ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03428360DBFUpdated Aug 5, 2021Results posted

Safety and Tolerability Study of Diazepam Buccal Film (DBF) in Subjects With Epilepsy

A Phase 3 interventional study of Diazepam Buccal Soluble Film 5, 7.5,10, 12.5,15 or 17.5 mg with individual dose determined according to age and weight category in Epilepsy, sponsored by Aquestive Therapeutics. Completed at 6 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 2 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-08-05.

Sponsored by Aquestive Therapeutics · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
149
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
2 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 793 studies in Epilepsy with a site in United States — 162 open to participants now, 195 under way, 17 of them phase 3. Epilepsy · United States.

Enrollment
134th of 588
149 · median 40
Started
2018
with 43 others
Phase 3
126 of 793
11 open now
Registered
460th of 793
by date

Among the 793 studies in Epilepsy with a site in United States, this one is the 134th largest by enrollment of the 588 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 44 that started in 2018, is one of 126 in phase 3, and was the 460th registered.

Epilepsy

1,848 studies on the registry are indexed under Epilepsy; 420 are open to participants now.

Browse Epilepsy studies →

Open to participants now

162 of the 793 studies in Epilepsy with a site in United States are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

157 more — sign in →

All 162 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in United States have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in United States →

Who these studies take

Of the 283 Epilepsy studies recruiting now, 112 (40%) set no upper age limit and 148 (52%) stop at 75 or younger; 140 take children under 18; 55 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 2 Years to 65 Years · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 793 studies in Epilepsy with a site in United States, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

This Phase 3, multicenter, open-label study of chronic, intermittent use of study drug (DBF) is designed to evaluate the safety and tolerability of the buccal formulation of diazepam in children, adolescents and adults with intermittent, stereotypic episodes of frequent seizure activity (eg, seizure clusters) that are distinct from the subject's usual seizure pattern.

Read the detailed description

The Primary objective of the study is to assess the safety and tolerability of DBF (study drug) administered a minimum of 3 times to subjects with epilepsy for the treatment of seizures over a minimum 6-month period.

Secondary objectives:

  • To evaluate the usability of study drug as assessed by the ability of caregivers/subjects to administer study drug based on the Instructions for Use (IFU).
  • To evaluate the Quality of Life (QoL) of the subjects during the study drug treatment period as assessed by use of age-appropriate epilepsy scales over a minimum 6-month period.
03

Conditions studied

  • Epilepsy

Keywords

  • Seizure
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
2 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Female or male subject between the ages of 2 and 65 years of age, inclusive
  2. Written to participate in the study
  3. Subject has an established diagnosis of epilepsy either partial or generalized epilepsy with motor seizures with clear alteration of awareness, and while on a regimen of anti-epileptic medication(s), still experiences bouts of seizures (frequent break through seizures, e.g. Acute Repetitive Seizures (ARS) or seizure clusters) and who, in the opinion of the Investigator, may need benzodiazepine intervention for seizure control at least 1 time a month on average.
  4. Caregiver, if needed for subject, provides written informed consent and is able to administer study drug in the event of a seizure.
  5. Female subjects ≥12 years of age have a negative serum pregnancy test at screening. Female subjects of , (not surgically sterile or less than 2 years ), must have a partner who is sterile, agrees to abstinence, be practicing double barrier or using an FDA approved contraceptive (e.g., licensed hormonal or barrier methods) for greater than 2 months prior to screening visit and commit to an acceptable form of birth control for the duration of the study and for 30 days after the study
  6. No aspects of the medical history and/or the physical-neurological examination that at the judgment of the Investigator, in consultation with the Sponsor, will interfere with administration or absorption of study drug, or could evolve into a safety issue
  7. No abnormal findings on the (≤450 msec for males and QTcF≤470 msec for females)
  8. Subject and caregiver must be willing to comply with all study visits and all required study procedures

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. A history of gastrointestinal, renal/genitourinary, hepatic, hematologic, dermatologic, endocrine, oncologic, pulmonary, immunologic, psychiatric, or cardiovascular disease, or any other clinically significant abnormalities, such as physical examination, vital signs, laboratory tests or at Screening or Baseline which in the opinion of the investigator require further investigation or treatment or which may interfere with study procedures or safety or other medical conditions (e.g., cardiac, respiratory, gastrointestinal, psychiatric, renal disease) which are not adequately and stably controlled, or which in the opinion of the investigator(s) could affect the subject's safety or interfere with the study assessments or any other condition which, in the opinion of the Investigator, would jeopardize the safety of the subject
  2. Subject has had significant traumatic injury, major surgery or open within 30 days prior to study screening
  3. Subject with an active major depression or a past suicide attempt, or any suicidal ideation of 4, or 5 or any suicidal behavior in lifetime using Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale(C-SSRS). The pediatric C-SSRS should be used for subjects 6 to 11 years of age. The adult C-SSRS should be used for subjects ≥12 years of age. Note that this exclusion is only applicable to cognitive-appropriate subjects who are able to understand and complete the Suicide Rating Scale
  4. A history of allergic or adverse responses to diazepam or any other benzodiazepine
  5. Participation in a clinical trial other than MonoSol Rx Phase 2 studies 160325 and 160326 within 30 days prior to Day 0. Participation in an observational (non-interventional) study is not an exclusion, provided that there are no scheduling conflicts with this study. Received any other medication (unless it can be documented that the subject received only placebo) or device within 8 weeks or 5 half-lives (whichever is longer) before assignment to study drug treatment
  6. Lactating female or positive serum pregnancy test (ß-hCG) at screening for female subjects ≥12 years of age
  7. Positive blood screen for , HbSAg, or , or a positive urine screen for alcohol or drugs of abuse, except marijuana use for medicinal indications. When marijuana is or was used for medicinal indications in the opinion of the Investigator, it is not considered as drug abuse and the subject can be enrolled in states where medical marijuana use is legal, even if the marijuana metabolites in the urine revealed as positive
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(11)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Postmenopausal

Periods have stopped for good: usually no period for 12 months in a row without another medical reason, sometimes confirmed by a blood test (FSH).

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

ECG (electrocardiogram)

A recording of the heart’s electrical activity, taken with stickers on the chest, arms and legs. It takes a few minutes and does not hurt.

QT and QTc

On an ECG, the QT interval is the time the heart’s lower chambers take to activate electrically and recover in each beat. QTc is that time adjusted for heart rate (QTcF by Fridericia’s formula, QTcB by Bazett’s). Some medicines lengthen it, and a long QTc can raise the risk of a dangerous heart rhythm.

The study may name a correction formula and a limit in milliseconds, often around 450–480.

Biopsy and archival tissue

A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.

Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Hepatitis C tests

Hepatitis C is a virus that infects the liver. An HCV antibody test can stay positive after an infection has cleared (and is occasionally positive without one); an HCV RNA test shows whether the virus is there now.

After treatment, hepatitis C counts as cured when HCV RNA is still undetectable 12 weeks or more after the treatment ended. Studies often accept people cured this way.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
149 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Subjects with Epilepsy

    Male or female subjects between the ages of 2 and 65 years who had an established diagnosis of epilepsy exhibited by motor seizures with clear alteration of awareness, and while on a regimen of anti-epileptic medication(s), still experienced bouts of seizures (frequent breakthrough seizures, eg, seizure clusters) and who, in the opinion of the Investigator, could need benzodiazepine intervention for seizure control at least 1 time a month on average. Subjects must have been on at least 1 concomitant anti-epileptic drug at screening.

    Drug: Diazepam Buccal Soluble Film 5, 7.5,10, 12.5,15 or 17.5 mg with individual dose determined according to age and weight category

Interventions

  • DrugDiazepam Buccal Soluble Film 5, 7.5,10, 12.5,15 or 17.5 mg with individual dose determined according to age and weight category

    The subjects in this study administered DBF themselves or with the help of a caregiver, (trained by the study site staff in study drug administration and documentation) in the same setting as they typically used the diazepam rectal gel or other rescue medication, without the presence of study staff.

    Also known as: DBF, Diazepam Buccal Film (Aquestive Therapeutics)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Subjects in the Safety Analysis Set With at Least 1 Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)

    A TEAE was defined as any adverse event with onset date on the day of or after administration of study drug including relationship and severity.

    Time frame: Adverse events (AEs) were recorded from Day 1 through the last study contact (Month 7 telephone contact).

  2. Number of Subjects in Safety Analysis Set With Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI)

    A.Oral irritation related AEs including but not limited to: buccal mucosal swelling, mouth ulceration, injuries to oral cavity (such as tongue or mucosal laceration, broken tooth, bleeding), erythema, stomatitis, gingivitis, xerostomia, staining, dysphagia, dysgeusia, burning, stinging, tingling. B. Abuse related AEs including euphoria, euphoric mood, feeling of relaxation, anger, dissociative effects, hallucinations, psychosis, changes in mood, impaired cognition, attention, psychomotor effects, inappropriate affect, overdose, and misuse. C. Other: Respiratory disorders, nervous system disorders

    Time frame: AESIs were recorded from Day 1 through the last study contact (Month 7 telephone contact).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Usability Assessment: Number of Use Occasions Where Difficulty in Opening the Outer Packaging Was Recorded.

    For each use occasion the following question was asked: Did you have difficulty in opening the outer plastic packaging on this use occasion? Yes

    Time frame: Recorded in an electronic diary after each use of study drug, throughout the course of the study; approximately 6 months

  2. Usability Assessment: Ability to Open Foil Pouch on Each Use Occasion

    For each use occasion the following question was asked: Did you have difficulty in opening the foil pouch on this use occasion? Yes or No

    Time frame: Recorded in an electronic diary after each use of study drug, throughout the course of the study; approximately 6 months

  3. Usability Assessment: Ability to Remove Study Drug From Foil Pouch on Each Use Occasion

    For each use occasion the following question was asked: Did you have difficulty in removing study drug from foil pouch on this occasion? Yes or No

    Time frame: Recorded in an electronic diary after each use of study drug, throughout the course of the study; approximately 6 months

  4. Number of Occasions With Successful Insertion/Retention in Cheek

    Of the total number of use occasions over the course of the study, the number of use occasions that were successfully inserted/retained in the cheek

    Time frame: Recorded in an electronic diary after each use of study drug, throughout the course of the study; approximately 6 months

  5. Usability Assessment: Difficulty Inserting DBF Against the Buccal Mucosa (Number of Attempts to Insert Film for Each Use Occasion)

    Number of occasions where it took 1 attempt to insert film, Number of occasions where it took 2 attempts to insert film, Number of occasions where it took 3 attempts to insert film, Number of occasions where it took \>3 attempts to insert film

    Time frame: Recorded in an electronic diary after each use of study drug, throughout the course of the study; approximately 6 months

  6. Usability Assessment: Number of Occasions Where DBF Was Not Placed or Retained on the Inner Cheek Until Dissolution

    Number of occasions where the study drug was not successfully placed and or retained in cheek until the film fully dissolved.

    Time frame: Recorded in an electronic diary after each use of study drug, throughout the course of the study; approximately 6 months

  7. Usability Assessment: Reasons for Multiple Placement/Insertion Attempts During a Use Occasion

    Reasons for multiple attempts at insertion Multiple choice answer was: Excessive drooling, Clenching jaw / Won't open mouth, Spit out before sticking, Other/None of the above

    Time frame: Recorded in an electronic diary after each use of study drug, throughout the course of the study; approximately 6 months

07

Results

Posted Aug 5, 2021
Limitations and caveats
Only those subjects who received at least one dose of DBF (130 out of 149) for a breakthrough seizure were included in the Safety Analysis Set.

Participant flow

150 subjects with epilepsy passed screening but 1 was never enrolled

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneSafety Set
Started130
Completed90
Not completed40
Withdrew: Informed consent withdrawn5
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject4
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up5
Withdrew: Physician decision2
Withdrew: Informed consent withdrawn5
Withdrew: Study terminated by sponsor10
Withdrew: Non-compliant with study1
Withdrew: Non-compliant with study drug3
Withdrew: Death3
Withdrew: Adverse event1
Withdrew: Not on antiepileptic drug1

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Subjects in the Safety Analysis Set With at Least 1 Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)

A TEAE was defined as any adverse event with onset date on the day of or after administration of study drug including relationship and severity.

Time frame:
Adverse events (AEs) were recorded from Day 1 through the last study contact (Month 7 telephone contact).
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Subjects in the Safety Analysis Set With at Least 1 Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)
ParticipantsSafety Analysis Set: Enrolled Subjects With Epilepsy Who Received at Least 1 Dose of Study Drug
At least 1 TEAE84
At least 1 severe TEAE14
At least 1 study drug related TEAE10
At least 1 severe and related TEAE1
At least 1 serious TEAE18
At least 1 serious and related TEAE1
PrimaryNumber of Subjects in Safety Analysis Set With Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI)

A.Oral irritation related AEs including but not limited to: buccal mucosal swelling, mouth ulceration, injuries to oral cavity (such as tongue or mucosal laceration, broken tooth, bleeding), erythema, stomatitis, gingivitis, xerostomia, staining, dysphagia, dysgeusia, burning, stinging, tingling. B. Abuse related AEs including euphoria, euphoric mood, feeling of relaxation, anger, dissociative effects, hallucinations, psychosis, changes in mood, impaired cognition, attention, psychomotor effects, inappropriate affect, overdose, and misuse. C. Other: Respiratory disorders, nervous system disorders

Time frame:
AESIs were recorded from Day 1 through the last study contact (Month 7 telephone contact).
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Subjects in Safety Analysis Set With Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI)
participantsSubjects With Epilepsy
Any adverse event of special interest32
Any oral irritation adverse event3
Any oral safety adverse event8
Any potential abuse related adverse event21
Any abuse related adverse event1
Any other adverse event of special interest8
SecondaryUsability Assessment: Number of Use Occasions Where Difficulty in Opening the Outer Packaging Was Recorded.

For each use occasion the following question was asked: Did you have difficulty in opening the outer plastic packaging on this use occasion? Yes

Time frame:
Recorded in an electronic diary after each use of study drug, throughout the course of the study; approximately 6 months
Reported as:
Number · total number of use occasions
Usability Assessment: Number of Use Occasions Where Difficulty in Opening the Outer Packaging Was Recorded.
total number of use occasionsTotal Use Occasions
Usability Assessment: Number of Use Occasions Where Difficulty in Opening the Outer Packaging Was Recorded.211
SecondaryUsability Assessment: Ability to Open Foil Pouch on Each Use Occasion

For each use occasion the following question was asked: Did you have difficulty in opening the foil pouch on this use occasion? Yes or No

Time frame:
Recorded in an electronic diary after each use of study drug, throughout the course of the study; approximately 6 months
Reported as:
Count of units · total number of use occasions
Usability Assessment: Ability to Open Foil Pouch on Each Use Occasion
total number of use occasionsStudy Drug Use Occasions
Yes, I had difficulty opening the foil pouch391
No, I did not have difficulty opening the foil pouch957
SecondaryUsability Assessment: Ability to Remove Study Drug From Foil Pouch on Each Use Occasion

For each use occasion the following question was asked: Did you have difficulty in removing study drug from foil pouch on this occasion? Yes or No

Time frame:
Recorded in an electronic diary after each use of study drug, throughout the course of the study; approximately 6 months
Reported as:
Count of units · total number of use occasions rpoeted
Usability Assessment: Ability to Remove Study Drug From Foil Pouch on Each Use Occasion
total number of use occasions rpoetedStudy Drug Use Occasions
Yes, I had difficulty removing study drug from pouch on this occasion47
No, I did not have difficulty removing study drug from the pouch on this occasion1301
SecondaryNumber of Occasions With Successful Insertion/Retention in Cheek

Of the total number of use occasions over the course of the study, the number of use occasions that were successfully inserted/retained in the cheek

Time frame:
Recorded in an electronic diary after each use of study drug, throughout the course of the study; approximately 6 months
Reported as:
Number · Number of events
Number of Occasions With Successful Insertion/Retention in Cheek
Number of eventsStudy Drug Use Occasions
Number of Occasions With Successful Insertion/Retention in Cheek1330
SecondaryUsability Assessment: Difficulty Inserting DBF Against the Buccal Mucosa (Number of Attempts to Insert Film for Each Use Occasion)

Number of occasions where it took 1 attempt to insert film, Number of occasions where it took 2 attempts to insert film, Number of occasions where it took 3 attempts to insert film, Number of occasions where it took \>3 attempts to insert film

Time frame:
Recorded in an electronic diary after each use of study drug, throughout the course of the study; approximately 6 months
Reported as:
Number · Number of events
Usability Assessment: Difficulty Inserting DBF Against the Buccal Mucosa (Number of Attempts to Insert Film for Each Use Occasion)
Number of eventsStudy Drug Use Occasions
Number of occasions where it required 1 attempt to insert film1268
Number of occasions that required 2 attempts to insert film38
Number of occasions that required 3 attempts to insert film18
Number of occasions that required >3 attempts to insert film6
SecondaryUsability Assessment: Number of Occasions Where DBF Was Not Placed or Retained on the Inner Cheek Until Dissolution

Number of occasions where the study drug was not successfully placed and or retained in cheek until the film fully dissolved.

Time frame:
Recorded in an electronic diary after each use of study drug, throughout the course of the study; approximately 6 months
Reported as:
Count of units · total number of use occasions
Usability Assessment: Number of Occasions Where DBF Was Not Placed or Retained on the Inner Cheek Until Dissolution
total number of use occasionsStudy Drug Use Occasions
Usability Assessment: Number of Occasions Where DBF Was Not Placed or Retained on the Inner Cheek Until Dissolution16
SecondaryUsability Assessment: Reasons for Multiple Placement/Insertion Attempts During a Use Occasion

Reasons for multiple attempts at insertion Multiple choice answer was: Excessive drooling, Clenching jaw / Won't open mouth, Spit out before sticking, Other/None of the above

Time frame:
Recorded in an electronic diary after each use of study drug, throughout the course of the study; approximately 6 months
Reported as:
Number · total number of use occasions
Usability Assessment: Reasons for Multiple Placement/Insertion Attempts During a Use Occasion
total number of use occasionsStudy Drug Use Occasions
Clenching jaw / won't open mouth21
Excessive drooling24
Spit out before sticking17
Other (none of the above)33

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse events that started after the first intake of DBF through the Final Visit were considered treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs).. Non-serious events are listed at a 3% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Safety Analysis Set3/130 (2.3%)17/130 (13.1%)84/130 (64.6%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 17
Most frequent serious events
EventSafety Analysis Set
SeizureNervous system disorders1/130
EpilepsyNervous system disorders1/130
Partial seizureNervous system disorders1/130
AspirationRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/130
Acute respiratory failureRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/130
PneumonitisRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/130
Respiratory failureRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/130
EnterocolitisGastrointestinal disorders1/130
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders1/130
Small bowel obstructionGastrointestinal disorders1/130
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 18
Most frequent other events
EventSafety Analysis Set
SeizureNervous system disorders26/130
Upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations8/130
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders7/130
PyrexiaGeneral disorders7/130
SomnolenceNervous system disorders6/130
SinusitisInfections and infestations6/130
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders5/130
FallInjury, poisoning and procedural complications5/130
CoughRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders5/130
LethargyNervous system disorders4/130

Baseline characteristics

Safety Analysis Set: Enrolled subjects with epilepsy who received at least 1 dose of study drug

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Safety Analysis Set: Enrolled Subjects With Epilepsy Who Received at Least 1 Dose of Study Drug
Mean25.9 ± 13.28
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Safety Analysis Set: Enrolled Subjects With Epilepsy Who Received at Least 1 Dose of Study Drug
Female66
Male64
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Safety Analysis Set: Enrolled Subjects With Epilepsy Who Received at Least 1 Dose of Study Drug
Hispanic or Latino29
Not Hispanic or Latino99
Unknown or Not Reported2
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Safety Analysis Set: Enrolled Subjects With Epilepsy Who Received at Least 1 Dose of Study Drug
American Indian or Alaska Native0
Asian5
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander6
Black or African American12
White99
More than one race8
Unknown or Not Reported0
Body Mass Index (kg/m^2
Body Mass Index (kg/m^2(kg/m^2)Safety Analysis Set: Enrolled Subjects With Epilepsy Who Received at Least 1 Dose of Study Drug
Mean24.108 ± 6.8148
08

Study locations

6 sites
  • Hawaii Neuroscience Center
    Honolulu, Hawaii 96187, United States
  • Consultants in Epilepsy and Neurology, PLLC
    Boise, Idaho 83702, United States
  • Clinical Research Center of New Jersey (CRCNJ)
    Voorhees, New Jersey 08043, United States
  • OnSite Clinical Solutions LLC
    Charlotte, North Carolina 28203, United States
  • Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States
  • Austin Epilepsy Care Center
    Austin, Texas 78758, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Jan 2018 to primary completion in Jun 2020, 29 months.

Results were first posted in Aug 2021, 1 year 1 month after primary completion.

Of 66 industry-sponsored phase 3 interventional studies under Epilepsy, half reached primary completion within 48 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 30 and three quarters within 70. This study's 29 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 85 studies reached it within 48 months; a quarter within 29 and three quarters within 69.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 18, 2017
First posted
Feb 9, 2018
StartActual
Jan 23, 2018
Primary completionActual
Jun 25, 2020
CompletionActual
Jun 25, 2020
Results first posted
Aug 5, 2021
Last update
Aug 5, 2021
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 5, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03428360
Lead sponsor
Aquestive Therapeutics
Collaborators
Syneos Health, Covance
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 9, 2018
Start date
Jan 23, 2018
Primary completion
Jun 25, 2020
Completion
Jun 25, 2020
Results posted
Aug 5, 2021
Last update
Aug 5, 2021

Study contacts

Gary Slatko
study director · Aquestive Therapeutics

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion