ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT03410836Updated Oct 18, 2023

Impact of Intravenous Lidocaine During Colorectal Surgery on Pain and Immune Functions

A Phase 4 interventional study of intravenous lidocaine (IVL) and Placebo in Intravenous Lidocaine and Immunity, sponsored by Ciusss de L'Est de l'Île de Montréal. Recruiting at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-10-18.

Sponsored by Ciusss de L'Est de l'Île de Montréal · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Dec 2024, 1 year 11 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Apr 2019; still recruiting 7 years 6 months later.
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study evaluates the impact of intraoperative intravenous lidocaine administered during laparoscopic colorectal surgery on the intraoperative remifentanil consumption as well as postoperative pain and opioid requirements. It will evaluate immune cell activity for 48hours after surgical stress and general anesthesia with or without intravenous lidocaine.

Read the detailed description

Hypothesis: We hypothesize that the intravenous lidocaine (IVL) versus placebo administered during laparoscopic colorectal surgery will allow for: a reduction in intraoperative remifentanil consumption, an improvement in patients' early rehabilitation after surgery, and an enhancement of the immune profile of our patients through an increase in the balance Th1/Th2 and cellular immunity.

Background: so far, IVL was shown to have several properties: analgesic, anti-inflammatory, and anti-hyperalgesic. Its effects on rehabilitation and pain are still controversial except for abdominal surgery. To date, no study evaluated the impact of IVL in colorectal surgery on intraoperative consumption of remifentanil. Postoperative immune suppression is multifactorial and depends on the surgical traumatism, but also on the doses of opioids given during anesthesia. No study evaluated in colorectal surgery the impact of IVL on postoperative cellular immunity and on the risk of cancer recurrence.

Specific Objectives: primary objective: to reduce by 30% the consumption of remifentanil in the IVL group versus the placebo group; secondary objectives: to evaluate the quality of recovery from anesthesia in the OR (awakening and extubation time), in the PACU and on the wards (pain scores, opioid consumption with patient controlled analgesia (PCA), postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), transit recovery time, time in PACU and time in hospital), and to evaluate the postoperative inflammatory parameters and adaptative immune functions (Th1/Th2) until postoperative 48h.

Methods: 60 adult patients ASA 1-3 scheduled for elective laparoscopic colorectal surgery will be included in this randomized controlled trial. Randomisation will be into group Control (C) and Lidocaine (IVL). Anesthesia and monitoring will be standardized and accompanied with the monitoring of the depth of anesthesia (BISpectral index, Medtronic) and the depth of analgesia (NoL index, Medasense LTD, recorded on an observational manner). IVL group will blindly be administered intravenous 1.5 mg/kg lidocaine bolus and then 1.5 mg/kg/h until the end of the surgery as previously described. C group will receive the same amount (ml) of placebo. Statistics: a preliminary analysis (idem group C) showed that the total amount of remifentanil given for this type of surgery was 2481+/-985 mcg (duration 141+/-30Min). Considering that we wish to reduce by 30% the remifentanil consumption in the group IVL, the number of patients to be included per group is 30 (alpha 0.05 and beta 20%).

Significance/Importance: this study will evaluate the impact of IVL on intraoperative consumption of remifentanil but also on immune functions after surgery in order to reduce the risk of cancer recurrence. If this study brings positive results, this will lead to a significant change in clinical practice of anesthesia. This is a pilot study on the immune functions, but this might bring very strong results to ask for future grants on the impact of IVL on cancer recurrence.

Study Design: Prospective, randomized controlled study. Subject Population: Adult patients scheduled to undergo elective laparoscopic colorectal surgery under general anesthesia.

Sample Size: 60 patients will be evaluated in this study. Study Duration: 1 year. Study Center: Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital, CIUSSS de l'Est de l'Ile de Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Adverse Events: None expected.

02

Conditions studied

  • Intravenous Lidocaine and Immunity

Keywords

  • lidocaine
  • colorectal cancer
  • laparoscopy surgery
  • anesthesia
  • inflammation
  • cytokine
  • post-operative immunosuppression
03

In context

Colorectal Neoplasms

6,541 studies on the registry are indexed under Colorectal Neoplasms; 1,667 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 60 is below the median of 76 across 4,800 interventional studies indexed under Colorectal Neoplasms.

Browse Colorectal Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Ciusss de L'Est de l'Île de Montréal is the lead sponsor of 90 studies on the registry; 32 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • ASA status I, II or III
  • Patients older than 18 years
  • Colonic surgery
  • Classical management of ERAS program patients in our center

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Arrhythmia, abnormal electrocardiographic , antiarrhythmic therapy
  • treatments, or long-term NSAIDs (multiple weekly doses) or during preoperative 48 hours
  • conversion intraoperative of a laparoscopic surgical technique to a laparotomy technique
  • Pregnant women
  • Inability to complete the questions related to this study
  • Inability to use hydromorphone postoperative PCA
  • Intolerance or allergy to lidocaine, hydromorphone or any other drug that is included in the protocol for perioperative management

Unexpected events leading to the exclusion:

  • Difficult unplanned intubation
  • Surgical complication requiring aggressive haemodynamic support (vasopressors, inotropes, transfusion)
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
60 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    intravenous lidocaine (IVL)

    Will receive during the colorectal surgery under General Anesthesia intravenous lidocaine bolus 1.5mg/kg at the beginning of anesthesia (induction) and 1.5mg/kg/h until the end of anesthesia.

    Drug: intravenous lidocaine (IVL)

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Will receive the same volume of normal saline for the entire duration of anesthesia.

    Other: Placebo

Interventions

  • lidocaine 2% will be used for induction (1 syringe of 5 ml, administered dose of 1.5 mg / kg) and for intra-operative infusion (1 syringe of 30 ml, infusion dose of 1.5 mg / kg / h). Lidocaine syringes and placebo will be prepared on a blinded manner so that the investigating anesthesiologist in charge of the patient in the operating room, as well as the respiratory therapist and the recovery room nurse and the floors do not know what the patient received during the anesthesia (whether IVL or placebo).

  • OtherPlacebo

    Group Control will receive (double blinded) an infusion of saline at the same volume and regimen than the lidocaine 2% group (IVL).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Reduction of total intraoperative remifentanil consumption by 30% in the intravenous lidocaine ("IVL") group compared with the control group ("C"). Total consumption of remifentanil in mcg.

    Reduction of total intraoperative remifentanil consumption by 30% in the intravenous lidocaine group compared with the control group.

    Time frame: Intra-operative, 5 hours

Secondary outcomes

  1. Evaluation of the number of remifentanil boluses given intraoperatively (n)

    Evaluation of the number of remifentanil boluses given intraoperatively, based on the intraoperative NOL index from T0 which is the time of the incision

    Time frame: T0 to end of surgery, 5 hours

  2. Assessment of total consumption of inhaled anesthetic desflurane in ml

    The Dräger Perseus A500 that we have in each anesthesia room offers the opportunity to get the ml of halogenous gas consumed precisely, and our electronic extraction database will allow to have this data in ml per second and the total at the end of surgery

    Time frame: intra-operative

  3. Evaluation of time for extubation

    Evaluation of time for extubation after surgery in the operating room

    Time frame: post-operative 1 hour

  4. Evaluation of the hydromorphone dose in mg used in the post-operative care unit (PACU) titration

    Evaluation of the hydromorphone dose in mg used as post-operative titration immediately in the recovery room (PACU) to obtain NRS pain scores \< 3/10

    Time frame: in recovery room, 3 hours

  5. Evaluation of the nausea and vomiting scores, 0 to 3 scale

    Evaluation of the nausea and vomiting scores (0 to 3) for the first 48 hours

    Time frame: 48 hours

  6. Evaluation of the length of stay in the recovery room based on the Aldrete scores (Score from 0 to 9)

    Evaluation of the length of stay in the recovery room based on the Aldrete scores (time to be ready to leave the recovery room)

    Time frame: in recovery room, 3 hours

  7. total hydromorphone consumption (mg) after PACU, on wards

    total hydromorphone consumption (mg given by Patient Controlled Analgesia) on wards for 48 hours

    Time frame: 48 hours

  8. Evaluation of the satisfaction of the patient scale 0 to 100 (%)

    Evaluation of the satisfaction of the patient as for the management of his pain for 48 hours

    Time frame: 48 hours postoperatively

  9. Assessment of total hospital duration of stay in hours

    Assessment of total hospital stay in hours

    Time frame: 7 days postoperatively

  10. Evaluation of the time in hours required for the emission of a first gas in hours

    Evaluation of the time in hours required for the emission of a first gas, a sign of resumption of normal intestinal function

    Time frame: 5 days postoperatively

  11. Assessment of rehabilitation scores and cognitive functions

    Assessment of rehabilitation scores and cognitive functions at 48h after surgery

    Time frame: 2 days

  12. Assessment of cytokines in plasma

    Assessment of inflammation parameters by blood sample for 48 hours

    Time frame: 48 hours

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 18, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03410836
Lead sponsor
Ciusss de L'Est de l'Île de Montréal
Collaborators
Foundation of Anesthesia and Resuscitation of Quebec
Responsible party
Philippe Richebe (Director of Research in Anesthesiology, MD, PhD, Ciusss de L'Est de l'Île de Montréal) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 25, 2018
Start date
Apr 29, 2019
Primary completion
Dec 2024 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 18, 2023

Study contacts

Philippe Richebé, MD PhD
Contact
philippe.richebe@umontreal.ca
514-743-6558
Nadia Godin, RN
Contact
ngodin.hmr@ssss.gouv.qc.ca
514-525-3400 ext. 3193
Philippe Richebé, MD, PhD
principal investigator · CIUSSS Est de l'ile de Montreal

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Lidocaine

Start the discussion