ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03222349Updated May 26, 2021Results posted

Pharmacokinetics and Safety Study of Diazepam Buccal Film (DBF) in Pediatric Subjects With Epilepsy

A Phase 2 interventional study of Diazepam Buccal Film in Epilepsy, sponsored by Aquestive Therapeutics. Completed at 10 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 2 Years to 16 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-05-26.

Sponsored by Aquestive Therapeutics · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
24
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
2 Years to 16 Years
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 793 studies in Epilepsy with a site in United States — 162 open to participants now, 195 under way, 17 of them phase 3. Epilepsy · United States.

Enrollment
386th of 588
24 · median 40
Started
2017
with 30 others
Phase 2
103 of 793
6 open now
Registered
446th of 793
by date

Among the 793 studies in Epilepsy with a site in United States, this one is the 386th largest by enrollment of the 588 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 31 that started in 2017, is one of 103 in phase 2, and was the 446th registered.

Epilepsy

1,848 studies on the registry are indexed under Epilepsy; 420 are open to participants now.

Browse Epilepsy studies →

Open to participants now

162 of the 793 studies in Epilepsy with a site in United States are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

157 more — sign in →

All 162 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in United States have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in United States →

Who these studies take

Of the 283 Epilepsy studies recruiting now, 112 (40%) set no upper age limit and 148 (52%) stop at 75 or younger; 140 take children under 18; 55 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 2 Years to 16 Years · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 793 studies in Epilepsy with a site in United States, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

Open-label study to assess the pharmacokinetics of a single diazepam buccal film (DBF) dose in 3 age cohorts of pediatric patients with epilepsy (age 2-5 years, age 6-11 years, and age 12-16 years). Subjects in the 6-11 years and 12-16 years age cohorts received a single DBF dose during the interictal period (Period A) and ictal/peri-ictal period (Period B) with at least 14 days washout between doses. Subjects in the age 2-5 years age cohort received a single DBF dose only during the ictal/peri-ictal period (Period B).

Read the detailed description

This was a Phase 2 multicenter, open-label, two-way study conducted in male and female pediatric subjects (aged 2 to 16 years) with a clinical diagnosis of epilepsy who were scheduled to be admitted to an Epilepsy Monitoring Unit (EMU), a general clinical research center (GCRC), or similar facility for evaluation of seizures and who complied with all remaining protocol eligibility criteria. To ensure that 16 to 18 subjects would complete the study across 3 age ranges (2 to 5 years, 6 to 11 years, and 12 to 16 years), a minimum of 24 subjects were to be enrolled (8 in each age cohort).

Subjects in the 6 to 11 years and 12 to 16 years age cohorts received a single dose of DBF during the interictal period (Period A) and ictal/peri-ictal period (Period B) with at least 14 days washout between doses. Subjects in the age 2 to 5 years age cohort received a single dose of DBF only during the ictal/peri-ictal period (Period B). DBF was provided in a range of doses from 5 to 17.5 mg. The appropriate dose of DBF was assigned on the basis of age and weight using an interactive web response system during check-in.

Period A (interictal administration): Subjects were considered to be in an interictal state if an interval of at least 3 hours had elapsed since any clinically observable postictal signs or symptoms (from the last observed seizure) and the subject had been seizure-free over this period. Subjects on electroencephalogram (EEG) monitoring were to be considered to be in an interictal state if an interval of at least 3 hours had elapsed since there were any postictal electrical findings on EEG.

Period B (ictal/peri-ictal administration): For the purpose of this study, the ictal state was defined as an ongoing clinically observable seizure or seizure activity as verified via EEG. The peri-ictal state was defined clinically as the subject's immediate postictal state following a generalized tonic-clonic (GTC) seizure or focal seizure with impaired awareness, and within 5 minutes following the last clonic jerk. For subjects on EEG monitoring, the peri-ictal state was to be defined as less than 5 minutes after cessation of seizure activity as verified via EEG.

.

03

Conditions studied

  • Epilepsy

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • interictal state
  • ictal/peri-ictal state
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
2 Years to 16 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Potential subjects meeting all of the following criteria may be included in the study:

  1. Subjects have a clinical diagnosis of epilepsy (GTC seizures or focal seizures with impaired awareness) and were scheduled for admission to an Epilepsy Monitoring Unit (EMU), General Clinical Research Center (GCRC), or similar facility for evaluation.
  2. Male and female subjects between 2 and 16 years of age, inclusive.
  3. Subjects had a body weight of at least 6 kg and less than or equal to 111 kg.
  4. Subjects had an average frequency of at least 1 clinically apparent seizure every 3 days or ≥10 clinically apparent seizures per month, with alteration of consciousness as documented by reliable subject report, personal seizure diary records, and/or by seizure diaries dispensed at screening and verified prior to study entry.
  5. Female subjects of (i.e., were having periods, were not surgically sterile) must have had a negative serum pregnancy test (using Beta-hCG) at Screening and a negative urine pregnancy test on Study Day I prior to drug dosing. Female subjects of childbearing potential must have agreed to abstinence, have had a partner who was sterile, or have been practicing double barrier or have been using an FDA-approved contraceptive (e.g., licensed hormonal or barrier methods) for greater than 2 months prior to screening visit, and must have committed to an acceptable form of birth control for the duration of the study and for 30 days after participation in the study.
  6. Male subjects with a female sexual partner of childbearing potential must have agreed to abstinence or to practice adequate birth control during the study, including at least 1 barrier method such a condom, diaphragm, or spermicide for more than 2 months prior to the screening visit, and must have committed to an acceptable form of birth control for the duration of the study and for 30 days after participation in the study. Also, male subjects must have agreed not to donate sperm during the study and for 90 days after the follow-up visit.
  7. Subjects were currently receiving at least one antiepileptic medication.
  8. Subject's parent or legally authorized representative must have been willing and able to complete and HIPAA authorization. Subjects must have been willing to give assent as required by the Institutional Review Board (IRB).
  9. Subject must have agreed to be available or subject's parent(s) or legally authorized representative(s) must have agreed to have the subject be available for both Treatment Periods and the Follow-up Visit, and must have been willing to comply with all required study procedures and adhere to all protocol requirements.
  10. Subject or subject's parent(s) or legally authorized representative(s) must have been able to comprehend and be informed of the nature of the study, as assessed by the Investigator.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Potential subjects meeting any of the following criteria were excluded from participating in the study:

  1. Subjects with a progressive neurological disorder such as a brain tumor, demyelinating disease, or degenerative central nervous system (CNS) disease that was likely to progress in the 12 months after screening.
  2. Subjects with respiratory failure (or is at risk for respiratory failure) or other severe cardiorespiratory disease with Class Ill or IV functional status, or who required supplemental oxygen.
  3. Female subjects who were lactating, had a positive serum pregnancy test (β-hCG) at screening, or had a positive urine pregnancy test at Check-in for treatment periods.
  4. Subjects with psychiatric disease that in the Investigator's judgment would prevent the subject's successful completion of the study.
  5. Subjects with recent history of suicide attempt (defined as an active, interrupted, or aborted attempt within the previous 5 years) or reported suicidal ideation in the previous 6 months as indicated by a positive response ("Yes") to either Question 4 or Question 5 of the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale performed at the screening visit.
  6. Subjects with known history or presence of any hepatic (e.g., hepatic impairment), renal/genitourinary (renal impairment, kidney stones), psychiatric, dermatological, or hematological disease or condition, unless determined as not clinically significant by the Investigator or designee and confirmed by Sponsor via written communication prior to subject enrollment. Abnormal laboratory results considered clinically significant by the Investigator or designee were to be evaluated by the Investigator in consultation with the Medical Monitor.
  7. Subjects with any clinically significant illness other than epilepsy within 30 days prior to study drug administration, as determined by the Investigator.
  8. Subjects with any significant physical or organ abnormality or other condition that would interfere with study participation or constitute a safety risk in the judgment of the Investigator.
  9. Subjects with any significant lesion of the oral cavity or having oral prophylactic or dental procedures within 30 days prior to study drug administration.
  10. Subjects with a corrected by Fridericia's formula (QTcF) >450 ms for males or QTcF >470 ms for females on screening unless determined as not clinically significant by the Investigator.
  11. Subjects with a positive test result for any of the following drugs of abuse:

    amphetamines, cocaine, opiates, phencyclidine, or a positive breath alcohol test. Subjects who tested positive for tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) at screening were excluded unless the Investigator was able to affirm in writing that the use of a medical marijuana product was part of the subject's treatment plan as recommended by a physician for treatment of a medical condition. In such case, the subject was to be allowed to continue with screening, and the medical marijuana product was to be recorded as a concomitant medication.

  12. Subjects with a known history or presence of any of the following:

    1. Substance abuse or dependence (including alcohol) within 1 year prior to first study drug administration
    2. or idiosyncratic reaction to diazepam, its , sodium phosphates, and/or related substances, e.g., benzodiazepines
    3. Glaucoma (open or acute narrow angle)
    4. Severe allergic reactions (e.g., anaphylactic reactions, angioedema) to product and excipients
  13. Subjects who had participated in another clinical trial or who had received an investigational drug within 30 days prior to study drug administration or 5 half-lives of the investigational drug-whichever was the longer period.
  14. Subjects with presence of mouth jewelry, dentures, oral implants, braces, or piercings in the mouth or tongue that, in the opinion of the Investigator, would have been likely to interfere with successful completion of the dosing procedure.
  15. Subjects with a blood or plasma donation within 30 days prior to screening.
  16. Subjects not willing or unable to tolerate blood draws.
  17. Consumption of alcohol within 48 hours before dosing; or food or beverages containing grapefruit, star fruit, Seville oranges, and/or pomelo, or their derived products (e.g., fruit juice) within 10 days prior to study drug administration.
  18. Use of any enzyme-modifying drugs, including strong inhibitors of cytochrome (CYP) 450 enzymes (e.g., cimetidine, fluoxetine, quinidine, erythromycin, ciprofloxacin, fluconazole, ketoconazole, diltiazem, or antivirals) and strong inducers of CYP enzymes (e.g., , St. John's Wort, or rifampicin), in the previous 30 days prior to study drug administration. (Barbiturates, carbamazepine, phenytoin, and other enzyme-modifying antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) that were medically needed were permitted.)
  19. Use of any monoamine oxidase (MAO) inhibitors (e.g., phenelzine, tranylcypromine ), and/or phenothiazines (chlorpromazine) within 30 days prior to first study drug administration.
  20. Employee or immediate relative of an employee of Aquestive Therapeutics, any of its affiliates or partners, or Syneos Health.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(12)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

QT and QTc

On an ECG, the QT interval is the time the heart’s lower chambers take to activate electrically and recover in each beat. QTc is that time adjusted for heart rate (QTcF by Fridericia’s formula, QTcB by Bazett’s). Some medicines lengthen it, and a long QTc can raise the risk of a dangerous heart rhythm.

The study may name a correction formula and a limit in milliseconds, often around 450–480.

ECG (electrocardiogram)

A recording of the heart’s electrical activity, taken with stickers on the chest, arms and legs. It takes a few minutes and does not hurt.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Excipients

The other ingredients in a medicine besides the active drug, such as fillers, colours or preservatives.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
24 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Interictal Period

    Each subject received a single dose of DBF based on the subject's age and weight.

    Drug: Diazepam Buccal Film

  • Experimental
    Ictal/Peri-ictal Period

    Each subject received a single dose of DBF based on the subject's age and weight.

    Drug: Diazepam Buccal Film

Interventions

  • DrugDiazepam Buccal Film

    Subjects received a single DBF dose determined by age and body weight during the interictal state and during the ictal/peri-ictal period with at least 14 days washout between doses.

    Also known as: DBSF

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Area Under the Concentration Time Curve (AUC) 0 to 4 Hours Post-dose

    AUC calculated from time 0 (dosing) to 4 hours post-dose in both Period A (interictal administration) and Period B (ictal/peri-ictal administration)

    Time frame: Time 0 (dosing), 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 4 hours post-dose

  2. Area Under the Concentration Time Curve (AUC) From 0 to 2 Hours Post-dose

    AUC calculated from time 0 (dosing) to 2 hours post-dose in both Period A (interictal administration) and Period B (ictal/peri-ictal administration)Period A (interictal administration) and Period B (ictal/peri-ictal administration)

    Time frame: Time 0 (dosing), 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2 hours post-dose

  3. Time When Maximum Plasma Concentration Was Observed (Tmax) 0 to 2 Hours Post-dose

    Tmax calculated from time 0 (dosing) to 2 hours post-dose in both Period A (interictal administration) and Period B (ictal/peri-ictal administration)

    Time frame: Time 0 (dosing), 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2 hours post-dose

  4. Time When Maximum Plasma Concentration Was Observed (Tmax) 0-4 Hours Post-Dose

    Tmax calculated from dosing (Time 0) to 4 hours post-dose in both Period A (interictal administration) and Period B (ictal/peri-ictal administration)

    Time frame: Time 0 (dosing), 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 4 hours post-dose

  5. Observed Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) 0-2 Hours

    Maximum observed plasma concentration measured from Time 0 to 2 hours post-dose in Period A (interictal administration) and Period B (ictal/peri-ictal administration)

    Time frame: Time 0 (dosing), 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2 hours post-dose

  6. Observed Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) From Time 0 (Dosing) to 4 Hours Post-dose

    Maximum observed plasma concentration from Time 0 to 4 hours post-dose in Period A (interictal administration) and Period B (ictal/peri-ictal administration)

    Time frame: Time 0 (dosing), 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 4 hours post-dose

Secondary outcomes

  1. Usability of Diazepam Buccal Film: Number of Subjects Who Spit Out/Moved/Chewed the Film After it Adhered (Stuck) to Buccal Mucosa During Period A and Period B.

    Was DBF spit out or blown out by the subject after adherence to the buccal mucosa or did the subject chew, talk or move the DBF prior to complete disintegration/dissolution?

    Time frame: Period A and Period B from the time of first attempt at DBF insertion to 15 minutes after insertion.

  2. Usability of Diazepam Buccal Film: Unsuccessful Attempts

    Number of subjects with any unsuccessful DBF insertion attempts (All analyzed subjects with an unsuccessful attempt ultimately had a successful attempt at dosing)

    Time frame: Period A and Period B from the time of first attempt at DBF insertion to 15 minutes after insertion.

  3. Usability Endpoint : Amount of Saliva That Exited the Mouth After DBF Dosing

    Estimation of the amount of saliva exiting the mouth in mL after DBF dosing in Period A and Period B

    Time frame: Period A and Period B from the time of first attempt at DBF insertion to 15 minutes after insertion.

  4. Number of Subjects Who Swallowed DBF After Initial Insertion

    Number of subjects who swallowed DBF during Period A and/or Period B

    Time frame: Period A and Period B from the time of first attempt at DBF insertion to 15 minutes after insertion.

07

Results

Posted May 26, 2021

Participant flow

Planned enrollment was 24 male and female subjects with 8 subjects in each of 3 age ranges (2 to 5 years, 6 to 11 years, and 12 to 16 years) with a clinical diagnosis of epilepsy (generalized tonic clonic seizures or focal seizures with impaired awareness) currently receiving at least one epileptic medication who were scheduled for admission to an Epilepsy Monitoring Unit (EMU), General Clinical Research Center (GCRC), or similar facility for evaluation.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneInterictal State, Then Ictal/Peri-ictal StateIctal/Peri-ictal State, Then Interictal State
Started1113
Completed36
Not completed87
Withdrew: Treatment b not done50
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up12
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject10
Withdrew: Treatment a not done05
Withdrew: Study terminated by sponsor10

Outcome measures

PrimaryArea Under the Concentration Time Curve (AUC) 0 to 4 Hours Post-dose

AUC calculated from time 0 (dosing) to 4 hours post-dose in both Period A (interictal administration) and Period B (ictal/peri-ictal administration)

Time frame:
Time 0 (dosing), 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 4 hours post-dose
Reported as:
Mean · hr*ng/mL
Area Under the Concentration Time Curve (AUC) 0 to 4 Hours Post-dose
hr*ng/mLInterictal StateIctal/Peri-ictal State
Area Under the Concentration Time Curve (AUC) 0 to 4 Hours Post-dose739.33 ± 312.06585 ± 377.11
PrimaryArea Under the Concentration Time Curve (AUC) From 0 to 2 Hours Post-dose

AUC calculated from time 0 (dosing) to 2 hours post-dose in both Period A (interictal administration) and Period B (ictal/peri-ictal administration)Period A (interictal administration) and Period B (ictal/peri-ictal administration)

Time frame:
Time 0 (dosing), 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2 hours post-dose
Reported as:
Mean · hr*ng/mL
Area Under the Concentration Time Curve (AUC) From 0 to 2 Hours Post-dose
hr*ng/mLInterictal State (Period A)Ictal/Peri-ictal State (Period B)
Area Under the Concentration Time Curve (AUC) From 0 to 2 Hours Post-dose394.63 ± 192.47309.34 ± 210.39
PrimaryTime When Maximum Plasma Concentration Was Observed (Tmax) 0 to 2 Hours Post-dose

Tmax calculated from time 0 (dosing) to 2 hours post-dose in both Period A (interictal administration) and Period B (ictal/peri-ictal administration)

Time frame:
Time 0 (dosing), 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2 hours post-dose
Reported as:
Mean · hours
Time When Maximum Plasma Concentration Was Observed (Tmax) 0 to 2 Hours Post-dose
hoursInterictal State (Period A)Ictal/Peri-ictal State (Period B)
Time When Maximum Plasma Concentration Was Observed (Tmax) 0 to 2 Hours Post-dose1.196 ± 0.7540.861 ± 0.574
PrimaryTime When Maximum Plasma Concentration Was Observed (Tmax) 0-4 Hours Post-Dose

Tmax calculated from dosing (Time 0) to 4 hours post-dose in both Period A (interictal administration) and Period B (ictal/peri-ictal administration)

Time frame:
Time 0 (dosing), 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 4 hours post-dose
Reported as:
Mean · hours
Time When Maximum Plasma Concentration Was Observed (Tmax) 0-4 Hours Post-Dose
hoursInterictal Period (Period A)Ictal/Peri-Ictal Period (Period B)
Time When Maximum Plasma Concentration Was Observed (Tmax) 0-4 Hours Post-Dose1.196 ± 0.7540.861 ± 0.574
PrimaryObserved Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) 0-2 Hours

Maximum observed plasma concentration measured from Time 0 to 2 hours post-dose in Period A (interictal administration) and Period B (ictal/peri-ictal administration)

Time frame:
Time 0 (dosing), 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2 hours post-dose
Reported as:
Mean · ng/mL
Observed Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) 0-2 Hours
ng/mLInterictal Period (Period A)Ictal/Peri-ictal Period (Period B)
Observed Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) 0-2 Hours296.64 ± 152.82233.50 ± 141.92
PrimaryObserved Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) From Time 0 (Dosing) to 4 Hours Post-dose

Maximum observed plasma concentration from Time 0 to 4 hours post-dose in Period A (interictal administration) and Period B (ictal/peri-ictal administration)

Time frame:
Time 0 (dosing), 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 4 hours post-dose
Reported as:
Mean · ng/mL
Observed Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) From Time 0 (Dosing) to 4 Hours Post-dose
ng/mLInterictal StateIctal/Peri-ictal State
Observed Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) From Time 0 (Dosing) to 4 Hours Post-dose296.64 ± 152.82233.50 ± 141.92
SecondaryUsability of Diazepam Buccal Film: Number of Subjects Who Spit Out/Moved/Chewed the Film After it Adhered (Stuck) to Buccal Mucosa During Period A and Period B.

Was DBF spit out or blown out by the subject after adherence to the buccal mucosa or did the subject chew, talk or move the DBF prior to complete disintegration/dissolution?

Time frame:
Period A and Period B from the time of first attempt at DBF insertion to 15 minutes after insertion.
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Usability of Diazepam Buccal Film: Number of Subjects Who Spit Out/Moved/Chewed the Film After it Adhered (Stuck) to Buccal Mucosa During Period A and Period B.
ParticipantsInterictal Period (Period A)Ictal/Peri-ictal Period (Period B)
Usability of Diazepam Buccal Film: Number of Subjects Who Spit Out/Moved/Chewed the Film After it Adhered (Stuck) to Buccal Mucosa During Period A and Period B.31
SecondaryUsability of Diazepam Buccal Film: Unsuccessful Attempts

Number of subjects with any unsuccessful DBF insertion attempts (All analyzed subjects with an unsuccessful attempt ultimately had a successful attempt at dosing)

Time frame:
Period A and Period B from the time of first attempt at DBF insertion to 15 minutes after insertion.
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Usability of Diazepam Buccal Film: Unsuccessful Attempts
ParticipantsInterictal Period (Period A)Ictal/Peri-ictal Period (Period B)
Usability of Diazepam Buccal Film: Unsuccessful Attempts04
SecondaryUsability Endpoint : Amount of Saliva That Exited the Mouth After DBF Dosing

Estimation of the amount of saliva exiting the mouth in mL after DBF dosing in Period A and Period B

Time frame:
Period A and Period B from the time of first attempt at DBF insertion to 15 minutes after insertion.
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Usability Endpoint : Amount of Saliva That Exited the Mouth After DBF Dosing
ParticipantsInterictal Period (Period A)Ictal/Peri-Ictal Period (Period B)
Participants with 0 mL saliva exiting the mouth1315
Participants with > 0 mL to ≤ 1 mL saliva exiting the mouth01
Participants with > 1 mL to ≤ 2 mL saliva exiting the mouth20
Participants with > 2 mL to ≤ 3 mL saliva exiting the mouth10
Participants with no data reported or unknown10
SecondaryNumber of Subjects Who Swallowed DBF After Initial Insertion

Number of subjects who swallowed DBF during Period A and/or Period B

Time frame:
Period A and Period B from the time of first attempt at DBF insertion to 15 minutes after insertion.
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Subjects Who Swallowed DBF After Initial Insertion
ParticipantsInterictal Period (Period A)Ictal/Peri-ictal Period (Period B)
Number of Subjects Who Swallowed DBF After Initial Insertion21

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse event data were collected from the time of informed consent through 14 days +/- 2 days after dosing. Non-serious events are listed at a 4% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Interictal Period (Period A)0/17 (0%)0/17 (0%)9/17 (52.9%)
Ictal/Peri-ictal Period (Period B)2/16 (12.5%)2/16 (12.5%)7/16 (43.8%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventInterictal Period (Period A)Ictal/Peri-ictal Period (Period B)
SeizureNervous system disorders0/171/16
Seizure clusterNervous system disorders0/171/16
PneumoniaInfections and infestations0/171/16
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 14
Most frequent other events
EventInterictal Period (Period A)Ictal/Peri-ictal Period (Period B)
SeizureNervous system disorders1/173/16
DizzinessNervous system disorders2/170/16
Upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations2/171/16
PyexiaGeneral disorders2/171/16
Petit mal epilepsyGeneral disorders1/171/16
Generalized tonic-clonic seizureNervous system disorders0/171/16
Myoclonic epilepsyNervous system disorders0/171/16
PneumoniaInfections and infestations0/171/16
RashSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders0/171/16
HeadacheNervous system disorders1/170/16

Baseline characteristics

Safety Analysis Set: The safety analysis set comprised all subjects who received at least 1 dose of DBF determined according to the weight and age of the subject.

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Safety Analysis Set
<=18 years24
Between 18 and 65 years0
>=65 years0
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Safety Analysis Set
Mean14.0 ± 1.58
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Safety Analysis Set
Female14
Male10
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Safety Analysis Set
American Indian or Alaska Native0
Asian1
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Black or African American5
White14
More than one race0
Unknown or Not Reported4
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)Safety Analysis Set
United States24
Body Mass Index (kg/m^2)
Body Mass Index (kg/m^2)(kg/m^2)Safety Analysis Set
Mean22.166 ± 10.1980
08

Study locations

10 sites
  • University of Arizona
    Tucson, Arizona 85719, United States
  • NW FL Clinical Research Group, LLC
    Gulf Breeze, Florida 32561, United States
  • Children's St. Peters University Hospital
    New Brunswick, New Jersey 08901, United States
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
    New York, New York 10029, United States
  • University of Rochester
    Rochester, New York 14607, United States
  • Onsite Clinical Solutions LLC
    Charlotte, North Carolina 28203, United States
  • Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States
  • Dell Children's Medical Center
    Austin, Texas 78723, United States
  • Austin Epilepsy Care Center
    Austin, Texas 78758, United States
  • Virginia Commonwealth University
    Richmond, Virginia 23298, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Aug 2017 to primary completion in Jan 2020, 28 months.

Results were first posted in May 2021, 1 year 3 months after primary completion.

Of 45 industry-sponsored phase 2 interventional studies under Epilepsy, half reached primary completion within 21 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 29. This study's 28 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 66 studies reached it within 23 months; a quarter within 14 and three quarters within 40.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 12, 2017
First posted
Jul 19, 2017
StartActual
Aug 31, 2017
Primary completionActual
Jan 28, 2020
CompletionActual
Mar 11, 2020
Results first posted
May 26, 2021
Last update
May 26, 2021
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 26, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03222349
Lead sponsor
Aquestive Therapeutics
Collaborators
Syneos Health, Covance
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 19, 2017
Start date
Aug 31, 2017
Primary completion
Jan 28, 2020
Completion
Mar 11, 2020
Results posted
May 26, 2021
Last update
May 26, 2021

Study contacts

Gary Slatko
study director · Aquestive Therapeutics

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion