ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03412916Updated Oct 14, 2025Results posted

Integrating Mind-Body Skills With Physical Activity to Improve Physical and Emotional Outcomes in Patients With Chronic Pain

An interventional study of GetActive and Get Active with Fitbit in Pain, Chronic Pain and Physical Activity, sponsored by Massachusetts General Hospital. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-10-14.

Primary conditionChronic PainRegistry: PainReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Pain — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Chronic Pain
Why
  1. The study's listed conditions name Chronic Pain, a narrower term within Pain.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by Massachusetts General Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 3 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Oct 2017, registered Jan 2018).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
82
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 27 studies in Chronic Pain by Massachusetts General Hospital — 7 open to participants now, 8 under way, none of them phase 3. Chronic Pain · Massachusetts General Hospital.

Enrollment
8th of 23
82 · median 60
Started
2017
the only one that year
No phase
20 of 27
5 open now
Registered
9th of 27
by date

Among the 27 studies in Chronic Pain by Massachusetts General Hospital, this one is the 8th largest by enrollment of the 23 interventional ones that give a count, is the only one that started in 2017, is one of 20 with no phase, and was the 9th registered.

Chronic Pain

3,227 studies on the registry are indexed under Chronic Pain; 729 are open to participants now.

Browse Chronic Pain studies →

Open to participants now

7 of the 27 studies in Chronic Pain by Massachusetts General Hospital are open now, in 1 country. Recruiting first, the newest first:

2 more — sign in →

By country, each count listing its studies:

All 7 open studies →

Where they have run

Who these studies take

Of the 486 Chronic Pain studies recruiting now, 239 (49%) set no upper age limit and 173 (36%) stop at 75 or younger; 43 take children under 18; 64 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years and older · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 27 studies in Chronic Pain by Massachusetts General Hospital, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

The aims of this study are to adapt, pilot, and examine the credibility, acceptability, and feasibility of an evidence-based mind-body program, the Relaxation Response Resiliency Program for Chronic Pain (p3RP), and the p3RP-Digital Monitoring Device (p3RP-DMD), which is the p3RP integrated with a commercial DMD, the Fitbit.

Read the detailed description

The study has three phases. In phase I, the investigators are adapting the 3RP as a multidisciplinary team, and then conducting two focus groups. In phase two, the investigators are piloting the p3RP and p3RP-DMD. In phase three, the investigators are conducting a small randomized-controlled trial of the p3RP versus p3RP-DMD.

03

Conditions studied

  • Pain
  • Chronic Pain
  • Physical Activity

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Chronic Pain
  • Physical Activity
  • Mind-body
04

In context

Chronic Pain Reclassified

3,227 studies on the registry are indexed under Chronic Pain; 729 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 82 is above the median of 60 across 2,388 interventional studies indexed under Chronic Pain.

Browse Chronic Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

Massachusetts General Hospital is the lead sponsor of 2,586 studies on the registry; 447 are open to participants now.

Of its 222 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 168 (76%) have results posted.

Compared within Chronic Pain, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Pain. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

05

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Male and female patients, age 18 years or older
  • Have nonmalignant chronic pain for more than 3 months
  • Able to perform a 6-minute walk test
  • Owns a smartphone with Bluetooth 4.0
  • Willingness and ability to participate in the 3RP intervention and to comply with the requirements of the study protocol (including weekly sessions and DMD use)
  • Free of concurrent psychotropic or pain medication for at least 2 weeks prior to initiation of treatment, OR stable on current psychotropic or pain medication for a minimum of 6 weeks and willing to maintain a stable dose
  • Cleared by a medical doctor for study participation
  • Leads a sedentary lifestyle

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosed with medical illness expected to worsen in the next 6 months
  • Serious mental illness or instability for which hospitalization may be likely in the next 6 months
  • Current suicidal ideation reported on self-report
  • Lifetime history of schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, or other psychotic disorder, or substance dependence
  • Current substance use disorder, within the past 6 months
  • Practice of yoga/meditation, or other mind-body techniques that elicit the relaxation response, once per week for 45 minutes or more within the last 3 months or less
  • Regular use of DMD in the last 3 months
  • Engagement in regular intensive physical exercise for >30 minute daily
  • Unable to walk without use of assistance (e.g., wheelchair, walker)
06

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
82 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    GetActive

    The GetActive program uses a multimodal approach to introduce and reinforce new skills, including didactics, in-session activities, discussions, and weekly practice assignments (homework). The GetActive sessions reflect a purposeful integration of the three treatment approaches (relaxation methods, stress appraisal \& coping, and growth enhancement). The format is a 10-week program with weekly meetings and a focus on relaxation response strategies, cognitive behavioral training, positive psychology and mind-body interactions.

    Behavioral: GetActive

  • Experimental
    GetActive with Fitbit

    The GetActive with Fitbit is identical to that of the p3RP with the addition of a digital monitoring device (i.e., Fitbit) for recording of physical activity.

    Behavioral: Get Active with Fitbit

Interventions

  • BehavioralGetActive

    GetActive is a comprehensive, multimodal treatment that was designed to increase quality of life, resiliency and ability to cope with medical symptoms and stress. This program is rooted in the elicitation of the relaxation response, a non-judgmental state of focused attention and increased awareness.

    Also known as: The Relaxation Response Resiliency Program for Pain

  • BehavioralGet Active with Fitbit

    The GetActive Program for Pain with a Digital Monitoring Device (GetActive Fitbit) is identical to the GetActive with the addition of a FitBit for recording of physical activity.

    Also known as: The Relaxation Response Resiliency Program for Pain with DMD

07

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With Client Satisfaction Questionnaire 3-Item (CSQ-3) Scores Above and Below the Scale Midpoint

    Items are summed to generate a total score; scores range from 3 to 12, with higher values indicating higher satisfaction.

    Time frame: Post-Test (10 Weeks)

  2. Therapist Adherence

    Two independent coders rated whether clinicians delivered each component of study sessions (e.g., deep breathing, providing education on prevalent myths about chronic pain) , exhibited skillful delivery (e.g., active listening, validation), and followed study protocol (e.g., collecting home practice sheets, logging attendance). Each individual component was rated on a yes/no scale. The adherent ("yes") components were summed, tallied against the total number of components in the adherence checklist, and averaged between the 2 reviewers. The score represents a total rate of adherence.

    Time frame: Collected during the intervention

  3. Adherence to DMD - Number of Participants Who Wore DMD for ≥ 5 and < 5 Out of 7 Days

    Rate of participant's use of ActiGraph watch for a period of one week at both baseline and post-treatment assessments. A valid day of wear consisted of at least 7 hours of wear time.

    Time frame: Baseline (0 Weeks), Post-Test (10 Weeks)

  4. Program Safety - Number of Adverse Events Related to Study Participation

    Any self-reported or observed negative events related to participation.

    Time frame: Baseline (0 Weeks), Post-Test (10 Weeks)

  5. Adherence to Home Practice - Number of Participants That Completed Homework Logs That Met Adherence Criteria

    Rate of participant's completion of homework assigned throughout the study. Logs were considered adherent if participants completed 3 home practice components 3 out of 7 days per week or 1 home practice component 5 out of 7 days per week.

    Time frame: Baseline (0 Weeks), Post-Test (10 Weeks)

  6. Feasibility of Quantitative Measures

    The number of participants that completed quantitative measures. Rate of participant's completion of self-report measures administered at baseline and post-test assessments.

    Time frame: Baseline (0 Weeks), Post-Test (10 Weeks)

  7. Credibility and Expectancy Questionnaire (CEQ)

    Number of participants who score above the midpoint on two subscales assessed using frequencies and proportions. The measure involves two subscales: credibility (questions 1-3) and expectancy (questions 4-6). Subscale scores range from 3 to 27. Higher scores indicate greater perceived credibility and greater belief that treatment will help.

    Time frame: Baseline (0 Weeks)

  8. Program Acceptability

    Assessed via the percentage of participants who attended at least 7 out of 10 sessions.

    Time frame: Post-Test (10 Weeks)

Secondary outcomes

  1. 6-Min Walk Test Distance

    Recorded the distance in meters each participant covered by walking on a flat surface for 6 minutes.

    Time frame: 6 minutes at baseline (0 Weeks), 6 minutes at post-test (10 Weeks).

  2. ActiGraph Average Steps

    Average steps counted for using the wGT3X-BT ActiGraph accelerometer device. Daily step counts were collected using the device for a week at each assessment period. A weekly average was calculated from the daily totals.

    Time frame: 1 week at baseline (0 Weeks), 1 week at post-test (10 Weeks)

  3. Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)

    The PGIC assesses clinically important change in symptoms since beginning treatment. Each of the 6 items assesses a different treatment target. Items are assessed on a scale of 0 to 6. Lower scores indicate greater symptom improvement.

    Time frame: Post-Test (10 Weeks)

  4. Physical Activity Scale for Persons With Physical Disabilities (PASIPD)

    The PASIPD is a 13-item measure that assesses one's level of physical activity and exercise in the past 7 days. Scores range from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate greater activity.

    Time frame: Baseline (0 Weeks), Post-Test (10 Weeks), 3-Month Follow-Up (23 Weeks)

  5. WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS)

    The WHODAS measures level of functioning in six domains: cognition, mobility, self-care, getting along, life activities, and participation. Scores range from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate more disability.

    Time frame: Baseline (0 Weeks), Post-Test (10 Weeks), 3-Month Follow-Up (23 Weeks)

  6. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function v.8b

    The 8-item scale assesses for how difficult it is for one to perform daily living activities. Raw scores range from 8 to 40. T scores range from 20.3 to 60.1. Higher scores indicate better physical function and ability to perform activities of daily living.

    Time frame: Baseline (0 Weeks), Post-Test (10 Weeks), 3-Month Follow-Up (23 Weeks)

  7. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Anxiety v.8a

    The 8-item scale measures fear and worry over the past week. Raw scores range from 8 to 40. T-scores range from 37.1 to 83.1. Higher scores indicate higher levels of anxiety.

    Time frame: Baseline (0 Weeks), Post-Test (10 Weeks), 3-Month Follow-Up (23 Weeks)

  8. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Depression v.8b

    The 8-item scale measures depressive symptoms over the past week. Raw scores range from 8 to 40 and t scores range from 37.1 to 82.4. Higher scores indicate greater depressive symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline (0 Weeks), Post-Test (10 Weeks), 3-Month Follow-Up (23 Weeks)

  9. Pain Resilience Scale (PRS)

    The PRS, a 14-item scale, measures pain resilience and how one would respond emotionally when faced with prolonged pain. Scores range from 0 to 56. Higher scores indicate greater resilience.

    Time frame: Baseline (0 Weeks), Post-Test (10 Weeks), 3-Month Follow-Up (23 Weeks)

  10. Numerical Rating Scale

    Measures pain at rest and pain with activity on a Likert scale with 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain ever

    Time frame: Baseline (0 Weeks), Post-Test (10 Weeks), 3-Month Follow-Up (23 Weeks)

  11. Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale (CAMS)

    The CAMS, a 12-item scale, measures how much one experiences their thoughts and feelings. Items range from 1 to 4. Total scores range from 12 to 48. Higher values reflect higher levels of mindfulness.

    Time frame: Baseline (0 Weeks), Post-Test (10 Weeks), 3-Month Follow-Up (23 Weeks)

  12. Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)

    Measures one's sleep quality. Scores range from 0 to 21. Higher scores indicate worse sleep quality.

    Time frame: Baseline (0 Weeks), Post-Test (10 Weeks), 3-Month Follow-Up (23 Weeks)

  13. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Social Isolation v.4a

    The 4-item scale measures how often one perceives feeling apart from others and excluded. Raw scores range from 4 to 20. Scaled scores range from 34.8 to 74.2. Higher scores indicate greater social isolation.

    Time frame: Baseline (0 Weeks), Post-Test (10 Weeks), 3-Month Follow-Up (23 Weeks)

  14. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Emotional Support v.4a

    The 4-item scale measures perceived emotional support. Raw scores range from 4 to 20. Scaled scores range from 25.7 to 62. Higher score indicate greater emotional support.

    Time frame: Baseline (0 Weeks), Post-Test (10 Weeks), 3-Month Follow-Up (23 Weeks)

  15. Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)

    The PCS, a 13-item scale, measures how individuals experience pain, in terms of catastrophizing. Total scores range from 0 to 52. A higher score indicates more catastrophizing.

    Time frame: Baseline (0 Weeks), Post-Test (10 Weeks), 3-Month Follow-Up (23 Weeks)

  16. Tampa Kinesiophobia Scale (TKS)

    The TKS is a 17-item scale that measures one's fear of movement, with a greater score indicating greater fear of injury due to movement. Scores range from 11 to 44.

    Time frame: Baseline (0 Weeks), Post-Test (10 Weeks), 3-Month Follow-Up (23 Weeks)

  17. Measure of Current Status (MOCS-A)

    The MOCS-A, a 13-item scale, measures one's perceived ability to perform various skills that the intervention aims to target. Scores range from 0 to 52. Higher scores indicate greater perceived ability.

    Time frame: Baseline (0 Weeks), Post-Test (10 Weeks), 3-Month Follow-Up (23 Weeks)

08

Results

Posted Oct 14, 2025

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneGetActiveGetActive With Fitbit
Started4141
Completed3537
Not completed64

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage of Participants With Client Satisfaction Questionnaire 3-Item (CSQ-3) Scores Above and Below the Scale Midpoint

Items are summed to generate a total score; scores range from 3 to 12, with higher values indicating higher satisfaction.

Time frame:
Post-Test (10 Weeks)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Percentage of Participants With Client Satisfaction Questionnaire 3-Item (CSQ-3) Scores Above and Below the Scale Midpoint
ParticipantsGetActiveGetActive With Fitbit
Scored above the scale midpoint3435
Scored below the scale midpoint01
PrimaryTherapist Adherence

Two independent coders rated whether clinicians delivered each component of study sessions (e.g., deep breathing, providing education on prevalent myths about chronic pain) , exhibited skillful delivery (e.g., active listening, validation), and followed study protocol (e.g., collecting home practice sheets, logging attendance). Each individual component was rated on a yes/no scale. The adherent ("yes") components were summed, tallied against the total number of components in the adherence checklist, and averaged between the 2 reviewers. The score represents a total rate of adherence.

Time frame:
Collected during the intervention
Reported as:
Number · percentage of adherence
Therapist Adherence
percentage of adherenceGetActive With FitbitGetActive
Therapist Adherence9498
PrimaryAdherence to DMD - Number of Participants Who Wore DMD for ≥ 5 and < 5 Out of 7 Days

Rate of participant's use of ActiGraph watch for a period of one week at both baseline and post-treatment assessments. A valid day of wear consisted of at least 7 hours of wear time.

Time frame:
Baseline (0 Weeks), Post-Test (10 Weeks)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Adherence to DMD - Number of Participants Who Wore DMD for ≥ 5 and < 5 Out of 7 Days
ParticipantsGetActiveGetActive With Fitbit
Baseline — Who received the ActiGraph and wore it for ≥ 5 out of 7 days3136
Baseline — Who received the ActiGraph and wore it for < 5 out of 7 days23
Post-Test — Who received the ActiGraph and wore it for ≥ 5 out of 7 days2529
Post-Test — Who received the ActiGraph and wore it for < 5 out of 7 days24
PrimaryProgram Safety - Number of Adverse Events Related to Study Participation

Any self-reported or observed negative events related to participation.

Time frame:
Baseline (0 Weeks), Post-Test (10 Weeks)
Reported as:
Number · adverse events
Program Safety - Number of Adverse Events Related to Study Participation
adverse eventsGetActiveGetActive With Fitbit
Program Safety - Number of Adverse Events Related to Study Participation00
PrimaryAdherence to Home Practice - Number of Participants That Completed Homework Logs That Met Adherence Criteria

Rate of participant's completion of homework assigned throughout the study. Logs were considered adherent if participants completed 3 home practice components 3 out of 7 days per week or 1 home practice component 5 out of 7 days per week.

Time frame:
Baseline (0 Weeks), Post-Test (10 Weeks)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Adherence to Home Practice - Number of Participants That Completed Homework Logs That Met Adherence Criteria
ParticipantsGetActiveGetActive With Fitbit
participants that completed logs handed in met adherence criteria3436
participants that completed logs handed in that did not meet adherence criteria11
PrimaryFeasibility of Quantitative Measures

The number of participants that completed quantitative measures. Rate of participant's completion of self-report measures administered at baseline and post-test assessments.

Time frame:
Baseline (0 Weeks), Post-Test (10 Weeks)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Feasibility of Quantitative Measures
ParticipantsGetActiveGetActive With Fitbit
Feasibility of Quantitative Measures4140
PrimaryCredibility and Expectancy Questionnaire (CEQ)

Number of participants who score above the midpoint on two subscales assessed using frequencies and proportions. The measure involves two subscales: credibility (questions 1-3) and expectancy (questions 4-6). Subscale scores range from 3 to 27. Higher scores indicate greater perceived credibility and greater belief that treatment will help.

Time frame:
Baseline (0 Weeks)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Credibility and Expectancy Questionnaire (CEQ)
ParticipantsGetActiveGetActive With Fitbit
Expectancy — scored above the scale midpoint2722
Expectancy — scored below the scale midpoint1419
Credibility — scored above the scale midpoint3738
Credibility — scored below the scale midpoint43
PrimaryProgram Acceptability

Assessed via the percentage of participants who attended at least 7 out of 10 sessions.

Time frame:
Post-Test (10 Weeks)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Program Acceptability
ParticipantsGetActiveGetActive With Fitbit
Attended ≥7 out of 10 group or make-up sessions3134
Attended <7 out of 10 group or make-up sessions107
Secondary6-Min Walk Test Distance

Recorded the distance in meters each participant covered by walking on a flat surface for 6 minutes.

Time frame:
6 minutes at baseline (0 Weeks), 6 minutes at post-test (10 Weeks).
Reported as:
Mean · Meters
6-Min Walk Test Distance
MetersGetActiveGetActive With Fitbit
Baseline346.244 ± 13.684331.866 ± 13.898
Posttest389.492 ± 12.950385.872 ± 12.691
SecondaryActiGraph Average Steps

Average steps counted for using the wGT3X-BT ActiGraph accelerometer device. Daily step counts were collected using the device for a week at each assessment period. A weekly average was calculated from the daily totals.

Time frame:
1 week at baseline (0 Weeks), 1 week at post-test (10 Weeks)
Reported as:
Mean · Steps
ActiGraph Average Steps
StepsGetActiveGetActive With Fitbit
Baseline5621.095674 ± 595.3695226.732 ± 409.875
Posttest5606.226 ± 600.8985271.760 ± 391.723
SecondaryPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)

The PGIC assesses clinically important change in symptoms since beginning treatment. Each of the 6 items assesses a different treatment target. Items are assessed on a scale of 0 to 6. Lower scores indicate greater symptom improvement.

Time frame:
Post-Test (10 Weeks)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
score on a scaleGetActiveGetActive With Fitbit
Impression of change in pain2.51 ± 1.172.70 ± 1.20
Impression of change in physical activity2.31 ± 1.182.30 ± 1.10
Impression of change in physical function2.57 ± 1.192.78 ± 0.95
Impression of change in emotional function2.40 ± 1.012.54 ± 0.84
Impression of change in resiliency2.14 ± 0.912.32 ± 1.03
Impression of change from use of FitbitNA ± NA1.86 ± 0.95
SecondaryPhysical Activity Scale for Persons With Physical Disabilities (PASIPD)

The PASIPD is a 13-item measure that assesses one's level of physical activity and exercise in the past 7 days. Scores range from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate greater activity.

Time frame:
Baseline (0 Weeks), Post-Test (10 Weeks), 3-Month Follow-Up (23 Weeks)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Physical Activity Scale for Persons With Physical Disabilities (PASIPD)
score on a scaleGetActiveGetActive With Fitbit
Baseline9.200 ± 1.07314.213 ± 2.819
Posttest10.985 ± 1.42216.742 ± 2.421
Follow up9.097 ± 1.28013.396 ± 1.791
SecondaryWHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS)

The WHODAS measures level of functioning in six domains: cognition, mobility, self-care, getting along, life activities, and participation. Scores range from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate more disability.

Time frame:
Baseline (0 Weeks), Post-Test (10 Weeks), 3-Month Follow-Up (23 Weeks)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS)
score on a scaleGetActiveGetActive With Fitbit
Baseline26.91 ± 2.5136.64 ± 3.28
Posttest18.56 ± 2.2827.88 ± 2.71
Follow-up20.88 ± 3.1727.42 ± 3.38
SecondaryPatient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function v.8b

The 8-item scale assesses for how difficult it is for one to perform daily living activities. Raw scores range from 8 to 40. T scores range from 20.3 to 60.1. Higher scores indicate better physical function and ability to perform activities of daily living.

Time frame:
Baseline (0 Weeks), Post-Test (10 Weeks), 3-Month Follow-Up (23 Weeks)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function v.8b
score on a scaleGetActiveGetActive With Fitbit
Baseline39.74 ± 1.0537.29 ± 1.26
Posttest42.27 ± 1.2140.18 ± 1.37
Follow-up44.70 ± 1.3541.30 ± 1.65
SecondaryPatient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Anxiety v.8a

The 8-item scale measures fear and worry over the past week. Raw scores range from 8 to 40. T-scores range from 37.1 to 83.1. Higher scores indicate higher levels of anxiety.

Time frame:
Baseline (0 Weeks), Post-Test (10 Weeks), 3-Month Follow-Up (23 Weeks)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Anxiety v.8a
score on a scaleGetActiveGetActive With Fitbit
Baseline53.50 ± 1.5859.33 ± 1.39
Posttest51.26 ± 1.4156.39 ± 1.53
Follow-up51.49 ± 1.6857.27 ± 1.62
SecondaryPatient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Depression v.8b

The 8-item scale measures depressive symptoms over the past week. Raw scores range from 8 to 40 and t scores range from 37.1 to 82.4. Higher scores indicate greater depressive symptoms.

Time frame:
Baseline (0 Weeks), Post-Test (10 Weeks), 3-Month Follow-Up (23 Weeks)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Depression v.8b
score on a scaleGetActiveGetActive With Fitbit
Baseline53.14 ± 1.6960.02 ± 1.45
Posttest50.21 ± 1.5555.74 ± 1.21
Follow-up50.21 ± 1.5455.75 ± 1.70
SecondaryPain Resilience Scale (PRS)

The PRS, a 14-item scale, measures pain resilience and how one would respond emotionally when faced with prolonged pain. Scores range from 0 to 56. Higher scores indicate greater resilience.

Time frame:
Baseline (0 Weeks), Post-Test (10 Weeks), 3-Month Follow-Up (23 Weeks)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Pain Resilience Scale (PRS)
score on a scaleGetActiveGetActive With Fitbit
Baseline Pain resilience37.68 ± 1.4732.51 ± 1.58
Posttest Pain resilience43.55 ± 1.6436.19 ± 1.82
3-Month follow- up Pain resilience45.02 ± 1.3936.13 ± 2.07
SecondaryNumerical Rating Scale

Measures pain at rest and pain with activity on a Likert scale with 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain ever

Time frame:
Baseline (0 Weeks), Post-Test (10 Weeks), 3-Month Follow-Up (23 Weeks)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Numerical Rating Scale
score on a scaleGetActiveGetActive With Fitbit
Baseline Pain at rest5.07 ± 0.395.70 ± 0.34
Posttest Pain at rest3.73 ± 0.414.58 ± 0.36
Follow up Pain at rest4.18 ± 0.414.30 ± 0.50
Baseline Pain during activity6.93 ± 0.317.15 ± 0.34
Posttest Pain during activity5.16 ± 0.426.01 ± 0.41
Follow-up Pain during activity5.28 ± 0.455.31 ± 0.60
SecondaryCognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale (CAMS)

The CAMS, a 12-item scale, measures how much one experiences their thoughts and feelings. Items range from 1 to 4. Total scores range from 12 to 48. Higher values reflect higher levels of mindfulness.

Time frame:
Baseline (0 Weeks), Post-Test (10 Weeks), 3-Month Follow-Up (23 Weeks)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale (CAMS)
score on a scaleGetActiveGetActive With Fitbit
Baseline Mindfulness32.12 ± 0.9930.29 ± 1.11
Posttest Mindfulness36.09 ± 1.0733.07 ± 1.00
Three-Month follow-up Mindfulness35.95 ± 1.0934.08 ± 1.36
SecondaryPittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)

Measures one's sleep quality. Scores range from 0 to 21. Higher scores indicate worse sleep quality.

Time frame:
Baseline (0 Weeks), Post-Test (10 Weeks), 3-Month Follow-Up (23 Weeks)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)
score on a scaleGetActiveGetActive With Fitbit
Baseline8.756 ± .66411.293 ± .629
Post-test6.979 ± .62210.754 ± .686
Follow up6.565 ± .55810.046 ± .737
SecondaryPatient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Social Isolation v.4a

The 4-item scale measures how often one perceives feeling apart from others and excluded. Raw scores range from 4 to 20. Scaled scores range from 34.8 to 74.2. Higher scores indicate greater social isolation.

Time frame:
Baseline (0 Weeks), Post-Test (10 Weeks), 3-Month Follow-Up (23 Weeks)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Social Isolation v.4a
score on a scaleGetActiveGetActive-Fitbit
Baseline48.788 ± 1.74351.880 ± 1.538
Post-test45.364 ± 1.55649.793 ± 1.629
Follow-up47.582 ± 1.67351.252 ± 1.916
SecondaryPatient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Emotional Support v.4a

The 4-item scale measures perceived emotional support. Raw scores range from 4 to 20. Scaled scores range from 25.7 to 62. Higher score indicate greater emotional support.

Time frame:
Baseline (0 Weeks), Post-Test (10 Weeks), 3-Month Follow-Up (23 Weeks)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Emotional Support v.4a
score on a scaleGetActiveGetActive With Fitbit
Baseline49.924 ± 1.36548.432 ± 1.288
Post-test53.078 ± 1.60450.330 ± 1.560
Follow-up53.425 ± 1.41752.311 ± 1.845
SecondaryPain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)

The PCS, a 13-item scale, measures how individuals experience pain, in terms of catastrophizing. Total scores range from 0 to 52. A higher score indicates more catastrophizing.

Time frame:
Baseline (0 Weeks), Post-Test (10 Weeks), 3-Month Follow-Up (23 Weeks)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)
score on a scaleGetActiveGetActive With Fitbit
Baseline19.71 ± 1.8422.27 ± 1.89
Posttest9.98 ± 1.2916.75 ± 1.77
Three-Month follow-up9.91 ± 1.4916.79 ± 2.03
SecondaryTampa Kinesiophobia Scale (TKS)

The TKS is a 17-item scale that measures one's fear of movement, with a greater score indicating greater fear of injury due to movement. Scores range from 11 to 44.

Time frame:
Baseline (0 Weeks), Post-Test (10 Weeks), 3-Month Follow-Up (23 Weeks)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Tampa Kinesiophobia Scale (TKS)
score on a scaleGetActiveGetActive With Fitbit
Baseline38.65 ± 1.3239.54 ± 1.38
Posttest31.42 ± 1.2735.22 ± 1.32
3-Month follow- up35.82 ± 1.4635.92 ± 1.45
SecondaryMeasure of Current Status (MOCS-A)

The MOCS-A, a 13-item scale, measures one's perceived ability to perform various skills that the intervention aims to target. Scores range from 0 to 52. Higher scores indicate greater perceived ability.

Time frame:
Baseline (0 Weeks), Post-Test (10 Weeks), 3-Month Follow-Up (23 Weeks)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Measure of Current Status (MOCS-A)
score on a scaleGetActiveGetActive With Fitbit
Baseline Adaptive Coping27.56 ± 1.4927.27 ± 1.50
Posttest Adaptive Coping36.09 ± 1.4334.10 ± 1.33
Three-Month follow-up Adaptive Coping34.24 ± 1.5031.98 ± 1.36

Adverse events

Collected over 10 weeks. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
GetActive0/35 (0%)1/35 (2.9%)3/35 (8.6%)
GetActive With Fitbit0/37 (0%)1/37 (2.7%)7/37 (18.9%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventGetActiveGetActive With Fitbit
StrokeVascular disorders1/350/37
FallMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0/351/37
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventGetActiveGetActive With Fitbit
SciaticaNervous system disorders1/350/37
Lung InfectionRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/350/37
Pain FlareMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1/351/37
Sprained quadricep muscleMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0/351/37
Sickle Cell Anemia FlareBlood and lymphatic system disorders0/351/37
DiverticulitisGastrointestinal disorders0/351/37
ChemotherapySurgical and medical procedures0/351/37
HospitalizationGeneral disorders0/351/37
Elevated blood pressure and heart rateCardiac disorders0/351/37

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)GetActiveGetActive With FitbitTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years323466
>=65 years9716
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)GetActiveGetActive With FitbitTotal
Mean54.46 ± 14.549.07 ± 14.251.77 ± 14.53
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)GetActiveGetActive With FitbitTotal
Female233154
Male181028
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)GetActiveGetActive With FitbitTotal
Hispanic or Latino448
Not Hispanic or Latino353772
Unknown or Not Reported202
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)GetActiveGetActive With FitbitTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native202
Asian123
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American527
White323466
More than one race134
Unknown or Not Reported000
Marital status
Marital status(Participants)GetActiveGetActive With FitbitTotal
Single, never married131528
Living with significant other5611
Married15823
Separated/divorced51116
Widowed314
Education
Education(Participants)GetActiveGetActive With FitbitTotal
High school (12 years)5611
Some college/associate degree (<16 years)151126
Completed college (16 years)9817
Graduate/professional degree (>16 years)121628
09

Study locations

1 site
  • Massachusetts General Hospital
    Boston, Massachusetts 02114, United States
10

References and documents

Publications

  • Hopkins SW, Greenberg J, Isaacs J, Vranceanu AM. "Practice Makes Perfect"? Associations Between Home Practice and Physical and Emotional Function Outcomes Among Patients with Chronic Pain Enrolled in a Mind-Body Program. J Integr Complement Med. 2022 Apr;28(4):320-327. doi: 10.1089/jicm.2021.0324. Epub 2022 Feb 28. PubMed 35231185 ↗
  • Greenberg J, Singh T, Popok PJ, Kulich RJ, Vranceanu AM. Sustainability of Improvements in Adaptive Coping Following Mind-Body and Activity Training for Chronic Pain. Int J Behav Med. 2021 Dec;28(6):820-826. doi: 10.1007/s12529-021-09971-3. Epub 2021 Mar 2. PubMed 33649888 ↗
  • Greenberg J, Mace RA, Bannon SM, Kulich RJ, Vranceanu AM. Mind-Body Activity Program for Chronic Pain: Exploring Mechanisms of Improvement in Patient-Reported, Performance-Based and Ambulatory Physical Function. J Pain Res. 2021 Feb 5;14:359-368. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S298212. eCollection 2021. PubMed 33574699 ↗
  • Bannon S, Greenberg J, Mace RA, Locascio JJ, Vranceanu AM. The role of social isolation in physical and emotional outcomes among patients with chronic pain. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2021 Mar-Apr;69:50-54. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2021.01.009. Epub 2021 Jan 28. PubMed 33540223 ↗
  • Greenberg J, Lin A, Popok PJ, Kulich RJ, Edwards RR, Vranceanu AM. Getting Active Mindfully: Rationale and Case Illustration of a Group Mind-body and Activity Program for Chronic Pain. J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2021 Dec;28(4):706-719. doi: 10.1007/s10880-020-09758-w. Epub 2021 Jan 19. PubMed 33469845 ↗
  • Greenberg J, Mace RA, Popok PJ, Kulich RJ, Patel KV, Burns JW, Somers TJ, Keefe FJ, Schatman ME, Vranceanu AM. Psychosocial Correlates of Objective, Performance-Based, and Patient-Reported Physical Function Among Patients with Heterogeneous Chronic Pain. J Pain Res. 2020 Sep 10;13:2255-2265. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S266455. eCollection 2020. PubMed 32982388 ↗
  • Greenberg J, Popok PJ, Lin A, Kulich RJ, James P, Macklin EA, Millstein RA, Edwards RR, Vranceanu AM. A Mind-Body Physical Activity Program for Chronic Pain With or Without a Digital Monitoring Device: Proof-of-Concept Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Form Res. 2020 Jun 8;4(6):e18703. doi: 10.2196/18703. PubMed 32348281 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

11

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Oct 2017 to primary completion in Jun 2020, 32 months.

Results were first posted in Oct 2025, 5 years 3 months after primary completion.

Of 1,295 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Chronic Pain, half reached primary completion within 20 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 39. This study's 32 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 1,378 studies reached it within 20 months; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 38.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 12, 2018
First posted
Jan 29, 2018
StartActual
Oct 1, 2017
Primary completionActual
Jun 30, 2020
CompletionActual
Jun 30, 2020
Results first posted
Oct 14, 2025
Last update
Oct 14, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 14, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
12

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03412916
Responsible party
Ana-Maria Vranceanu, PhD (Clinical Psychologist, Massachusetts General Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 29, 2018
Start date
Oct 1, 2017
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2020
Completion
Jun 30, 2020
Results posted
Oct 14, 2025
Last update
Oct 14, 2025

Study contacts

Ana-Maria Vranceanu, PhD
principal investigator · Massachusetts General Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion