ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT03391583Updated Apr 18, 2019

Can Targeted Education Impact the Current Standard of Care in Patients With Mild Traumatic Brain Injury?

An interventional study of Education in Headache Disorders, Post-Concussion Syndrome and Mild Traumatic Brain Injury, sponsored by Unity Health Toronto. Status unknown at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-04-18.

Sponsored by Unity Health Toronto · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Apr 2019), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
70
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The study will ask the question as to whether or not it is possible to deliver education material to patients with a mild traumatic brain injury in a consistent matter. The question will be asked as to whether an educational intervention decreases symptom reporting specifically looking at headache symptoms. Half of the patients will receive the current standard of care in the tertiary clinic they have been referred to while the other half will also receive the current standard of care with the addition of targeted headache educational material at various time points.

Read the detailed description

Post-traumatic headache is a common symptom endorsed in individuals who have suffered from mild traumatic brain injury. Headaches are often debilitating and can significantly impact a patient's ability to function and interact in society(Azulay et.al 2013).

The provision of education to patients and primary care physicians is important. There is often not enough time during clinic appointments to ensure that patients understand the pathophysiology, treatment and red-flags of their post concussive symptoms. The question is asked as to whether educational material can be delivered in a consistent and comprehensible manner.

The study will look at whether or not targeted headache education material presented to patients at multiple time points outside of the current standard of care is feasible and if there is any impact on symptom severity scores utilizing standardized surveys such as the Rivermead Post Concussion Questionnaire. A patient's frequency and type of social interactions during their recovery along with their perceived quality of life will be measured using the Participation Assessment with Recombined Tools-Objective (PART-O tool) and the Quality of Life after Brain Injury (Quolibri) tools respectively will be analyzed. By providing the basics of when to seek medical attention, the hope is be able to track what type and how frequently patients access medical treatment outside of the tertiary care clinic setting.

The investigators would like to see whether this education model is feasible and can be used as a consistent message sent to patients as well as other health care professionals.

02

Conditions studied

  • Headache Disorders
  • Post-Concussion Syndrome
  • Mild Traumatic Brain Injury

Keywords

  • Education
  • Pain
03

In context

Headache Disorders

145 studies on the registry are indexed under Headache Disorders; 37 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 70 is above the median of 60 across 98 interventional studies indexed under Headache Disorders.

Browse Headache Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

Unity Health Toronto is the lead sponsor of 447 studies on the registry; 82 are open to participants now.

Of its 5 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 1 (20%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients must be diagnosed with a chronic ( between 2 and 4 months post injury) mTBI based on CDC criteria. They must have the ability to give consent, speak English with awareness that they will need to be contacted at various time points, and must have access to email. There will be inclusion of patients who score 3 or more on the RPQ during their initial assessment in the St. Michael's Head Injury Clinic. They must be medically stable.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients will be excluded from the study if they have a documented history of moderate to severe traumatic brain injury. If they have a prior history of other neurological (i.e. Epilepsy, MS, Alzheimer's Disease, primary headache disorder), psychiatric (i.e. Psychotic disorder or other history of a mental health disorder) or substance abuse disorders. Subjects will be excluded if they have no fixed address or are incarcerated, as that would hinder follow up.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
70 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Standard of Care plus Education

    Educational material will be provided at three time points along with the current standard of care provided in tertiary health care setting

    Other: Education

  • No intervention
    Standard of Care

    Current standard of care provided in tertiary health care setting

Interventions

  • OtherEducation

    Participants in the education arm of the study will be provided with three PowerPoint presentations. Material for these slides has been adapted from material developed by the Ontario Neurotrauma Foundation. Topics to be addressed will surround post-traumatic headache and will include information regarding common symptoms, timeline for improvement, red- flags and when to seek medical attention

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Survey response

    How many people randomized to the study will complete the study. This will be a raw number and calculated by counting how many people complete the administered surveys at the end of the trial.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Rivermead post concussion questionnaire scores (RPQ)

    The Rivermead post concussion questionnaire (RPQ) asks 16 questions about patient's headache symptoms after head injury and are given a scale from 0-4 in order to rate symptoms from none to maximum severity (0 = Not experienced at all, 1 = No more of a problem, 2 = A mild problem, 3 = A moderate problem and 4 = a severe problem). The first three questions( RPQ-3) focuses on the most frequently endorsed headache symptoms. This study aims to reduce a patients overall score at the end of the study by 3 with the max possible score being 12 ( maximum score of 4 times 3 questions). Only those initially scoring 9 or more out of the 12 will be asked to participate in the study. The last thirteen questions (RPQ-13) focuses on other frequently endorsed symptoms of headache. For these questions, the target is to decrease a patient's total score by 10 out of a possible maximum score of 52 (maximum score of 4 times 13 questions). Both the RPQ-3 and 13 will be compared to the standard of care.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  2. Access to health care

    What type of health care services do participants in this study access. Both the educational group and the standard of care patients will be asked to document this on administered surveys

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  3. Social and Societal Functioning

    Can an educational intervention regarding headache management and lifestyle strategies improve social/societal functioning. This will be assessed with the Participation Assessment with Recombined Tools (PART-O tool). A 5-point decrease in total score out of 17 questions will be deemed significant.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  4. Perceived quality of life

    Does education and reassurance alter a patient's perceived quality of life after a mild-traumatic brain injury. This will be analyzed by using the QOLIBRI (Quality of Life after Brain Injury). The investigators hope to capture whether or not patients believe they play an active role in their health and whether or not they feel empowered to alter their health status. The point is to capture what barriers there are to a patient's recovery in regard to what negative feelings and limits they perceive.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • St. Michael's Hospital
    Toronto, Ontario M5B 1W8,, Canada
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Azulay J, Smart CM, Mott T, Cicerone KD. A pilot study examining the effect of mindfulness-based stress reduction on symptoms of chronic mild traumatic brain injury/postconcussive syndrome. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2013 Jul-Aug;28(4):323-31. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0b013e318250ebda. PubMed 22688212 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Patient study data will be de-identified or coded. A master linking log with identifiers will be kept and stored separately from the data. Data for all primary and secondary outcomes will be available.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form, Clinical study report

Time frame: The data will be available 6 months post study completion.

Access criteria: Data access requests will be independently reviewed by the St. Michael's Steering Committee. Requesters will sign a Data Access Agreement.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jan 2018 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2019, 23 months after the start.

Of 41 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Headache Disorders, half reached primary completion within 20 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 7 and three quarters within 42. This study's planned 23 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 43 studies reached it within 20 months; a quarter within 7 and three quarters within 42.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 7, 2017
First posted
Jan 5, 2018
StartActual
Jan 8, 2018
Primary completionEst.
Dec 17, 2019
CompletionEst.
Dec 17, 2019
Last update
Apr 18, 2019
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 18, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03391583
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 5, 2018
Start date
Jan 8, 2018
Primary completion
Dec 17, 2019 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 17, 2019 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 18, 2019

Study contacts

Cindy Hunt, PH, RN
Contact
huntci@smh.ca
Phone: 416-864-6060 ext. 77081
Candice M Todd, MD
Contact
candice.todd@mail.utoronto.ca
416-603-5800 ext. 6262
Andrew Baker
principal investigator · Unity Health Toronto

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Apr 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion