ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT03442166Updated Oct 11, 2018

Effectiveness of Light-emitting Diode (LED) Photobiomodulation in the Extraction of Retained Lower Third Molars

A Phase 2 interventional study of LED group and Sham group in Pain, Postoperative, Edema and Trismus, sponsored by University of Nove de Julho. Status unknown at 1 site in Brazil. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 35 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-10-11.

Sponsored by University of Nove de Julho · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Oct 2018), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
34
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 35 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

In dentistry, one of the most common surgical procedures is the removal of included third molars. This surgery generates great morbidity to patients for causing pain, edema and trismus due to surgical trauma. The use of photobiomodulation (PBM) (low-power laser or light emitting diode - LED) in the postoperative of these procedures has shown excellent results in the control of postoperative sequelae. The objective of the present study is to evaluate the effectiveness of PBM with LED in the control of pain, facial edema, trismus and quality of life resulting from the extraction of retained lower third molars. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial involving 34 adult patients, who search the Discipline of Buccomaxillofacial Surgery and Traumatology (CTBMF) II of FO-UFRGS for the removal of included lower third molars will be conducted. Before and after the surgeries, the facial and mouth opening measurements of all patients will be done. Immediately after the surgeries, the patients will be randomized by means of envelopes in two groups. In the LED group the patients will receive daily LED applications (intra oral with 660nm and extra oral with 850nm) from the immediate postoperative to 7 days after the surgical procedure. In the control group the patients will be treated in the same way as in the LED group, however, the person in charge of the application will simulate intraoral and extraoral irradiation with the LED kept off. Pain (EVA and NRS-101), postoperative edema, trismus, temperature, dysphagia and hematomas, as well as the impact of the surgical procedure on patients' quality of life will be evaluated after 1, 2, 5 and 7 days. For the analysis of the oral health impact profile (OHIP-14 Questionnaire) and anxiety analysis (Beck anxiety inventory -BAI) the questionnaires will be applied preoperatively and 7 days after treatment. Initial descriptive analyzes will be performed considering all variables measured in the study, both quantitative (mean and standard deviation) and qualitative (frequencies and percentages). Later, the appropriate statistical tests will be applied for each specific analysis. In all tests, the significance level of 5% probability or the corresponding p-value will be adopted. All analyzes will be performed using the statistical software SAS for Windows, version 9.1.3.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pain, Postoperative
  • Edema
  • Trismus
  • Quality of Life
03

In context

Pain, Postoperative

5,640 studies on the registry are indexed under Pain, Postoperative; 1,230 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 34 is below the median of 75 across 4,821 interventional studies indexed under Pain, Postoperative.

Browse Pain, Postoperative studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Nove de Julho is the lead sponsor of 246 studies on the registry; 52 are open to participants now.

Of its 8 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 1 (13%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 35 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients who need surgical removal of retained lower third molars;
  • Patients who agree to participate in the study after reading and signing the Term of Consent for Participation in Clinical Research.
  • Patients with indication for extraction of lower third molars (recurrent infections, bad position, orthodontic indication) or written professional indication ( - negative medical history), systolic blood pressure less than 140mmHg, and diastolic blood pressure lower than 90mmHg and heart rate values of 70 ± 20 beats / minute and have the upper and lower central incisor teeth.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who have systemic diseases, chronic pain or neurological and psychiatric disorders;
  • Claim to be smokers;
  • Are using anti-inflammatories, analgesics or bisphosphonates in the last 15 days;
  • Present active pericoronaritis;
  • Are pregnant;
  • are breastfeeding;
  • Severe temporomandibular disorders
  • Have photo sensitivity history
  • Are allergic to any drug used in the research (paracetamol, chlorhexidine 2%)
  • Patients presenting radiolucent images associated with the teeth to be extracted
  • Patients who present any type of complication during surgery (hemorrhage, operative difficulty, time greater than 90 minutes of surgery), as these cases are not in the standard expected for third molar surgeries. In this case the central action analgesic will be prescribed. These data will not be part of the statistical analysis but will be described and discussed as well as possible adverse effects.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ASA physical status

The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
34 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    LED group

    The patients (n=17) will receive daily intra and extra oral LED applications from the immediate postoperative period up to 7 days after the surgical procedure. The LED irradiation will be performed in two areas, one intra and one extra oral. The LED to be used in the intraoral site will be red, 660+/-20nm wavelength, 5 mW power, 2.7J/cm2 energy density for 7 min, 2J energy per point, knowing that the 6 irradiated spots will have 12J in total. In the extra oral site the infra-red LED will be used, 850+/-20nm wavelength, power of 5mW, 3.8J/cm2 of energy density for 10 min, 3J of energy per point, knowing that 36 will be irradiated, so we will have 108J in total.

    Radiation: LED group

  • Sham comparator
    Sham group

    Patients (n=17) will be treated in the same way as the LED group. The person in charge of the application will simulate the intraoral and extraoral irradiation by positioning the LED in the same locations described for the LED group, but the equipment will be kept off. So that the patient does not identify the sound of activation of the device (beep), it will be recorded, and connected at the time of application.

    Radiation: Sham group

Interventions

  • RadiationLED group

    The patients (n=17) will receive daily intra and extra oral LED applications from the immediate postoperative period up to 7 days after the surgical procedure. The LED irradiation will be performed in two areas, one intra and one extra oral. The LED to be used in the intraoral site will be red, 660+/-20nm wavelength, 5 mW power, 2.7J/cm2 energy density for 7 min, 2J energy per point, knowing that the 6 irradiated spots will have 12J in total. In the extra oral site the infra-red LED will be used, 850+/-20nm wavelength, power of 5mW, 3.8J/cm2 of energy density for 10 min, 3J of energy per point, knowing that 36 will be irradiated, so we will have 108J in total.

  • RadiationSham group

    Patients will be treated in the same way as the LED group. The person in charge of the application will simulate the intraoral and extraoral irradiation by positioning the LED in the same locations described for the LED group, but the equipment will be kept off. So that the patient does not identify the sound of activation of the device (beep), it will be recorded, and connected at the time of application.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Changes in postoperative pain

    A Visual Analog Scale (VAS) will be printed on the patient evaluation form and the subjects will be instructed by the evaluator to mark a point in the line of 10 cm, indicating the intensity of their pain after 1,2, 5 and 7 days of the surgeries.

    Time frame: After 1, 2, 5 and 7 days of surgeries.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Changes of postoperative edema

    The evaluator will measure the distances between the corner of the eye and angle of the mandible, between the tragus and labial commissure and between the tragus and pogonium.

    Time frame: After 1, 2, 5 and 7 days of surgeries.

  2. Change of trismus

    The evaluator will measure the opening of the mouth using a pachymeter in each patient 1, 2, 5 and 7 days after surgery.

    Time frame: After 1, 2, 5 and 7 days of surgeries.

  3. Changes in quality of life

    The Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14) is a simplified form of the original OHIP questionnaire that is used to assess the impact of oral health on subjects' quality of life. The items are distributed among the following subscales: functional limitation, pain, psychological discomfort, physical disability, psychological deficiency, social incapacity and disability. The questionnaire will be applied by the evaluator.

    Time frame: Before and 7 days after surgery.

  4. Changes in postoperative pain (NRS-10 scale)

    For the NRS-101 scale, the evaluators will ask patients to assign a number between 0 (no pain) and 100 (worst possible pain) that best represents the pain they are currently experiencing after 1, 2, 5 and 7 days of surgeries.

    Time frame: After 1, 2, 5 and 7 days of surgeries.

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • UniNove
    São Paulo, SP 01504-000, Brazil
    Recruiting
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Sep 2018 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Sep 2019, 12 months after the start.

Of 91 non-industry phase 2 interventional studies under Pain, Postoperative, half reached primary completion within 19 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 33. This study's planned 12 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 140 studies reached it within 12 months; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 24.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 9, 2018
First posted
Feb 22, 2018
StartActual
Sep 1, 2018
Primary completionEst.
Sep 30, 2019
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2019
Last update
Oct 11, 2018
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 11, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03442166
Responsible party
Sandra Kalil Bussadori (Principal Investigator, University of Nove de Julho) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 22, 2018
Start date
Sep 1, 2018
Primary completion
Sep 30, 2019 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2019 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 11, 2018

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Oct 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion