CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03455699Updated Apr 12, 2019

VeClose Five Year Follow-Up Extension Study

An observational study in Great Saphenous Vein (GSV) With Venous Reflux Disease, sponsored by Medtronic Endovascular. Completed at 9 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 21 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-04-12.

Sponsored by Medtronic Endovascular · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
114
Ages
21 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The VeClose Five Year Follow-up Extension Study will seek to gain additional follow-up data from the patients enrolled in the VeClose study (NCT01807585).

Read the detailed description

The VeClose Five Year Follow-up Extension Study will continue to assess the safety and efficacy of the VenaSeal Closure System for the long term effect on closure of the great saphenous vein by conducting a follow-up visit at five years post index procedure/enrollment in the VeClose study.

02

Conditions studied

  • Great Saphenous Vein (GSV) With Venous Reflux Disease

Keywords

  • GSV
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Subjects currently enrolled in both arms of the VeClose Study (NCT01807585) will be assessed for eligibility to enroll in the VeClose Five Year Follow-up Extension Study. All subjects must meet the inclusion criteria and must not meet the exclusion criteria. Assessment of eligibility is based on data available to the investigator at the time of subject enrollment. The subject will be considered to be enrolled in the VeClose Five Year Follow-up Extension Study after the informed consent is signed/dated and all of the study eligibility criteria have been met.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Enrolled in the VeClose study.
  2. Able and willing to complete the required 5 year study visit including Duplex ultrasound exam.
  3. Able and willing to provide written informed consent prior to study specific data collection.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Withdrew consent from the VeClose study.
04

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
114 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Experimental: VenaSeal SCS

    Endovenous delivery of VenaSeal Adhesive (VA) to a target site in diseased great saphenous veins (GSV). The VA is dispensed in small amounts with each pull of the trigger equaling 0.10 cc. Subjects were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either VenaSeal SCS or to RFA at the time of enrollment into the VeClose study (NCT01807585).

    Device: VenaSeal SCS

  • Active Comparator: RFA

    Endovenous insertion of the ClosureFast radiofrequency ablation (RFA) catheter into a target site in diseased great saphenous veins (GSV). Heat is applied to the target vein using radiofrequency energy to ablate the target vein. Subjects were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either VenaSeal SCS or to RFA at the time of enrollment into the VeClose study (NCT01807585).

    Device: ClosureFast Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA)

  • Experimental: Roll-in (VenaSeal SCS)

    Prior to initiation of the randomized cohort at each site for the VeClose study (NCT01807585), a non-randomized cohort of 2 subjects per site (roll-in phase) were enrolled and treated with VenaSeal SCS with endovenous delivery of VenaSeal Adhesive (VA) to a target site in diseased great saphenous veins (GSV). The VA is dispensed in small amounts with each pull of the trigger equaling 0.10 cc.

    Device: Roll-In (VenaSeal SCS)

Interventions

  • DeviceVenaSeal SCS

    Non-tumescent, non-thermal, non-sclerosant procedure that uses a proprietary medical adhesive delivered endovenously to close the vein.

    Also known as: VenaSeal Sapheon Closure System, VSCS

  • DeviceClosureFast Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA)

    Radiofrequency thermal ablation of the GSV using the Covidien ClosureFast system.

    Also known as: ClosureFast

  • DeviceRoll-In (VenaSeal SCS)

    Non-tumescent, non-thermal, non-sclerosant procedure that uses a proprietary medical adhesive delivered endovenously to close the vein.

    Also known as: VenaSeal Sapheon Closure System, VSCS, Roll-in

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Complete Closure of the Target Vein at 5 years after index treatment in the VeClose study (NCT01807585).

    Complete closure is defined as Doppler ultrasound examination showing closure along entire treated target vein segment with no discrete segments of patency exceeding 5cm.

    Time frame: 5 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS)

    Change in Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS) at 5 years as compared to baseline data from the VeClose study (NCT01807585). The VCSS is an Investigator assessment of the severity of venous reflux disease, assessing signs and symptoms such as pain, varicose veins, venous edema, skin pigmentation, induration and inflammation. The VCSS score is the sum of responses to 10 questions. Each question has a total possible of 3 points, which are then added for each question. The overall VCSS scores can therefore range from 0 (no venous disease) to 30 (severe venous disease). High scores indicate worse outcomes and "0" is the best possible outcome.

    Time frame: 5 years

  2. Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire (AVVQ)

    Change in Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire (AVVQ) at 5 years as compared to baseline data from the VeClose study (NCT01807585). AVVQ is a disease-specific 13-item questionnaire used to assess the impact of varicose veins on the quality of life, such as pain caused by varicose veins, and need to take painkilling tablets for varicose veins as well as assessing the presence of signs/symptoms such as ankle swelling, purple discoloration and rash/eczema. The total score of AVVQ is the sum of all questions for each leg. Scores range from 0 (no disease) to 100 (maximal disease). High scores indicate worse outcomes and "0" is the best possible outcome.

    Time frame: 5 years

  3. Quality of Life survey (EQ-5D)

    Change in Quality of Life survey (EQ-5D) at 5 years as compared to baseline data from the VeClose study (NCT01807585). EQ-5D is a short generic quality of life survey that is commonly used outside of the United States for health technology assessments. The "health state today" question provides an overall assessment along a 20-cm visual analog scale (VAS) with a range from 0 ("worst imaginable health state") to 100 ("best imaginable health state").

    Time frame: 5 years

  4. CEAP classification ("clinical, etiology, assessment and pathophysiology")

    Standardized measure of the degree of venous insufficiency and secondary manifestations of venous disease as measured by the treating physician.

    Time frame: 5 years

  5. Satisfaction with Treatment

    Satisfaction with Treatment assessment consists of a brief 2-question patient survey rating satisfaction with treatment provided and whether the subject would undergo the assigned treatment again. The number (percent) of subjects on each level of satisfaction are summarized (Very satisfied, Somewhat satisfied, Somewhat dissatisfied, Very dissatisfied). The number (percent) of subjects for the second satisfaction question, "would undergo treatment again" were also summarized by response (Definitely have again, Might have again, Not have again).

    Time frame: 5 years

  6. Adverse events (AE) related to the target GSV

    AEs related to the GSV will be tabulated and reporting using the MedDRA dictionary, version 16.1.

    Time frame: 5 years

  7. Adjunctive procedures performed on the study limb

    Details of adjunctive procedures performed on the study limb will be captured on Case Report Forms (CRFs)

    Time frame: 5 years

06

Study locations

9 sites
  • Morrison Vein Institute
    Scottsdale, Arizona 85255, United States
  • GBK Cosmetic Laser Dermatology
    San Diego, California 92121, United States
  • Radiology Imaging Associates (RIA)
    Greenwood Village, Colorado 80111, United States
  • Prairie Education & Research Cooperative
    Springfield, Illinois 62701, United States
  • MD Laser Skin & Vein Institute
    Hunt Valley, Maryland 21030, United States
  • Vein Institute of Buffalo
    North Tonawanda, New York 14120, United States
  • Inovia Vein Speciality Center
    Bend, Oregon 97701, United States
  • Sentara Vascular Specialists
    Virginia Beach, Virginia 23452, United States
  • Lake Washington Vascular
    Bellevue, Washington 98004, United States
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Morrison N, Gibson K, Vasquez M, Weiss R, Cher D, Madsen M, Jones A. VeClose trial 12-month outcomes of cyanoacrylate closure versus radiofrequency ablation for incompetent great saphenous veins. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2017 May;5(3):321-330. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2016.12.005. Epub 2017 Mar 6. PubMed 28411697 ↗
  • Kolluri R, Gibson K, Cher D, Madsen M, Weiss R, Morrison N. Roll-in phase analysis of clinical study of cyanoacrylate closure for incompetent great saphenous veins. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2016 Oct;4(4):407-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2016.06.017. Epub 2016 Aug 8. PubMed 27638993 ↗
  • Morrison N, Gibson K, Vasquez M, Weiss R, Jones A. Five-year extension study of patients from a randomized clinical trial (VeClose) comparing cyanoacrylate closure versus radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of incompetent great saphenous veins. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2020 Nov;8(6):978-989. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2019.12.080. Epub 2020 Mar 20. PubMed 32205125 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03455699
Lead sponsor
Medtronic Endovascular
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 6, 2018
Start date
Jul 2016
Primary completion
Jan 2019
Completion
Jan 2019
Last update
Apr 12, 2019

Study contacts

Nick Morrison, MD
principal investigator · Morrison Vein Institute

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion