet S, Sadoine J, Guilbert T, Cauvet A, Tu L, Luccarini JM, Junien JL, Broqua P, Allanore Y. Pan-PPAR agonist IVA337 is effective in experimental lung fibrosis and pulmonary hypertension. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Nov;76(11):1931-1940. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210821. Epub 2017 Aug 11. PubMed 28801346 ↗
  • Ruzehaji N, Frantz C, Ponsoye M, Avouac J, Pezet S, Guilbert T, Luccarini JM, Broqua P, Junien JL, Allanore Y. Pan PPAR agonist IVA337 is effective in prevention and treatment of experimental skin fibrosis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2016 Dec;75(12):2175-2183. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-208029. Epub 2016 Mar 9. PubMed 26961294 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Feb 7, 2022

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — There is not a plan to make IPD available.

09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03459079
Lead sponsor
University of Florida
Collaborators
Inventiva Pharma
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 8, 2018
Start date
Aug 14, 2018
Primary completion
Apr 18, 2023
Completion
Jun 1, 2023
Results posted
Sep 19, 2024
Last update
Sep 19, 2024

Study contacts

Kenneth Cusi, MD
principal investigator · University of Florida

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion