CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT03416972RICT-LUNGUpdated Jan 31, 2018

Detecting Radiation-Induced Cardiac Toxicity After Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Radiotherapy

An observational study in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer and Radiation Toxicity, sponsored by London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute and Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's. Status unknown at 1 site in Canada. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-01-31.

Sponsored by London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute and Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's · Observational

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Jan 2018), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
20
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer death in Canada. For approximately 30% of patients that present with locally-advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the standard treatment is curative-intent concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Outcomes remain poor, with 5-year survival of only 20%. Despite the long-held belief that higher radiation doses lead to improved overall survival (OS), the landmark randomized trial (RTOG 0617) showed the opposite. The investigators hypothesize that the inferior survival observed may be due to unexpected heart toxicity as secondary analysis revealed that the heart dose was a strong predictor of inferior OS. Up to now, change in heart function is typically detected histologically, requiring autopsy tissue. Therefore, a non-invasive marker of early heart damage is required. Hybrid PET-MRI has become available in Canada only recently. The ability to simultaneously perform metabolic imaging with functional and tissue imaging allows for novel assessment of heart toxicity. The primary objective is to examine the utility of hybrid PET-MRI and DCE-CT to assess acute changes in heart function and to measure inflammation before, and six weeks after NSCLC radiotherapy. A pilot of 20 patients with Stage I-III NSCLC will be enrolled. The findings of this study will aid in the design of new studies to reassess dose escalation for locally advanced NSCLC while limiting the risk of heart toxicity. FDG PET will be used to simultaneously assess both cardiac inflammation and tumour response. Quantitative DCE-CT will also be used to measure ventilation and perfusion changes in the normal lung and tumour after radiotherapy, providing image data that can comprehensively assess both tumour response and potential toxicity in both the heart and lungs. Such information is crucial in understanding the disease and its response to treatment. This data will also aid in the design of radiation techniques that spare the heart in other patients with any thoracic malignancies, including breast cancer, lymphoma, and esophageal cancer.

Read the detailed description

The investigators propose a longitudinal imaging pilot study composed of 20 Stage I-III NSCLC patients before, and six weeks after standard radiotherapy using a hybrid 3T-PET/MRI system (Biograph mMR, Siemens Healthcare) and a GE Revolution 256-slice CT scanner. The imaging protocol is designed to detect acute changes in myocardial perfusion, inflammation, edema, left ventricular ejection fraction, normal lung and tumour perfusion, and tumour metabolism. During each imaging session, patients will receive an 18F-FDG PET scan to image macrophage-related inflammation and tumour metabolism, MRI to identify edema, mature fibrosis or scar, and Dynamic contrast enhanced CT (DCE-CT) imaging to image perfusion and (LVEF). All images will be fused and rendered with radiation treatment planning dose distributions. Parameters such as Standard Uptake Value (SUV) will be used to compare PET scans, while heart volume and presence of Gadolinium enhancement will be used to compare MRI scans. Blood flow, blood volume, and permeability will be used to compare CT scans. Blood tests including Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR), high sensitivity C-reactive protein, and troponin at each timepoint will also be performed to detect cardiac inflammation. Comparisons between Stage I/II and Stage III patients will allow us to determine whether our metrics for heart changes is radiation related. Relative differences from the six-week time point to baseline will be correlated with the radiation dose distribution to attempt to define a dose-response relationship between radiation dose and cardiac toxicity.

02

Conditions studied

  • Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
  • Radiation Toxicity
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Ultimately, the sample size was based upon practical considerations and that 20 NSCLC patients (10 Stage I/II and 10 Stage III) could be accrued relatively easily from new patient clinics, while sufficiently providing enough evidence to validate the imaging techniques to be used as a non-invasive measure for future clinical trials aimed at reducing or mitigating radiation-induced cardiac toxicity.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18 or older
  • Ability to provide informed consent
  • Histologically confirmed carcinoma of the lung
  • Stage I-III NSCLC
  • Stage I-II patients to receive 54 Gy in 3 fractions, 55 Gy in 5 fractions, or 60 Gy in 8 fractions (treated every other day)
  • Stage III patient to receive concurrent chemoradiation ( 60 Gy in 30 daily fractions)
  • No prior RT to the thorax
  • ECOG performance status 0-1 within one month of accrual
  • Expected lifespan at least 1 year
  • Negative pregnancy test within one month of accrual if woman is premenopausal
  • Patient presented at multidisciplinary tumor board or quality-assurance rounds
  • Satisfactory pulmonary function tests as determined by the treating radiation oncologist (ie. FEV1 >= 0.8 for Stage III NSCLC and no threshold for Stage I/II).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients receiving Prescription RT dose to anything other than LRCP standards for Stage I-III NSCLC.
  • Prior history of atrial fibrillation
  • Previous coronary bypass surgery
  • Patients with severe reversible airways obstruction
  • Patients with acute coronary syndrome (STEMI/non-STEMI and unstable angina)
  • AV block without pacemaker
  • Patients who are renal insufficient (eGFR \<40)
  • Patients with asthma
  • Allergy to iodinated contrast for scans (study subject will be eligible for non-contrast scans)
  • Use of metformin-containing products less than 24 hours prior to CT contrast administration
  • Other contraindications to iodinated contrast media as determined by the research team.
  • Allergy to gadolinium for scans using contrast; will be eligible for non-contrast scans.
  • Other contraindications to gadolinium contrast media as determined by the research team.
04

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
20 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Stage I-III NSCLC patients

    Stage I/II NSCLC patients receiving standard stereotactic body radiation therapy and Stage III patients receiving Standard platinum-based chemoradiotherapy will receive PET/MRI, DCE-CT, ECG/EKG, and bloodwork before and six weeks post treatment.

    Radiation: Standard platinum-based chemoradiotherapy

Interventions

  • RadiationStandard platinum-based chemoradiotherapy

    Stage III patients: Standard platinum-based chemotherapy, total radiation dose 60 Gy in 30 fractions. Stage I/II patients: Standard radiotherapy, total radiation dose of 54 Gy in 3 fractions (peripheral), 55 Gy in 5 fractions (near chest wall), or 60 Gy in 8 fractions (central).

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Detection of Imaging Biomarkers of acute cardiac inflammation

    FDG-PET imaging to detect increase in cardiac inflammation compared to baseline with corresponding blood markers (Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR), high sensitivity C-reactive protein, and troponin levels in blood (inflammation)).

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  2. Detection of Imaging Biomarkers of acute cardiac perfusion changes

    DCE-CT imaging to detect changes in acute cardiac perfusion changes compared to baseline.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  3. Detection of Imaging Biomarkers of acute changes in Left-ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)

    Contrast-enhanced CT imaging to detect acute changes in LVEF compared to baseline.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  4. Detection of cardiac fibrosis

    Gadolinium Enhanced MR imaging to detect cardiac fibrosis compared to baseline

    Time frame: 6 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Tumour Response (metabolism)

    FDG-PET imaging to detect tumour metabolism changes compared to baseline.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  2. Tumour Response (perfusion)

    DCE-CT imaging to detect changes in tumour perfusion compared to baseline

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  3. Acute Changes in Lung Ventilation

    4D-CT imaging to detect changes in lung ventilation compared to baseline

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  4. Acute Changes in Lung Perfusion

    DCE-CT imaging to detect changes in lung perfusion compared to baseline

    Time frame: 6 weeks

06

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Lawson Health Research Institute
    London, Ontario N6C 2R5, Canada
    Recruiting
07

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03416972
Lead sponsor
London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute and Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's
Collaborators
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 31, 2018
Start date
Jan 11, 2018
Primary completion
Mar 1, 2019 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 1, 2020 (estimated)
Last update
Jan 31, 2018

Study contacts

Stewart Gaede, PhD
Contact
stewart.gaede@lhsc.on.ca
519-685-8600 ext. 53144
Anne O'Connell
Contact
anne.oconnell@lhsc.on.ca
519-685-8500 ext. 58623
Stewart Gaede, PhD
principal investigator · London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute and Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Jan 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion