ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03457246Updated Mar 7, 2018

Efficacy and Tolerance of D-pigment Versus Moisturizer in Hands' Lentigo Lesions With or Without Laser Therapy

An interventional study of D-Pigment rich texture and Hydrance optimale riche in Lentigo and Hyperpigmentation, sponsored by Pierre Fabre Dermo Cosmetique. Completed. Open to participants aged 50 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-03-07.

Sponsored by Pierre Fabre Dermo Cosmetique (part of Pierre Fabre) · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 4 years 9 months after the study started (first participant enrolled May 2013, registered Feb 2018).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
50 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Pierre Fabre Dermo-Cosmétique has commercialized a cosmetic product (D-pigment rich texture) for treatment of hyperpigmentation. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of D-pigment after laser therapy, through its action on peri-lesional areas, in obtaining better cosmetic effect.

Read the detailed description

Many studies have shown the efficacy of topical products such as hydroquinone, tretinoin, ascorbic and phytic acid... The combination of topical agents has shown better improvement of lentigos aspect. Many physical therapy such as chemical peels, cryosurgery, dermabrasion, and pigment-specific lasers show good results.

The combination of physical and topical therapies may be beneficial to patients. For example, the use of combination topical therapy may be used after cryotherapy as a maintenance therapy to diminish the risk of relapse. Laser therapy is very efficient on visible lesion, but not to prevent lesions apparition. A cosmetic topical depigmenting product may be a support of laser therapy, to prevent lentigos apparition in peri-lesional areas.

Furthermore, Post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH) is a common adverse effect seen with laser, occurring in approximately 35-40% of patients with Fitzpatrick skin types I-III. Another study related that 28% of study population has post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation. A cosmetic topical depigmenting product may be a support of laser therapy, to prevent possible laser side effect.

Pierre Fabre Dermo-Cosmétique has commercialized a cosmetic product (D-pigment rich texture) for treatment of hyperpigmentation. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of D-pigment as a support of a laser therapy, through its action on peri-lesional areas.

The expected effect is to show the efficacy of D-pigment in post laser long-term treatment, having a more homogenous skin colour on the D-pigment hand versus the moisturizer hand. The subjects will benefit from a strengthened follow-up by the investigator (one visit every 3 months). After the completion of the study, a complete hands laser treatment will be done for each subject and D-pigment tubes will be offered to the subjects for a 6 months application period.

02

Conditions studied

  • Lentigo
  • Hyperpigmentation

Keywords

  • solar lentigos
  • physical Hyperpigmentation therapies
  • cosmetic topical depigmenting product
  • topical Hyperpigmentation therapies
03

In context

Lentigo

28 studies on the registry are indexed under Lentigo; 2 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 40 is above the median of 30 across 25 interventional studies indexed under Lentigo.

Browse Lentigo studies →

Lead sponsor

Pierre Fabre Dermo Cosmetique is the lead sponsor of 59 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
50 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Subject consenting on the use of photos for scientific and commercial purposes,
  • Subject having signed his/her written .
  • Subject treated by laser therapy in the previous 15 to 30 days
  • Subject having 5 to 10 lentigos on the surface of each hands
  • Subject having lentigos graded 6 or more on the severity grading scale
  • Subject with same lentigo severity in each hand.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subject who has planned to stay for more than 15 days in an area with an important increase in sun exposure conditions compared to his/her usual place of residence,
  • Subject who has planned to sun expose himself/herself more than 7 days,
  • Women with
  • Participation to an other clinical trial in the previous month or during the study,
  • Subject who is not able to understand the information (for linguistic or psychiatric reasons), to give ,
  • Subject who, in the judgement of the investigator, is not likely to be compliant with study-related constraints during the study (daily product application during one year),
  • Subject who has forfeited her freedom by administrative or legal decision, or who is under guardianship.

Criteria related to pathologies:

  • Hyperpigmentation other than lentigos or other hypermelanosis (post-inflammatory laser or chemical melanosis) on the hands,
  • Diabetic subject,
  • Chronic or progressive disease which may interfere with the study in the opinion of the investigator,
  • Pathology, skin disorder or lesions other than lentigo (psoriasis, atopic dermatitis, mycose, intertrigo, sunburn...) at the dorsum of the hand which could interfere with the evaluation,
  • Systemic infectious pathology,
  • , allergy or intolerance to retinaldehyde or any component of the formulation.

Criteria related to treatments:

  • Treatment by depigmenting cosmetic products on the hands within 4 weeks prior to inclusion,
  • Treatment by depigmenting treatment containing hydroquinone or any depigmenting drug on the hands (e.g. topical retinoids, topical , ...) within 8 weeks prior to inclusion,
  • Previous treatment by chemical peels, dermabrasions on the hands within one year prior to inclusion,
  • Treatment by photosensitive agents within 8 weeks prior to inclusion.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
40 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    D-Pigment rich texture

    Hand with 5 to 10 lentigos (graded 6 or more on the severity grading scale) treated by test product ( D-pigment rich texture).

    Other: D-Pigment rich texture

  • Placebo comparator
    Hydrance optimale riche

    Hand with 5 to 10 lentigos (graded 6 or more on the severity grading scale) treated by reference product (Hydrance optimale riche)

    Other: Hydrance optimale riche

Interventions

  • OtherD-Pigment rich texture

    Also known as: Dermo-cosmetic product

  • OtherHydrance optimale riche

    Also known as: Dermo-cosmetic product

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline skin color homogeneity at 12 months by blinded evaluation from standardized photos.

    Scoring homogeneity will be assessed through 2 Visual Analogue Scales. One VAS grades the surface affected by lentigo on observed area, no lentigo corresponding to 0 and area completely hidden by lentigo to 10. The second VAS grades differences between lighter and darker skin of areas, same color skin corresponding to 0 and extremely dark lentigo to 10. Sum of the two VAS (0 to 20) represents the homogeneity of the skin color Blinded evaluation. During all the visits, an investigator will take photos. After visits, photos will be renamed and resampled. The investigator who will evaluate the parameter may be independent from that one who took photos. Each parameter will be evaluated by the same person avoiding thus quotation bias. They will be evaluated on each area blinded from product applied and from time evaluated. The appraiser will quote at the same time the pictures obtained for one subject, for one hand, at Baseline and at 12 months.

    Time frame: Assessed at 12 months versus baseline.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change over time of skin color homogeneity by blinded evaluation from standardized photos.

    Scoring homogeneity will be assessed through 2 Visual Analogue Scales. One VAS grades the surface affected by lentigo on observed area, no lentigo corresponding to 0 and area completely hidden by lentigo to 10. The second VAS grades differences between lighter and darker skin of areas, same color skin corresponding to 0 and extremely dark lentigo to 10. Sum of the two VAS (0 to 20) represents the homogeneity of the skin color Blinded evaluation. During all the visits, an investigator will take photos. After visits, photos will be renamed and resampled. The investigator who will evaluate the parameter may be independent from that one who took photos. Each parameter will be evaluated by the same person avoiding thus quotation bias. They will be evaluated on each area blinded from product applied and from time evaluated. The appraiser will quote at the same time the pictures obtained for one subject, for one hand, at the different times evaluated for the study.

    Time frame: assessed at Day 0, 3 months, 6 months, and 9 months.

  2. Change over time of skin color homogeneity by clinical evaluation.

    An Investigator will grade the skin colour homogeneity by clinical evaluation through 2 Visual Analogue Scales. One VAS grades the surface affected by lentigo on observed area, no lentigo corresponding to 0 and area completely hidden by lentigo to 10. The second VAS grades differences between lighter and darker skin of areas, same color skin corresponding to 0 and extremely dark lentigo to 10. Sum of the two VAS (0 to 20) represents the homogeneity of the skin color.

    Time frame: assessed at Day 0, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months.

  3. Lentigos number by clinical evaluation

    At each visit the investigator will examine the subject, count the number of lentigos and report the number on the CRF.

    Time frame: assessed at Day 0, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months

  4. Lentigos number by blinded count from standardized photos.

    During all the visits, an investigator will take photos. After visits, photos will be renamed and resampled. The investigator who will count the number of lentigos may be independent from that one who took photos. The count will be performed by the same person avoiding thus quotation bias. Lentigos will be count on each area blinded from product applied and from time evaluated. The appraiser will quote at the same time the pictures obtained for one subject, for one hand, at the different times evaluated for the study.

    Time frame: assessed at Day 0, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months

  5. Evaluation of lentigo Color versus healthy surrounding skin color by Colorimetry (L*, a*, b*)

    Colorimetric measurements of the coloration are performed by a colorimeter. Skin color is characterized according to 3 components of the three-dimensional colorimetric space L \*, a \*, b \*, where L\* represents the brightness ( black / white axis), a\* represent the redness ( green / red axis), b\* represent the 'yellow' ( blue / yellow axis). Four lentigos as "target lesions" will be selected. Colorimetric measurements will be performed on each and compared to those of healthy surrounding skin.

    Time frame: assessed at Day 0, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months

  6. Pigment distribution of lentigos assessed by In vivo Reflectance Confocal Microscopy (RCM)

    Four lentigos as "target lesions" will be selected and imaged by RCM : Pigment distribution will be evaluated through a 5 points scale. 0 = Absence of pigment on the study area 1. \< 10 %, 2. = between 10-30%, 3. = between 30-50%, 4. \> 50% of the study area covered by pigment

    Time frame: assessed at Day 0, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months

  7. Enlarged interpapillary spaces of lentigos assessed by In vivo Reflectance Confocal Microscopy (RCM)

    Four lentigos as "target lesions" will be selected and imaged by RCM. Interpapillary spaces will be evaluated through a 4 points scale. 0 = Absence of interpapillary space 1. \< 10 %, 2. = between 10-30%, 3. = interpapillary space is between 30-50% of papillary size

    Time frame: assessed at Day 0, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months

  8. Intensity of papillary brightness of lentigos assessed by In vivo Reflectance Confocal Microscopy (RCM)

    Four lentigos as "target lesions" will be selected and imaged by RCM. Interpapillary spaces will be evaluated through a 3 points scale. 1= low brightness 2 = medium 3= hight brightness

    Time frame: assessed at Day 0, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months

  9. Signs of inflammation in lentigos assessed by In vivo Reflectance Confocal Microscopy (RCM)

    Four lentigos as "target lesions" will be selected and imaged by RCM. inflammation signs will be evaluated through a 3 points scale. 0 = Absence of inflammation signs 1. \< 10 %, 2. = between 10-30% of the study area covered by inflammation signs

    Time frame: assessed at Day 0, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months

  10. Dynamic Physician Global Assessment (PGA)

    For this parameter, four "target lesions" will be selected for the analysis: one previous treated by laser and one not treated by laser on each hand. The instrument's field of view will allow exploring parameters on the target lesions and the peri-lesional area.

    Time frame: assessed at 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months

  11. Overall efficacy assessed by the Subject

    The overall efficacy is defined through a 5 points scale. 0 = completely improved 1. = mostly improved 2. = slightly improved 3. = no improvement 4. = worse The subjects will assess the overall efficacy on each global hand, on area treated by laser and area not treated by laser of each hand. The efficacy assessed by the subjects will be compared at 3 and 12 months of product application between : * D-pigment hand versus moisturizer hand * area treated by laser on D-pigment hand versus area treated by laser on moisturizer hand * area not treated by laser on D-pigment versus area not treated by laser on moisturizer hand

    Time frame: assessed at 3 months and 12 months

  12. Satisfaction regarding to the use of D-Pigment

    The satisfaction regarding to the use of D-pigment (conditions of use, organoleptic properties, effects...) will be assessed by the subject through a questionnaire The overall satisfaction will be assessed by the Subject through a 5 points scale. 1. = Much pleased 2. = Pleased 3. = Fairly pleased 4. = Unpleased 5. = Much Unpleased

    Time frame: assessed after 3 months of daily applications

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 7, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03457246
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 7, 2018
Start date
May 6, 2013
Primary completion
Jun 10, 2014
Completion
Jun 10, 2014
Last update
Mar 7, 2018

Study contacts

Giovanni PELLACANI
principal investigator · Department of Dermatology - University of Modena and Reggio Emilia

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion