An interventional study of High-flow oxygen and Standard oxygen in Acute Respiratory Failure, sponsored by Poitiers University Hospital. Completed at 2 sites in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-02-27.
Sponsored by Poitiers University Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care
The aim of the study is to compare the efficiency on respiratory failure regression of high-flow nasal oxygen therapy versus standard oxygen in patients admitted to the ED for de novo acute respiratory failure.
Prospective observational before-after study at the ED in two French centers.
Selection of patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure at the ED.
Application of oxygen strategy according to the period:
Inclusion Criteria:
Main exclusion Criteria:
Patients are treated with standard oxygen delivered through nasal cannula, face mask or non-rebreathing reservoir
Device: Standard oxygen
Patients are treated with high-flow nasal cannula oxygen continuously applied via large-bore nasal prongs with a gas flow rate of 50 L/min
Device: High-flow oxygen
HFNC is continuously applied via large-bore nasal prongs with a gas flow rate of 50 L/min and a FiO2 adjusted to maintain a pulse oxymetry at least 92%
Also known as: High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy
nasal cannula, face mask or non-rebreathing reservoir mask
complete regression of respiratory failure
respiratory rate less than 25 breaths per minute and regression of signs of increased work of breathing
Time frame: one hour after initiation of oxygen strategies
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Poitiers University Hospital