ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03391284Updated Nov 22, 2022

Oral vs Intravenous Acetominophen for Postoperative Pain in Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery

An interventional study of acetominophen and Acetaminophen in Post-operative Pain, sponsored by Scripps Health. Completed at 2 sites in United States. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-11-22.

Sponsored by Scripps Health · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
75
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Hypothesis: Postoperative pain will be equivalent in patients receiving preemptive oral acetaminophen as compared to patients receiving preemptive intravenous acetaminophen following minimally invasive benign gynecologic surgery.

Primary outcome:

  • Difference in postoperative pain comparing preemptive use of PO versus IV acetaminophen

o Mean Visual analog Scale (VAS) scores will be compared between the intervention group (PO acetaminophen) and the control group (IV acetaminophen).

Secondary outcomes:

  • Difference in postoperative analgesic use between groups

    o Narcotics, NSAIDs

  • Difference in postoperative N/V between groups

    o Patient rated measure - none, mild, moderate, severe

  • Cost comparison between drugs
Read the detailed description

Hypothesis: Postoperative pain will be equivalent in patients receiving preemptive oral acetaminophen as compared to patients receiving preemptive intravenous acetaminophen following minimally invasive benign gynecologic surgery.

Importance/significance: Adequate control of postoperative pain is important for patient satisfaction, adequate healing, and optimizing length of stay. The idea of preemptive analgesia (giving an analgesic prior to first skin incision to prevent sensitization of nerve pathways from the trauma of surgery) has been shown in many studies to improve postoperative pain. Intravenous acetaminophen has been found to be an effective agent when given preemptively, and many surgeons have adopted this practice. Unfortunately, the IV formulation of acetaminophen, unlike the oral formulation, is expensive as it is a relatively new drug. There are other oral analgesics (i.e. Celebrex) that have been found to be efficacious for postoperative pain control when given preemptively. There are no studies in gynecologic surgery, however, comparing the effectiveness of PO acetaminophen with IV acetaminophen. Given that PO acetaminophen is significantly cheaper than the IV formulation, this could result in cost savings for hospital systems while maintaining adequate patient comfort and satisfaction.

Primary outcome:

  1. Difference in postoperative pain comparing preemptive use of PO versus IV acetaminophen
  2. Mean VAS scores will be compared between the intervention group (PO acetaminophen) and the control group (IV acetaminophen).

Secondary outcomes:

  1. Difference in postoperative analgesic use between groups - Narcotics, NSAIDs
  2. Difference in postoperative N/V between groups
  3. Patient rated measure - none, mild, moderate, severe
  4. Cost comparison between drugs

Methods:

Patients scheduled to undergo minimally invasive benign gynecologic surgery will be randomized to one of two groups:

Group 1: acetaminophen 1 gram PO 30min before surgery, then saline placebo IV after anesthesia induction but before skin incision

Group 2: receives placebo pill PO 30min before surgery, then acetaminophen 1 gram IV after anesthesia induction but before skin incision

Primary outcome: After surgery, postoperative pain measured at various time points by blinded investigator

2 hours postop, 4 hours postop, 24 hours postop

Secondary outcomes:

  1. Evaluate N/V - self-rated as none, mild, moderate, severe
  2. Document amount of analgesic use (narcotic, NSAIDs) during hospital course
  3. Compute cost comparison between medications

Demographics to collect:

Age, parity, BMI, procedure indication, pathology including uterine weight, procedure length

02

Conditions studied

  • Post-operative Pain

Browse trials for

03

In context

Pain, Postoperative

5,640 studies on the registry are indexed under Pain, Postoperative; 1,230 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 75 is close to the median of 75 across 4,821 interventional studies indexed under Pain, Postoperative.

Browse Pain, Postoperative studies →

Lead sponsor

Scripps Health is the lead sponsor of 48 studies on the registry; 8 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients 18 years of age or older scheduled to undergo robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign conditions.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known or suspected ,
  • Active liver/renal disease,
  • Chronic alcohol use/alcoholism,
  • Allergy to acetaminophen,
  • Conversion to laparotomy,
  • hx gastroparesis,
  • Poorly controlled insulin dependent diabetes or gastric bypass surgery,
  • Regular/recent (past 6 months) narcotic use,
  • Inability to swallow pills.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator)
Enrollment
75 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Oral Acetominophen Arm

    1000 mg acetominophen oral

    Drug: acetominophen · Drug: Acetaminophen

  • Active comparator
    Intravenous

    1000 mg acetominophen intravenous

    Drug: acetominophen · Drug: Acetaminophen

Interventions

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain - VAS

    Pain level 2 hours post treatment

    Time frame: 2 hours

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pain - VAS

    Pain level 4 hours post treatment

    Time frame: 4 hours

  2. Pain - VAS

    Pain level 24 hours post treatment

    Time frame: 24 hours

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • Scripps Clinic
    San Diego, California 92130, United States
  • Scripps Clininc Dept of Ob/Gyn
    San Diego, California 92130, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Lombardi TM, Kahn BS, Tsai LJ, Waalen JM, Wachi N. Preemptive Oral Compared With Intravenous Acetaminophen for Postoperative Pain After Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Dec;134(6):1293-1297. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003578. PubMed 31764741 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Feb 2016 to primary completion in Feb 2018, 24 months.

Of 2,089 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Pain, Postoperative, half reached primary completion within 11 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 23. This study's 24 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 2,102 studies reached it within 11 months; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 23.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 9, 2016
First posted
Jan 5, 2018
StartActual
Feb 2016
Primary completionActual
Feb 2018
CompletionActual
Feb 2018
Last update
Nov 22, 2022
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 22, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03391284
Lead sponsor
Scripps Health
Responsible party
Bruce Kahn (PI, Scripps Health) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 5, 2018
Start date
Feb 2016
Primary completion
Feb 2018
Completion
Feb 2018
Last update
Nov 22, 2022

Study contacts

Bruce Kahn, MD
principal investigator · Scripps

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Acetaminophen

Start the discussion