CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03456323Updated Jul 16, 2024

Post-ICU Palliative Care Intervention (PIPCI) Trial

An interventional study of Palliative Care Consultation and Usual Care in Critical Illness, Frailty and Palliative Care, sponsored by Columbia University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 50 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-07-16.

Sponsored by Columbia University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
66
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
50 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a single center, pilot, randomized, single-blind, usual care controlled, pragmatic clinical trial of a post-ICU palliative care consultation intervention in older (age ≥50 years) survivors of acute respiratory failure.

Aim 1: To conduct a pilot post-ICU palliative care consultation intervention trial among frail older ICU survivors and their surrogates. Hypothesis:The Investigators can achieve an adequate enrollment rate, protocol adherence, and intervention fidelity.

Aim 2: To estimate effect sizes and variability for changes in symptoms at hospital discharge and 1 month, and to estimate hospice referral rates and acute-care readmission rates at 1 and 3 months. Hypothesis: Effect sizes and feasibility data will inform and support future post-ICU palliative care studies focused on improving ICU survivorship.

Exploratory Aim. To assess the use of methylphenidate that is recommended and dosed by the palliative care physician for the treatment of moderate-to-severe fatigue. Hypothesis: (1) Not all patients with moderate-to-severe fatigue will be recommended for methylphenidate therapy. (2) Patients prescribed methylphenidate for treatment of moderate-to-severe fatigue after critical illness will adhere to methylphenidate therapy.

Read the detailed description

There is an urgent need for research to improve outcomes for the rapidly growing population of older survivors of critical illness. Most adults, including older adults, survive critical illness. While recovery with minimal sequelae occurs, a substantial proportion of survivors are left with physical disability and cognitive impairment, have an increased risk of death, and incur high health care costs after hospital discharge. In prior work the Investigators have shown that about 75% of older survivors of respiratory failure are phenotypically frail and that these frail ICU survivors have a high burden of uncontrolled symptoms at hospital discharge and 1-month later. Moderate to severe post-ICU fatigue is the most prevalent symptom and may interfere with functional recovery.

This study is designed to determine whether consultation with a palliative care team may help alleviate any physical symptoms or psychological distress that the patients and their caregivers (surrogates) have coming out of the ICU.

02

Conditions studied

  • Critical Illness
  • Frailty
  • Palliative Care

Keywords

  • Critical Illness
  • Frailty
  • Palliative Care
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
50 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥ 50 years.
  • Acute respiratory failure requiring invasive mechanical ventilation, non-invasive mechanical ventilation (continuous or bi-level positive pressure), or high flow nasal cannula for greater than 24 hours in a Columbia University Medical Center medical or surgical ICU.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Hospital discharge directly from ICU.
  • Already received palliative care consultation during the hospitalization.
  • Planned discharge to hospice or home hospice. These patients do not need further palliative care consultation since they have already decided on prioritizing palliative care over life-sustaining treatment.
  • Respiratory failure due to neurologic diagnosis (intracranial hemorrhage, stroke, or coma). These patients are unlikely to be able to participate in any frailty measurements, and may have difficulty with communicating their symptom burden.
  • Pre-existing neurologic disease or stroke with motor deficits. Older adults with motor diseases (e.g Parkinson's disease) will be excluded from frailty measurements because they could present with frailty characteristics from a single disease. This criterion was used to exclude subjects in the original Cardiovascular Health Study from which the Fried frailty phenotype was first assessed.
  • Psychiatric history of Bipolar Disorder, Schizoaffective Disorder, or Schizophrenia.
  • Current Alcoholism or drug abuse.
  • Not English or Spanish speaking. Many surveys are not validated in other languages besides English or Spanish. Obtaining interpreters in other languages for palliative care assessments and intervention can be challenging. We expect \< 3% of all potentially eligible patients/surrogates to not have English or Spanish speaking ability.
  • No healthcare proxy or surrogate also consenting to participate.
  • Expected to be discharged to a location >20 miles from Columbia University Medical Center. This discharge radius will make in-person 1-month follow-up feasible.
  • Status post heart, lung, or liver transplantation. These patients are not representative of the larger population of older adult survivors of acute respiratory failure.
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
66 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Palliative Care Consultation

    After enrollment the palliative care consultation team will meet with the patient-surrogate pair one or more times to (1) assess symptoms, (2) provide supportive counseling, (3) make symptom treatment recommendations to the primary team of physicians, and (4) will address goals of care.

    Behavioral: Palliative Care Consultation

  • Placebo comparator
    Usual Care

    Patient-surrogate pairs randomized to usual care will continue to receive care by their primary physicians without having a palliative care consultation intervention offered.

    Other: Usual Care

Interventions

  • BehavioralPalliative Care Consultation

    The palliative care consultation team will be led by one of the board-certified palliative care physicians at Columbia University Medical Center. Over one or more visits, the palliative care consultation team will first review intervention participants' medical records and baseline Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) scores. They will also directly assess participants' physical and psychological symptoms. They will provide supportive counseling, make treatment recommendations for burdensome symptoms to the primary team of physicians, and will address goals of care. They will document these activities in structured electronic medical record consultation notes.

    Also known as: PIPCI

  • OtherUsual Care

    Patient-surrogate pairs randomized to usual care will not have a palliative care consultation intervention offered, and will receive care by their primary physicians. However, if a palliative care consultation is requested after randomization to usual care by the primary team of physicians and/or the patient/surrogate, it will be provided.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Annual enrollment rate

    The number of patients who enroll compared to the number of patients who enroll and decline enrolling over 1 year

    Time frame: 1 year

  2. Adherence to the palliative care consultation intervention

    Proportion of patient-surrogate pairs randomized to a palliative care consultation who actually agree to have the palliative care consultation prior to hospital discharge.

    Time frame: From date of Randomization until the date of hospital discharge or 28 days later.

  3. Crossover from usual care to post-ICU palliative care

    Proportion of patient-surrogate pairs randomized to usual care who end up receiving a post-ICU palliative care consultation prior to hospital discharge.

    Time frame: From date of Randomization until the date of hospital discharge or 28 days later.

  4. Fidelity of the palliative care intervention

    Documentation in electronic medical record consultation notes of (a) burdensome symptoms, (b) supportive counseling, (c) symptom treatment recommendations, and (d) addressing goals-of-care.

    Time frame: From date of Randomization until the date of hospital discharge or 28 days later.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) scores

    Changes in patients' ESAS symptoms (best(0) to worse(10)) from randomization to hospital discharge, and from hospital discharge to 1-month follow-up. ESAS symptoms are: pain, fatigue, drowsiness, nausea, lack of appetite, depression, anxiety, shortness of breath, and wellbeing.

    Time frame: Pre-randomization baseline until the date of hospital discharge or 28 days later, and 1-month follow-up after hospital discharge.

  2. Change in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scores (HADS) for surrogates

    Changes in surrogates' HADS scores (best(0) to worst(42)) from randomization to hospital discharge, and from hospital discharge to 1-month follow-up.

    Time frame: Pre-randomization baseline until the date of hospital discharge or 28 days later, and 1-month follow-up after hospital discharge.

Other outcomes

  1. Number of patients with moderate-to-severe fatigue who are recommended for and receive methylphenidate treatment.

    Number of patients with ESAS fatigue scores greater than or equal to 4 at baseline who are recommended for and receive methylphenidate treatment.

    Time frame: Randomization until 1-month follow-up after hospital discharge.

  2. New limitation of life-sustaining therapy

    Number of patients who elect DNR after randomization

    Time frame: Day of hospital discharge until 3-month follow-up after hospital discharge.

  3. Enrollment in Hospice

    Number of patients who enroll in-patient hospice or home hospice.

    Time frame: Day of hospital discharge until 3-month follow-up after hospital discharge.

  4. Acute-care readmissions

    Number of patients who are re-admitted to an acute care hospital within 1-month and 3-months.

    Time frame: Day of hospital discharge until 3-month follow-up after hospital discharge.

06

Study locations

1 site
  • Columbia University Irving Medical Center
    New York, New York 10032, United States
07

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03456323
Lead sponsor
Columbia University
Collaborators
National Institute on Aging (NIA)
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 7, 2018
Start date
Mar 20, 2018
Primary completion
Jan 23, 2019
Completion
Jan 23, 2019
Last update
Jul 16, 2024

Study contacts

Matthew R Baldwin, MD, MS
principal investigator · Columbia University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion