CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03406507Updated Mar 27, 2023Results posted

A Study of Ravulizumab (ALXN1210) in Children and Adolescents With Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria

A Phase 3 interventional study of Ravulizumab in Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria, sponsored by Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. Completed at 9 sites in 6 countries. Open to participants aged Up to 17 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-03-27.

Sponsored by Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
13
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
Up to 17 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study was to assess the pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), safety, and efficacy of ravulizumab in pediatric participants with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH).

Read the detailed description

The study consists of a 4-week Screening Period, a 26-week Primary Evaluation Period, and an Extension Period of up to 4 years (with the exception of any country-specific mandates), whichever occurs first.

Efficacy and safety data are reported for the 26-week Primary Evaluation Period only. Analyses were conducted separately for complement inhibitor treatment-naïve participants and eculizumab-experienced participants.

02

Conditions studied

  • Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria

Keywords

  • Ravulizumab
  • ALXN1210
  • Ultomiris
  • Pharmacokinetics
  • Pharmacodynamics
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Up to 17 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Participants from birth up to \<18 years of age and weighing ≥ 5 kilograms at the time of consent.
  2. PNH diagnosis confirmed by documented high-sensitivity flow cytometry.
  3. Presence of 1 or more of the following PNH-related signs or symptoms within 3 months of Screening: fatigue, hemoglobinuria, abdominal pain, shortness of breath (dyspnea), anemia, history of a major adverse vascular event (including thrombosis), dysphagia, or erectile dysfunction; or history of packed red blood cell transfusion due to PNH.
  4. Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level ≥ 1.5 × upper limit of normal (ULN) for participants not being treated with eculizumab at screening and LDH level ≤ 1.5 × ULN for participants taking eculizumab.
  5. Documented meningococcal vaccination not more than 3 years prior to dosing, and vaccination against Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae.
  6. Female participants of childbearing potential must use highly effective contraception starting at screening and continuing until at least 8 months after the last dose of ravulizumab.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. History of bone marrow transplantation.
  2. History of or ongoing major cardiac, pulmonary, renal, endocrine, or hepatic disease that, in the opinion of the investigator or sponsor, would preclude participation.
  3. Unstable medical conditions (for example, myocardial ischemia, active gastrointestinal bleed, severe congestive heart failure, anticipated need for major surgery within 6 months of randomization, coexisting chronic anemia unrelated to PNH).
  4. Females who are pregnant or breastfeeding or who have a positive pregnancy test at screening or Day 1.
  5. Participation in another interventional clinical study or use of any experimental therapy within 30 days before initiation of study drug on Day 1 in this study or within 5 half-lives of that investigational product, whichever is greater.
04

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
13 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Ravulizumab

    Complement inhibitor treatment-naïve and eculizumab-experienced participants received ravulizumab.

    Biological: Ravulizumab

Interventions

  • BiologicalRavulizumab

    Single intravenous (IV) loading dose on Day 1, followed by regular IV maintenance dosing beginning on Day 15, based on weight.

    Also known as: ALXN1210, Ultomiris

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) Of Ravulizumab

    Blood samples for determination of ravulizumab Cmax were collected before and after administration of study drug at designated time points. Results are reported in micrograms/milliliter (μg/mL).

    Time frame: Week 1 (Day 1), Week 2 (Day 15), Week 10 (Day 71), and Week 18 (Day 127)

  2. Trough Serum Concentration (Ctrough) Of Ravulizumab

    Blood samples for determination of ravulizumab Ctrough were collected before and after administration of study drug at designated time points. Trough serum concentration was measured at end of dosing interval at steady state. Results are reported in μg/mL.

    Time frame: Week 2 (Day 15), Week 10 (Day 71), Week 18 (Day 127), Week 26 (Day 183)

  3. Mean Accumulation Ratio For Cmax Of Ravulizumab Following The Last Maintenance Dose Relative To The First Maintenance Dose

    Blood samples for determination of ravulizumab accumulation ratio for Cmax were collected before and after administration of study drug at designated time points. The accumulation ratio was calculated as Cmax from the last maintenance dose (Week 18) divided by Cmax from the first maintenance dose (Week 2).

    Time frame: Week 18

  4. Mean Accumulation Ratio For Ctrough Of Ravulizumab Following The Last Maintenance Dose Relative To The First Maintenance Dose

    Blood samples for determination of ravulizumab accumulation ratio for Ctrough were collected before and after administration of study drug at designated time points. The accumulation ratio was calculated as Ctrough from the last maintenance dose (Week 18) divided by Ctrough from the first maintenance dose (Week 2).

    Time frame: Week 18

  5. Change In Free Complement Component C5 (C5) Concentrations Over Time

    Blood samples for determination of free C5 were collected before and after administration of study drug at designated time points.

    Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 10, 18, and 26 (end of infusion)

  6. Change In Chicken Red Blood Cell (cRBC) Hemolytic Activity Over Time

    Blood samples for determination of cRBC hemolytic activity were collected before and after administration of study drug at designated time points.

    Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 10, 18, and 26

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage Change From Baseline At Week 26 In Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH) Levels

    Blood and urine samples for determination of LDH levels were collected at designated time points. Baseline was defined as the average of all assessments analyzed by the central laboratory prior to first study drug administration.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 26

  2. Percentage Of Participants Who Achieved Transfusion Avoidance (TA)

    Transfusion avoidance was defined as the proportion of participants who remained transfusion-free and did not require a transfusion according to protocol-specified guidelines. Point estimates and 2-sided 95% exact confidence intervals (CIs) were computed. Participants who withdrew from the study due to lack of efficacy during the Primary Evaluation Period were considered as non-responders and were counted in the group needing transfusion. For participants who withdrew from the study for any other reason during the Primary Evaluation Period, their data up to the time of withdrawal was used to assess TA.

    Time frame: Week 26

  3. Change In Quality Of Life (QoL) From Baseline To Week 26

    Quality of life was measured by Pediatric Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) Fatigue Questionnaire (participants ≥ 5 years of age), a 13-item questionnaire that assesses fatigue and its impact upon daily activities and function over the preceding 7 days. Each item is scored on a 5-point scale, and total scores range from 0 to 52, with a higher score indicating better QoL. The scoring guideline for the Pediatric FACIT-Fatigue instrument was used to calculate a FACIT-Fatigue score. Changes from baseline in FACIT-Fatigue scores were summarized at baseline and at the study visits where this assessment was collected up to Day 183 (Week 26). At each study visit, the proportion of participants who showed an improvement of at least 3 points for the Pediatric FACIT-Fatigue scores were summarized by point estimates and 2-sided 95% exact CIs.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 26

  4. Percentage Of Participants With Stabilized Hemoglobin At Week 26

    Stabilized hemoglobin was defined as avoidance of a ≥ 2 g/dL decrease in hemoglobin level from baseline in the absence of transfusion through Week 26. Point estimates and 2-sided 95% exact CIs were computed. Participants who withdrew from the study due to lack of efficacy during the Primary Evaluation Period were considered as non-responders and were counted in the group who did not meet the stabilized hemoglobin definition. For participants who withdrew from the study for any other reason during the Primary Evaluation Period, their data up to the time of withdrawal were used to assess stabilized hemoglobin.

    Time frame: Week 26

  5. Percentage Change In Free Hemoglobin From Baseline To Week 26

    Percentage change from baseline in free hemoglobin was summarized at all study visits up to Day 183 (Week 26). Baseline was defined as the last non-missing assessment value prior to the first study drug infusion.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 26

  6. Percentage Of Participants With Breakthrough Hemolysis (BTH) At Week 26

    Breakthrough hemolysis was defined as at least one new or worsening symptom or sign of intravascular hemolysis (fatigue, hemoglobinuria, abdominal pain, shortness of breath \[dyspnea\], anemia, major adverse vascular event \[including thrombosis\], dysphagia, or erectile dysfunction) in the presence of elevated LDH as follows: for participants who entered the study naïve to complement inhibitor treatment, elevated LDH ≥ 2 × the upper limit of normal (ULN) after prior LDH reduction to \< 1.5 × ULN on therapy; for participants who entered the study stabilized on eculizumab treatment, elevated LDH ≥ 2 × ULN. Participants who withdrew from the study due to lack of efficacy during the Primary Evaluation Period were considered as non-responders and were counted in the group with BTH. For participants who withdrew from the study for any other reason during the Primary Evaluation Period, their data up to the time of withdrawal were used to assess BTH. No participants experienced BTH.

    Time frame: Week 26

06

Results

Posted May 9, 2022

Participant flow

Thirteen participants, from birth to \< 18 years, were planned to be enrolled to ensure at least 10 evaluable participants would complete the 26-week Primary Evaluation Period. Participants were recruited from 9 sites across 6 countries (United States, United Kingdom, France, Netherlands, Russia, and Norway).

Primary Evaluation Period
Participant flow — Primary Evaluation Period
MilestoneTreatment NaïveEculizumab Experienced
Started58
Received at least 1 dose of study drug58
Completed58
Not completed00
Extension Period
Participant flow — Extension Period
MilestoneTreatment NaïveEculizumab Experienced
Started58
Received at least 1 dose of study drug58
Completed57
Not completed01
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy01

Outcome measures

PrimaryMaximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) Of Ravulizumab

Blood samples for determination of ravulizumab Cmax were collected before and after administration of study drug at designated time points. Results are reported in micrograms/milliliter (μg/mL).

Time frame:
Week 1 (Day 1), Week 2 (Day 15), Week 10 (Day 71), and Week 18 (Day 127)
Reported as:
Mean · μg/mL
Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) Of Ravulizumab
μg/mLTreatment NaïveEculizumab Experienced
Day 1: End of Infusion725.40 ± 93.730884.63 ± 170.842
Day 15: End of Infusion1161.60 ± 254.3481612.50 ± 211.441
Day 71: End of Infusion1402.00 ± 344.2671581.43 ± 207.961
Day 127: End of Infusion1396.00 ± 403.7701705.00 ± 164.751
PrimaryTrough Serum Concentration (Ctrough) Of Ravulizumab

Blood samples for determination of ravulizumab Ctrough were collected before and after administration of study drug at designated time points. Trough serum concentration was measured at end of dosing interval at steady state. Results are reported in μg/mL.

Time frame:
Week 2 (Day 15), Week 10 (Day 71), Week 18 (Day 127), Week 26 (Day 183)
Reported as:
Mean · μg/mL
Trough Serum Concentration (Ctrough) Of Ravulizumab
μg/mLTreatment NaïveEculizumab Experienced
Day 15: Predose358.20 ± 51.978452.25 ± 68.312
Day 71: Predose370.20 ± 134.267521.00 ± 72.870
Day 127: Predose410.80 ± 215.503554.88 ± 60.976
Day 183: Predose419.00 ± 191.921565.63 ± 68.980
PrimaryMean Accumulation Ratio For Cmax Of Ravulizumab Following The Last Maintenance Dose Relative To The First Maintenance Dose

Blood samples for determination of ravulizumab accumulation ratio for Cmax were collected before and after administration of study drug at designated time points. The accumulation ratio was calculated as Cmax from the last maintenance dose (Week 18) divided by Cmax from the first maintenance dose (Week 2).

Time frame:
Week 18
Reported as:
Mean · Ratio
Mean Accumulation Ratio For Cmax Of Ravulizumab Following The Last Maintenance Dose Relative To The First Maintenance Dose
RatioTreatment NaïveEculizumab Experienced
Mean Accumulation Ratio For Cmax Of Ravulizumab Following The Last Maintenance Dose Relative To The First Maintenance Dose1.1995 ± 0.210381.0630 ± 0.06872
PrimaryMean Accumulation Ratio For Ctrough Of Ravulizumab Following The Last Maintenance Dose Relative To The First Maintenance Dose

Blood samples for determination of ravulizumab accumulation ratio for Ctrough were collected before and after administration of study drug at designated time points. The accumulation ratio was calculated as Ctrough from the last maintenance dose (Week 18) divided by Ctrough from the first maintenance dose (Week 2).

Time frame:
Week 18
Reported as:
Mean · Ratio
Mean Accumulation Ratio For Ctrough Of Ravulizumab Following The Last Maintenance Dose Relative To The First Maintenance Dose
RatioTreatment NaïveEculizumab Experienced
Mean Accumulation Ratio For Ctrough Of Ravulizumab Following The Last Maintenance Dose Relative To The First Maintenance Dose1.2208 ± 0.324901.0700 ± 0.09089
PrimaryChange In Free Complement Component C5 (C5) Concentrations Over Time

Blood samples for determination of free C5 were collected before and after administration of study drug at designated time points.

Time frame:
Baseline, Weeks 2, 10, 18, and 26 (end of infusion)
Reported as:
Mean · ug/mL
Change In Free Complement Component C5 (C5) Concentrations Over Time
ug/mLTreatment NaïveEculizumab Experienced
Week 2-105.319 ± 17.11180.000 ± 0.0000
Week 10-105.310 ± 17.11390.003 ± 0.0052
Week 18-105.320 ± 17.11650.006 ± 0.0067
Week 26-105.320 ± 17.11840.006 ± 0.0070
PrimaryChange In Chicken Red Blood Cell (cRBC) Hemolytic Activity Over Time

Blood samples for determination of cRBC hemolytic activity were collected before and after administration of study drug at designated time points.

Time frame:
Baseline, Weeks 2, 10, 18, and 26
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of hemolysis
Change In Chicken Red Blood Cell (cRBC) Hemolytic Activity Over Time
percentage of hemolysisTreatment NaïveEculizumab Experienced
Week 2-93.12 ± 9.2591.95 ± 2.816
Week 10-93.24 ± 9.2413.97 ± 9.209
Week 18-96.93 ± 4.5432.78 ± 5.673
Week 26-96.78 ± 4.8167.03 ± 12.680
SecondaryPercentage Change From Baseline At Week 26 In Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH) Levels

Blood and urine samples for determination of LDH levels were collected at designated time points. Baseline was defined as the average of all assessments analyzed by the central laboratory prior to first study drug administration.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 26
Reported as:
Mean · Percent Change
Percentage Change From Baseline At Week 26 In Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH) Levels
Percent ChangeTreatment NaïveEculizumab Experienced
Percentage Change From Baseline At Week 26 In Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH) Levels-47.91 ± 52.7164.65 ± 44.702
SecondaryPercentage Of Participants Who Achieved Transfusion Avoidance (TA)

Transfusion avoidance was defined as the proportion of participants who remained transfusion-free and did not require a transfusion according to protocol-specified guidelines. Point estimates and 2-sided 95% exact confidence intervals (CIs) were computed. Participants who withdrew from the study due to lack of efficacy during the Primary Evaluation Period were considered as non-responders and were counted in the group needing transfusion. For participants who withdrew from the study for any other reason during the Primary Evaluation Period, their data up to the time of withdrawal was used to assess TA.

Time frame:
Week 26
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of Participants
Percentage Of Participants Who Achieved Transfusion Avoidance (TA)
Percentage of ParticipantsTreatment NaïveEculizumab Experienced
Percentage Of Participants Who Achieved Transfusion Avoidance (TA)60.00 (14.66 to 94.73)100.00 (63.06 to 100.00)
SecondaryChange In Quality Of Life (QoL) From Baseline To Week 26

Quality of life was measured by Pediatric Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) Fatigue Questionnaire (participants ≥ 5 years of age), a 13-item questionnaire that assesses fatigue and its impact upon daily activities and function over the preceding 7 days. Each item is scored on a 5-point scale, and total scores range from 0 to 52, with a higher score indicating better QoL. The scoring guideline for the Pediatric FACIT-Fatigue instrument was used to calculate a FACIT-Fatigue score. Changes from baseline in FACIT-Fatigue scores were summarized at baseline and at the study visits where this assessment was collected up to Day 183 (Week 26). At each study visit, the proportion of participants who showed an improvement of at least 3 points for the Pediatric FACIT-Fatigue scores were summarized by point estimates and 2-sided 95% exact CIs.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 26
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change In Quality Of Life (QoL) From Baseline To Week 26
units on a scaleTreatment NaïveEculizumab Experienced
Change In Quality Of Life (QoL) From Baseline To Week 263.40 ± 6.1071.28 ± 5.235
SecondaryPercentage Of Participants With Stabilized Hemoglobin At Week 26

Stabilized hemoglobin was defined as avoidance of a ≥ 2 g/dL decrease in hemoglobin level from baseline in the absence of transfusion through Week 26. Point estimates and 2-sided 95% exact CIs were computed. Participants who withdrew from the study due to lack of efficacy during the Primary Evaluation Period were considered as non-responders and were counted in the group who did not meet the stabilized hemoglobin definition. For participants who withdrew from the study for any other reason during the Primary Evaluation Period, their data up to the time of withdrawal were used to assess stabilized hemoglobin.

Time frame:
Week 26
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of Participants
Percentage Of Participants With Stabilized Hemoglobin At Week 26
Percentage of ParticipantsTreatment NaïveEculizumab Experienced
Percentage Of Participants With Stabilized Hemoglobin At Week 2660.0 (14.66 to 94.73)75.0 (34.91 to 96.81)
SecondaryPercentage Change In Free Hemoglobin From Baseline To Week 26

Percentage change from baseline in free hemoglobin was summarized at all study visits up to Day 183 (Week 26). Baseline was defined as the last non-missing assessment value prior to the first study drug infusion.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 26
Reported as:
Mean · Percentage Change
Percentage Change In Free Hemoglobin From Baseline To Week 26
Percentage ChangeTreatment NaïveEculizumab Experienced
Percentage Change In Free Hemoglobin From Baseline To Week 2687.32 ± 226.816-15.29 ± 71.780
SecondaryPercentage Of Participants With Breakthrough Hemolysis (BTH) At Week 26

Breakthrough hemolysis was defined as at least one new or worsening symptom or sign of intravascular hemolysis (fatigue, hemoglobinuria, abdominal pain, shortness of breath \[dyspnea\], anemia, major adverse vascular event \[including thrombosis\], dysphagia, or erectile dysfunction) in the presence of elevated LDH as follows: for participants who entered the study naïve to complement inhibitor treatment, elevated LDH ≥ 2 × the upper limit of normal (ULN) after prior LDH reduction to \< 1.5 × ULN on therapy; for participants who entered the study stabilized on eculizumab treatment, elevated LDH ≥ 2 × ULN. Participants who withdrew from the study due to lack of efficacy during the Primary Evaluation Period were considered as non-responders and were counted in the group with BTH. For participants who withdrew from the study for any other reason during the Primary Evaluation Period, their data up to the time of withdrawal were used to assess BTH. No participants experienced BTH.

Time frame:
Week 26
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Percentage Of Participants With Breakthrough Hemolysis (BTH) At Week 26
ParticipantsTreatment NaïveEculizumab Experienced
Percentage Of Participants With Breakthrough Hemolysis (BTH) At Week 2600

Adverse events

Collected over Day 1 through End of Study (Up to Day 1610). Non-serious events are listed at a 5.00% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Treatment Naïve0/5 (0%)2/5 (40%)4/5 (80%)
Eculizumab Experienced0/8 (0%)2/8 (25%)7/8 (87.5%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventTreatment NaïveEculizumab Experienced
Device related thrombosisGeneral disorders1/50/8
Multiple organ dysfunction syndromeGeneral disorders1/50/8
Device related sepsisInfections and infestations1/50/8
Septic shockInfections and infestations1/50/8
Staphylococcal infectionInfections and infestations1/50/8
Aplastic anaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders1/50/8
Viral upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations0/51/8
Breakthrough haemolysisBlood and lymphatic system disorders0/51/8
InfluenzaInfections and infestations0/51/8
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 70
Most frequent other events
EventTreatment NaïveEculizumab Experienced
COVID-19Infections and infestations2/51/8
Abdominal painGastrointestinal disorders0/53/8
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders0/53/8
Abdominal pain upperGastrointestinal disorders0/53/8
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders0/52/8
FatigueGeneral disorders0/52/8
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations1/52/8
Upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations0/52/8
Urinary tract infectionInfections and infestations0/52/8
Pain in extremityMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0/52/8

Baseline characteristics

Full Analysis: all participants who received at least 1 dose of ravulizumab and had at least 1 efficacy assessment after the first infusion of ravulizumab.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Treatment NaïveEculizumab ExperiencedTotal
Mean14.4 ± 2.1914.4 ± 3.0714.4 ± 2.66
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Treatment NaïveEculizumab ExperiencedTotal
Female178
Male415
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Treatment NaïveEculizumab ExperiencedTotal
Race - Undisclosed5813
Ethnicity - Undisclosed5813
07

Study locations

9 sites
  • Clinical Trial Site
    Atlanta, Georgia 30329, United States
  • Clinical Trial Site
    Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53226, United States
  • Clinical Trial Site
    Paris, France
  • Clinical Trial Site
    Utrecht, Netherlands
  • Clinical Trial Site
    Oslo, Norway
  • Clinical Trial Site
    Moscow, Russian Federation
  • Clinical Trial Site
    Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation
  • Clinical Trial Site
    Leeds, United Kingdom
  • Clinical Trial Site
    London, United Kingdom
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Kulagin A, Chonat S, Maschan A, Bartels M, Buechner J, Punzalan R, Richards M, Ogawa M, Hicks E, Yu J, Baruchel A, Kulasekararaj AG. Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, efficacy, and safety of ravulizumab in children and adolescents with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria: interim analysis of a phase 3, open-label study. Presented at the European Hematology Association 2021 Virtual Congress, June 9-17, 2021.

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Apr 22, 2020
  • Statistical analysis plan · May 8, 2020

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes

09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03406507
Lead sponsor
Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 23, 2018
Start date
Feb 22, 2018
Primary completion
Mar 25, 2020
Completion
Aug 25, 2022
Results posted
May 9, 2022
Last update
Mar 27, 2023

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion