A Phase 3 interventional study of Ravulizumab in Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria, sponsored by Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. Completed at 9 sites in 6 countries. Open to participants aged Up to 17 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-03-27.
Sponsored by Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment
The purpose of this study was to assess the pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), safety, and efficacy of ravulizumab in pediatric participants with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH).
The study consists of a 4-week Screening Period, a 26-week Primary Evaluation Period, and an Extension Period of up to 4 years (with the exception of any country-specific mandates), whichever occurs first.
Efficacy and safety data are reported for the 26-week Primary Evaluation Period only. Analyses were conducted separately for complement inhibitor treatment-naïve participants and eculizumab-experienced participants.
Exclusion Criteria:
Complement inhibitor treatment-naïve and eculizumab-experienced participants received ravulizumab.
Biological: Ravulizumab
Single intravenous (IV) loading dose on Day 1, followed by regular IV maintenance dosing beginning on Day 15, based on weight.
Also known as: ALXN1210, Ultomiris
Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) Of Ravulizumab
Blood samples for determination of ravulizumab Cmax were collected before and after administration of study drug at designated time points. Results are reported in micrograms/milliliter (μg/mL).
Time frame: Week 1 (Day 1), Week 2 (Day 15), Week 10 (Day 71), and Week 18 (Day 127)
Trough Serum Concentration (Ctrough) Of Ravulizumab
Blood samples for determination of ravulizumab Ctrough were collected before and after administration of study drug at designated time points. Trough serum concentration was measured at end of dosing interval at steady state. Results are reported in μg/mL.
Time frame: Week 2 (Day 15), Week 10 (Day 71), Week 18 (Day 127), Week 26 (Day 183)
Mean Accumulation Ratio For Cmax Of Ravulizumab Following The Last Maintenance Dose Relative To The First Maintenance Dose
Blood samples for determination of ravulizumab accumulation ratio for Cmax were collected before and after administration of study drug at designated time points. The accumulation ratio was calculated as Cmax from the last maintenance dose (Week 18) divided by Cmax from the first maintenance dose (Week 2).
Time frame: Week 18
Mean Accumulation Ratio For Ctrough Of Ravulizumab Following The Last Maintenance Dose Relative To The First Maintenance Dose
Blood samples for determination of ravulizumab accumulation ratio for Ctrough were collected before and after administration of study drug at designated time points. The accumulation ratio was calculated as Ctrough from the last maintenance dose (Week 18) divided by Ctrough from the first maintenance dose (Week 2).
Time frame: Week 18
Change In Free Complement Component C5 (C5) Concentrations Over Time
Blood samples for determination of free C5 were collected before and after administration of study drug at designated time points.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 10, 18, and 26 (end of infusion)
Change In Chicken Red Blood Cell (cRBC) Hemolytic Activity Over Time
Blood samples for determination of cRBC hemolytic activity were collected before and after administration of study drug at designated time points.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 10, 18, and 26
Percentage Change From Baseline At Week 26 In Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH) Levels
Blood and urine samples for determination of LDH levels were collected at designated time points. Baseline was defined as the average of all assessments analyzed by the central laboratory prior to first study drug administration.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 26
Percentage Of Participants Who Achieved Transfusion Avoidance (TA)
Transfusion avoidance was defined as the proportion of participants who remained transfusion-free and did not require a transfusion according to protocol-specified guidelines. Point estimates and 2-sided 95% exact confidence intervals (CIs) were computed. Participants who withdrew from the study due to lack of efficacy during the Primary Evaluation Period were considered as non-responders and were counted in the group needing transfusion. For participants who withdrew from the study for any other reason during the Primary Evaluation Period, their data up to the time of withdrawal was used to assess TA.
Time frame: Week 26
Change In Quality Of Life (QoL) From Baseline To Week 26
Quality of life was measured by Pediatric Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) Fatigue Questionnaire (participants ≥ 5 years of age), a 13-item questionnaire that assesses fatigue and its impact upon daily activities and function over the preceding 7 days. Each item is scored on a 5-point scale, and total scores range from 0 to 52, with a higher score indicating better QoL. The scoring guideline for the Pediatric FACIT-Fatigue instrument was used to calculate a FACIT-Fatigue score. Changes from baseline in FACIT-Fatigue scores were summarized at baseline and at the study visits where this assessment was collected up to Day 183 (Week 26). At each study visit, the proportion of participants who showed an improvement of at least 3 points for the Pediatric FACIT-Fatigue scores were summarized by point estimates and 2-sided 95% exact CIs.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 26
Percentage Of Participants With Stabilized Hemoglobin At Week 26
Stabilized hemoglobin was defined as avoidance of a ≥ 2 g/dL decrease in hemoglobin level from baseline in the absence of transfusion through Week 26. Point estimates and 2-sided 95% exact CIs were computed. Participants who withdrew from the study due to lack of efficacy during the Primary Evaluation Period were considered as non-responders and were counted in the group who did not meet the stabilized hemoglobin definition. For participants who withdrew from the study for any other reason during the Primary Evaluation Period, their data up to the time of withdrawal were used to assess stabilized hemoglobin.
Time frame: Week 26
Percentage Change In Free Hemoglobin From Baseline To Week 26
Percentage change from baseline in free hemoglobin was summarized at all study visits up to Day 183 (Week 26). Baseline was defined as the last non-missing assessment value prior to the first study drug infusion.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 26
Percentage Of Participants With Breakthrough Hemolysis (BTH) At Week 26
Breakthrough hemolysis was defined as at least one new or worsening symptom or sign of intravascular hemolysis (fatigue, hemoglobinuria, abdominal pain, shortness of breath \[dyspnea\], anemia, major adverse vascular event \[including thrombosis\], dysphagia, or erectile dysfunction) in the presence of elevated LDH as follows: for participants who entered the study naïve to complement inhibitor treatment, elevated LDH ≥ 2 × the upper limit of normal (ULN) after prior LDH reduction to \< 1.5 × ULN on therapy; for participants who entered the study stabilized on eculizumab treatment, elevated LDH ≥ 2 × ULN. Participants who withdrew from the study due to lack of efficacy during the Primary Evaluation Period were considered as non-responders and were counted in the group with BTH. For participants who withdrew from the study for any other reason during the Primary Evaluation Period, their data up to the time of withdrawal were used to assess BTH. No participants experienced BTH.
Time frame: Week 26
Thirteen participants, from birth to \< 18 years, were planned to be enrolled to ensure at least 10 evaluable participants would complete the 26-week Primary Evaluation Period. Participants were recruited from 9 sites across 6 countries (United States, United Kingdom, France, Netherlands, Russia, and Norway).
| Milestone | Treatment Naïve | Eculizumab Experienced |
|---|---|---|
| Started | 5 | 8 |
| Received at least 1 dose of study drug | 5 | 8 |
| Completed | 5 | 8 |
| Not completed | 0 | 0 |
| Milestone | Treatment Naïve | Eculizumab Experienced |
|---|---|---|
| Started | 5 | 8 |
| Received at least 1 dose of study drug | 5 | 8 |
| Completed | 5 | 7 |
| Not completed | 0 | 1 |
| Withdrew: Lack of efficacy | 0 | 1 |
Blood samples for determination of ravulizumab Cmax were collected before and after administration of study drug at designated time points. Results are reported in micrograms/milliliter (μg/mL).
| μg/mL | Treatment Naïve | Eculizumab Experienced |
|---|---|---|
| Day 1: End of Infusion | 725.40 ± 93.730 | 884.63 ± 170.842 |
| Day 15: End of Infusion | 1161.60 ± 254.348 | 1612.50 ± 211.441 |
| Day 71: End of Infusion | 1402.00 ± 344.267 | 1581.43 ± 207.961 |
| Day 127: End of Infusion | 1396.00 ± 403.770 | 1705.00 ± 164.751 |
Blood samples for determination of ravulizumab Ctrough were collected before and after administration of study drug at designated time points. Trough serum concentration was measured at end of dosing interval at steady state. Results are reported in μg/mL.
| μg/mL | Treatment Naïve | Eculizumab Experienced |
|---|---|---|
| Day 15: Predose | 358.20 ± 51.978 | 452.25 ± 68.312 |
| Day 71: Predose | 370.20 ± 134.267 | 521.00 ± 72.870 |
| Day 127: Predose | 410.80 ± 215.503 | 554.88 ± 60.976 |
| Day 183: Predose | 419.00 ± 191.921 | 565.63 ± 68.980 |
Blood samples for determination of ravulizumab accumulation ratio for Cmax were collected before and after administration of study drug at designated time points. The accumulation ratio was calculated as Cmax from the last maintenance dose (Week 18) divided by Cmax from the first maintenance dose (Week 2).
| Ratio | Treatment Naïve | Eculizumab Experienced |
|---|---|---|
| Mean Accumulation Ratio For Cmax Of Ravulizumab Following The Last Maintenance Dose Relative To The First Maintenance Dose | 1.1995 ± 0.21038 | 1.0630 ± 0.06872 |
Blood samples for determination of ravulizumab accumulation ratio for Ctrough were collected before and after administration of study drug at designated time points. The accumulation ratio was calculated as Ctrough from the last maintenance dose (Week 18) divided by Ctrough from the first maintenance dose (Week 2).
| Ratio | Treatment Naïve | Eculizumab Experienced |
|---|---|---|
| Mean Accumulation Ratio For Ctrough Of Ravulizumab Following The Last Maintenance Dose Relative To The First Maintenance Dose | 1.2208 ± 0.32490 | 1.0700 ± 0.09089 |
Blood samples for determination of free C5 were collected before and after administration of study drug at designated time points.
| ug/mL | Treatment Naïve | Eculizumab Experienced |
|---|---|---|
| Week 2 | -105.319 ± 17.1118 | 0.000 ± 0.0000 |
| Week 10 | -105.310 ± 17.1139 | 0.003 ± 0.0052 |
| Week 18 | -105.320 ± 17.1165 | 0.006 ± 0.0067 |
| Week 26 | -105.320 ± 17.1184 | 0.006 ± 0.0070 |
Blood samples for determination of cRBC hemolytic activity were collected before and after administration of study drug at designated time points.
| percentage of hemolysis | Treatment Naïve | Eculizumab Experienced |
|---|---|---|
| Week 2 | -93.12 ± 9.259 | 1.95 ± 2.816 |
| Week 10 | -93.24 ± 9.241 | 3.97 ± 9.209 |
| Week 18 | -96.93 ± 4.543 | 2.78 ± 5.673 |
| Week 26 | -96.78 ± 4.816 | 7.03 ± 12.680 |
Blood and urine samples for determination of LDH levels were collected at designated time points. Baseline was defined as the average of all assessments analyzed by the central laboratory prior to first study drug administration.
| Percent Change | Treatment Naïve | Eculizumab Experienced |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage Change From Baseline At Week 26 In Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH) Levels | -47.91 ± 52.716 | 4.65 ± 44.702 |
Transfusion avoidance was defined as the proportion of participants who remained transfusion-free and did not require a transfusion according to protocol-specified guidelines. Point estimates and 2-sided 95% exact confidence intervals (CIs) were computed. Participants who withdrew from the study due to lack of efficacy during the Primary Evaluation Period were considered as non-responders and were counted in the group needing transfusion. For participants who withdrew from the study for any other reason during the Primary Evaluation Period, their data up to the time of withdrawal was used to assess TA.
| Percentage of Participants | Treatment Naïve | Eculizumab Experienced |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage Of Participants Who Achieved Transfusion Avoidance (TA) | 60.00 (14.66 to 94.73) | 100.00 (63.06 to 100.00) |
Quality of life was measured by Pediatric Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) Fatigue Questionnaire (participants ≥ 5 years of age), a 13-item questionnaire that assesses fatigue and its impact upon daily activities and function over the preceding 7 days. Each item is scored on a 5-point scale, and total scores range from 0 to 52, with a higher score indicating better QoL. The scoring guideline for the Pediatric FACIT-Fatigue instrument was used to calculate a FACIT-Fatigue score. Changes from baseline in FACIT-Fatigue scores were summarized at baseline and at the study visits where this assessment was collected up to Day 183 (Week 26). At each study visit, the proportion of participants who showed an improvement of at least 3 points for the Pediatric FACIT-Fatigue scores were summarized by point estimates and 2-sided 95% exact CIs.
| units on a scale | Treatment Naïve | Eculizumab Experienced |
|---|---|---|
| Change In Quality Of Life (QoL) From Baseline To Week 26 | 3.40 ± 6.107 | 1.28 ± 5.235 |
Stabilized hemoglobin was defined as avoidance of a ≥ 2 g/dL decrease in hemoglobin level from baseline in the absence of transfusion through Week 26. Point estimates and 2-sided 95% exact CIs were computed. Participants who withdrew from the study due to lack of efficacy during the Primary Evaluation Period were considered as non-responders and were counted in the group who did not meet the stabilized hemoglobin definition. For participants who withdrew from the study for any other reason during the Primary Evaluation Period, their data up to the time of withdrawal were used to assess stabilized hemoglobin.
| Percentage of Participants | Treatment Naïve | Eculizumab Experienced |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage Of Participants With Stabilized Hemoglobin At Week 26 | 60.0 (14.66 to 94.73) | 75.0 (34.91 to 96.81) |
Percentage change from baseline in free hemoglobin was summarized at all study visits up to Day 183 (Week 26). Baseline was defined as the last non-missing assessment value prior to the first study drug infusion.
| Percentage Change | Treatment Naïve | Eculizumab Experienced |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage Change In Free Hemoglobin From Baseline To Week 26 | 87.32 ± 226.816 | -15.29 ± 71.780 |
Breakthrough hemolysis was defined as at least one new or worsening symptom or sign of intravascular hemolysis (fatigue, hemoglobinuria, abdominal pain, shortness of breath \[dyspnea\], anemia, major adverse vascular event \[including thrombosis\], dysphagia, or erectile dysfunction) in the presence of elevated LDH as follows: for participants who entered the study naïve to complement inhibitor treatment, elevated LDH ≥ 2 × the upper limit of normal (ULN) after prior LDH reduction to \< 1.5 × ULN on therapy; for participants who entered the study stabilized on eculizumab treatment, elevated LDH ≥ 2 × ULN. Participants who withdrew from the study due to lack of efficacy during the Primary Evaluation Period were considered as non-responders and were counted in the group with BTH. For participants who withdrew from the study for any other reason during the Primary Evaluation Period, their data up to the time of withdrawal were used to assess BTH. No participants experienced BTH.
| Participants | Treatment Naïve | Eculizumab Experienced |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage Of Participants With Breakthrough Hemolysis (BTH) At Week 26 | 0 | 0 |
Collected over Day 1 through End of Study (Up to Day 1610). Non-serious events are listed at a 5.00% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment Naïve | 0/5 (0%) | 2/5 (40%) | 4/5 (80%) |
| Eculizumab Experienced | 0/8 (0%) | 2/8 (25%) | 7/8 (87.5%) |
| Event | Treatment Naïve | Eculizumab Experienced |
|---|---|---|
| Device related thrombosisGeneral disorders | 1/5 | 0/8 |
| Multiple organ dysfunction syndromeGeneral disorders | 1/5 | 0/8 |
| Device related sepsisInfections and infestations | 1/5 | 0/8 |
| Septic shockInfections and infestations | 1/5 | 0/8 |
| Staphylococcal infectionInfections and infestations | 1/5 | 0/8 |
| Aplastic anaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders | 1/5 | 0/8 |
| Viral upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations | 0/5 | 1/8 |
| Breakthrough haemolysisBlood and lymphatic system disorders | 0/5 | 1/8 |
| InfluenzaInfections and infestations | 0/5 | 1/8 |
| Event | Treatment Naïve | Eculizumab Experienced |
|---|---|---|
| COVID-19Infections and infestations | 2/5 | 1/8 |
| Abdominal painGastrointestinal disorders | 0/5 | 3/8 |
| NauseaGastrointestinal disorders | 0/5 | 3/8 |
| Abdominal pain upperGastrointestinal disorders | 0/5 | 3/8 |
| ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders | 0/5 | 2/8 |
| FatigueGeneral disorders | 0/5 | 2/8 |
| NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations | 1/5 | 2/8 |
| Upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations | 0/5 | 2/8 |
| Urinary tract infectionInfections and infestations | 0/5 | 2/8 |
| Pain in extremityMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | 0/5 | 2/8 |
Full Analysis: all participants who received at least 1 dose of ravulizumab and had at least 1 efficacy assessment after the first infusion of ravulizumab.
| Age, Continuous(years) | Treatment Naïve | Eculizumab Experienced | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 14.4 ± 2.19 | 14.4 ± 3.07 | 14.4 ± 2.66 |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | Treatment Naïve | Eculizumab Experienced | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 1 | 7 | 8 |
| Male | 4 | 1 | 5 |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants) | Treatment Naïve | Eculizumab Experienced | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Race - Undisclosed | 5 | 8 | 13 |
| Ethnicity - Undisclosed | 5 | 8 | 13 |
Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.
Plan to share: Yes
This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.