ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03443713Updated Mar 18, 2020Results posted

Evaluation of Physician-based Decision Support

An interventional study of Dexcom G6 CGM in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus, MDI and CGM, sponsored by Oregon Health and Science University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 50 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-03-18.

Sponsored by Oregon Health and Science University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
25
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 50 Years
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 20 studies in Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 by Oregon Health and Science University — 5 open to participants now, 5 under way, none of them phase 3. Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 · Oregon Health and Science University.

Enrollment
10th of 18
25 · median 26
Started
2018
with 1 other
No phase
16 of 20
3 open now
Registered
7th of 20
by date

Among the 20 studies in Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 by Oregon Health and Science University, this one is the 10th largest by enrollment of the 18 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 2 that started in 2018, is one of 16 with no phase, and was the 7th registered.

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1

3,754 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; 600 are open to participants now.

Browse Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 studies →

Open to participants now

5 of the 20 studies in Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 by Oregon Health and Science University are open now, in 1 country. Recruiting first, the newest first:

By country, each count listing its studies:

All 5 open studies →

Where they have run

Who these studies take

Of the 411 Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 studies recruiting now, 128 (31%) set no upper age limit and 257 (63%) stop at 75 or younger; 184 take children under 18; 64 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years to 50 Years · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 20 studies in Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 by Oregon Health and Science University, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

The goal of this study is to assess the impact of physician-driven insulin setting changes in type 1 patients using multiple daily injection insulin therapy with exercise. This is a short outpatient study with multiple outpatient and home exercise sessions with an assigned type of exercise.

Read the detailed description

Subjects will be on study for 28 days. Sensor glucose, exercise, insulin and meal data will be collected during this time. Subjects will wear the Dexcom G6 CGM system and a physical activity monitor. The Subjects will complete 2 exercise visits in-clinic and 4 exercise visits as an outpatient. Subjects will be randomized to aerobic, anaerobic or high intensity interval exercise sessions for 30 minutes each. Physicians will review CGM and insulin data every 7 days and make insulin dose recommendations that the subject will adjust in the dose calculator.

03

Conditions studied

  • Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
  • MDI
  • CGM
  • Exercise
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 50 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosis of type 1 diabetes mellitus for at least 1 year.
  • Male or female subjects 18 to 50 years of age.
  • Physically willing and able to perform 30 min of exercise (as determined by the investigator after reviewing the subject's activity level).
  • Use of multiple daily insulin injections (MDI).
  • ≥7.0% at the time of screening.
  • Current use of a smart phone.
  • Willingness to follow all study procedures, including attending all clinic visits.
  • Willingness to sign and HIPAA documents.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Female of who is pregnant or intending to become pregnant or breast-feeding, or is not using adequate methods. Acceptable contraception includes birth control pill / patch / vaginal ring, Depo-Provera, Norplant, an IUD, the double barrier method (the woman uses a diaphragm and spermicide and the man uses a condom), or abstinence.
  • Any cardiovascular disease, defined as a abnormality at the time of screening or any history of: stroke, heart failure, myocardial infarction, angina pectoris, or coronary arterial bypass graft or angioplasty. Diagnosis of 2nd or 3rd degree heart block or any non-physiological arrhythmia judged by the investigator to be exclusionary.
  • Renal insufficiency ( \< 60 ml/min, using the MDRD equation as reported by the OHSU laboratory).
  • Liver failure, cirrhosis, or any other liver disease that compromises liver function as determined by the investigator.
  • Hematocrit of less than 36% for men, less than 32% for women.
  • History of severe hypoglycemia during the past 12 months prior to screening visit or hypoglycemia unawareness as judged by the investigator. Subjects will complete a hypoglycemia awareness questionnaire. Subjects will be excluded for four or more R responses.
  • Adrenal insufficiency.
  • Any active infection.
  • Known or suspected abuse of alcohol, narcotics, or illicit drugs.
  • Seizure disorder.
  • Active foot ulceration.
  • Peripheral arterial disease.
  • Major surgical operation within 30 days prior to screening.
  • Use of an drug within 30 days prior to screening.
  • Chronic usage of any medication (such as cyclosporine, azathioprine, sirolimus, or tacrolimus).
  • Bleeding disorder or count below 50,000.
  • Allergy to aspart or glargine insulin.
  • Need for uninterrupted treatment of acetaminophen.
  • Current administration of oral or parenteral .
  • Any life threatening disease, including malignant neoplasms and medical history of malignant neoplasms within the past 5 years prior to screening (except basal and squamous cell skin cancer).
  • Beta blockers or non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers.
  • Current use of any medication intended to lower glucose other than insulin (ex. use of liraglutide).
  • A positive response to any of the questions from the Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire with one exception: subject will not be excluded if he/she takes a single blood pressure medication that doesn't impact heart rate and blood pressure is controlled on the medication (blood pressure is less than 140/90 mmHg).
  • Any chest discomfort with physical activity, including pain or pressure, or other types of discomfort.
  • Any clinically significant disease or disorder which in the opinion of the Investigator may jeopardize the subject's safety or compliance with the protocol.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(11)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

HbA1c

A blood test of average blood sugar over the past two to three months, given as a percentage or in mmol/mol. 6.5% (48 mmol/mol) or more is the usual threshold for diabetes, normally confirmed by a second test.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

ECG (electrocardiogram)

A recording of the heart’s electrical activity, taken with stickers on the chest, arms and legs. It takes a few minutes and does not hurt.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
25 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Aerobic exercise

    Subjects in this arm will complete aerobic exercise at home and at OHSU for the study. Subjects will use a Dexcom G6 CGM.

    Device: Dexcom G6 CGM

  • Experimental
    Anaerobic exercise

    Subjects in this arm will complete anaerobic exercise at home and at OHSU for the study. Subjects will use a Dexcom G6 CGM.

    Device: Dexcom G6 CGM

  • Experimental
    High intensity interval exercise

    Subjects in this arm will complete high intensity interval exercise at home and at OHSU for the study. Subjects will use a Dexcom G6 CGM.

    Device: Dexcom G6 CGM

Interventions

  • DeviceDexcom G6 CGM

    Subjects will wear a Dexcom G6 CGM for the 28 days they are on study.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percent of Time With Sensed Glucose 70-180 mg/dl

    Assess the percent of time that the Dexcom G6 reported sensor glucose values between 70-180 mg/dl using values uploaded to Dexcom Clarity. The percent of time with sensed glucose 70-180 mg/dl was averaged across days 1-7.

    Time frame: Days 1-7

  2. Percent of Time With Sensed Glucose Less Than 70 mg/dl

    Assess the percent of time that the Dexcom G6 reported sensor glucose values less than 70 mg/dl using values uploaded to Dexcom Clarity.The percent of time with sensed glucose less than 70 mg/dl was averaged across days 1-7.

    Time frame: Days 1-7

  3. Percent of Time With Sensed Glucose 70-180 mg/dl

    Assess the percent of time that the Dexcom G6 reported sensor glucose values between 70-180 mg/dl using values uploaded to Dexcom Clarity.The percent of time with sensed glucose 70-180 mg/dl was averaged across days 22-28.

    Time frame: Days 22-28

  4. Percent of Time With Sensed Glucose Less Than 70 mg/dl

    Assess the percent of time that the Dexcom G6 reported sensor glucose values less than 70 mg/dl using values uploaded to Dexcom Clarity.The percent of time with sensed glucose less then 70 mg/dl was averaged across days 22-28.

    Time frame: Days 22-28

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percent of Time With Sensed Glucose Less Than 54 mg/dl

    Assess the percent of time that the Dexcom G6 reported sensor glucose values less than 54 mg/dl using values uploaded to Dexcom Clarity.The percent of time with sensed glucose less then 54 mg/dl was averaged across days 1-7.

    Time frame: Days 1-7

  2. Mean Sensed Glucose

    Assess the mean Dexcom G6 reported sensor glucose values using values uploaded to Dexcom Clarity.The mean sensed glucose was averaged across days 1-7.

    Time frame: Days 1-7

  3. Percent of Time With Sensed Glucose Less Than 54 mg/dl

    Assess the percent of time that the Dexcom G6 reported sensor glucose values less than 54 mg/dl using values uploaded to Dexcom Clarity.The percent of time with sensed glucose less then 54 mg/dl was averaged across days 22-28.

    Time frame: Days 22-28

  4. Mean Sensed Glucose

    Assess the mean Dexcom G6 reported sensor glucose values using values uploaded to Dexcom Clarity.The mean sensed glucose was averaged across days 22-28.

    Time frame: Days 22-28

07

Results

Posted Mar 18, 2020

Participant flow

Start up Visit (2 Hours)
Participant flow — Start up Visit (2 Hours)
MilestoneAerobic ExerciseAnaerobic ExerciseHigh Intensity Interval Exercise
Started889
Completed889
Not completed000
First at Home Period (9-14 Days)
Participant flow — First at Home Period (9-14 Days)
MilestoneAerobic ExerciseAnaerobic ExerciseHigh Intensity Interval Exercise
Started889
Completed888
Not completed001
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject001
First Exercise Visit (1 Hour)
Participant flow — First Exercise Visit (1 Hour)
MilestoneAerobic ExerciseAnaerobic ExerciseHigh Intensity Interval Exercise
Started888
Completed888
Not completed000
Dexcom Insertion Visit (30 Minutes)
Participant flow — Dexcom Insertion Visit (30 Minutes)
MilestoneAerobic ExerciseAnaerobic ExerciseHigh Intensity Interval Exercise
Started888
Completed888
Not completed000
Second at Home Period (2-11 Days)
Participant flow — Second at Home Period (2-11 Days)
MilestoneAerobic ExerciseAnaerobic ExerciseHigh Intensity Interval Exercise
Started888
Completed888
Not completed000
Second Exercise Visit (1 Hour)
Participant flow — Second Exercise Visit (1 Hour)
MilestoneAerobic ExerciseAnaerobic ExerciseHigh Intensity Interval Exercise
Started888
Completed888
Not completed000
Third at Home Period (8-12 Days)
Participant flow — Third at Home Period (8-12 Days)
MilestoneAerobic ExerciseAnaerobic ExerciseHigh Intensity Interval Exercise
Started888
Completed888
Not completed000
Close-out Visit (30 Minutes)
Participant flow — Close-out Visit (30 Minutes)
MilestoneAerobic ExerciseAnaerobic ExerciseHigh Intensity Interval Exercise
Started888
Completed888
Not completed000

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercent of Time With Sensed Glucose 70-180 mg/dl

Assess the percent of time that the Dexcom G6 reported sensor glucose values between 70-180 mg/dl using values uploaded to Dexcom Clarity. The percent of time with sensed glucose 70-180 mg/dl was averaged across days 1-7.

Time frame:
Days 1-7
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of time
Percent of Time With Sensed Glucose 70-180 mg/dl
percentage of timeAerobic ExerciseAnaerobic ExerciseHigh Intensity Interval Exercise
Percent of Time With Sensed Glucose 70-180 mg/dl58.8 ± 18.951.2 ± 10.859.3 ± 14.6
PrimaryPercent of Time With Sensed Glucose Less Than 70 mg/dl

Assess the percent of time that the Dexcom G6 reported sensor glucose values less than 70 mg/dl using values uploaded to Dexcom Clarity.The percent of time with sensed glucose less than 70 mg/dl was averaged across days 1-7.

Time frame:
Days 1-7
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of time
Percent of Time With Sensed Glucose Less Than 70 mg/dl
percentage of timeAerobic ExerciseAnaerobic ExerciseHigh Intensity Interval Exercise
Percent of Time With Sensed Glucose Less Than 70 mg/dl3.3 ± 3.52.4 ± 1.43.3 ± 2.2
PrimaryPercent of Time With Sensed Glucose 70-180 mg/dl

Assess the percent of time that the Dexcom G6 reported sensor glucose values between 70-180 mg/dl using values uploaded to Dexcom Clarity.The percent of time with sensed glucose 70-180 mg/dl was averaged across days 22-28.

Time frame:
Days 22-28
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of time
Percent of Time With Sensed Glucose 70-180 mg/dl
percentage of timeAerobic ExerciseAnaerobic ExerciseHigh Intensity Interval Exercise
Percent of Time With Sensed Glucose 70-180 mg/dl53.6 ± 13.651.0 ± 16.050.4 ± 13.4
PrimaryPercent of Time With Sensed Glucose Less Than 70 mg/dl

Assess the percent of time that the Dexcom G6 reported sensor glucose values less than 70 mg/dl using values uploaded to Dexcom Clarity.The percent of time with sensed glucose less then 70 mg/dl was averaged across days 22-28.

Time frame:
Days 22-28
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of time
Percent of Time With Sensed Glucose Less Than 70 mg/dl
percentage of timeAerobic ExerciseAnaerobic ExerciseHigh Intensity Interval Exercise
Percent of Time With Sensed Glucose Less Than 70 mg/dl3.8 ± 3.42.2 ± 2.43.1 ± 4.0
SecondaryPercent of Time With Sensed Glucose Less Than 54 mg/dl

Assess the percent of time that the Dexcom G6 reported sensor glucose values less than 54 mg/dl using values uploaded to Dexcom Clarity.The percent of time with sensed glucose less then 54 mg/dl was averaged across days 1-7.

Time frame:
Days 1-7
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of time
Percent of Time With Sensed Glucose Less Than 54 mg/dl
percentage of timeAerobic ExerciseAnaerobic ExerciseHigh Intensity Interval Exercise
Percent of Time With Sensed Glucose Less Than 54 mg/dl0.5 ± 0.80.4 ± 0.30.5 ± 0.4
SecondaryMean Sensed Glucose

Assess the mean Dexcom G6 reported sensor glucose values using values uploaded to Dexcom Clarity.The mean sensed glucose was averaged across days 1-7.

Time frame:
Days 1-7
Reported as:
Mean · mg/dl
Mean Sensed Glucose
mg/dlAerobic ExerciseAnaerobic ExerciseHigh Intensity Interval Exercise
Mean Sensed Glucose168.4 ± 28.7177.7 ± 14.5166.4 ± 25.7
SecondaryPercent of Time With Sensed Glucose Less Than 54 mg/dl

Assess the percent of time that the Dexcom G6 reported sensor glucose values less than 54 mg/dl using values uploaded to Dexcom Clarity.The percent of time with sensed glucose less then 54 mg/dl was averaged across days 22-28.

Time frame:
Days 22-28
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of time
Percent of Time With Sensed Glucose Less Than 54 mg/dl
percentage of timeAerobic ExerciseAnaerobic ExerciseHigh Intensity Interval Exercise
Percent of Time With Sensed Glucose Less Than 54 mg/dl0.7 ± 0.80.5 ± 1.10.8 ± 1.2
SecondaryMean Sensed Glucose

Assess the mean Dexcom G6 reported sensor glucose values using values uploaded to Dexcom Clarity.The mean sensed glucose was averaged across days 22-28.

Time frame:
Days 22-28
Reported as:
Mean · mg/dl
Mean Sensed Glucose
mg/dlAerobic ExerciseAnaerobic ExerciseHigh Intensity Interval Exercise
Mean Sensed Glucose174.0 ± 22.1184.1 ± 25.2183.0 ± 33.1

Adverse events

Collected over 28 days. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Aerobic Exercise0/8 (0%)0/8 (0%)2/8 (25%)
Anaerobic Exercise0/8 (0%)0/8 (0%)0/8 (0%)
High Intensity Interval Exercise0/9 (0%)0/9 (0%)3/9 (33.3%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventAerobic ExerciseAnaerobic ExerciseHigh Intensity Interval Exercise
redness and swelling at sensor siteSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders1/80/80/9
upper respiratory infectionInfections and infestations1/80/81/9
Shoulder injuryMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0/80/81/9
lightheadednessVascular disorders0/80/81/9

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Aerobic ExerciseAnaerobic ExerciseHigh Intensity Interval ExerciseTotal
<=18 years0000
Between 18 and 65 years88925
>=65 years0000
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Aerobic ExerciseAnaerobic ExerciseHigh Intensity Interval ExerciseTotal
Mean31.8 ± 6.728.6 ± 6.029 ± 5.329.8 ± 5.9
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Aerobic ExerciseAnaerobic ExerciseHigh Intensity Interval ExerciseTotal
Female45615
Male43310
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Aerobic ExerciseAnaerobic ExerciseHigh Intensity Interval ExerciseTotal
Hispanic or Latino0000
Not Hispanic or Latino88925
Unknown or Not Reported0000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Aerobic ExerciseAnaerobic ExerciseHigh Intensity Interval ExerciseTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native0000
Asian0000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0000
Black or African American1214
White74819
More than one race0202
Unknown or Not Reported0000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Aerobic ExerciseAnaerobic ExerciseHigh Intensity Interval ExerciseTotal
United States88925
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Oregon Health and Science University
    Portland, Oregon 97239, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Tyler NS, Mosquera-Lopez CM, Wilson LM, Dodier RH, Branigan DL, Gabo VB, Guillot FH, Hilts WW, El Youssef J, Castle JR, Jacobs PG. An artificial intelligence decision support system for the management of type 1 diabetes. Nat Metab. 2020 Jul;2(7):612-619. doi: 10.1038/s42255-020-0212-y. Epub 2020 Jun 1. PubMed 32694787 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Jul 2018 to primary completion in May 2019, 9 months.

Results were first posted in Mar 2020, 10 months after primary completion.

Of 844 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, half reached primary completion within 19 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 38. This study's 9 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 949 studies reached it within 18 months; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 35.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 16, 2018
First posted
Feb 23, 2018
StartActual
Jul 18, 2018
Primary completionActual
May 8, 2019
CompletionActual
May 8, 2019
Results first posted
Mar 18, 2020
Last update
Mar 18, 2020
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 18, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03443713
Collaborators
DexCom, Inc.
Responsible party
Jessica Castle (Associate Professor, Oregon Health and Science University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 23, 2018
Start date
Jul 18, 2018
Primary completion
May 8, 2019
Completion
May 8, 2019
Results posted
Mar 18, 2020
Last update
Mar 18, 2020

Study contacts

Jessica Castle, MD
principal investigator · Oregon Health and Science University
Peter Jacobs, PhD
principal investigator · Oregon Health and Science University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion