ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03425396Updated Jun 9, 2020Results posted

Oral Omadacycline vs. Oral Nitrofurantoin for the Treatment of Cystitis

A Phase 2 interventional study of Omadacycline tablets and Nitrofurantoin capsules in Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infection and Cystitis, sponsored by Paratek Pharmaceuticals Inc. Completed at 23 sites in United States. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-06-09.

Sponsored by Paratek Pharmaceuticals Inc · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
225
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of oral omadacycline as compared to oral nitrofurantoin in the treatment of female adults with cystitis.

Read the detailed description

Participants were randomized to receive 7 days of treatment of either omadacycline or nitrofurantoin. The End of Treatment visit, Post Therapy Evaluation visit, and Final Follow-up visit was planned within 2 days following the last dose of study drug, on Day 14 (+/- 2 days) after the first dose of study drug, and within 30 to 37 days following the first dose of study drug, respectively. The study followed a double-dummy design. To maintain the study blinding, participants assigned to omadacycline received active omadacycline tablets and over-encapsulated nitrofurantoin placebo tablets. Participants assigned to the nitrofurantoin arm received omadacycline placebo tablets and over-encapsulated active nitrofurantoin capsules.

02

Conditions studied

  • Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infection
  • Cystitis

Browse trials for

03

In context

Cystitis

69 studies on the registry are indexed under Cystitis; 17 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 225 is above the median of 112 across 50 interventional studies indexed under Cystitis.

Browse Cystitis studies →

Lead sponsor

Paratek Pharmaceuticals Inc is the lead sponsor of 12 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Of its 7 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 7 (100%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Female participants, age 18 or older who have signed the form
  • Must have a qualifying uncomplicated urinary tract infection
  • Participants must not be pregnant at the time of enrollment
  • Must agree to a reliable method of during the study and for 30 days following the last dose of study drug

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Males
  • Evidence of complicated urinary tract infection (UTI), upper UTI, vaginitis, or sexually transmitted infection
  • Evidence of significant immunological disease
  • Has received an drug within the past 30 days
  • Participants who are pregnant or nursing
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
225 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Omadacycline 300/300 once every 24 hours

    Participants received omadacycline 300 milligrams orally, once every 12 hours, fed on Day 1 and omadacycline 300 milligrams orally, once every 24 hours on Days 2 through 7. Odd doses on Days 2 to 7 were administered in a fasted state. Even doses on Days 2 to 7 were administered approximately 2 hours following a light meal.

    Drug: Omadacycline tablets

  • Experimental
    Omadacycline 450/300 once every 24 hours

    Participants received omadacycline 450 milligrams orally, once every 12 hours, fed on Day 1 and omadacycline 300 milligrams orally, once every 24 hours on Days 2 through 7. Odd doses on Days 2 to 7 were administered in a fasted state. Even doses on Days 2 to 7 were administered approximately 2 hours following a light meal.

    Drug: Omadacycline tablets

  • Experimental
    Omadacycline 450/450 once every 24 hours

    Participants received omadacycline 450 milligrams orally, once every 12 hours, fed on Day 1 and omadacycline 450 milligrams orally, once every 24 hours on Days 2 through 7. Odd doses on Days 2 to 7 were administered in a fasted state. Even doses on Days 2 to 7 were administered approximately 2 hours following a light meal.

    Drug: Omadacycline tablets

  • Experimental
    Omadacycline 450/450 once every 12 hours

    Participants received omadacycline 450 milligrams orally, once every 12 hours, fed on Day 1 and omadacycline 450 milligrams orally, once every 12 hours on Days 2 through 7. Odd doses on Days 2 to 7 were administered in a fasted state. Even doses on Days 2 to 7 were administered approximately 2 hours following a light meal.

    Drug: Omadacycline tablets

  • Active comparator
    Nitrofurantoin 100/100 once every 12 hours

    Participants received nitrofurantoin 100 milligrams orally, once every 12 hours, fed on Day 1 and nitrofurantoin 100 milligrams orally, once every 12 hours on Days 2 through 7. Odd doses on Days 2 to 7 were administered in a fasted state. Even doses on Days 2 to 7 were administered approximately 2 hours following a light meal.

    Drug: Nitrofurantoin capsules

Interventions

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With an Investigator Assessment of Clinical Response at the Post Therapy Evaluation (PTE) Visit (ITT Population)

    Clinical response was determined by the investigator at the PTE visit by assessing whether or not the participant met the clinical outcome of Clinical Success, Clinical Failure, or Indeterminate. Clinical Success was defined as sufficient resolution of cystitis signs and symptoms at the PTE visit such that no additional systemic antimicrobial therapy was required for the current infection. Clinical Failure was defined as no apparent response to therapy or persistence of signs and symptoms of infection or reappearance of signs and symptoms at or before the PTE visit such that use of additional systemic antimicrobial therapy for the current infection was required. The clinical outcome was deemed as Indeterminate when the PTE visit was not completed.

    Time frame: Day 14 (A PTE occurred on Day 14 ± 2 days after the participant's first dose of study drug)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With an Investigator Assessment of Clinical Response at the End of Treatment (EOT) Visit (ITT Population)

    Clinical response was determined by the investigator at the EOT visit by assessing whether or not the participant met the clinical outcome of Clinical Success, Clinical Failure. Clinical Success was defined as sufficient resolution of cystitis signs and symptoms at the EOT visit such that no additional systemic antimicrobial therapy was required for the current infection. Clinical Failure was defined as no apparent response to therapy or persistence of signs and symptoms of infection at the EOT visit such that use of additional systemic antimicrobial therapy for the current infection was required. The clinical outcome was deemed as Indeterminate when the EOT visit was not completed.

    Time frame: EOT visit (within 1 to 2 days following the last dose of study drug i.e. up to approximately 9 days)

  2. Number of Participants With an Investigator Assessment of Clinical Response at the EOT Visit (Microbiological [Micro]-ITT Population)

    Clinical response was determined by the investigator at the EOT visit by assessing whether or not the participant met the clinical outcome of Clinical Success, Clinical Failure, or Indeterminate. Clinical Success was defined as sufficient resolution of cystitis signs and symptoms at the EOT visit such that no additional systemic antimicrobial therapy was required for the current infection. Clinical Failure was defined as no apparent response to therapy or persistence of signs and symptoms of infection at the EOT visit such that use of additional systemic antimicrobial therapy for the current infection was required. The clinical outcome was deemed as Indeterminate when the EOT visit was not completed.

    Time frame: EOT visit (within 1 to 2 days following the last dose of study drug i.e. up to approximately 9 days)

  3. Number of Participants With an Investigator Assessment of Clinical Response at the EOT Visit (CE-EOT Population)

    Clinical response was determined by the investigator at the EOT visit by assessing whether or not the participant met the clinical outcome of Clinical Success or Clinical Failure. Clinical Success was defined as sufficient resolution of cystitis signs and symptoms at the EOT visit such that no additional systemic antimicrobial therapy was required for the current infection. Clinical Failure was defined as no apparent response to therapy or persistence of signs and symptoms of infection at the EOT visit such that use of additional systemic antimicrobial therapy for the current infection was required. For the CE population, the clinical outcome was not deemed as indeterminate response.

    Time frame: EOT visit (within 1 to 2 days following the last dose of study drug i.e. up to approximately 9 days)

  4. Number of Participants With an Investigator Assessment of Clinical Response at the PTE Visit (CE-PTE Population)

    Clinical response was determined by the investigator at the PTE visit by assessing whether or not the participant met the clinical outcome of Clinical Success or Clinical Failure. Clinical Success was defined as sufficient resolution of cystitis signs and symptoms at the PTE visit such that no additional systemic antimicrobial therapy was required for the current infection. Clinical Failure was defined as no apparent response to therapy or persistence of signs and symptoms of infection or reappearance of signs and symptoms at or before the PTE visit such that use of additional systemic antimicrobial therapy for the current infection was required. For the CE population, the clinical outcome was not deemed as indeterminate response.

    Time frame: Day 14 (A PTE occurred on Day 14 ± 2 days after the participant's first dose of study drug)

  5. Number of Participants With an Investigator Assessment of Clinical Response at the PTE Visit (Micro-ITT Population)

    Clinical response was determined by the investigator at the PTE visit by assessing whether or not the participant met the clinical outcome of Clinical Success, Clinical Failure or indeterminate. Clinical Success was defined as sufficient resolution of cystitis signs and symptoms at the PTE visit such that no additional systemic antimicrobial therapy was required for the current infection. Clinical Failure was defined as no apparent response to therapy or persistence of signs and symptoms of infection or reappearance of signs and symptoms at or before the PTE visit such that use of additional systemic antimicrobial therapy for the current infection was required. The clinical outcome was deemed as Indeterminate when the PTE visit was not completed.

    Time frame: Day 14 (A PTE occurred on Day 14 ± 2 days after the participant's first dose of study drug)

  6. Number of Participants With an Investigator Assessment of Clinical Response at the Final Follow-up (FFU) Visit (ITT Population)

    Clinical response was determined by the investigator at the FFU visit by assessing whether or not the participant met the clinical outcome of Clinical Success, Clinical Failure, or Indeterminate. Clinical Success was defined as sufficient resolution of cystitis signs and symptoms at the FFU visit such that no additional systemic antimicrobial therapy was required for the current infection. Clinical Failure was defined as no apparent response to therapy or persistence of signs and symptoms of infection at the FFU visit such that use of additional systemic antimicrobial therapy for the current infection was required. The clinical outcome was deemed as Indeterminate when the FFU visit was not completed

    Time frame: FFU visit (A FFU occurred 30 to 37 days following the first dose of study drug)

  7. Number of Participants With an Investigator Assessment of Clinical Response at the FFU Visit (CE-FFU Population)

    Clinical response was determined by the investigator at the FFU visit by assessing whether or not the participant met the clinical outcome of Clinical Success or Clinical Failure. Clinical Success was defined as sufficient resolution of cystitis signs and symptoms at the FFU visit such that no additional systemic antimicrobial therapy was required for the current infection. Clinical Failure was defined as no apparent response to therapy or persistence of signs and symptoms of infection at the FFU visit such that use of additional systemic antimicrobial therapy for the current infection was required. For the CE population, the clinical outcome was not deemed as indeterminate response.

    Time frame: FFU visit (A FFU occurred 30 to 37 days following the first dose of study drug)

  8. Number of Participants With an Investigator Assessment of Clinical Response at the FFU Visit (Micro-ITT Population)

    Clinical response was determined by the investigator at the FFU visit by assessing whether or not the participant met the clinical outcome of Clinical Success, Clinical Failure, or Indeterminate. Clinical Success was defined as sufficient resolution of cystitis signs and symptoms at the FFU visit such that no additional systemic antimicrobial therapy was required for the current infection. Clinical Failure was defined as no apparent response to therapy or persistence of signs and symptoms of infection at the FFU visit such that use of additional systemic antimicrobial therapy for the current infection was required. The clinical outcome was deemed as Indeterminate when the FFU visit was not completed.

    Time frame: FFU visit (A FFU occurred 30 to 37 days following the first dose of study drug)

  9. Number of Participants With a Microbiological Response at the EOT Visit (Micro-ITT Population)

    Microbiological response was determined programmatically at the EOT visit by assessing whether or not the participant met the microbiological outcome of Favorable, Unfavorable, or Indeterminate. Favorable microbiological outcomes included eradication and presumed eradication i.e., urine specimen showed absence of the original baseline pathogen or the baseline pathogen grew at \<10\^4 CFU/mL at visit. Unfavorable microbiological outcome included persistence i.e. urine culture showed continued presence (defined as ≥10\^4 CFU/mL) of the original baseline pathogen(s) at visit. The microbiological outcome was deemed as Indeterminate when the urine specimen was not available to culture or the culture result was not interpretable.

    Time frame: EOT visit (within 1 to 2 days following the last dose of study drug i.e. up to approximately 9 days)

  10. Number of Participants With a Microbiological Response at the EOT Visit (ME-EOT Population)

    Microbiological response was determined programmatically at the EOT visit by assessing whether or not the participant met the microbiological outcome of Favorable or Unfavorable. Favorable microbiological outcomes included eradication and presumed eradication i.e., urine specimen showed absence of the original baseline pathogen or the baseline pathogen grew at \<10\^4 CFU/mL at visit. Unfavorable microbiological outcome included persistence i.e. urine culture showed continued presence (defined as ≥10\^4 CFU/mL) of the original baseline pathogen(s) at visit. For the ME population, the microbiological outcome was not deemed as indeterminate response.

    Time frame: EOT visit (within 1 to 2 days following the last dose of study drug i.e. up to approximately 9 days)

  11. Number of Participants With a Microbiological Response at the PTE Visit (Micro-ITT Population)

    Microbiological response was determined programmatically at the PTE visit by assessing whether or not the participant met the microbiological outcome of Favorable, Unfavorable, or Indeterminate. Favorable microbiological outcomes included eradication and presumed eradication i.e., urine specimen showed absence of the original baseline pathogen or the baseline pathogen grew at \<10\^4 CFU/mL at visit. Unfavorable microbiological outcome included persistence i.e. urine culture showed continued presence (defined as ≥10\^4 CFU/mL) of the original baseline pathogen(s) at visit. The microbiological outcome was deemed as Indeterminate when the urine specimen was not available to culture or the culture result was not interpretable.

    Time frame: Day 14 (A PTE occurred on Day 14 ± 2 days after the participant's first dose of study drug)

  12. Number of Participants With a Microbiological Response at the PTE Visit (ME-PTE Population)

    Microbiological response was determined programmatically at the PTE visit by assessing whether or not the participant met the microbiological outcome of Favorable or Unfavorable. Favorable microbiological outcomes included eradication and presumed eradication i.e., urine specimen showed absence of the original baseline pathogen or the baseline pathogen grew at \<10\^4 CFU/mL at visit. Unfavorable microbiological outcome included persistence i.e. urine culture showed continued presence (defined as ≥10\^4 CFU/mL) of the original baseline pathogen(s) at visit. For the ME population, the microbiological outcome was not deemed as indeterminate response.

    Time frame: Day 14 (A PTE occurred on Day 14 ± 2 days after the participant's first dose of study drug)

Other outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Resolution of All Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) Signs and Clinical Symptoms at PTE Visit (ITT Population)

    Participants recorded their assessments using the UTI Symptoms Assessment (UTISA) questionnaire, a 14-item questionnaire that assessed the levels of 'severity' and 'bothersomeness' for seven UTI signs and symptoms: Frequency, Urgency, Pain/burning on urination, Incomplete voiding, Pain in pelvic area, Low back pain, and Blood in urine. The sub-scale responses were recorded as 'did not have', 'mild', 'moderate', and 'severe' for 'severity'; and 'not at all', 'a little', 'moderately', and 'a lot' for 'bothersomeness', both scored 0-3. Total scores were calculated by summing the non-missing scores of the 7 items, divided by the number of non-missing items, and then multiplied by 7. For each sub-scale, the total score ranged from 0 (least Severe/ least bothersome) and 21 (worst severity/most bothersome). Number of participants with resolution of all symptoms, without occurrence of new symptoms is reported. Resolution was defined as absence of all baseline symptoms.

    Time frame: Day 14 (A PTE occurred on Day 14 ± 2 days after the participant's first dose of study drug)

  2. Number of Participants With No Worsening and Absence of New UTI Signs and Clinical Symptoms at PTE Visit (ITT Population)

    Participants recorded their assessments using the UTI Symptoms Assessment (UTISA) questionnaire, a 14-item questionnaire that assessed the levels of 'severity' and 'bothersomeness' for seven UTI signs and symptoms: Frequency, Urgency, Pain/burning on urination, Incomplete voiding, Pain in pelvic area, Low back pain, and Blood in urine. The sub-scale responses were recorded as 'did not have', 'mild', 'moderate', and 'severe' for 'severity'; and 'not at all', 'a little', 'moderately', and 'a lot' for 'bothersomeness', both scored 0-3. Total scores were calculated by summing the non-missing scores of the 7 items, divided by the number of non-missing items, and then multiplied by 7. For each sub-scale, the total score ranged from 0 (least Severe/ least bothersome) and 21 (worst severity/most bothersome). Number of participants with no worsening and absence of new UTI signs and clinical symptoms is reported. No worsening meant that each question score is same or better at post baseline.

    Time frame: Day 14 (A PTE occurred on Day 14 ± 2 days after the participant's first dose of study drug)

07

Results

Posted Jun 4, 2020
Limitations and caveats
An additional treatment group (omadacycline 450/450 once every 12 hours) was added with Protocol Amendment 2. However, the majority of enrollment was completed by this time, and therefore, fewer participants were enrolled in this group.

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneOmadacycline 300/300 Once Every 24 HoursOmadacycline 450/300 Once Every 24 HoursOmadacycline 450/450 Once Every 24 HoursOmadacycline 450/450 Once Every 12 HoursNitrofurantoin 100/100 Once Every 12 Hours
Started555454854
Completed end of treatment visit535251753
Completed post-therapy evaluation visit534951754
Completed final follow-up visit534751753
Completed534751753
Not completed27311
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up25200
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject01010
Withdrew: Other01101

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Participants With an Investigator Assessment of Clinical Response at the Post Therapy Evaluation (PTE) Visit (ITT Population)

Clinical response was determined by the investigator at the PTE visit by assessing whether or not the participant met the clinical outcome of Clinical Success, Clinical Failure, or Indeterminate. Clinical Success was defined as sufficient resolution of cystitis signs and symptoms at the PTE visit such that no additional systemic antimicrobial therapy was required for the current infection. Clinical Failure was defined as no apparent response to therapy or persistence of signs and symptoms of infection or reappearance of signs and symptoms at or before the PTE visit such that use of additional systemic antimicrobial therapy for the current infection was required. The clinical outcome was deemed as Indeterminate when the PTE visit was not completed.

Time frame:
Day 14 (A PTE occurred on Day 14 ± 2 days after the participant's first dose of study drug)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With an Investigator Assessment of Clinical Response at the Post Therapy Evaluation (PTE) Visit (ITT Population)
ParticipantsOmadacycline 300/300 Once Every 24 HoursOmadacycline 450/300 Once Every 24 HoursOmadacycline 450/450 Once Every 24 HoursOmadacycline 450/450 Once Every 12 HoursNitrofurantoin 100/100 Once Every 12 Hours
Clinical Success484246749
Clinical Failure56505
Indeterminate26310
Statistical analysis
  • Omadacycline 300/300 Once Every 24 Hours vs Nitrofurantoin 100/100 Once Every 12 Hours · Treatment difference: -3.5 · 95% CI -16.8 to 9.6Point estimate and exact 95% confidence intervals for difference from nitrofurantoin (omadacycline minus nitrofurantoin) in clinical success rate was estimated.
  • Omadacycline 450/300 Once Every 24 Hours vs Nitrofurantoin 100/100 Once Every 12 Hours · Treatment difference: -13.0 · 95% CI -27.4 to 1.2Point estimate and exact 95% confidence intervals for difference from nitrofurantoin (omadacycline minus nitrofurantoin) in clinical success rate was estimated.
  • Omadacycline 450/450 Once Every 24 Hours vs Nitrofurantoin 100/100 Once Every 12 Hours · Treatment difference: -5.6 · 95% CI -19.6 to 7.4Point estimate and exact 95% confidence intervals for difference from nitrofurantoin (omadacycline minus nitrofurantoin) in clinical success rate was estimated.
  • Omadacycline 450/450 Once Every 12 Hours vs Nitrofurantoin 100/100 Once Every 12 Hours · Treatment difference: -3.2 · 95% CI -44.1 to 14.7Point estimate and exact 95% confidence intervals for difference from nitrofurantoin (omadacycline minus nitrofurantoin) in clinical success rate was estimated.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With an Investigator Assessment of Clinical Response at the End of Treatment (EOT) Visit (ITT Population)

Clinical response was determined by the investigator at the EOT visit by assessing whether or not the participant met the clinical outcome of Clinical Success, Clinical Failure. Clinical Success was defined as sufficient resolution of cystitis signs and symptoms at the EOT visit such that no additional systemic antimicrobial therapy was required for the current infection. Clinical Failure was defined as no apparent response to therapy or persistence of signs and symptoms of infection at the EOT visit such that use of additional systemic antimicrobial therapy for the current infection was required. The clinical outcome was deemed as Indeterminate when the EOT visit was not completed.

Time frame:
EOT visit (within 1 to 2 days following the last dose of study drug i.e. up to approximately 9 days)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With an Investigator Assessment of Clinical Response at the End of Treatment (EOT) Visit (ITT Population)
ParticipantsOmadacycline 300/300 Once Every 24 HoursOmadacycline 450/300 Once Every 24 HoursOmadacycline 450/450 Once Every 24 HoursOmadacycline 450/450 Once Every 12 HoursNitrofurantoin 100/100 Once Every 12 Hours
Clinical Success494749749
Clinical Failure45204
Indeterminate22311
Statistical analysis
  • Omadacycline 300/300 Once Every 24 Hours vs Nitrofurantoin 100/100 Once Every 12 Hours · Treatment difference: -1.6 · 95% CI -14.3 to 11.2Point estimate and exact 95% confidence intervals for difference from nitrofurantoin (omadacycline minus nitrofurantoin) in clinical success rate was estimated.
  • Omadacycline 450/300 Once Every 24 Hours vs Nitrofurantoin 100/100 Once Every 12 Hours · Treatment difference: -3.7 · 95% CI -16.8 to 9.0Point estimate and exact 95% confidence intervals for difference from nitrofurantoin (omadacycline minus nitrofurantoin) in clinical success rate was estimated.
  • Omadacycline 450/450 Once Every 24 Hours vs Nitrofurantoin 100/100 Once Every 12 Hours · Treatment difference: 0.0 · 95% CI -12.3 to 12.3Point estimate and exact 95% confidence intervals for difference from nitrofurantoin (omadacycline minus nitrofurantoin) in clinical success rate was estimated.
  • Omadacycline 450/450 Once Every 12 Hours vs Nitrofurantoin 100/100 Once Every 12 Hours · Treatment difference: -3.2 · 95% CI -44.1 to 14.7Point estimate and exact 95% confidence intervals for difference from nitrofurantoin (omadacycline minus nitrofurantoin) in clinical success rate was estimated.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With an Investigator Assessment of Clinical Response at the EOT Visit (Microbiological [Micro]-ITT Population)

Clinical response was determined by the investigator at the EOT visit by assessing whether or not the participant met the clinical outcome of Clinical Success, Clinical Failure, or Indeterminate. Clinical Success was defined as sufficient resolution of cystitis signs and symptoms at the EOT visit such that no additional systemic antimicrobial therapy was required for the current infection. Clinical Failure was defined as no apparent response to therapy or persistence of signs and symptoms of infection at the EOT visit such that use of additional systemic antimicrobial therapy for the current infection was required. The clinical outcome was deemed as Indeterminate when the EOT visit was not completed.

Time frame:
EOT visit (within 1 to 2 days following the last dose of study drug i.e. up to approximately 9 days)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With an Investigator Assessment of Clinical Response at the EOT Visit (Microbiological [Micro]-ITT Population)
ParticipantsOmadacycline 300/300 Once Every 24 HoursOmadacycline 450/300 Once Every 24 HoursOmadacycline 450/450 Once Every 24 HoursOmadacycline 450/450 Once Every 12 HoursNitrofurantoin 100/100 Once Every 12 Hours
Clinical Success222922527
Clinical Failure14103
Indeterminate21000
Statistical analysis
  • Omadacycline 300/300 Once Every 24 Hours vs Nitrofurantoin 100/100 Once Every 12 Hours · Treatment difference: -2.0 · 95% CI -22.5 to 16.8Point estimate and exact 95% confidence intervals for difference from nitrofurantoin (omadacycline minus nitrofurantoin) in clinical success rate was estimated.
  • Omadacycline 450/300 Once Every 24 Hours vs Nitrofurantoin 100/100 Once Every 12 Hours · Treatment difference: -4.7 · 95% CI -23.3 to 14.2Point estimate and exact 95% confidence intervals for difference from nitrofurantoin (omadacycline minus nitrofurantoin) in clinical success rate was estimated.
  • Omadacycline 450/450 Once Every 24 Hours vs Nitrofurantoin 100/100 Once Every 12 Hours · Treatment difference: 5.7 · 95% CI -13.0 to 22.6Point estimate and exact 95% confidence intervals for difference from nitrofurantoin (omadacycline minus nitrofurantoin) in clinical success rate was estimated.
  • Omadacycline 450/450 Once Every 12 Hours vs Nitrofurantoin 100/100 Once Every 12 Hours · Treatment difference: 10.0 · 95% CI -40.4 to 28.9Point estimate and exact 95% confidence intervals for difference from nitrofurantoin (omadacycline minus nitrofurantoin) in clinical success rate was estimated.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With an Investigator Assessment of Clinical Response at the EOT Visit (CE-EOT Population)

Clinical response was determined by the investigator at the EOT visit by assessing whether or not the participant met the clinical outcome of Clinical Success or Clinical Failure. Clinical Success was defined as sufficient resolution of cystitis signs and symptoms at the EOT visit such that no additional systemic antimicrobial therapy was required for the current infection. Clinical Failure was defined as no apparent response to therapy or persistence of signs and symptoms of infection at the EOT visit such that use of additional systemic antimicrobial therapy for the current infection was required. For the CE population, the clinical outcome was not deemed as indeterminate response.

Time frame:
EOT visit (within 1 to 2 days following the last dose of study drug i.e. up to approximately 9 days)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With an Investigator Assessment of Clinical Response at the EOT Visit (CE-EOT Population)
ParticipantsOmadacycline 300/300 Once Every 24 HoursOmadacycline 450/300 Once Every 24 HoursOmadacycline 450/450 Once Every 24 HoursOmadacycline 450/450 Once Every 12 HoursNitrofurantoin 100/100 Once Every 12 Hours
Clinical Success474247748
Clinical Failure35004
Statistical analysis
  • Omadacycline 300/300 Once Every 24 Hours vs Nitrofurantoin 100/100 Once Every 12 Hours · Treatment difference: 1.7 · 95% CI -10.0 to 13.4Point estimate and exact 95% confidence intervals for difference from nitrofurantoin (omadacycline minus nitrofurantoin) in clinical success rate was estimated.
  • Omadacycline 450/300 Once Every 24 Hours vs Nitrofurantoin 100/100 Once Every 12 Hours · Treatment difference: -2.9 · 95% CI -16.2 to 9.7Point estimate and exact 95% confidence intervals for difference from nitrofurantoin (omadacycline minus nitrofurantoin) in clinical success rate was estimated.
  • Omadacycline 450/450 Once Every 24 Hours vs Nitrofurantoin 100/100 Once Every 12 Hours · Treatment difference: 7.7 · 95% CI -0.3 to 18.5Point estimate and exact 95% confidence intervals for difference from nitrofurantoin (omadacycline minus nitrofurantoin) in clinical success rate was estimated.
  • Omadacycline 450/450 Once Every 12 Hours vs Nitrofurantoin 100/100 Once Every 12 Hours · Treatm,ent difference: 7.7 · 95% CI -34.9 to 20.6Point estimate and exact 95% confidence intervals for difference from nitrofurantoin (omadacycline minus nitrofurantoin) in clinical success rate was estimated.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With an Investigator Assessment of Clinical Response at the PTE Visit (CE-PTE Population)

Clinical response was determined by the investigator at the PTE visit by assessing whether or not the participant met the clinical outcome of Clinical Success or Clinical Failure. Clinical Success was defined as sufficient resolution of cystitis signs and symptoms at the PTE visit such that no additional systemic antimicrobial therapy was required for the current infection. Clinical Failure was defined as no apparent response to therapy or persistence of signs and symptoms of infection or reappearance of signs and symptoms at or before the PTE visit such that use of additional systemic antimicrobial therapy for the current infection was required. For the CE population, the clinical outcome was not deemed as indeterminate response.

Time frame:
Day 14 (A PTE occurred on Day 14 ± 2 days after the participant's first dose of study drug)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With an Investigator Assessment of Clinical Response at the PTE Visit (CE-PTE Population)
ParticipantsOmadacycline 300/300 Once Every 24 HoursOmadacycline 450/300 Once Every 24 HoursOmadacycline 450/450 Once Every 24 HoursOmadacycline 450/450 Once Every 12 HoursNitrofurantoin 100/100 Once Every 12 Hours
Clinical success454146745
Clinical failure45104
Statistical analysis
  • Omadacycline 300/300 Once Every 24 Hours vs Nitrofurantoin 100/100 Once Every 12 Hours · Treatment difference: 0.0 · 95% CI -12.6 to 12.6Point estimate and exact 95% confidence intervals for difference from nitrofurantoin (omadacycline minus nitrofurantoin) in clinical success rate was estimated.
  • Omadacycline 450/300 Once Every 24 Hours vs Nitrofurantoin 100/100 Once Every 12 Hours · Treatment difference: -2.7 · 95% CI -16.3 to 10.2Point estimate and exact 95% confidence intervals for difference from nitrofurantoin (omadacycline minus nitrofurantoin) in clinical success rate was estimated.
  • Omadacycline 450/450 Once Every 24 Hours vs Nitrofurantoin 100/100 Once Every 12 Hours · Treatment difference: 6.0 · 95% CI -4.5 to 17.7Point estimate and exact 95% confidence intervals for difference from nitrofurantoin (omadacycline minus nitrofurantoin) in clinical success rate was estimated
  • Omadacycline 450/450 Once Every 12 Hours vs Nitrofurantoin 100/100 Once Every 12 Hours · Treatment difference: 8.2 · 95% CI -35.3 to 20.7Point estimate and exact 95% confidence intervals for difference from nitrofurantoin (omadacycline minus nitrofurantoin) in clinical success rate was estimated.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With an Investigator Assessment of Clinical Response at the PTE Visit (Micro-ITT Population)

Clinical response was determined by the investigator at the PTE visit by assessing whether or not the participant met the clinical outcome of Clinical Success, Clinical Failure or indeterminate. Clinical Success was defined as sufficient resolution of cystitis signs and symptoms at the PTE visit such that no additional systemic antimicrobial therapy was required for the current infection. Clinical Failure was defined as no apparent response to therapy or persistence of signs and symptoms of infection or reappearance of signs and symptoms at or before the PTE visit such that use of additional systemic antimicrobial therapy for the current infection was required. The clinical outcome was deemed as Indeterminate when the PTE visit was not completed.

Time frame:
Day 14 (A PTE occurred on Day 14 ± 2 days after the participant's first dose of study drug)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With an Investigator Assessment of Clinical Response at the PTE Visit (Micro-ITT Population)
ParticipantsOmadacycline 300/300 Once Every 24 HoursOmadacycline 450/300 Once Every 24 HoursOmadacycline 450/450 Once Every 24 HoursOmadacycline 450/450 Once Every 12 HoursNitrofurantoin 100/100 Once Every 12 Hours
Clinical success212721527
Clinical failure25203
Indeterminate22000
Statistical analysis
  • Omadacycline 300/300 Once Every 24 Hours · Treatment difference: -6.0 · 95% CI -27.3 to 13.3Point estimate and exact 95% confidence intervals for difference from nitrofurantoin (omadacycline minus nitrofurantoin) in clinical success rate was estimated.
  • Omadacycline 450/300 Once Every 24 Hours vs Nitrofurantoin 100/100 Once Every 12 Hours · Treatment difference: -10.6 · 95% CI -29.2 to 8.6Point estimate and exact 95% confidence intervals for difference from nitrofurantoin (omadacycline minus nitrofurantoin) in clinical success rate was estimated.
  • Omadacycline 450/450 Once Every 24 Hours vs Nitrofurantoin 100/100 Once Every 12 Hours · Treatment difference: 1.3 · 95% CI -19.0 to 19.2Point estimate and exact 95% confidence intervals for difference from nitrofurantoin (omadacycline minus nitrofurantoin) in clinical success rate was estimated.
  • Omadacycline 450/450 Once Every 12 Hours vs Nitrofurantoin 100/100 Once Every 12 Hours · Treatment difference: 10.0 · 95% CI -40.4 to 28.9Point estimate and exact 95% confidence intervals for difference from nitrofurantoin (omadacycline minus nitrofurantoin) in clinical success rate was estimated.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With an Investigator Assessment of Clinical Response at the Final Follow-up (FFU) Visit (ITT Population)

Clinical response was determined by the investigator at the FFU visit by assessing whether or not the participant met the clinical outcome of Clinical Success, Clinical Failure, or Indeterminate. Clinical Success was defined as sufficient resolution of cystitis signs and symptoms at the FFU visit such that no additional systemic antimicrobial therapy was required for the current infection. Clinical Failure was defined as no apparent response to therapy or persistence of signs and symptoms of infection at the FFU visit such that use of additional systemic antimicrobial therapy for the current infection was required. The clinical outcome was deemed as Indeterminate when the FFU visit was not completed

Time frame:
FFU visit (A FFU occurred 30 to 37 days following the first dose of study drug)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With an Investigator Assessment of Clinical Response at the Final Follow-up (FFU) Visit (ITT Population)
ParticipantsOmadacycline 300/300 Once Every 24 HoursOmadacycline 450/300 Once Every 24 HoursOmadacycline 450/450 Once Every 24 HoursOmadacycline 450/450 Once Every 12 HoursNitrofurantoin 100/100 Once Every 12 Hours
Clinical success474144749
Clinical failure67705
Indeterminate26310
Statistical analysis
  • Omadacycline 300/300 Once Every 24 Hours vs Nitrofurantoin 100/100 Once Every 12 Hours · Treatment difference: -5.3 · 95% CI -18.6 to 7.8Point estimate and exact 95% confidence intervals for difference from nitrofurantoin (omadacycline minus nitrofurantoin) in clinical success rate was estimated.
  • Omadacycline 450/300 Once Every 24 Hours vs Nitrofurantoin 100/100 Once Every 12 Hours · Treatment difference: -14.8 · 95% CI -29.6 to -0.6Point estimate and exact 95% confidence intervals for difference from nitrofurantoin (omadacycline minus nitrofurantoin) in clinical success rate was estimated.
  • Omadacycline 450/450 Once Every 24 Hours vs Nitrofurantoin 100/100 Once Every 12 Hours · Treatment difference: -9.3 · 95% CI -23.2 to 4.4Point estimate and exact 95% confidence intervals for difference from nitrofurantoin (omadacycline minus nitrofurantoin) in clinical success rate was estimated.
  • Omadacycline 450/450 Once Every 12 Hours vs Nitrofurantoin 100/100 Once Every 12 Hours · Treatment difference: -3.2 · 95% CI -44.1 to 14.7Point estimate and exact 95% confidence intervals for difference from nitrofurantoin (omadacycline minus nitrofurantoin) in clinical success rate was estimated.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With an Investigator Assessment of Clinical Response at the FFU Visit (CE-FFU Population)

Clinical response was determined by the investigator at the FFU visit by assessing whether or not the participant met the clinical outcome of Clinical Success or Clinical Failure. Clinical Success was defined as sufficient resolution of cystitis signs and symptoms at the FFU visit such that no additional systemic antimicrobial therapy was required for the current infection. Clinical Failure was defined as no apparent response to therapy or persistence of signs and symptoms of infection at the FFU visit such that use of additional systemic antimicrobial therapy for the current infection was required. For the CE population, the clinical outcome was not deemed as indeterminate response.

Time frame:
FFU visit (A FFU occurred 30 to 37 days following the first dose of study drug)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With an Investigator Assessment of Clinical Response at the FFU Visit (CE-FFU Population)
ParticipantsOmadacycline 300/300 Once Every 24 HoursOmadacycline 450/300 Once Every 24 HoursOmadacycline 450/450 Once Every 24 HoursOmadacycline 450/450 Once Every 12 HoursNitrofurantoin 100/100 Once Every 12 Hours
Clinical success433739745
Clinical failure46404
Statistical analysis
  • Omadacycline 300/300 Once Every 24 Hours vs Nitrofurantoin 100/100 Once Every 12 Hours · Treatment difference: -0.3 · 95% CI -13.1 to 12.7Point estimate and exact 95% confidence intervals for difference from nitrofurantoin (omadacycline minus nitrofurantoin) in clinical success rate was estimated.
  • Omadacycline 450/300 Once Every 24 Hours vs Nitrofurantoin 100/100 Once Every 12 Hours · Treatment difference: -5.8 · 95% CI -20.7 to 7.8Point estimate and exact 95% confidence intervals for difference from nitrofurantoin (omadacycline minus nitrofurantoin) in clinical success rate was estimated.
  • Omadacycline 450/450 Once Every 24 Hours vs Nitrofurantoin 100/100 Once Every 12 Hours · Treatment difference: -1.1 · 95% CI -15.1 to 11.6Point estimate and exact 95% confidence intervals for difference from nitrofurantoin (omadacycline minus nitrofurantoin) in clinical success rate was estimated.
  • Nitrofurantoin 100/100 Once Every 12 Hours · Treatment difference: 8.2 · 95% CI -35.3 to 20.7Point estimate and exact 95% confidence intervals for difference from nitrofurantoin (omadacycline minus nitrofurantoin) in clinical success rate was estimated.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With an Investigator Assessment of Clinical Response at the FFU Visit (Micro-ITT Population)

Clinical response was determined by the investigator at the FFU visit by assessing whether or not the participant met the clinical outcome of Clinical Success, Clinical Failure, or Indeterminate. Clinical Success was defined as sufficient resolution of cystitis signs and symptoms at the FFU visit such that no additional systemic antimicrobial therapy was required for the current infection. Clinical Failure was defined as no apparent response to therapy or persistence of signs and symptoms of infection at the FFU visit such that use of additional systemic antimicrobial therapy for the current infection was required. The clinical outcome was deemed as Indeterminate when the FFU visit was not completed.

Time frame:
FFU visit (A FFU occurred 30 to 37 days following the first dose of study drug)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With an Investigator Assessment of Clinical Response at the FFU Visit (Micro-ITT Population)
ParticipantsOmadacycline 300/300 Once Every 24 HoursOmadacycline 450/300 Once Every 24 HoursOmadacycline 450/450 Once Every 24 HoursOmadacycline 450/450 Once Every 12 HoursNitrofurantoin 100/100 Once Every 12 Hours
Clinical success212620527
Clinical failure26303
Indeterminate22000
Statistical analysis
  • Omadacycline 300/300 Once Every 24 Hours vs Nitrofurantoin 100/100 Once Every 12 Hours · Treatment difference: -6.0 · 95% CI -27.3 to 13.3Point estimate and exact 95% confidence intervals for difference from nitrofurantoin (omadacycline minus nitrofurantoin) in clinical success rate was estimated
  • Omadacycline 450/300 Once Every 24 Hours vs Nitrofurantoin 100/100 Once Every 12 Hours · Treatment difference: -13.5 · 95% CI -32.4 to 5.9Point estimate and exact 95% confidence intervals for difference from nitrofurantoin (omadacycline minus nitrofurantoin) in clinical success rate was estimated
  • Omadacycline 450/450 Once Every 24 Hours vs Nitrofurantoin 100/100 Once Every 12 Hours · Treatment difference: -3.0 · 95% CI -25.7 to 15.6Point estimate and exact 95% confidence intervals for difference from nitrofurantoin (omadacycline minus nitrofurantoin) in clinical success rate was estimated
  • Omadacycline 450/450 Once Every 12 Hours vs Nitrofurantoin 100/100 Once Every 12 Hours · Treatment difference: 10.0 · 95% CI -40.4 to 28.9Point estimate and exact 95% confidence intervals for difference from nitrofurantoin (omadacycline minus nitrofurantoin) in clinical success rate was estimated
SecondaryNumber of Participants With a Microbiological Response at the EOT Visit (Micro-ITT Population)

Microbiological response was determined programmatically at the EOT visit by assessing whether or not the participant met the microbiological outcome of Favorable, Unfavorable, or Indeterminate. Favorable microbiological outcomes included eradication and presumed eradication i.e., urine specimen showed absence of the original baseline pathogen or the baseline pathogen grew at \<10\^4 CFU/mL at visit. Unfavorable microbiological outcome included persistence i.e. urine culture showed continued presence (defined as ≥10\^4 CFU/mL) of the original baseline pathogen(s) at visit. The microbiological outcome was deemed as Indeterminate when the urine specimen was not available to culture or the culture result was not interpretable.

Time frame:
EOT visit (within 1 to 2 days following the last dose of study drug i.e. up to approximately 9 days)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With a Microbiological Response at the EOT Visit (Micro-ITT Population)
ParticipantsOmadacycline 300/300 Once Every 24 HoursOmadacycline 450/300 Once Every 24 HoursOmadacycline 450/450 Once Every 24 HoursOmadacycline 450/450 Once Every 12 HoursNitrofurantoin 100/100 Once Every 12 Hours
Favorable182717528
Unfavorable56601
Indeterminate21001
Statistical analysis
  • Omadacycline 300/300 Once Every 24 Hours vs Nitrofurantoin 100/100 Once Every 12 Hours · Treatment difference: -21.3 · 95% CI -44.1 to -1.0Point estimate and exact 95% confidence intervals for difference from nitrofurantoin (omadacycline minus nitrofurantoin) in clinical success rate was estimated.
  • Omadacycline 450/300 Once Every 24 Hours vs Nitrofurantoin 100/100 Once Every 12 Hours · Treatment difference: -13.9 · 95% CI -32.2 to 4.9Point estimate and exact 95% confidence intervals for difference from nitrofurantoin (omadacycline minus nitrofurantoin) in clinical success rate was estimated.
  • Omadacycline 450/450 Once Every 24 Hours vs Nitrofurantoin 100/100 Once Every 12 Hours · Treatment difference: -19.4 · 95% CI -43.1 to 1.1Point estimate and exact 95% confidence intervals for difference from nitrofurantoin (omadacycline minus nitrofurantoin) in clinical success rate was estimated.
  • Omadacycline 450/450 Once Every 12 Hours vs Nitrofurantoin 100/100 Once Every 12 Hours · Treatment difference: 6.7 · 95% CI -43.8 to 23.2Point estimate and exact 95% confidence intervals for difference from nitrofurantoin (omadacycline minus nitrofurantoin) in clinical success rate was estimated.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With a Microbiological Response at the EOT Visit (ME-EOT Population)

Microbiological response was determined programmatically at the EOT visit by assessing whether or not the participant met the microbiological outcome of Favorable or Unfavorable. Favorable microbiological outcomes included eradication and presumed eradication i.e., urine specimen showed absence of the original baseline pathogen or the baseline pathogen grew at \<10\^4 CFU/mL at visit. Unfavorable microbiological outcome included persistence i.e. urine culture showed continued presence (defined as ≥10\^4 CFU/mL) of the original baseline pathogen(s) at visit. For the ME population, the microbiological outcome was not deemed as indeterminate response.

Time frame:
EOT visit (within 1 to 2 days following the last dose of study drug i.e. up to approximately 9 days)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With a Microbiological Response at the EOT Visit (ME-EOT Population)
ParticipantsOmadacycline 300/300 Once Every 24 HoursOmadacycline 450/300 Once Every 24 HoursOmadacycline 450/450 Once Every 24 HoursOmadacycline 450/450 Once Every 12 HoursNitrofurantoin 100/100 Once Every 12 Hours
Favorable182516528
Unfavorable46601
Statistical analysis
  • Omadacycline 300/300 Once Every 24 Hours vs Nitrofurantoin 100/100 Once Every 12 Hours · Treatment difference: -14.7 · 95% CI -37.2 to 3.1Point estimate and exact 95% confidence intervals for difference from nitrofurantoin (omadacycline minus nitrofurantoin) in clinical success rate was estimated.
  • Omadacycline 450/300 Once Every 24 Hours vs Nitrofurantoin 100/100 Once Every 12 Hours · Treatment difference: -15.9 · 95% CI -34.3 to 1.2Point estimate and exact 95% confidence intervals for difference from nitrofurantoin (omadacycline minus nitrofurantoin) in clinical success rate was estimated.
  • Omadacycline 450/450 Once Every 24 Hours vs Nitrofurantoin 100/100 Once Every 12 Hours · Treatment difference: -23.8 · 95% CI -46.9 to -4.3Point estimate and exact 95% confidence intervals for difference from nitrofurantoin (omadacycline minus nitrofurantoin) in clinical success rate was estimated.
  • Omadacycline 450/450 Once Every 12 Hours vs Nitrofurantoin 100/100 Once Every 12 Hours · Treatment difference: 3.4 · 95% CI -48.5 to 19.7Point estimate and exact 95% confidence intervals for difference from nitrofurantoin (omadacycline minus nitrofurantoin) in clinical success rate was estimated.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With a Microbiological Response at the PTE Visit (Micro-ITT Population)

Microbiological response was determined programmatically at the PTE visit by assessing whether or not the participant met the microbiological outcome of Favorable, Unfavorable, or Indeterminate. Favorable microbiological outcomes included eradication and presumed eradication i.e., urine specimen showed absence of the original baseline pathogen or the baseline pathogen grew at \<10\^4 CFU/mL at visit. Unfavorable microbiological outcome included persistence i.e. urine culture showed continued presence (defined as ≥10\^4 CFU/mL) of the original baseline pathogen(s) at visit. The microbiological outcome was deemed as Indeterminate when the urine specimen was not available to culture or the culture result was not interpretable.

Time frame:
Day 14 (A PTE occurred on Day 14 ± 2 days after the participant's first dose of study drug)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With a Microbiological Response at the PTE Visit (Micro-ITT Population)
ParticipantsOmadacycline 300/300 Once Every 24 HoursOmadacycline 450/300 Once Every 24 HoursOmadacycline 450/450 Once Every 24 HoursOmadacycline 450/450 Once Every 12 HoursNitrofurantoin 100/100 Once Every 12 Hours
Favorable142015423
Unfavorable811816
Indeterminate33001
Statistical analysis
  • Omadacycline 300/300 Once Every 24 Hours vs Nitrofurantoin 100/100 Once Every 12 Hours · Treatment difference: -20.7 · 95% CI -45.1 to 6.0Point estimate and exact 95% confidence intervals for difference from nitrofurantoin (omadacycline minus nitrofurantoin) in clinical success rate was estimated.
  • Omadacycline 450/300 Once Every 24 Hours vs Nitrofurantoin 100/100 Once Every 12 Hours · Treatment difference: -17.8 · 95% CI -40.2 to 5.9Point estimate and exact 95% confidence intervals for difference from nitrofurantoin (omadacycline minus nitrofurantoin) in clinical success rate was estimated.
  • Omadacycline 450/450 Once Every 24 Hours vs Nitrofurantoin 100/100 Once Every 12 Hours · Treatment difference: -11.4 · 95% CI -36.8 to 14.7Point estimate and exact 95% confidence intervals for difference from nitrofurantoin (omadacycline minus nitrofurantoin) in clinical success rate was estimated.
  • Omadacycline 450/450 Once Every 12 Hours vs Nitrofurantoin 100/100 Once Every 12 Hours · Treatment difference: 3.3 · 95% CI -47.0 to 33.2Point estimate and exact 95% confidence intervals for difference from nitrofurantoin (omadacycline minus nitrofurantoin) in clinical success rate was estimated.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With a Microbiological Response at the PTE Visit (ME-PTE Population)

Microbiological response was determined programmatically at the PTE visit by assessing whether or not the participant met the microbiological outcome of Favorable or Unfavorable. Favorable microbiological outcomes included eradication and presumed eradication i.e., urine specimen showed absence of the original baseline pathogen or the baseline pathogen grew at \<10\^4 CFU/mL at visit. Unfavorable microbiological outcome included persistence i.e. urine culture showed continued presence (defined as ≥10\^4 CFU/mL) of the original baseline pathogen(s) at visit. For the ME population, the microbiological outcome was not deemed as indeterminate response.

Time frame:
Day 14 (A PTE occurred on Day 14 ± 2 days after the participant's first dose of study drug)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With a Microbiological Response at the PTE Visit (ME-PTE Population)
ParticipantsOmadacycline 300/300 Once Every 24 HoursOmadacycline 450/300 Once Every 24 HoursOmadacycline 450/450 Once Every 24 HoursOmadacycline 450/450 Once Every 12 HoursNitrofurantoin 100/100 Once Every 12 Hours
Favorable132014422
Unfavorable79716
Statistical analysis
  • Omadacycline 300/300 Once Every 24 Hours vs Nitrofurantoin 100/100 Once Every 12 Hours · Treatment difference: -13.6 · 95% CI -40.4 to 13.2Point estimate and exact 95% confidence intervals for difference from nitrofurantoin (omadacycline minus nitrofurantoin) in clinical success rate was estimated.
  • Omadacycline 450/300 Once Every 24 Hours vs Nitrofurantoin 100/100 Once Every 12 Hours · Treatment difference: -9.6 · 95% CI -32.7 to 14.6Point estimate and exact 95% confidence intervals for difference from nitrofurantoin (omadacycline minus nitrofurantoin) in clinical success rate was estimated.
  • Omadacycline 450/450 Once Every 24 Hours vs Nitrofurantoin 100/100 Once Every 12 Hours · Treatment difference: -11.9 · 95% CI -38.2 to 14.9Point estimate and exact 95% confidence intervals for difference from nitrofurantoin (omadacycline minus nitrofurantoin) in clinical success rate was estimated.
  • Omadacycline 450/450 Once Every 12 Hours vs Nitrofurantoin 100/100 Once Every 12 Hours · Treatment difference: 1.4 · 95% CI -50.3 to 30.9Point estimate and exact 95% confidence intervals for difference from nitrofurantoin (omadacycline minus nitrofurantoin) in clinical success rate was estimated.
Other pre-specifiedNumber of Participants With Resolution of All Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) Signs and Clinical Symptoms at PTE Visit (ITT Population)

Participants recorded their assessments using the UTI Symptoms Assessment (UTISA) questionnaire, a 14-item questionnaire that assessed the levels of 'severity' and 'bothersomeness' for seven UTI signs and symptoms: Frequency, Urgency, Pain/burning on urination, Incomplete voiding, Pain in pelvic area, Low back pain, and Blood in urine. The sub-scale responses were recorded as 'did not have', 'mild', 'moderate', and 'severe' for 'severity'; and 'not at all', 'a little', 'moderately', and 'a lot' for 'bothersomeness', both scored 0-3. Total scores were calculated by summing the non-missing scores of the 7 items, divided by the number of non-missing items, and then multiplied by 7. For each sub-scale, the total score ranged from 0 (least Severe/ least bothersome) and 21 (worst severity/most bothersome). Number of participants with resolution of all symptoms, without occurrence of new symptoms is reported. Resolution was defined as absence of all baseline symptoms.

Time frame:
Day 14 (A PTE occurred on Day 14 ± 2 days after the participant's first dose of study drug)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Resolution of All Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) Signs and Clinical Symptoms at PTE Visit (ITT Population)
ParticipantsOmadacycline 300/300 Once Every 24 HoursOmadacycline 450/300 Once Every 24 HoursOmadacycline 450/450 Once Every 24 HoursOmadacycline 450/450 Once Every 12 HoursNitrofurantoin 100/100 Once Every 12 Hours
Number of Participants With Resolution of All Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) Signs and Clinical Symptoms at PTE Visit (ITT Population)333032634
Other pre-specifiedNumber of Participants With No Worsening and Absence of New UTI Signs and Clinical Symptoms at PTE Visit (ITT Population)

Participants recorded their assessments using the UTI Symptoms Assessment (UTISA) questionnaire, a 14-item questionnaire that assessed the levels of 'severity' and 'bothersomeness' for seven UTI signs and symptoms: Frequency, Urgency, Pain/burning on urination, Incomplete voiding, Pain in pelvic area, Low back pain, and Blood in urine. The sub-scale responses were recorded as 'did not have', 'mild', 'moderate', and 'severe' for 'severity'; and 'not at all', 'a little', 'moderately', and 'a lot' for 'bothersomeness', both scored 0-3. Total scores were calculated by summing the non-missing scores of the 7 items, divided by the number of non-missing items, and then multiplied by 7. For each sub-scale, the total score ranged from 0 (least Severe/ least bothersome) and 21 (worst severity/most bothersome). Number of participants with no worsening and absence of new UTI signs and clinical symptoms is reported. No worsening meant that each question score is same or better at post baseline.

Time frame:
Day 14 (A PTE occurred on Day 14 ± 2 days after the participant's first dose of study drug)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With No Worsening and Absence of New UTI Signs and Clinical Symptoms at PTE Visit (ITT Population)
ParticipantsOmadacycline 300/300 Once Every 24 HoursOmadacycline 450/300 Once Every 24 HoursOmadacycline 450/450 Once Every 24 HoursOmadacycline 450/450 Once Every 12 HoursNitrofurantoin 100/100 Once Every 12 Hours
Number of Participants With No Worsening and Absence of New UTI Signs and Clinical Symptoms at PTE Visit (ITT Population)504545750

Adverse events

Collected over Up to approximately 37 days. Non-serious events are listed at a 2% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Omadacycline 300/300 Once Every 24 Hours0/55 (0%)0/55 (0%)16/55 (29.1%)
Omadacycline 450/300 Once Every 24 Hours0/54 (0%)0/54 (0%)13/54 (24.1%)
Omadacycline 450/450 Once Every 24 Hours0/54 (0%)1/54 (1.9%)15/54 (27.8%)
Omadacycline 450/450 Once Every 12 Hours0/8 (0%)0/8 (0%)4/8 (50%)
Nitrofurantoin 100/100 Once Every 12 Hours0/54 (0%)0/54 (0%)9/54 (16.7%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventOmadacycline 300/300 Once Every 24 HoursOmadacycline 450/300 Once Every 24 HoursOmadacycline 450/450 Once Every 24 HoursOmadacycline 450/450 Once Every 12 HoursNitrofurantoin 100/100 Once Every 12 Hours
Pyelonephritis AcuteInfections and infestations0/550/541/540/80/54
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 11
Most frequent other events
EventOmadacycline 300/300 Once Every 24 HoursOmadacycline 450/300 Once Every 24 HoursOmadacycline 450/450 Once Every 24 HoursOmadacycline 450/450 Once Every 12 HoursNitrofurantoin 100/100 Once Every 12 Hours
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders12/558/5410/544/85/54
HeadacheNervous system disorders3/552/544/542/81/54
Abdominal discomfortGastrointestinal disorders0/550/540/541/80/54
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders3/553/543/541/80/54
HordeolumInfections and infestations0/550/540/541/80/54
DysgeusiaNervous system disorders0/550/540/541/80/54
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders2/551/543/540/82/54
Asymptomatic bacteriuriaInfections and infestations1/552/541/540/80/54
BronchitisInfections and infestations0/550/540/540/82/54
Urinary tract infectionInfections and infestations1/551/542/540/80/54

Baseline characteristics

The Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population consisted of all randomized participants regardless of whether or not the participant received study drug.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Omadacycline 300/300 Once Every 24 HoursOmadacycline 450/300 Once Every 24 HoursOmadacycline 450/450 Once Every 24 HoursOmadacycline 450/450 Once Every 12 HoursNitrofurantoin 100/100 Once Every 12 HoursTotal
Mean45.3 ± 17.0547.4 ± 15.7045.0 ± 15.4937.5 ± 13.6045.5 ± 17.8245.5 ± 16.41
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Omadacycline 300/300 Once Every 24 HoursOmadacycline 450/300 Once Every 24 HoursOmadacycline 450/450 Once Every 24 HoursOmadacycline 450/450 Once Every 12 HoursNitrofurantoin 100/100 Once Every 12 HoursTotal
Female555454854225
Male000000
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Omadacycline 300/300 Once Every 24 HoursOmadacycline 450/300 Once Every 24 HoursOmadacycline 450/450 Once Every 24 HoursOmadacycline 450/450 Once Every 12 HoursNitrofurantoin 100/100 Once Every 12 HoursTotal
Hispanic or Latino474743747191
Not Hispanic or Latino87111734
Unknown or Not Reported000000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Omadacycline 300/300 Once Every 24 HoursOmadacycline 450/300 Once Every 24 HoursOmadacycline 450/450 Once Every 24 HoursOmadacycline 450/450 Once Every 12 HoursNitrofurantoin 100/100 Once Every 12 HoursTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000011
Asian011013
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander100012
Black or African American2142413
White525248647205
More than one race000000
Unknown or Not Reported001001
08

Study locations

23 sites
  • Site 106
    Chula Vista, California 91911, United States
  • Site 101
    La Mesa, California 91942, United States
  • Site 109
    Los Angeles, California 90017, United States
  • Site 114
    Aventura, Florida 33180, United States
  • Site 102
    DeLand, Florida 32720, United States
  • Site 103
    Hialeah, Florida 33015, United States
  • Site 125
    Jacksonville, Florida 32256, United States
  • Site 127
    Miami Springs, Florida 33166, United States
  • Site 121
    Miami, Florida 33126, United States
  • Site 130
    Miami, Florida 33126, United States
  • Site 115
    Miami, Florida 33134, United States
  • Site 126
    Orlando, Florida 82306, United States
  • Site 113
    Newton, Kansas 67114, United States
  • Site 110
    Wichita, Kansas 67207, United States
  • Site 112
    Omaha, Nebraska 68144, United States
  • Site 132
    Las Vegas, Nevada 89106, United States
  • Site 108
    Las Vegas, Nevada 89109, United States
  • Site 122
    Berlin, New Jersey 08009, United States
  • Site 118
    Raleigh, North Carolina 27612, United States
  • Site 104
    Jackson, Tennessee 38305, United States
  • Site 105
    Smyrna, Tennessee 37167, United States
  • Site 131
    Houston, Texas 77061, United States
  • Site 120
    San Antonio, Texas 78229, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Jan 2018 to primary completion in May 2019, 16 months.

Results were first posted in Jun 2020, 1 year after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 28, 2017
First posted
Feb 7, 2018
StartActual
Jan 4, 2018
Primary completionActual
May 15, 2019
CompletionActual
Jun 5, 2019
Results first posted
Jun 4, 2020
Last update
Jun 9, 2020
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 9, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03425396
Lead sponsor
Paratek Pharmaceuticals Inc
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 7, 2018
Start date
Jan 4, 2018
Primary completion
May 15, 2019
Completion
Jun 5, 2019
Results posted
Jun 4, 2020
Last update
Jun 9, 2020

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Omadacycline

Start the discussion