ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04922554Updated Jul 30, 2025Results posted

Oral Omadacycline vs. Placebo in Adults With NTM Pulmonary Disease Caused by Mycobacterium Abscessus Complex (MABc)

A Phase 2 interventional study of Omadacycline Oral Tablet and Placebo in Mycobacterium Infections, Nontuberculous, Mycobacterium Abscessus Infection and Nontuberculous Mycobacterial Lung Disease, sponsored by Paratek Pharmaceuticals Inc. Completed at 17 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-07-30.

Sponsored by Paratek Pharmaceuticals Inc · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
66
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of oral omadacycline as compared to placebo in the treatment of adults with Nontuberculous Mycobacterial (NTM) pulmonary disease caused by Mycobacterium abscessus complex (MABc)

Read the detailed description

The total duration of subject participation in the study is approximately 5 months which includes a total duration of study treatment for approximately 3 months (84 days). Eligible participants will be randomized 1.5:1 to receive 3 months of treatment with either omadacycline or placebo (monotherapy). The study will use a double-dummy design in order to maintain the study blinding.

02

Conditions studied

  • Mycobacterium Infections, Nontuberculous
  • Mycobacterium Abscessus Infection
  • Nontuberculous Mycobacterial Lung Disease
  • Nontuberculous Mycobacterial Pulmonary Infection

Keywords

  • Nontuberculous Mycobacteria (NTM)
  • Mycobacterium abscessus complex (MABc)
  • NTM pulmonary disease
  • NTM lung disease
03

In context

Mycobacterium Infections, Nontuberculous

54 studies on the registry are indexed under Mycobacterium Infections, Nontuberculous; 19 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 66 is above the median of 40 across 35 interventional studies indexed under Mycobacterium Infections, Nontuberculous.

Browse Mycobacterium Infections, Nontuberculous studies →

Lead sponsor

Paratek Pharmaceuticals Inc is the lead sponsor of 12 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Of its 7 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 7 (100%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria:

  • Has a diagnosis of Nontuberculous Mycobacterial pulmonary disease caused by MABc
  • Has at least 2 of the following NTM-infection symptoms present at Screening and Baseline: chronic cough, coughing up blood (hemoptysis), wheezing, chest pain, frequent throat clearing, phlegm or sputum production, shortness of breath, fatigue, fever, night sweats, poor appetite, and/or weight loss.
  • At least 1 positive pulmonary (sputum) culture for MABc in the 6 months prior to Screening and 1 positive culture at Screening
  • Radiographic evidence of MABc infection via computed tomography (CT) scan of the chest within 3 months prior to Screening
  • In the opinion of the investigator, guideline-directed antibiotic therapy for treatment of MABc will not be required within the next 3 months, and a delay, in order for the subject to participate in a placebo-controlled clinical trial, is considered reasonable and clinically acceptable
  • Additional inclusion criteria as per protocol

Key Exclusion Criteria:

  • Has received antibiotic treatment within 6 months prior to Screening for MABc or MAC
  • Has received systemic or inhaled antibiotic therapy (other than chronic macrolide therapy) within 4 weeks prior to Screening
  • Has any of the following medical conditions:
  • Active pulmonary , or any type of malignancy requiring chemotherapy or radiation within 1 year prior to Screening
  • Active allergic bronchopulmonary mycosis, or any other condition requiring chronic treatment with systemic within 90 days prior to Screening
  • Radiologic evidence of cavitary disease
  • Known active pulmonary tuberculosis
  • Cystic fibrosis
  • History of lung transplantation
  • Another advanced lung disease with a known percent predicted \< 30%.
  • Disseminated or extra-pulmonary NTM disease
  • Has been previously treated with omadacycline
  • Has a history of or allergic reaction to tetracyclines
  • Additional exclusion criteria as per protocol
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

FEV1

From a breathing test (spirometry): how much air you can blow out in the first second. Often given as a percentage of what is expected for your age, height and sex.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
66 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Omadacycline 300 mg PO

    omadacycline 150 mg tablets (x 2) administered orally, once daily, q24h

    Drug: Omadacycline Oral Tablet

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo PO

    Placebo tablets resembling omadacycline (x 2) administered once daily, q24h

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • omadacycline 300 mg orally, once daily (150 mg tablets x 2)

    Also known as: Nuzyra

  • DrugPlacebo

    placebo tablets resembling omadacycline orally, once daily (x 2 tablets)

    Also known as: placebo tablets

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response on NTM Symptom Assessment Scale at Day 84

    A clinical responder is defined as a participant who shows improvement in at least 50% of baseline symptoms on the NTM Symptom Assessment Questionnaire at the Day 84 Visit. This self-administered tool assesses 12 common NTM symptoms, each rated on a 4-point scale (absent, mild, moderate, severe), reflecting the participant's overall impression over the past week. The questionnaire is completed solely by the participant, without any interpretation from clinicians or site staff.

    Time frame: Day 1 to Day 84

  2. Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response on NTM Symptom Assessment Scale at Day 84 With no Deterioration in Severity of Symptoms That Were Present at Baseline.

    A clinical responder is defined as a participant who shows improvement in at least 50% of baseline symptoms with no deterioration of symptoms present at baseline on the NTM Symptom Assessment Questionnaire at the Day 84 Visit. This self-administered tool assesses 12 common NTM symptoms, each rated on a 4-point scale (absent, mild, moderate, severe), reflecting the participant's overall impression over the past week. The questionnaire is completed solely by the participant, without any interpretation from clinicians or site staff.

    Time frame: Day 1 to Day 84

  3. Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

    A TEAE is an adverse event that occurred on or after first dose of test article and those existing AEs that worsened on or after first dose of test article. An SAE is an adverse event that results in death, is life-threatening, requires hospitalization or extends an existing one, causes significant or lasting disability/incapacity, or leads to a congenital anomaly or birth defect. Additionally, events that may not meet these criteria but are medically significant can also be classified as SAEs.

    Time frame: From screening period (up to 8 weeks prior to randomization) through Day 114 (at any study timepoint)

  4. Change From Baseline in Laboratory Test Parameters - Hepatic and Enzymatic Biomarkers

    To assess the incidents of abnormal hepatic and enzymatic biomarkers following 84 days of IP administration

    Time frame: Day 1 (Baseline) to Day 84/EOT

  5. Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Laboratory Parameter

    Laboratory PCS event is defined as at least a 2 grade increase from baseline based on the Division of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (DMID) v5.0.

    Time frame: Day 1 through Day 84 (at any study timepoint)

  6. Change From Baseline in Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure

    To assess the incidents of abnormal blood pressure assessments following 84 days of IP administration

    Time frame: Day 1 (Baseline) to Day 84/EOT

  7. Change From Baseline in Heart Rate

    To assess the incidents of abnormal heart rate following 84 days of IP administration

    Time frame: Day 1 (Baseline) to Day 84/EOT

  8. Number of Participants With PCS Threshold Vital Signs Measurement

    To assess the incidents of PCS heart rate and blood pressure following 84 days of IP administration

    Time frame: Day 1 through Day 84 (at any study timepoint)

  9. Change From Baseline in ECG PR Interval, QRS Duration, QT Interval, and QTcF Interval

    To assess the incidents of cardiac rhythm, PR interval, QRS interval, QT interval and QTc interval assessments following 84 days of IP administration

    Time frame: Day 1 (Baseline) to Day 84/EOT

  10. Number of Participants With PCS QTcF Value

    To assess the incidents of PCS and QTc interval assessments following 84 days of IP administration

    Time frame: Day 1 through Day 84/EOT (at any study timepoint)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in the Total Score of the Quality of Life - Bronchiectasis (QOL-B) Questionnaire - Emotional Functioning Domain

    The QOL-B is a self-administered, patient-reported outcome measure assessing symptoms, functioning and health-related quality of life for participants with non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis using a series of 37 questions. The QOL-B includes domains for physical functioning, role functioning, vitality, emotional functioning, social functioning, treatment burden, health perceptions and respiratory symptoms. For each domain, scores will be standardized on a 0 to 100 scale and higher scores represent better outcomes.

    Time frame: Day 1 (Baseline) to Day 84/EOT

  2. Change From Baseline in the Total Score of the QOL-B Questionnaire - Health Perceptions Domain

    The QOL-B is a self-administered, patient-reported outcome measure assessing symptoms, functioning and health-related quality of life for participants with non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis using a series of 37 questions. The QOL-B includes domains for physical functioning, role functioning, vitality, emotional functioning, social functioning, treatment burden, health perceptions and respiratory symptoms. For each domain, scores will be standardized on a 0 to 100 scale and higher scores represent better outcomes.

    Time frame: Day 1 (Baseline) to Day 84/EOT

  3. Change From Baseline in the Total Score of the QOL-B Questionnaire - Physical Functioning Domain

    The QOL-B is a self-administered, patient-reported outcome measure assessing symptoms, functioning and health-related quality of life for participants with non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis using a series of 37 questions. The QOL-B includes domains for physical functioning, role functioning, vitality, emotional functioning, social functioning, treatment burden, health perceptions and respiratory symptoms. For each domain, scores will be standardized on a 0 to 100 scale and higher scores represent better outcomes.

    Time frame: Day 1 (Baseline) to Day 84/EOT

  4. Change From Baseline in the Total Score of the QOL-B Questionnaire - Respiratory Symptoms Domain

    The QOL-B is a self-administered, patient-reported outcome measure assessing symptoms, functioning and health-related quality of life for participants with non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis using a series of 37 questions. The QOL-B includes domains for physical functioning, role functioning, vitality, emotional functioning, social functioning, treatment burden, health perceptions and respiratory symptoms. For each domain, scores will be standardized on a 0 to 100 scale and higher scores represent better outcomes.

    Time frame: Day 1 (Baseline) to Day 84/EOT

  5. Change From Baseline in the Total Score of the QOL-B Questionnaire - Role Functioning Domain

    The QOL-B is a self-administered, patient-reported outcome measure assessing symptoms, functioning and health-related quality of life for participants with non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis using a series of 37 questions. The QOL-B includes domains for physical functioning, role functioning, vitality, emotional functioning, social functioning, treatment burden, health perceptions and respiratory symptoms. For each domain, scores will be standardized on a 0 to 100 scale and higher scores represent better outcomes.

    Time frame: Day 1 (Baseline) to Day 84/EOT

  6. Change From Baseline in the Total Score of the QOL-B Questionnaire - Social Functioning Domain

    The QOL-B is a self-administered, patient-reported outcome measure assessing symptoms, functioning and health-related quality of life for participants with non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis using a series of 37 questions. The QOL-B includes domains for physical functioning, role functioning, vitality, emotional functioning, social functioning, treatment burden, health perceptions and respiratory symptoms. For each domain, scores will be standardized on a 0 to 100 scale and higher scores represent better outcomes.

    Time frame: Day 1 (Baseline) to Day 84/EOT

  7. Change From Baseline in the Total Score of the QOL-B Questionnaire - Treatment Burden Domain

    The QOL-B is a self-administered, patient-reported outcome measure assessing symptoms, functioning and health-related quality of life for participants with non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis using a series of 37 questions. The QOL-B includes domains for physical functioning, role functioning, vitality, emotional functioning, social functioning, treatment burden, health perceptions and respiratory symptoms. For each domain, scores will be standardized on a 0 to 100 scale and higher scores represent better outcomes.

    Time frame: Day 1 (Baseline) to Day 84/EOT

  8. Change From Baseline in the Total Score of the QOL-B Questionnaire - Vitality Domain

    The QOL-B is a self-administered, patient-reported outcome measure assessing symptoms, functioning and health-related quality of life for participants with non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis using a series of 37 questions. The QOL-B includes domains for physical functioning, role functioning, vitality, emotional functioning, social functioning, treatment burden, health perceptions and respiratory symptoms. For each domain, scores will be standardized on a 0 to 100 scale and higher scores represent better outcomes.

    Time frame: Day 1 (Baseline) to Day 84/EOT

  9. Change From Baseline in Global Score and Individual Domain Scores of the SGRQ - Total Score

    The SGRQ is a disease-specific, 50-item instrument designed to measure the impact of obstructive airways disease on overall health, daily life, and perceived well-being in participants. It consists of three domains: Symptoms (distress from respiratory symptoms), Activity (limitations in mobility and physical activity), and Impacts (effects on employment, self-management, and medication needs). Scores range from 0 (no impairment) to 100 (maximum impairment) for each domain. The SGRQ Total Score is calculated by dividing the total score values of all positive responses across all domains in the questionnaire by the maximum possible total score that a participant could have achieved, and then multiplying the result by 100. Higher scores indicate worse health status

    Time frame: Day 1 (Baseline) to Day 84/EOT

  10. Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Short Form v1.0 - Fatigue 7a Daily (PROMIS-7a) Score

    The PROMIS Fatigue is a self-administered questionnaire that assesses fatigue and its impact on physical, mental, and social activities. The fatigue short form is universal rather than disease-specific and assesses fatigue over the past 7 days. Participants respond to each of the 7 items using a 5-point Likert scale (e.g., "Not at all" to "Very much") and item responses are summed to produce a raw total score. Raw scores are converted to T-scores using standardized PROMIS scoring tables. The average change in PROMIS Fatigue T-scores was calculated for each study arm. The PROMIS Fatigue T-score is a standardized score (mean = 50, SD = 10) where higher scores indicate greater fatigue severity. A negative change from baseline (i.e., lower T-scores over time) indicates improvement in fatigue symptoms, whereas a positive change (i.e., higher T-scores) indicates worsening of fatigue.

    Time frame: Day 1 (Baseline) to Day 84/EOT

  11. Number of Participants With Improvement in Patient Clinical Impression of Change (PGI-C)

    The PGI-C is a self-administered, single question assessed using a 7-point scale that measures a participant's perceived change in clinical status and overall improvement. Participants with improvement includes: Very much improved, much improved, minimally improved; participants without improvement include: no change, minimally worse, much worse, very much worse.

    Time frame: Day 1 to Day 84/EOT

  12. Number of Participants Reporting "Not Present or Mild Severity" in Patient Clinical Impression of Severity (PGI-S)

    The PGI-S is a self-administered, single question assessed using a 7-point scale that measures a participant's perception of disease severity. Participants with severity Not present or Mild include: not present, very mild, mild; Participants with severity Moderate or Severe include: moderate, moderately severe, severe, extremely severe.

    Time frame: Day 84/EOT

  13. Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness (CGI-S)

    The CGI-S is administered by an experienced clinician who is familiar with the disease under study. The CGI-S is a 1-item observer-rated scale that rates illness severity based upon observed and reported symptoms, behavior, and function over the past seven days.

    Time frame: Day 84/EOT

  14. Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I)

    The CGI-I is a single-item, observer-rated measure using a 7-point scale to assess overall improvement in a participant's condition due to drug treatment. Participants with improvement includes: very much improved, much improved, minimally improved; participants without improvement include: no change, minimally worse, much worse, very much worse.

    Time frame: Day 1 to Day 84/EOT

  15. Number of Participants With New Symptoms With a Severity Worse Than Mild on the NTM Symptom Assessment Questionnaire at Any Time Post-baseline

    The NTM symptom assessment questionnaire is a self-administered tool which assesses 12 common NTM symptoms on a 4-point scale (absent, mild, moderate, severe), reflecting the participant's overall impression over the past week. The questionnaire is completed solely by the participant, without any interpretation from clinicians or site staff.

    Time frame: Day 1 through Day 84 (at any study timepoint)

  16. Number of Participants With Decreased Semi-Quantitative Score of Mycobacterial Sputum Culture From Day 1 to Day 84

    Semi-quantitative score is derived based on growth in liquid medium, growth on agar plate, and colony count on agar plate; the score ranges from 0 to 6. A reduction in the semi-quantitative score reflects a decrease in the quantitative mycobacterial load.

    Time frame: Day 1 to Day 84

  17. Time to Growth in Liquid Medium Only

    Time to growth in liquid medium only is defined as the number of days from the date of study drug administration to the date of the first assessment where growth is detected in liquid medium only. The analysis was based on Kaplan Meier Estimation for Growth in Liquid Medium Only (Day). If there is no culture result indicating growth in liquid medium only and the culture plates are negative, the date of the first negative culture is used for determination of time to growth in liquid medium only.

    Time frame: Day 1 through Day 84 (at any study timepoint)

  18. Time to First Negative Sputum Culture

    Time to first negative sputum culture is defined as the number of days from the date of study drug administration to the date of the first negative sputum culture. The analysis was based on Kaplan Meier Estimation for Negative Sputum Culture (Day).

    Time frame: Day 1 through Day 84 (at any study timepoint)

07

Results

Posted Jul 30, 2025

Participant flow

This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluating the efficacy and safety of omadacycline in adult participants with nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease caused by Mycobacterium abscessus complex.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneOmadacycline 300 mgPlacebo
Started4125
Completed3625
Not completed50
Withdrew: Adverse event40
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject10

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage of Participants With Clinical Response on NTM Symptom Assessment Scale at Day 84

A clinical responder is defined as a participant who shows improvement in at least 50% of baseline symptoms on the NTM Symptom Assessment Questionnaire at the Day 84 Visit. This self-administered tool assesses 12 common NTM symptoms, each rated on a 4-point scale (absent, mild, moderate, severe), reflecting the participant's overall impression over the past week. The questionnaire is completed solely by the participant, without any interpretation from clinicians or site staff.

Time frame:
Day 1 to Day 84
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response on NTM Symptom Assessment Scale at Day 84
Percentage of participantsOmadacycline 300 mgPlacebo
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response on NTM Symptom Assessment Scale at Day 8434.120.0
Statistical analysis
  • Omadacycline 300 mg vs Placebo · Chi-squared · p = 0.2182 (Nominal p-values are provided for descriptive purposes.) · Difference in response rates: 14.15Analysis stratified by prior NTM antibiotic treatment was not performed due to small sample size in one randomization stratification subgroup.
PrimaryPercentage of Participants With Clinical Response on NTM Symptom Assessment Scale at Day 84 With no Deterioration in Severity of Symptoms That Were Present at Baseline.

A clinical responder is defined as a participant who shows improvement in at least 50% of baseline symptoms with no deterioration of symptoms present at baseline on the NTM Symptom Assessment Questionnaire at the Day 84 Visit. This self-administered tool assesses 12 common NTM symptoms, each rated on a 4-point scale (absent, mild, moderate, severe), reflecting the participant's overall impression over the past week. The questionnaire is completed solely by the participant, without any interpretation from clinicians or site staff.

Time frame:
Day 1 to Day 84
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response on NTM Symptom Assessment Scale at Day 84 With no Deterioration in Severity of Symptoms That Were Present at Baseline.
percentage of participantsOmadacycline 300 mgPlacebo
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response on NTM Symptom Assessment Scale at Day 84 With no Deterioration in Severity of Symptoms That Were Present at Baseline.34.112.0
Statistical analysis
  • Omadacycline 300 mg vs Placebo · Chi-squared · p = 0.0460 (Nominal p-values are provided for descriptive purposes.) · Difference in response rates: 22.15Analysis stratified by prior NTM antibiotic treatment was not performed due to small sample size in one randomization stratification subgroup.
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

A TEAE is an adverse event that occurred on or after first dose of test article and those existing AEs that worsened on or after first dose of test article. An SAE is an adverse event that results in death, is life-threatening, requires hospitalization or extends an existing one, causes significant or lasting disability/incapacity, or leads to a congenital anomaly or birth defect. Additionally, events that may not meet these criteria but are medically significant can also be classified as SAEs.

Time frame:
From screening period (up to 8 weeks prior to randomization) through Day 114 (at any study timepoint)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
ParticipantsOmadacycline 300 mgPlacebo
TEAEs3521
SAEs02
PrimaryChange From Baseline in Laboratory Test Parameters - Hepatic and Enzymatic Biomarkers

To assess the incidents of abnormal hepatic and enzymatic biomarkers following 84 days of IP administration

Time frame:
Day 1 (Baseline) to Day 84/EOT
Reported as:
Mean · Units per litre
Change From Baseline in Laboratory Test Parameters - Hepatic and Enzymatic Biomarkers
Units per litreOmadacycline 300 mgPlacebo
Alkaline Phosphatase-3.3 ± 14.46-3.0 ± 11.22
Alanine Aminotransferase10.4 ± 17.19-1.4 ± 9.74
Aspartate Aminotransferase3.9 ± 8.72-3.0 ± 11.88
Creatine Kinase2.5 ± 28.76-26.6 ± 116.68
Gamma Glutamyl Transferase1.7 ± 14.35-0.6 ± 12.83
Lipase3.5 ± 16.50-2.2 ± 8.39
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Laboratory Parameter

Laboratory PCS event is defined as at least a 2 grade increase from baseline based on the Division of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (DMID) v5.0.

Time frame:
Day 1 through Day 84 (at any study timepoint)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Laboratory Parameter
ParticipantsOmadacycline 300 mgPlacebo
Alkaline Phosphatase00
Alanine Aminotransferase20
Aspartate Aminotransferase00
Calcium00
Creatinine00
Gamma Glutamyl Transferase00
Lipase30
Magnesium00
Phosphate00
Potassium00
Sodium10
Bilirubin00
Neutrophils00
Hemoglobin00
Platelets00
Leukocytes01
PrimaryChange From Baseline in Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure

To assess the incidents of abnormal blood pressure assessments following 84 days of IP administration

Time frame:
Day 1 (Baseline) to Day 84/EOT
Reported as:
Mean · Millimeter of mercury
Change From Baseline in Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure
Millimeter of mercuryOmadacycline 300 mgPlacebo
Systolic Blood Pressure4.3 ± 12.532.4 ± 12.62
Diastolic Blood Pressure-0.5 ± 8.630.7 ± 10.45
PrimaryChange From Baseline in Heart Rate

To assess the incidents of abnormal heart rate following 84 days of IP administration

Time frame:
Day 1 (Baseline) to Day 84/EOT
Reported as:
Mean · Beats per minute
Change From Baseline in Heart Rate
Beats per minuteOmadacycline 300 mgPlacebo
Change From Baseline in Heart Rate1.1 ± 8.660.2 ± 10.09
PrimaryNumber of Participants With PCS Threshold Vital Signs Measurement

To assess the incidents of PCS heart rate and blood pressure following 84 days of IP administration

Time frame:
Day 1 through Day 84 (at any study timepoint)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With PCS Threshold Vital Signs Measurement
ParticipantsOmadacycline 300 mgPlacebo
Heart rate: >120 and increase of >=15 bpm00
Heart rate: <=50 and decrease of >=15 bpm00
Systolic blood pressure: >=180 and increase of >=20 mmHg00
Systolic blood pressure: <=90 and decrease of >=20 mmHg00
Diastolic blood pressure: >=105 and increase of >=15 mmHg00
Diastolic blood pressure: <=50 and decrease of >=15 mmHg20
Temperature: >38.000
Temperature: <36.040
PrimaryChange From Baseline in ECG PR Interval, QRS Duration, QT Interval, and QTcF Interval

To assess the incidents of cardiac rhythm, PR interval, QRS interval, QT interval and QTc interval assessments following 84 days of IP administration

Time frame:
Day 1 (Baseline) to Day 84/EOT
Reported as:
Mean · milliseconds
Change From Baseline in ECG PR Interval, QRS Duration, QT Interval, and QTcF Interval
millisecondsOmadacycline 300 mgPlacebo
PR Interval9.7 ± 57.235.8 ± 40.93
QRS Duration-0.5 ± 9.23-2.3 ± 5.11
QT Interval-11.7 ± 18.66-2.0 ± 29.63
QTcF Interval-8.5 ± 34.04-7.3 ± 68.65
PrimaryNumber of Participants With PCS QTcF Value

To assess the incidents of PCS and QTc interval assessments following 84 days of IP administration

Time frame:
Day 1 through Day 84/EOT (at any study timepoint)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With PCS QTcF Value
ParticipantsOmadacycline 300 mgPlacebo
> 450 msec35
> 480 msec12
> 500 msec10
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the Total Score of the Quality of Life - Bronchiectasis (QOL-B) Questionnaire - Emotional Functioning Domain

The QOL-B is a self-administered, patient-reported outcome measure assessing symptoms, functioning and health-related quality of life for participants with non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis using a series of 37 questions. The QOL-B includes domains for physical functioning, role functioning, vitality, emotional functioning, social functioning, treatment burden, health perceptions and respiratory symptoms. For each domain, scores will be standardized on a 0 to 100 scale and higher scores represent better outcomes.

Time frame:
Day 1 (Baseline) to Day 84/EOT
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Score on a scale
Change From Baseline in the Total Score of the Quality of Life - Bronchiectasis (QOL-B) Questionnaire - Emotional Functioning Domain
Score on a scaleOmadacycline 300 mgPlacebo
Change From Baseline in the Total Score of the Quality of Life - Bronchiectasis (QOL-B) Questionnaire - Emotional Functioning Domain3.5 ± 2.052.7 ± 2.69
Statistical analysis
  • Omadacycline 300 mg vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.8240 (ANCOVA analyzed change from baseline using treatment, prior antibiotic use, and baseline score as factors. LS mean difference = Omadacycline minus Placebo.) · Least square mean difference: 0.8 · 95% CI -6.01 to 7.52
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the Total Score of the QOL-B Questionnaire - Health Perceptions Domain

The QOL-B is a self-administered, patient-reported outcome measure assessing symptoms, functioning and health-related quality of life for participants with non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis using a series of 37 questions. The QOL-B includes domains for physical functioning, role functioning, vitality, emotional functioning, social functioning, treatment burden, health perceptions and respiratory symptoms. For each domain, scores will be standardized on a 0 to 100 scale and higher scores represent better outcomes.

Time frame:
Day 1 (Baseline) to Day 84/EOT
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Score on a scale
Change From Baseline in the Total Score of the QOL-B Questionnaire - Health Perceptions Domain
Score on a scaleOmadacycline 300 mgPlacebo
Change From Baseline in the Total Score of the QOL-B Questionnaire - Health Perceptions Domain4.2 ± 2.43-0.9 ± 3.25
Statistical analysis
  • Omadacycline 300 mg vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.2149 (ANCOVA analyzed change from baseline using treatment, prior antibiotic use, and baseline score as factors. LS mean difference = Omadacycline minus Placebo.) · Least square mean difference: 5.1 · 95% CI -3.03 to 13.20
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the Total Score of the QOL-B Questionnaire - Physical Functioning Domain

The QOL-B is a self-administered, patient-reported outcome measure assessing symptoms, functioning and health-related quality of life for participants with non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis using a series of 37 questions. The QOL-B includes domains for physical functioning, role functioning, vitality, emotional functioning, social functioning, treatment burden, health perceptions and respiratory symptoms. For each domain, scores will be standardized on a 0 to 100 scale and higher scores represent better outcomes.

Time frame:
Day 1 (Baseline) to Day 84/EOT
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Score on a scale
Change From Baseline in the Total Score of the QOL-B Questionnaire - Physical Functioning Domain
Score on a scaleOmadacycline 300 mgPlacebo
Change From Baseline in the Total Score of the QOL-B Questionnaire - Physical Functioning Domain5.6 ± 3.21-2.7 ± 4.20
Statistical analysis
  • Omadacycline 300 mg vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.1230 (ANCOVA analyzed change from baseline using treatment, prior antibiotic use, and baseline score as factors. LS mean difference = Omadacycline minus Placebo.) · Least square mean difference: 8.3 · 95% CI -2.31 to 18.88
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the Total Score of the QOL-B Questionnaire - Respiratory Symptoms Domain

The QOL-B is a self-administered, patient-reported outcome measure assessing symptoms, functioning and health-related quality of life for participants with non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis using a series of 37 questions. The QOL-B includes domains for physical functioning, role functioning, vitality, emotional functioning, social functioning, treatment burden, health perceptions and respiratory symptoms. For each domain, scores will be standardized on a 0 to 100 scale and higher scores represent better outcomes.

Time frame:
Day 1 (Baseline) to Day 84/EOT
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Score on a scale
Change From Baseline in the Total Score of the QOL-B Questionnaire - Respiratory Symptoms Domain
Score on a scaleOmadacycline 300 mgPlacebo
Change From Baseline in the Total Score of the QOL-B Questionnaire - Respiratory Symptoms Domain7.5 ± 2.102.0 ± 2.75
Statistical analysis
  • Omadacycline 300 mg vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.1168 (ANCOVA analyzed change from baseline using treatment, prior antibiotic use, and baseline score as factors. LS mean difference = Omadacycline minus Placebo.) · Least square mean difference: 5.5 · 95% CI -1.41 to 12.43
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the Total Score of the QOL-B Questionnaire - Role Functioning Domain

The QOL-B is a self-administered, patient-reported outcome measure assessing symptoms, functioning and health-related quality of life for participants with non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis using a series of 37 questions. The QOL-B includes domains for physical functioning, role functioning, vitality, emotional functioning, social functioning, treatment burden, health perceptions and respiratory symptoms. For each domain, scores will be standardized on a 0 to 100 scale and higher scores represent better outcomes.

Time frame:
Day 1 (Baseline) to Day 84/EOT
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Score on a scale
Change From Baseline in the Total Score of the QOL-B Questionnaire - Role Functioning Domain
Score on a scaleOmadacycline 300 mgPlacebo
Change From Baseline in the Total Score of the QOL-B Questionnaire - Role Functioning Domain7.4 ± 2.140.9 ± 2.86
Statistical analysis
  • Omadacycline 300 mg vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.0743 (ANCOVA analyzed change from baseline using treatment, prior antibiotic use, and baseline score as factors. LS mean difference = Omadacycline minus Placebo.) · Least square mean difference: 6.5 · 95% CI -0.66 to 13.66
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the Total Score of the QOL-B Questionnaire - Social Functioning Domain

The QOL-B is a self-administered, patient-reported outcome measure assessing symptoms, functioning and health-related quality of life for participants with non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis using a series of 37 questions. The QOL-B includes domains for physical functioning, role functioning, vitality, emotional functioning, social functioning, treatment burden, health perceptions and respiratory symptoms. For each domain, scores will be standardized on a 0 to 100 scale and higher scores represent better outcomes.

Time frame:
Day 1 (Baseline) to Day 84/EOT
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Score on a scale
Change From Baseline in the Total Score of the QOL-B Questionnaire - Social Functioning Domain
Score on a scaleOmadacycline 300 mgPlacebo
Change From Baseline in the Total Score of the QOL-B Questionnaire - Social Functioning Domain9.6 ± 2.452.6 ± 3.27
Statistical analysis
  • Omadacycline 300 mg vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.0899 (ANCOVA analyzed change from baseline using treatment, prior antibiotic use, and baseline score as factors. LS mean difference = Omadacycline minus Placebo.) · Least square mean difference: 7.1 · 95% CI -1.13 to 15.23
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the Total Score of the QOL-B Questionnaire - Treatment Burden Domain

The QOL-B is a self-administered, patient-reported outcome measure assessing symptoms, functioning and health-related quality of life for participants with non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis using a series of 37 questions. The QOL-B includes domains for physical functioning, role functioning, vitality, emotional functioning, social functioning, treatment burden, health perceptions and respiratory symptoms. For each domain, scores will be standardized on a 0 to 100 scale and higher scores represent better outcomes.

Time frame:
Day 1 (Baseline) to Day 84/EOT
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Score on a scale
Change From Baseline in the Total Score of the QOL-B Questionnaire - Treatment Burden Domain
Score on a scaleOmadacycline 300 mgPlacebo
Change From Baseline in the Total Score of the QOL-B Questionnaire - Treatment Burden Domain2.8 ± 2.382.3 ± 3.20
Statistical analysis
  • Omadacycline 300 mg vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.9019 (ANCOVA analyzed change from baseline using treatment, prior antibiotic use, and baseline score as factors. LS mean difference = Omadacycline minus Placebo.) · Least square mean difference: 0.5 · 95% CI -7.60 to 8.59
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the Total Score of the QOL-B Questionnaire - Vitality Domain

The QOL-B is a self-administered, patient-reported outcome measure assessing symptoms, functioning and health-related quality of life for participants with non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis using a series of 37 questions. The QOL-B includes domains for physical functioning, role functioning, vitality, emotional functioning, social functioning, treatment burden, health perceptions and respiratory symptoms. For each domain, scores will be standardized on a 0 to 100 scale and higher scores represent better outcomes.

Time frame:
Day 1 (Baseline) to Day 84/EOT
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Score on a scale
Change From Baseline in the Total Score of the QOL-B Questionnaire - Vitality Domain
Score on a scaleOmadacycline 300 mgPlacebo
Change From Baseline in the Total Score of the QOL-B Questionnaire - Vitality Domain9.3 ± 2.50-4.3 ± 3.27
Statistical analysis
  • Omadacycline 300 mg vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.0015 (ANCOVA analyzed change from baseline using treatment, prior antibiotic use, and baseline score as factors. LS mean difference = Omadacycline minus Placebo.) · Least square mean difference: 13.7 · 95% CI 5.43 to 21.89
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Global Score and Individual Domain Scores of the SGRQ - Total Score

The SGRQ is a disease-specific, 50-item instrument designed to measure the impact of obstructive airways disease on overall health, daily life, and perceived well-being in participants. It consists of three domains: Symptoms (distress from respiratory symptoms), Activity (limitations in mobility and physical activity), and Impacts (effects on employment, self-management, and medication needs). Scores range from 0 (no impairment) to 100 (maximum impairment) for each domain. The SGRQ Total Score is calculated by dividing the total score values of all positive responses across all domains in the questionnaire by the maximum possible total score that a participant could have achieved, and then multiplying the result by 100. Higher scores indicate worse health status

Time frame:
Day 1 (Baseline) to Day 84/EOT
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Global Score and Individual Domain Scores of the SGRQ - Total Score
Score on a scaleOmadacycline 300 mgPlacebo
Activity score-2.7 ± 2.50-3.6 ± 3.17
Impact score-3.7 ± 2.29-3.5 ± 2.99
Symptom score-5.6 ± 2.43-0.6 ± 3.11
Total score-3.7 ± 2.06-3.0 ± 2.67
Statistical analysis
  • Omadacycline 300 mg vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.8269 (ANCOVA analyzed change from baseline using treatment, prior antibiotic use, and baseline score as factors. LS mean difference = Omadacycline minus Placebo.) · Least square mean difference: 0.9 · 95% CI -7.26 to 9.05Treatment comparison of Omadacycline and Placebo for activity score has been presented.
  • Omadacycline 300 mg vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.9584 (ANCOVA analyzed change from baseline using treatment, prior antibiotic use, and baseline score as factors. LS mean difference = Omadacycline minus Placebo.) · Least square mean difference: -0.2 · 95% CI -7.74 to 7.35Treatment comparison between Omadacycline and Placebo for impact score has been presented
  • Omadacycline 300 mg vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.2123 (ANCOVA analyzed change from baseline using treatment, prior antibiotic use, and baseline score as factors. LS mean difference = Omadacycline minus Placebo.) · Least square mean difference: -5.0 · 95% CI -12.88 to 2.92Treatment comparison between Omadacycline and Placebo for symptom score has been presented.
  • Omadacycline 300 mg vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.8161 (ANCOVA analyzed change from baseline using treatment, prior antibiotic use, and baseline score as factors. LS mean difference = Omadacycline minus Placebo.) · Least square mean difference: -0.8 · 95% CI -7.58 to 5.99Treatment comparison between Omadacycline and Placebo for total score has been presented.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Short Form v1.0 - Fatigue 7a Daily (PROMIS-7a) Score

The PROMIS Fatigue is a self-administered questionnaire that assesses fatigue and its impact on physical, mental, and social activities. The fatigue short form is universal rather than disease-specific and assesses fatigue over the past 7 days. Participants respond to each of the 7 items using a 5-point Likert scale (e.g., "Not at all" to "Very much") and item responses are summed to produce a raw total score. Raw scores are converted to T-scores using standardized PROMIS scoring tables. The average change in PROMIS Fatigue T-scores was calculated for each study arm. The PROMIS Fatigue T-score is a standardized score (mean = 50, SD = 10) where higher scores indicate greater fatigue severity. A negative change from baseline (i.e., lower T-scores over time) indicates improvement in fatigue symptoms, whereas a positive change (i.e., higher T-scores) indicates worsening of fatigue.

Time frame:
Day 1 (Baseline) to Day 84/EOT
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Short Form v1.0 - Fatigue 7a Daily (PROMIS-7a) Score
score on a scaleOmadacycline 300 mgPlacebo
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Short Form v1.0 - Fatigue 7a Daily (PROMIS-7a) Score-4.3 ± 1.011.3 ± 1.30
Statistical analysis
  • Omadacycline 300 mg vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.0010 (ANCOVA analyzed change from baseline using treatment, prior antibiotic use, and baseline score as factors. LS mean difference = Omadacycline minus Placebo.) · Least square mean difference: -5.7 · 95% CI -8.95 to -2.38
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Improvement in Patient Clinical Impression of Change (PGI-C)

The PGI-C is a self-administered, single question assessed using a 7-point scale that measures a participant's perceived change in clinical status and overall improvement. Participants with improvement includes: Very much improved, much improved, minimally improved; participants without improvement include: no change, minimally worse, much worse, very much worse.

Time frame:
Day 1 to Day 84/EOT
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Improvement in Patient Clinical Impression of Change (PGI-C)
ParticipantsOmadacycline 300 mgPlacebo
Number of Participants With Improvement in Patient Clinical Impression of Change (PGI-C)319
Statistical analysis
  • Omadacycline 300 mg vs Placebo · Fisher Exact · p = 0.0020 · Difference in improvement rates: 39.61 · 95% CI 16.66 to 62.56
SecondaryNumber of Participants Reporting "Not Present or Mild Severity" in Patient Clinical Impression of Severity (PGI-S)

The PGI-S is a self-administered, single question assessed using a 7-point scale that measures a participant's perception of disease severity. Participants with severity Not present or Mild include: not present, very mild, mild; Participants with severity Moderate or Severe include: moderate, moderately severe, severe, extremely severe.

Time frame:
Day 84/EOT
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Reporting "Not Present or Mild Severity" in Patient Clinical Impression of Severity (PGI-S)
ParticipantsOmadacycline 300 mgPlacebo
Number of Participants Reporting "Not Present or Mild Severity" in Patient Clinical Impression of Severity (PGI-S)2612
Statistical analysis
  • Omadacycline 300 mg vs Placebo · Fisher Exact · p = 0.3051 · Difference in improvement rates: 15.41 · 95% CI -9.10 to 39.93
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness (CGI-S)

The CGI-S is administered by an experienced clinician who is familiar with the disease under study. The CGI-S is a 1-item observer-rated scale that rates illness severity based upon observed and reported symptoms, behavior, and function over the past seven days.

Time frame:
Day 84/EOT
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness (CGI-S)
ParticipantsOmadacycline 300 mgPlacebo
Normal, not at all ill144
Borderline ill98
Mildly ill119
Moderately ill64
Markedly ill00
Severely ill10
Among the most extremely ill participants00
Statistical analysis
  • Omadacycline 300 mg vs Placebo · Wilcoxon rank sum test · p = 0.3552
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I)

The CGI-I is a single-item, observer-rated measure using a 7-point scale to assess overall improvement in a participant's condition due to drug treatment. Participants with improvement includes: very much improved, much improved, minimally improved; participants without improvement include: no change, minimally worse, much worse, very much worse.

Time frame:
Day 1 to Day 84/EOT
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I)
ParticipantsOmadacycline 300 mgPlacebo
Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I)2911
Statistical analysis
  • Omadacycline 300 mg vs Placebo · Wilcoxon rank sum test · p = 0.0753
SecondaryNumber of Participants With New Symptoms With a Severity Worse Than Mild on the NTM Symptom Assessment Questionnaire at Any Time Post-baseline

The NTM symptom assessment questionnaire is a self-administered tool which assesses 12 common NTM symptoms on a 4-point scale (absent, mild, moderate, severe), reflecting the participant's overall impression over the past week. The questionnaire is completed solely by the participant, without any interpretation from clinicians or site staff.

Time frame:
Day 1 through Day 84 (at any study timepoint)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With New Symptoms With a Severity Worse Than Mild on the NTM Symptom Assessment Questionnaire at Any Time Post-baseline
ParticipantsOmadacycline 300 mgPlacebo
Number of Participants With New Symptoms With a Severity Worse Than Mild on the NTM Symptom Assessment Questionnaire at Any Time Post-baseline46
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Decreased Semi-Quantitative Score of Mycobacterial Sputum Culture From Day 1 to Day 84

Semi-quantitative score is derived based on growth in liquid medium, growth on agar plate, and colony count on agar plate; the score ranges from 0 to 6. A reduction in the semi-quantitative score reflects a decrease in the quantitative mycobacterial load.

Time frame:
Day 1 to Day 84
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Decreased Semi-Quantitative Score of Mycobacterial Sputum Culture From Day 1 to Day 84
ParticipantsOmadacycline 300 mgPlacebo
Number of Participants With Decreased Semi-Quantitative Score of Mycobacterial Sputum Culture From Day 1 to Day 842611
Statistical analysis
  • Omadacycline 300 mg vs Placebo · Chi-squared · p = 0.0168 · Odds ratio (or): 3.84 · 95% CI 1.24 to 11.87
SecondaryTime to Growth in Liquid Medium Only

Time to growth in liquid medium only is defined as the number of days from the date of study drug administration to the date of the first assessment where growth is detected in liquid medium only. The analysis was based on Kaplan Meier Estimation for Growth in Liquid Medium Only (Day). If there is no culture result indicating growth in liquid medium only and the culture plates are negative, the date of the first negative culture is used for determination of time to growth in liquid medium only.

Time frame:
Day 1 through Day 84 (at any study timepoint)
Reported as:
Median · Days
Time to Growth in Liquid Medium Only
DaysOmadacycline 300 mgPlacebo
Time to Growth in Liquid Medium Only34 (28 to 83)NA (28 to NA)
Statistical analysis
  • Omadacycline 300 mg vs Placebo · Log Rank · p = 0.0233
SecondaryTime to First Negative Sputum Culture

Time to first negative sputum culture is defined as the number of days from the date of study drug administration to the date of the first negative sputum culture. The analysis was based on Kaplan Meier Estimation for Negative Sputum Culture (Day).

Time frame:
Day 1 through Day 84 (at any study timepoint)
Reported as:
Median · Days
Time to First Negative Sputum Culture
DaysOmadacycline 300 mgPlacebo
Time to First Negative Sputum Culture30 (28 to 84)NA (30 to NA)
Statistical analysis
  • Omadacycline 300 mg vs Placebo · Log Rank · p = 0.0349

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse events were monitored from screening period (up to 8 weeks prior to randomization) through the final Follow-up assessment, which occurred up to 30 days after the last dose of study treatment, with the treatment period lasting for 84 days.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Omadacycline 300 mg0/41 (0%)0/41 (0%)35/41 (85.4%)
Placebo0/25 (0%)2/25 (8%)21/25 (84%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventOmadacycline 300 mgPlacebo
Gastrointestinal haemorrhageGastrointestinal disorders0/411/25
COVID-19Infections and infestations0/411/25
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 15
Most frequent other events
EventOmadacycline 300 mgPlacebo
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders22/412/25
HeadacheNervous system disorders7/414/25
FatigueGeneral disorders7/411/25
Abdominal painGastrointestinal disorders6/411/25
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders6/410/25
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders5/411/25
COVID-19Infections and infestations2/413/25
HaemoptysisRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders3/413/25
CoughRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders2/413/25
Alanine aminotransferase increasedInvestigations4/410/25

Baseline characteristics

Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of test article.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)Omadacycline 300 mgPlaceboTotal
Mean69.3 ± 9.6172.8 ± 7.6470.6 ± 9.02
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Omadacycline 300 mgPlaceboTotal
Female301545
Male111021
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Omadacycline 300 mgPlaceboTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian426
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American101
White362359
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported000
08

Study locations

17 sites
  • Stanford University
    Stanford, California 94305, United States
  • Georgetown University Hospital
    Washington D.C., District of Columbia 20057, United States
  • St. Francis Medical Institute
    Clearwater, Florida 33765, United States
  • University of Miami
    Miami, Florida 33136, United States
  • University of South Florida
    Tampa, Florida 33612, United States
  • Infectious Disease Consultants of the Treasure Coast
    Vero Beach, Florida 32960, United States
  • Emory University School of Medicine
    Atlanta, Georgia 30342, United States
  • Louisiana State University Medical Center Health Sciences Center-New Orleans Section of Pulmonary/Critical Care & Allergy/Immunology
    New Orleans, Louisiana 70112, United States
  • Johns Hopkins University
    Baltimore, Maryland 21287, United States
  • Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
    Lebanon, New Hampshire 03756, United States
  • Northwell Health
    New Hyde Park, New York 11042, United States
  • Einstein/Montefiore Medical Center
    The Bronx, New York 10467, United States
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
    Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, United States
  • Oregon Health & Science University
    Portland, Oregon 97239, United States
  • Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC)
    Charleston, South Carolina 29425, United States
  • The University of Texas Health Science Center at Tyler
    Tyler, Texas 75708, United States
  • University of Wisconsin Hospitals and Clinics
    Madison, Wisconsin 53792, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Jahanbakhsh S, Howland J, Ndayishimiye Uwineza MO, Thwaites MT, Pillar CM, Serio AW, Anastasiou DM, Hufnagel DA. Evaluation of omadacycline against intracellular Mycobacterium abscessus in an infection model in human macrophages. JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2023 Sep 15;5(5):dlad104. doi: 10.1093/jacamr/dlad104. eCollection 2023 Oct. PubMed 37720564 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 30, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04922554
Lead sponsor
Paratek Pharmaceuticals Inc
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 10, 2021
Start date
Oct 15, 2021
Primary completion
Jun 17, 2024
Completion
Jul 17, 2024
Results posted
Jul 30, 2025
Last update
Jul 30, 2025

Study contacts

Amy Manley
study chair · Paratek Pharmaceuticals Inc

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Omadacycline

Start the discussion