ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT03419312PET-SCSUpdated Apr 8, 2020

PET Patterns, Biomarkers and Outcome in Burst SCS Treated FBSS Patients

An interventional study of Proclaim™ Elite 5: Burst - Washout - Sham and Proclaim™ Elite 5: Sham - Washout - Burst in FBSS, Pain, Intractable and Low Back Pain, sponsored by Uppsala University. Status unknown at 1 site in Sweden. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 59 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-04-08.

Sponsored by Uppsala University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Basic science

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Apr 2020), so the status shown — last known as Active, not recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
12
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 59 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The primary aim of this study is to investigate cerebral mechanisms of burst stimulation in Failed Back Surgery Syndrome (FBSS) patients treated with Burst Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) for chronic back and leg pain. This study is a single center, prospective, blinded, randomized crossover trial with two 14 days treatment periods and two treatment arms (burst before sham stimulation or sham before burst stimulation).

Read the detailed description

Background and rationale:

Tonic spinal cord stimulation for chronic primarily neuropathic pain har been used for over 50 years. Tonic stimulation in frequencies from 20 to 70 Hz produces analgesia and paresthesia in the targeted area.

Burst stimulation, a novel spinal cord stimulation pattern, is an intermittent high frequency parenthesis-free therapy. This stimulation pattern consist of 5 spikes with an inter-spike frequency of 500 Hz, delivered at 40 Hz.

Clinical effectiveness and noninferiority of Burst stimulation has been proved. A few studies suggest that Burst stimulation induce different activities in cerebral pathways, compared with tonic stimulation. Patient reported attention to pain assessed by the pain vigilance and awareness questionnaire (PVAQ) seems to differ between burst and tonic spinal cord stimulation. This trial is designed to investigate cerebral mechanisms of burst stimulation, using PET O15-water measured blood flow and tissue perfusion as a proxy for cerebral activity.

Key events in study implementation:

Study phase 1

  • Study Inclusion and baseline visit.
  • Implantation of spinal cord stimulation system.

Study phase 2:

  • Study visit 1(study day 0): Collection of Patient Reported Outcome Measurements (PROM) data, Randomization to study sequence, blood sampling, PET 0, programming of SCS-system.
  • Study visit 2 (study day 14): Blood sampling, PET 1, collection of PROM-data, SCS system switched off for washout.
  • Study visit 3 (study day 21): Collection of PROM-data, programming of SCS-system, blood sampling.
  • Study visit 4 (study day 35): Blood sampling, PET 2, collection of PROM-data, programming of SCS-system.
02

Conditions studied

  • FBSS
  • Pain, Intractable
  • Low Back Pain
  • Radicular; Neuropathic, Lumbar, Lumbosacral

Keywords

  • Spinal Cord Stimulation
  • Burst Spinal Cord Stimulation
  • SCS
03

In context

Pain, Intractable

90 studies on the registry are indexed under Pain, Intractable; 16 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 12 is below the median of 60 across 64 interventional studies indexed under Pain, Intractable.

Browse Pain, Intractable studies →

Lead sponsor

Uppsala University is the lead sponsor of 390 studies on the registry; 86 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 59 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Occurrence of chronic pain in the lumbosacral region, as well as unilateral or bilateral leg pain.
  2. Prior lumbar surgery in medical history.
  3. Diagnosed with neuropathic pain in the lower extremities and graded as probable neuropathic pain or definite neuropathic pain according International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) criteria.
  4. Patient report largely unchanged pain condition last 6 months.
  5. Patient has undergone a 7 day SCS trial with epidural burst stimulation with the following results:

    1. At least 75% coverage of the painful area of tonic stimulation before start of burst trial stimulation.
    2. At least 50% reduction in pain intensity, measured via BPI, item 5 from baseline of trial to end of trial period.
  6. The patient is ≥ 18 years of age and \< 60 years of age.
  7. The patient must willingly participate in all parts of the study, as well as having the ability to complete the entire study plan.
  8. Patient must certify that he / she understands the study plan, as well as voluntarily sign to participate in the study.
  9. Must be able to sit still for a minimum of 45 minutes and be able to follow restrictions related to the PET survey.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. The patient has other current pain conditions than back and leg pain after back surgery.
  2. The patient is treated with opioids exceeding 80 milligrams of Morphine per day or is considered at risk for development of problematic opioid use.
  3. The patient suffers from an untreated depression or anxiety.
  4. The patient can not complete the study plan.
  5. The patient is unable to read or write Swedish.
  6. The patient is currently participates in another clinical trial.
  7. A history of previous PET scan or other substantial radiation dose in the last 5 years.
  8. The patients is suffering from claustrophobia.
  9. Ongoing pregnancy or planned pregnancy during study time.
  10. The patient has for arterial catheterization.
  11. The patient is previously treated with spinal cord stimulation.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
12 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Study sequence A

    Proclaim™ Elite 5: Burst - Washout - Sham 1. 14 days of burst stimulation. 2. 7 days washout. 3. 14 days of sham stimulation.

    Device: Proclaim™ Elite 5: Burst - Washout - Sham

  • Experimental
    Study sequence B

    Proclaim™ Elite 5: Sham - Washout - Burst 1. 14 days of sham stimulation. 2. 7 days washout. 3. 14 days of burst stimulation.

    Device: Proclaim™ Elite 5: Sham - Washout - Burst

Interventions

  • DeviceProclaim™ Elite 5: Burst - Washout - Sham

    All implanted hardware manufactured by S:t Jude Medical/Abbot: Implantable Pulse Generator (IPG): Proclaim™ Elite 5 IPG, model 3660. Electrode: Octrode percutaneous lead, 60 cm, model 3161. Anchor: Long lead anchor, model 1106.

    Also known as: Burst DR, Spinal Cord Stimulation

  • DeviceProclaim™ Elite 5: Sham - Washout - Burst

    All implanted hardware manufactured by S:t Jude Medical/Abbot: Implantable Pulse Generator (IPG): Proclaim™ Elite 5 IPG, model 3660. Electrode: Octrode percutaneous lead, 60 cm, model 3161. Anchor: Long lead anchor, model 1106.

    Also known as: Burst DR, Spinal Cord Stimulation

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in regional cerebral blood flow measured with 15O-water Positron Emission. Tomography (PET)

    35 Volume of Interest (VOI) will be applied to each PET scan using the PVElab software. Cerebral blood flow (CBF) and perfusable tissue fraction (PTF) will be calculated for each VOI at each scan. Same tests will be done at voxel level with the Statistical Parameter Mapping Software (SPM12), to identify areas with changed CBF or PTF that do not correspond to VOI in the template.

    Time frame: PET is performed at study day 0 (baseline), day 14 and day 35.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Semiquantitative assessment of protein levels associated with inflammation.

    Level of normalized protein expression (NPX) in plasma, assessed by a multiplex proximity extension assay panel (Olink Bioscience, Uppsala, Sweden).

    Time frame: Measured at day 0 (baseline), day 14, day 21 and day 35.

  2. Back and leg pain

    Measured using a 100mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for back and leg pain, respectively. Scale range: 0 mm indicates no pain (minimum), 100 mm indicates worst imaginable pain (maximum).

    Time frame: Measured at visit day 0 (baseline), day 14 and day 35.

  3. General pain

    General pain measured by Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) item 3, 4, 5 and 6

    Time frame: Measured at day 0 (baseline), day 14 and day 35.

  4. Pain inference

    Measured by BPI item 9A-9G

    Time frame: Measured at day 0 (baseline), day 14 and day 35.

  5. Disability

    Disability measured by Oswestry Disability Index (ODI).

    Time frame: Measured at day 0 (baseline), day 14 and day 35.

  6. Pain Catastrophizing

    Measured by Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS).

    Time frame: Measured at day 0 (baseline), day 14 and day 35.

  7. Pain Vigilance and Awareness

    Measured by the Pain Vigilance and Awareness Questionnaire (PVAQ).

    Time frame: Measured at day 0 (baseline), day 14 and day 35.

  8. Global Impression of Change

    Impression of change in health status assessed by the inventory Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC).

    Time frame: Measured at day 14 and day 35.

  9. Depression

    Symptoms of depression is assessed by the inventory Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9).

    Time frame: Measured at day 0 (baseline), day 14 and day 35.

  10. Anxiety

    Symptoms of anxiety is assessed by the inventory Generalized Anxiety Disorder Screener (GAD-7).

    Time frame: Measured at day 0 (baseline), day 14 and day 35.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala University, Dept. of Surgical Sciences and Dept. of Medicinal Chemistry, Div. of Molecular Imaging.
    Uppsala, 75185, Sweden
08

References and documents

Publications

  • O'Connell NE, Ferraro MC, Gibson W, Rice AS, Vase L, Coyle D, Eccleston C. Implanted spinal neuromodulation interventions for chronic pain in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Dec 2;12(12):CD013756. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013756.pub2. PubMed 34854473 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Feb 2018 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jun 2021, 40 months after the start.

Of 26 interventional studies with no phase under Pain, Intractable, half reached primary completion within 24 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 20 and three quarters within 34. This study's planned 40 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 27, 2017
First posted
Feb 1, 2018
StartActual
Feb 11, 2018
Primary completionEst.
Jun 2021
CompletionEst.
Jun 2021
Last update
Apr 8, 2020
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 8, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03419312
Lead sponsor
Uppsala University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 1, 2018
Start date
Feb 11, 2018
Primary completion
Jun 2021 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 2021 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 8, 2020

Study contacts

Rolf Karlsten, MD, PhD
principal investigator · rolf.karlsten@akademiska.se

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Apr 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion