ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03429959SOCKNLEGZHUpdated Jun 27, 2019

SOCKNLEG Compression Stocking Kit : User Friendliness

An interventional study of SOCKNLEG and SIGVARIS Cotton in Venous Insufficiency of Leg, sponsored by University of Zurich. Completed at 1 site in Switzerland. Open to participants aged 65 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-06-27.

Sponsored by University of Zurich · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
47
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
65 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The investigators aim to evaluate the user friendliness of a newly designed leg compression stocking kit, the SOCKNLEG, compared to a standard leg compression stocking of the same compression strength, the SIGVARIS Cotton. The SOCKNLEG is not yet commercially available, whereas the SIGVARIS Cotton has been successfully commercialized for many years.

After an initial screening visit, a computer generated list will allocate the participants in either the SOCKNLEG or the SIGVARIS Cotton group.

All participants will try on both study stockings, in the order of their allocated group, and will rate their donning and doffing success with a questionnaire. The patients will then wear only the assigned study stocking of their allocated group, for a day and rate its comfort again at the end of the day. The donning and doffing success will also be rated by the study investigator. Leg volume measurements of the study leg will be taken at each visit to determine edema prevention.

02

Conditions studied

  • Venous Insufficiency of Leg

Browse trials for

03

In context

Venous Insufficiency

162 studies on the registry are indexed under Venous Insufficiency; 14 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 47 is below the median of 60 across 127 interventional studies indexed under Venous Insufficiency.

Browse Venous Insufficiency studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Zurich is the lead sponsor of 1,049 studies on the registry; 133 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
65 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • as documented by signature
  • Male or female patient, aged over 65 years of age
  • Diagnosed venous insufficiency stage C3-C6 (according to CEAP (Clinical, Etiologic, Anatomic, Pathophysiologic) -classification for venous diseases)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Venous leg ulcer with a surface >5cm2
  • Peripheral artery disease (PAD) or media calcinosis (Ankle-Brachial-Index \<0.8 or >1.3)
  • Difference in brachial blood pressure >20mmHg in both arms
  • Suspected polyneuropathy with ≥4 sensible test areas, measured with the Semmes-Weinstein-Monofilament-Test
  • Inability to reach the forefoot with their hands
  • Inability to follow the procedures of the study
  • Bed-ridden hospitalized patients who are not able to leave the bed or sit upright for a few consecutive hours
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Postmenopausal

Periods have stopped for good: usually no period for 12 months in a row without another medical reason, sometimes confirmed by a blood test (FSH).

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
47 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    SOCKNLEG

    Donning and doffing success of the study stocking compared with both stockings, wearing of the study stocking for a day, standardized non invasive measurement to calculate leg volume of the study leg

    Device: SOCKNLEG

  • Active comparator
    SIGVARIS Cotton

    Donning and doffing success of the study stocking compared with both stockings, wearing of the study stocking for a day, standardized non invasive measurement to calculate leg volume of the study leg

    Device: SIGVARIS Cotton

Interventions

  • DeviceSOCKNLEG

    Donning and doffing success compared with the two study stockings, wearing the assigned study stocking for a day, Patient Quesationnaire on donning and doffing success and wearing comfort of each study stocking

  • DeviceSIGVARIS Cotton

    SIGVARIS Cotton

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of patients who completely don the two investigated leg compression devices

    Time frame: through study completion, within 7 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of patients who completely doff the two investigated leg compression devices

    Time frame: through study completion, within 7 months

  2. Patient evaluation of user friendliness

    Evaluation of user friendliness using the ICC compression questionnaire

    Time frame: 3 days

  3. Measuring oedema prevention of the compression stockings by comparison of leg volume measurement at V4 to V3 and V4 to V2.

    Assessment by measuring leg volume at the morning visit 3, compared to leg volume at the evening visit 4 and by comparing the leg volumes of visit 4 (compression) to visit 2 (no compression for 1 day)

    Time frame: 3 days

  4. Time needed to don and doff the two investigated leg compression

    Time in minutes and seconds needed to don and doff each study stocking, measured by study investigator

    Time frame: 3 days

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Department of Dermatology, University Hospital of Zurich, Switzerland
    Zurich, CH-8091, Switzerland
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Jan 2018 to primary completion in Jun 2018, 5 months.

Of 37 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Venous Insufficiency, half reached primary completion within 14 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 60. This study's 5 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 46 studies reached it within 15 months; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 38.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 15, 2017
First posted
Feb 12, 2018
StartActual
Jan 10, 2018
Primary completionActual
Jun 30, 2018
CompletionActual
Jun 30, 2018
Last update
Jun 27, 2019
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 27, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03429959
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 12, 2018
Start date
Jan 10, 2018
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2018
Completion
Jun 30, 2018
Last update
Jun 27, 2019

Study contacts

Juerg Hafner, Prof.
principal investigator · Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion