An interventional study of Alcohol in Alcohol Drinking, Alcohol Use Disorder and Alcohol Intoxication, sponsored by University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 21 Years to 30 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-07-31.
Sponsored by University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign · Not applicable, Interventional, and Basic science
In this study, the investigators examine whether emotional and social reward from alcohol varies depending on the social context of consumption.
Objective: Although the vast majority of alcohol consumption outside the laboratory occurs in social context, experimental studies of alcohol's emotionally reinforcing effects have overwhelmingly examined individuals drinking in isolation. The current study examines motivationally salient elements of everyday social drinking contexts as moderators of alcohol-related reinforcement. More specifically, the present study examine whether alcohol is more reinforcing within the context of unfamiliar vs. familiar social interaction and, further, whether alcohol is more reinforcing within the context of low vs. high quality social relationships. The current study furthermore examine whether individuals with characteristics that put them at risk for developing an alcohol use disorder (e.g., male gender, impulsive/extraverted personality profile, heavy patterns of consumption, family history of AUD, ...) exhibit heightened emotional reinforcement from alcohol within these social drinking contexts.
The current project represents a test of competing theories of alcohol reinforcement. Alcohol myopia theory-which has heretofore represented the most prominent theory of alcohol's effects-predicts that alcohol's ability to relieve stress depends on the nature (positive or negative) of stimuli in the drinker's immediate environment. Alcohol myopia theory might thus predict that alcohol's rewarding effects will be larger within familiar interactions and within secure relationships. In contrast, the social attributional theory of alcohol reinforcement predicts that alcohol-related reinforcement will be most pronounced within the context of unfamiliar social interactions.
In addition to providing an opportunity to test contextual and individual-level moderators of alcohol reinforcement, the current study represents an opportunity to directly test the replicability of research indicating a pronounced reinforcing effect of alcohol specifically within interactions among unfamiliar individuals (Sayette et al., 2012; Fairbairn et al., 2013).
Study Population: Participants will consist of 640 male and female drinkers, aged 21-30, with no reported history of severe alcohol use disorder. Participants will be sampled such that at least 360 of these participants will classify as heavy drinkers.
Design: In the laboratory arm of the study, individuals will be randomly assigned to consume either a moderate dose of alcohol or a control beverage in the company of either familiar or unfamiliar individuals. Of these individuals, a subset will participate in additional tasks post beverage-consumption including a hyperscanning EEG task, while an additional subset will also participate in an ambulatory assessment period over the course of several weeks to examine the interaction of alcohol and social contextual factors in daily life. In the ambulatory study arm, participants will wear transdermal sensors to assess BAC and will further provide information about their mood and their social contexts in response to random prompts.
Outcome Measures: Primary outcome measures include self-reports of positive and negative mood and perceived social reinforcement. The investigators will also examine facial expressions using the Facial Action Coding System, a comprehensive, anatomically-based system for categorizing facial muscle movement. One aim of the current study is to examine whether differential reinforcement from alcohol in unfamiliar social contexts emerges only with respect to self-reports, or is also observable within facial behaviors. EEG/ERP measures will also be examined for a subset of participants engaged in a hyperscanning task.
Exclusion Criteria:
A moderate dose of alcohol (Target BAC .08%)
Drug: Alcohol
Participants consume a non-alcoholic beverage
Alcohol Target BAC .08%
Self-Reported Emotion
Positive and negative emotion will be assessed during the laboratory beverage-administration session via self-report on the "8-item Mood Measure." This measure yields two subscales (positive emotion; negative emotion) each ranges from 1 to 6. For positive mood, higher value represents increased alcohol reward. For negative mood, lower value represents increased alcohol reward.
Time frame: during the laboratory session, up to 9 hours
Self-Reported Social Reinforcement
Social reinforcement will be assessed using an index of perceived social closeness as well as a modified version of the Perceived Group Reinforcement Scale. The score of the scale ranges from 1 to 9. Higher score indicates increased alcohol reward.
Time frame: during the laboratory session, up to 9 hours
Social Bonding
Social bonding will be assessed during the laboratory beverage-administration session. This will be assessed by examining the synchronization among group members of facial expressions of emotion.
Time frame: 1 day (laboratory session)
Self-Reported Emotion
Positive and negative emotion will be assessed during the ambulatory assessment period via self-report on the "8-item Mood Measure."
Time frame: 2-3 week ambulatory assessment period
Interpersonal Distance
Physical proximity to other participants during the experiment
Time frame: 1 day (laboratory session)
Neuro-cognitive Social Engagement
Electroencephalogram (EEG) hyperscanning methods will be employed to assess task engagement and social attention, including through the examination of event-related potentials (ERPs) during social tasks.
Time frame: 1 day (laboratory session)
| Milestone | Alcohol Administration | Control Beverage Administration |
|---|---|---|
| Started | 320 | 320 |
| Completed | 320 | 320 |
| Not completed | 0 | 0 |
Positive and negative emotion will be assessed during the laboratory beverage-administration session via self-report on the "8-item Mood Measure." This measure yields two subscales (positive emotion; negative emotion) each ranges from 1 to 6. For positive mood, higher value represents increased alcohol reward. For negative mood, lower value represents increased alcohol reward.
| score on a scale | Alcohol Administration | Control Beverage Administration |
|---|---|---|
| Positive Emotion | 3.49 ± 1.085 | 2.98 ± 1.101 |
| Negative Emotion | 0.32 ± 0.447 | 0.673 ± 0.750 |
Social reinforcement will be assessed using an index of perceived social closeness as well as a modified version of the Perceived Group Reinforcement Scale. The score of the scale ranges from 1 to 9. Higher score indicates increased alcohol reward.
| score on a scale | Alcohol Administration | Control Beverage Administration |
|---|---|---|
| Self-Reported Social Reinforcement | 7.471 ± 1.129 | 7.180 ± 1.155 |
Social bonding will be assessed during the laboratory beverage-administration session. This will be assessed by examining the synchronization among group members of facial expressions of emotion.
Results for this outcome have not been posted.
Positive and negative emotion will be assessed during the ambulatory assessment period via self-report on the "8-item Mood Measure."
Results for this outcome have not been posted.
Physical proximity to other participants during the experiment
Results for this outcome have not been posted.
Electroencephalogram (EEG) hyperscanning methods will be employed to assess task engagement and social attention, including through the examination of event-related potentials (ERPs) during social tasks.
Results for this outcome have not been posted.
Collected over 6-9 hours (length of the laboratory session). Non-serious events are listed at a 1% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alcohol Administration | 0/320 (0%) | 0/320 (0%) | 0/320 (0%) |
| Control Beverage Administration | 0/320 (0%) | 0/320 (0%) | 0/320 (0%) |
Primary participants in the current study consisted of both eligible individuals who first contacted the lab and their eligible friends. Here we report the total number of individual participants (both initial contacts and their friends) enrolled in the study.
| Age, Continuous(years) | Alcohol Administration | Control Beverage Administration | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 22.63 ± 1.923 | 22.74 ± 2.101 | 22.69 ± 2.013 |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | Alcohol Administration | Control Beverage Administration | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 160 | 160 | 320 |
| Male | 160 | 160 | 320 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants) | Alcohol Administration | Control Beverage Administration | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hispanic or Latino | 66 | 68 | 134 |
| Not Hispanic or Latino | 254 | 252 | 506 |
| Unknown or Not Reported | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants) | Alcohol Administration | Control Beverage Administration | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| American Indian or Alaska Native | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| Asian | 110 | 129 | 239 |
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Black or African American | 13 | 11 | 24 |
| White | 180 | 164 | 344 |
| More than one race | 15 | 15 | 30 |
| Unknown or Not Reported | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Region of Enrollment(participants) | Alcohol Administration | Control Beverage Administration | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 320 | 320 | 640 |
| Education level(Years of Education) | Alcohol Administration | Control Beverage Administration | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 16.08 ± 1.716 | 16.09 ± 1.741 | 16.08 ± 1.727 |
Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.
This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign