ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03421327Updated Feb 7, 2019

Genetic Risk: Whether, When, and How to Tell Adolescents

An observational study in Huntington Disease, Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer and Hereditary Cancer, sponsored by Johns Hopkins University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 15 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-02-07.

Sponsored by Johns Hopkins University · Observational

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
85
Ages
15 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-15

Among 138 studies in Huntington Disease with a site in United States — 21 open to participants now, 29 under way, 4 of them phase 3. Huntington Disease · United States.

Enrollment
30th of 48
85 · median 131
Started
2017
with 6 others
Observational
48 of 138
14 open now
Registered
79th of 138
by date
Lead sponsor
4 of 138
Johns Hopkins University

Among the 138 studies in Huntington Disease with a site in United States, this one is the 30th largest by enrollment of the 48 observational ones that give a count, is one of 7 that started in 2017, is one of 48 observational ones, and was the 79th registered.

Huntington Disease

293 studies on the registry are indexed under Huntington Disease; 54 are open to participants now.

Browse Huntington Disease studies →

Open to participants now

21 of the 138 studies in Huntington Disease with a site in United States are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

16 more — sign in →

All 21 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in United States have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in United States →

Who these studies take

Of the 43 Huntington Disease studies recruiting now, 19 (44%) set no upper age limit and 20 (47%) stop at 75 or younger; 5 take children under 18; 20 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 15 Years and older · all sexes · healthy volunteers too.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Get alerts for this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 138 studies in Huntington Disease with a site in United States, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

This study is being conducted to learn more about family communication of genetic risk information. Semi-structured interviews lasting up to one hour will be conducted with three populations: parent/child pairs at risk for Huntington's Disease, parent/child pairs at risk for hereditary cancer, and genetic counselors.

Read the detailed description

The investigators currently lack an adequate understanding of how parents and children feel about genetic risk/status, how it is communicated, and how it influences wellbeing and family relationships. This understanding is vital in order for genetic counselors and other health care professionals to provide the best guidance possible to families. However, little research has been conducted on the impact of genetic risk information or testing on children from the perspective of the child. The research proposed here is uniquely positioned to help fill this gap.

For this study, the investigators will interview 15-20 parent/child pairs who are at risk for Huntington's Disease (HD), 15-20 parent/child pairs who are at risk for hereditary cancer, and 15-20 certified genetic counselors. Interviews will last no more than one hour and will be conducted at a time and place that is convenient for the participant. The investigators will offer participants a choice of conducting the interview in a private conference room at the Berman Institute of Bioethics, or remotely by Skype or telephone. Parents and children will be interviewed separately. Parents will be asked about the decision process behind how and when they disclosed genetic information to their child, style of family communication, advice for other parents in similar situations, and other questions related to the subject of communication of genetic information to minors. Children will be asked about their experience learning genetic risk information, style of family communication, how they felt, advice for other kids in similar situations, and other questions related to the subject of communication of genetic information to minors.

03

Conditions studied

  • Huntington Disease
  • Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer
  • Hereditary Cancer
  • Hereditary Non-polyposis Colon Cancer
  • Hereditary Non-Polyposis Colorectal Cancer Syndrome
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
15 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The study population will include individuals who reside in the USA, speak English, and are able to participate in one interview either in person, via phone, or via Skype.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Parents at-risk for HD, affected by HD, or be the spouse/partner of someone living who at risk for or affected by HD.
  • Parents who have or have had a diagnosis of hereditary cancer, or the spouse/partner of someone living who has or has had had a diagnosis of hereditary cancer.
  • Children ages 15-17 who are at risk for either HD or hereditary cancer

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Parents and children who have not yet communicated about genetic risk
  • Children younger than age 15
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
85 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Families at-risk for HD

    No interventions will be administered. Participation involves one semi-structured interview that will last up to one hour. The interview will be scheduled at a time and place that is convenient for the participant. The participant will be given the option to conduct the interview via phone, Skype, or in-person at Johns Hopkins.

  • Families at-risk for hereditary cancer

    No interventions will be administered. Participation involves one semi-structured interview that will last up to one hour. The interview will be scheduled at a time and place that is convenient for the participant. The participant will be given the option to conduct the interview via phone, Skype, or in-person at Johns Hopkins.

  • Genetic Counselors

    No interventions will be administered. Participation involves one semi-structured interview that will last up to one hour. The interview will be scheduled at a time and place that is convenient for the participant. The participant will be given the option to conduct the interview via phone, Skype, or in-person at Johns Hopkins.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Qualitative analysis of how parents and children with either Huntington's Disease or hereditary cancer communicate about genetic risk information

    Qualitative interview performed at one occasion where the patient describes when and how genetic risk information was disclosed to minor as well as perspectives from both parent and child.

    Time frame: 1.5 years

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Johns Hopkins
    Baltimore, Maryland 21205, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Smith LA, Ullmann JF, Olson HE, Achkar CM, Truglio G, Kelly M, Rosen-Sheidley B, Poduri A. A Model Program for Translational Medicine in Epilepsy Genetics. J Child Neurol. 2017 Mar;32(4):429-436. doi: 10.1177/0883073816685654. Epub 2017 Jan 6. PubMed 28056630 ↗
  • Jarvik GP, Amendola LM, Berg JS, Brothers K, Clayton EW, Chung W, Evans BJ, Evans JP, Fullerton SM, Gallego CJ, Garrison NA, Gray SW, Holm IA, Kullo IJ, Lehmann LS, McCarty C, Prows CA, Rehm HL, Sharp RR, Salama J, Sanderson S, Van Driest SL, Williams MS, Wolf SM, Wolf WA; eMERGE Act-ROR Committee and CERC Committee; CSER Act-ROR Working Group; Burke W. Return of genomic results to research participants: the floor, the ceiling, and the choices in between. Am J Hum Genet. 2014 Jun 5;94(6):818-26. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2014.04.009. Epub 2014 May 8. PubMed 24814192 ↗
  • Appelbaum PS, Parens E, Waldman CR, Klitzman R, Fyer A, Martinez J, Price WN 2nd, Chung WK. Models of consent to return of incidental findings in genomic research. Hastings Cent Rep. 2014 Jul-Aug;44(4):22-32. doi: 10.1002/hast.328. Epub 2014 Jun 11. PubMed 24919982 ↗
  • Garber JE, Offit K. Hereditary cancer predisposition syndromes. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Jan 10;23(2):276-92. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.10.042. PubMed 15637391 ↗
  • Quarrell OW, Rigby AS, Barron L, Crow Y, Dalton A, Dennis N, Fryer AE, Heydon F, Kinning E, Lashwood A, Losekoot M, Margerison L, McDonnell S, Morrison PJ, Norman A, Peterson M, Raymond FL, Simpson S, Thompson E, Warner J. Reduced penetrance alleles for Huntington's disease: a multi-centre direct observational study. J Med Genet. 2007 Mar;44(3):e68. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2006.045120. PubMed 17361007 ↗
  • Ford D, Easton DF, Stratton M, Narod S, Goldgar D, Devilee P, Bishop DT, Weber B, Lenoir G, Chang-Claude J, Sobol H, Teare MD, Struewing J, Arason A, Scherneck S, Peto J, Rebbeck TR, Tonin P, Neuhausen S, Barkardottir R, Eyfjord J, Lynch H, Ponder BA, Gayther SA, Zelada-Hedman M, et al. Genetic heterogeneity and penetrance analysis of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in breast cancer families. The Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium. Am J Hum Genet. 1998 Mar;62(3):676-89. doi: 10.1086/301749. PubMed 9497246 ↗
  • McConkie-Rosell A, Spiridigliozzi GA, Melvin E, Dawson DV, Lachiewicz AM. Living with genetic risk: effect on adolescent self-concept. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2008 Feb 15;148C(1):56-69. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.c.30161. PubMed 18200514 ↗
  • Hamilton RJ. Using skype to conduct interviews for psychosocial research. Comput Inform Nurs. 2014 Aug;32(8):353-8. doi: 10.1097/CIN.0000000000000095. No abstract available. PubMed 25133565 ↗
  • Janghorban R, Latifnejad Roudsari R, Taghipour A. Skype interviewing: the new generation of online synchronous interview in qualitative research. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2014 Apr 15;9:24152. doi: 10.3402/qhw.v9.24152. eCollection 2014. PubMed 24746247 ↗
  • Meropol NJ, Daly MB, Vig HS, Manion FJ, Manne SL, Mazar C, Murphy C, Solarino N, Zubarev V. Delivery of Internet-based cancer genetic counselling services to patients' homes: a feasibility study. J Telemed Telecare. 2011;17(1):36-40. doi: 10.1258/jtt.2010.100116. Epub 2010 Nov 19. PubMed 21097566 ↗
  • Hilgart JS, Hayward JA, Coles B, Iredale R. Telegenetics: a systematic review of telemedicine in genetics services. Genet Med. 2012 Sep;14(9):765-76. doi: 10.1038/gim.2012.40. Epub 2012 Apr 12. PubMed 22498847 ↗
  • Abdolahi A, Bull MT, Darwin KC, Venkataraman V, Grana MJ, Dorsey ER, Biglan KM. A feasibility study of conducting the Montreal Cognitive Assessment remotely in individuals with movement disorders. Health Informatics J. 2016 Jun;22(2):304-11. doi: 10.1177/1460458214556373. Epub 2014 Nov 11. PubMed 25391849 ↗
  • Trondsen MV, Bolle SR, Stensland GO, Tjora A. Video-confidence: a qualitative exploration of videoconferencing for psychiatric emergencies. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Oct 31;14:544. doi: 10.1186/s12913-014-0544-y. PubMed 25359404 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Sep 2017 to primary completion in Dec 2018, 15 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 2, 2018
First posted
Feb 5, 2018
StartActual
Sep 1, 2017
Primary completionActual
Dec 31, 2018
CompletionActual
Dec 31, 2018
Last update
Feb 7, 2019
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 7, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03421327
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 5, 2018
Start date
Sep 1, 2017
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2018
Completion
Dec 31, 2018
Last update
Feb 7, 2019

Study contacts

Debra Mathews, PhD, MA
principal investigator · Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioeithics

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion