An observational study in Focal Epilepsy, Generalized Epilepsy and Partial Seizures, Simple, sponsored by Chinese University of Hong Kong. Status unknown at 1 site in Hong Kong. Open to participants aged 12 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-08-27.
Sponsored by Chinese University of Hong Kong · Observational
Background:
Epilepsy is a chronic neurological disease which affects approximately 70,000 patients in Hong Kong and 50 billion people worldwide. Among these patients one-third remained unresponsive to antiepileptic agents. Continual drug manipulation is an essential therapeutic option for these patients with refractory epilepsy. In particular, rational polytherapy has become the mainstay of treatment for the sub-group of patients who have failed two or more antiepileptic drugs (AEDs).
A substantial amount of research has shown that N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors (NMDA) may play a key role in the pathophysiology of several neurological diseases, including epilepsy. Animal models of epilepsy and clinical studies demonstrate that NMDA receptors activity and expression can be altered in association with epilepsy and particularly in some specific seizure types. NMDA receptor antagonists have been shown to have antiepileptic effects in both clinical and preclinical studies. There is some evidence that conventional antiepileptic drugs may also affect NMDA receptor function.
Aims:
To investigate the medium to long-term effects of AMPA/NMDA receptor antagonist in an Asian cohort as there is a relative lack of clinical data in this population To explore the efficacy of AMPA/NMDA receptor antagonist in patients with partial onsets seizures that may secondarily generalize and the specific side effects of AMPA/NMDA receptor antagonist in relation to behavioral problems.
Methods:
A semi-prospective design is adopted to recruit patients who are indicated and started on AMPA/NMDA receptor antagonist aged 12 or above in Hong Kong. This study will collect information about demographic details, medical history and seizure information. Assessment of seizure frequency is based on seizure diary and interviews with family members. Physical examination, electrocardiogram and other medical information relevant to the follow-up of the patient will be collected.
Epilepsy is a chronic neurological disease which affects approximately 70,000 patients in Hong Kong and 50 billion people worldwide. Among these patients, one-third remained unresponsive to antiepileptic agents. Continual drug manipulation is an essential therapeutic option for these patients with refractory epilepsy. In particular, rational polytherapy has become the mainstay of treatment for the sub-group of patients who have failed two or more antiepileptic drugs (AEDs).
Using AEDs with different mechanisms of action is a strategy adopted by many doctors around the world. In this regard, perampanel (PER) is an agent which is first in its class, with specific antagonistic action on ionotropic α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazoleproprionic acid (AMPA) glutamate receptor of post-synaptic neurons. The pharmacokinetics of PER suggested that it has a half-life of approximately 105 hours and the steady-state concentrations that can be reached in 14 days. PER is approximately 95% bound to plasma proteins. This metabolism is mediated by CYP 3A4 or CYP 3A5. The usual dosage of PER is between 2mg and 12 mg. PER can be administered once daily.
A total of five clinical studies demonstrated the efficacy of PER among patients with refractory epilepsy. These were all double-blind studies and all of them evaluated the 50% responder rate as a seizure outcome. The corresponding risk ratio for 50% responder rates for 4mg, 8mg and 12mg were 1.54, 1.8 and 1.72. The most common treatment-emergent adverse effects were dizziness, drowsiness, headache, fatigue, nasopharyngitis. The pooled results suggested that a higher dose was more efficacious if the side effects could be tolerated. There was an on-going study on the use of PER among patients with secondarily generalized seizures. Perampanel has been approved in many countries such as USA, EU, Australia, Canada, Switzerland, Singapore, and Malaysia, as an adjunctive therapy for refractory partial seizures with or without secondary generalisation among patients above 12 years of age.
A substantial amount of research has shown that N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors (NMDA) may play a key role in the pathophysiology of several neurological diseases, including epilepsy. Animal models of epilepsy and clinical studies demonstrate that NMDA receptors activity and expression can be altered in association with epilepsy and particularly in some specific seizure types. NMDA receptor antagonists have been shown to have antiepileptic effects in both clinical and preclinical studies. There is some evidence that conventional antiepileptic drugs may also affect NMDA receptor function.
243 studies on the registry are indexed under Epilepsies, Partial; 49 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 80 is below the median of 130 across 47 observational studies indexed under Epilepsies, Partial.
Browse Epilepsies, Partial studies →Chinese University of Hong Kong is the lead sponsor of 1,454 studies on the registry; 474 are open to participants now.
Of its 6 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Patients (diagnosed epilepsy with simple partial seizure) who have a baseline seizure rate of more than 2 months would be provided perampanel as adjunctive treatment.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
How quickly the kidneys clear creatinine, a waste product, from the blood. A study may estimate it from a blood test with age, weight and sex (often by the Cockcroft–Gault formula), or measure it using blood and urine collected over a set time. Given in mL/min; higher is better.
Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.
Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.
The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.
“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.
Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.
Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.
On an ECG, the QT interval is the time the heart’s lower chambers take to activate electrically and recover in each beat. QTc is that time adjusted for heart rate (QTcF by Fridericia’s formula, QTcB by Bazett’s). Some medicines lengthen it, and a long QTc can raise the risk of a dangerous heart rhythm.
The study may name a correction formula and a limit in milliseconds, often around 450–480.
A recording of the heart’s electrical activity, taken with stickers on the chest, arms and legs. It takes a few minutes and does not hurt.
Creatinine clearance (CrCl)
How quickly the kidneys clear creatinine, a waste product, from the blood. A study may estimate it from a blood test with age, weight and sex (often by the Cockcroft–Gault formula), or measure it using blood and urine collected over a set time. Given in mL/min; higher is better.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
ALT and AST (liver enzymes)
Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.
Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
ULN (upper limit of normal)
The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.
“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Cancer (malignancy)
Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.
Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
QT and QTc
On an ECG, the QT interval is the time the heart’s lower chambers take to activate electrically and recover in each beat. QTc is that time adjusted for heart rate (QTcF by Fridericia’s formula, QTcB by Bazett’s). Some medicines lengthen it, and a long QTc can raise the risk of a dangerous heart rhythm.
The study may name a correction formula and a limit in milliseconds, often around 450–480.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
ECG (electrocardiogram)
A recording of the heart’s electrical activity, taken with stickers on the chest, arms and legs. It takes a few minutes and does not hurt.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
A group of patients who aged 12 years or above and have a diagnosis of epilepsy with simple partial seizure and/or complex partial seizures
Drug: Perampanel
This study collects clinical information during the first 16 weeks after the first dose of AMPA/NMDA receptor antagonist. Subjects or caregivers shall provide seizure diary which documents seizure type and seizure frequency as per usual medical care. The final visit will be based on the week-16 visit.
Also known as: Fycompa
Efficacy end-points
The primary efficacy end-points evaluates seizure frequency (per month) in week 0 (baseline) and week 16 (maintenance phase). The investigators will used those seizure frequencies (per month) to calculate the percentage change from baseline to maintenance phase for each subject and categories: no change, between 0 to 50% decrease, 50% to 75% decrease, 75% to 100% decrease.
Time frame: 16 weeks
Seizure freedom rate in study population
The proportion of subjects achieving seizure freedom during the maintenance period will be documented. The percentage of seizure free days in the maintenance phase will also be collected. The investigators will report the seizure freedom rate for the present study population and the average days of achieving seizure freedom.
Time frame: 16 weeks
Psychiatric and behavioral adverse events
The investigators would use the Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire (NPI) with 12 domains to evaluate the neuropsychiatric events in week 0 (baseline) and week 16 (maintenance phase). The investigators will record each symptom severity (rated 1 occasional to 4 very frequent) and frequency (rated 1 mild to 3 severe).
Time frame: 16 weeks
Plan to share: No — This is a cohort study for perampanel in Hong Kong. There is no plan to make individual participant data to share. The results would be shared in publications. Electronic data will be saved in secured computer of the individual sites with restricted access. The anonymous data will be managed installed for developing future studies.
This study is status unknown, as verified in Aug 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Chinese University of Hong Kong →