ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03387813GUIDE-HFUpdated Aug 7, 2025Results posted

Hemodynamic-GUIDEd Management of Heart Failure

An interventional study of CardioMEMS™ HF System in Heart Failure, Heart Failure, Systolic and Heart Failure, Diastolic, sponsored by Abbott Medical Devices. Completed at 129 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-08-07.

Sponsored by Abbott Medical Devices (part of Abbott) · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
2,358
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-13

Among 120 studies in Heart Failure by Abbott — 6 open to participants now, 9 under way, none of them phase 3. Heart Failure · Abbott.

Enrollment
2nd of 72
2,358 · median 136
Started
2018
with 3 others
No phase
62 of 120
2 open now
Registered
99th of 120
by date

Among the 120 studies in Heart Failure by Abbott, this one is the 2nd largest by enrollment of the 72 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 4 that started in 2018, is one of 62 with no phase, and was the 99th registered.

Heart Failure

6,332 studies on the registry are indexed under Heart Failure; 1,392 are open to participants now.

Browse Heart Failure studies →

Open to participants now

6 of the 120 studies in Heart Failure by Abbott are open now, in 12 countries. Recruiting first, the newest first:

1 more — sign in →

By country, each count listing its studies:

All 6 open studies →

Who these studies take

Of the 966 Heart Failure studies recruiting now, 689 (71%) set no upper age limit and 89 (9%) stop at 75 or younger; 63 take children under 18; 96 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years and older · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 120 studies in Heart Failure by Abbott, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

The GUIDE-HF IDE clinical trial is intended to demonstrate the effectiveness of the CardioMEMS™ HF System in an expanded patient population including heart failure (HF) patients outside of the present indication, but at risk for future HF events or mortality.

Read the detailed description

The GUIDE-HF IDE clinical trial is intended to demonstrate the effectiveness of the CardioMEMS™ HF System in an expanded patient population including HF patients outside of the present indication, but at risk for future HF events or mortality.

The trial includes patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class II, III, or IV HF who have an elevated N-terminal pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) (or an elevated Brain Natriuretic Peptide (BNP)) and/or a prior HF hospitalization (HFH).

The GUIDE-HF IDE trial will include approximately 3600 subjects at approximately 140 North American sites and consists of two arms: a Randomized Arm and a Single Arm.

03

Conditions studied

  • Heart Failure
  • Heart Failure, Systolic
  • Heart Failure, Diastolic
  • Heart Failure NYHA Class II
  • Heart Failure NYHA Class III
  • Heart Failure NYHA Class IV
  • Heart Failure,Congestive
  • Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction
  • Heart Failure With Normal Ejection Fraction
  • Heart Failure; With Decompensation

Keywords

  • Heart Failure
  • Hemodynamic Monitoring
  • CardioMEMS
  • Pulmonary Artery Pressure
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Diagnosis and treatment for heart failure (HF) (regardless of (LVEF)) for > 90 days prior to the date of consent:

    a. Subjects should be on stable, optimally titrated medical therapy for at least 30 days, as recommended according to current American Heart Association (AHA)/American College of Cardiology (ACC) guidelines as standard-of-care for HF therapy in the United States, with any intolerance documented.

  2. GUIDE-HF Randomized Arm Only: Class II, III or IV HF symptoms documented within 30 days prior to consent.
  3. GUIDE-HF Single Arm Only: NYHA Class III HF symptoms documented within 30 days prior to consent.
  4. HF hospitalization (HFH) within 12 months prior to consent and/or elevated N-terminal pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) (or Brain Natriuretic Peptide (BNP)) within 30 days prior to consent defined as:

    1. Subjects with LVEF ≤ 40%: NT-proBNP ≥ 1000 pg/mL (or BNP ≥ 250 pg/mL).
    2. Subjects with LVEF > 40%: NT-proBNP ≥ 700 pg/mL (or BNP ≥ 175 pg/mL).
    3. Thresholds for NT-proBNP and BNP (for both LVEF ≤ 40% and LVEF > 40%) will be corrected for (BMI) using a 4% reduction per BMI unit over 25 kg/m2
  5. ≥ 18 years of age
  6. Chest circumference of \< 65 inches, if BMI is > 35 kg/m2
  7. Written obtained from subject
  8. Willing and able to upload pulmonary artery (PA) pressure information and comply with the follow-up requirements

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Intolerance to all neuro-hormonal antagonists (i.e., intolerance to angiotensin converting enzyme-inhibitors (ACE-I), angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB), angiotensin-neprilysin inhibitors (ARNi), hydralazine/isosorbide dinitrate and beta-blockers)
  2. ACC/AHA Stage D HF (including having received or currently receiving pharmacologic circulatory support with inotropes)
  3. Received or are likely to receive an advanced therapy (e.g., mechanical circulatory support or cardiac transplant) in the next 12 months
  4. Class IV HF patients with:

    1. Continuous or chronic use of scheduled intermittent inotropic therapy for HF and an INTERMACS level of ≤ 4, OR
    2. Persistence of fluid overload with maximum (or dose equivalent) diuretic intervention
  5. (eGFR) \< 25 mL/min and non-responsive to diuretic therapy, or receiving chronic dialysis
  6. Inability to tolerate or receive dual antiplatelet therapy or anticoagulation therapy for one month post-implantation
  7. Significant congenital heart disease that has not been repaired and would prevent implantation of the CardioMEMS™ PA Sensor
  8. Implanted with mechanical right heart valve(s)
  9. Unrepaired severe valvular disease
  10. Pregnant or planning to become pregnant in the next 12 months
  11. An active, ongoing infection, defined as being febrile, an elevated white blood cell count, on intravenous antibiotics, and/or positive cultures (blood, sputum or urine).
  12. History of current or recurrent (≥ 2 episodes within 5 years prior to consent) pulmonary emboli and/or deep vein thrombosis
  13. Major cardiovascular event (e.g., unstable angina, myocardial infarction, percutaneous coronary intervention, open heart surgery, or stroke, etc.) within 90 days prior to consent
  14. Implanted with Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT)-Pacemaker (CRT-P) or CRT-Defibrillator (CRT-D) for less than 90 days prior to consent
  15. Enrollment into another trial with an active treatment arm
  16. Anticipated of \< 12 months
  17. Any condition that, in the opinion of the Investigator, would not allow for utilization of the CardioMEMS™ HF System to manage the subject using information gained from hemodynamic measurements to adjust medications, including the presence of unexpectedly severe pulmonary hypertension (e.g., trans-pulmonary gradient >15) at implant right heart catheterization (RHC), a history of non-compliance, or any condition that would preclude CardioMEMS™ PA Sensor implantation
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(7)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

LVEF (left ventricular ejection fraction)

The share of blood the heart’s main pumping chamber (the left ventricle) pushes out with each beat, measured by an echocardiogram (heart ultrasound) or a MUGA scan. About 50–70% is normal.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Relapsed and refractory

Relapsed: the illness came back after treatment had worked. Refractory: it did not respond to treatment, or stopped responding while still on it.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
2,358 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Randomized Arm - Treatment Group

    Management of subjects based on pulmonary artery (PA) pressure information derived from the CardioMEMS™ HF System. All subjects will receive a CardioMEMS™ HF System.

    Device: CardioMEMS™ HF System

  • Experimental
    Randomized Arm - Control Group

    Management of subjects per standard of care (signs, symptoms, weight etc.) without knowledge of PA pressure information derived from the CardioMEMS™ HF System. All subjects will receive a CardioMEMS™ HF System.

    Device: CardioMEMS™ HF System

  • Experimental
    Single Arm

    Management of subjects based on PA pressure information derived from the CardioMEMS™ HF System. All subjects will receive a CardioMEMS™ HF System.

    Device: CardioMEMS™ HF System

Interventions

  • DeviceCardioMEMS™ HF System

    The CardioMEMS™ HF System is comprised of a lead-less, battery-less pressure sensor permanently implanted in the PA, which remotely transmits PA pressure measurements from the patient's home to a secure website. Healthcare professionals are able to access these measurements and associated waveforms to remotely guide individualization of medical management for their patients with chronic HF.

    Also known as: CardioMEMS, CardioMEMS PA Sensor, CardioMEMS HF System

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. (Randomized Arm) Composite Outcome of (1) HFHs, (2) Intravenous Diuretic Visits, and (3) All-cause Mortality

    The composite of: 1. The number of recurrent heart failure hospitalizations (HFHs) 2. The number of heart failure (HF) emergency department/hospital outpatient observation visits for intravenous diuretic therapy (ED/OP) 3. The number of deaths of any cause added together with equal weighting into a total number of events

    Time frame: 12 months post-implantation (395 days after implant date)

  2. (Randomized Arm) Composite Outcome of (1) HFHs, (2) Intravenous Diuretic Visits, and (3) All-cause Mortality [Follow-up Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]

    The composite of: 1. The number of recurrent heart failure hospitalizations (HFHs) 2. The number of heart failure (HF) emergency department/hospital outpatient observation visits for intravenous diuretic therapy (ED/OP) 3. The number of deaths of any cause added together with equal weighting into a total number of events.

    Time frame: The COVID-19 pandemic occurred during follow-up after enrollment of all subjects. Events were analyzed through March 13, 2020 for pre-COVID-19 (median follow-up: 8.4 months) and after March 13, 2020 for during COVID-19 (median follow-up: 5.2 months).

  3. (Randomized Arm) Composite Outcome of (1) HFHs, (2) Intravenous Diuretic Visits, and (3) All-cause Mortality [Subject Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]

    The composite of: 1. The number of recurrent heart failure hospitalizations (HFHs) 2. The number of heart failure (HF) emergency department/hospital outpatient observation visits for intravenous diuretic therapy (ED/OP) 3. The number of deaths of any cause added together with equal weighting into a total number of events.

    Time frame: 12 Months Post Implantation

  4. (Randomized Arm) Composite Outcome of (1) HFHs, (2) Intravenous Diuretic Visits, and (3) All-cause Mortality [Event Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]

    The composite of: 1. The number of recurrent heart failure hospitalizations (HFHs) 2. The number of heart failure (HF) emergency department/hospital outpatient observation visits for intravenous diuretic therapy (ED/OP) 3. The number of deaths of any cause added together with equal weighting into a total number of events.

    Time frame: 12 Months Post-Implantation

  5. (Single Arm) Composite Outcome of (1) HFHs, (2) Intravenous Diuretic Visits, and (3) All-cause Mortality

    The composite outcome of: 1. The number of recurrent heart failure hospitalizations (HFHs) 2. The number of emergency department/hospital outpatient observation visits for intravenous diuretic therapy 3. The number of deaths of any cause added together with equal weighting into a total number of events

    Time frame: 12 months post-implantation (395 days after implant date)

  6. (Single Arm) Composite Outcome of (1) HFHs, (2) Intravenous Diuretic Visits, and (3) All-cause Mortality [Follow-up Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]

    The composite outcome of: 1. The number of recurrent heart failure hospitalizations (HFHs) 2. The number of emergency department/hospital outpatient observation visits for intravenous diuretic therapy 3. The number of deaths of any cause added together with equal weighting into a total number of events

    Time frame: Events were analyzed through March 13, 2020 for pre-COVID-19 analysis (median follow-up: 5.4 months) and from March 13, 2020 through the end of subject's follow-up for during COVID-19 analysis (median follow-up: 11.2 months).

  7. (Single Arm) Composite Outcome of (1) HFHs, (2) Intravenous Diuretic Visits, and (3) All-cause Mortality [Subject Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]

    The composite outcome of: 1. The number of recurrent heart failure hospitalizations (HFHs) 2. The number of emergency department/hospital outpatient observation visits for intravenous diuretic therapy 3. The number of deaths of any cause added together with equal weighting into a total number of events

    Time frame: 12 Months Post Implantation

  8. (Single Arm) Composite Outcome of (1) HFHs, (2) Intravenous Diuretic Visits, and (3) All-cause Mortality [Event Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]

    The composite outcome of: 1. The number of recurrent heart failure hospitalizations (HFHs) 2. The number of emergency department/hospital outpatient observation visits for intravenous diuretic therapy 3. The number of deaths of any cause added together with equal weighting into a total number of events

    Time frame: 12 Months Post Implantation

Secondary outcomes

  1. (Randomized Arm) Composite Outcome of (1) HFHs and (2) Intravenous Diuretic Visits

    The composite outcome of: 1. The number of recurrent heart failure hospitalizations (HFHs) 2. The number of emergency department/hospital outpatient observation visits (ED/OP) for intravenous diuretic therapy added together with equal weighting into a total number of events

    Time frame: 12 months post-implantation

  2. (Randomized Arm) Composite Outcome of (1) HFHs and (2) Intravenous Diuretic Visits [Follow-up Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis)

    The composite outcome of: 1. The number of recurrent heart failure hospitalizations (HFHs) 2. The number of emergency department/hospital outpatient observation visits (ED/OP) for intravenous diuretic therapy added together with equal weighting into a total number of events

    Time frame: The COVID-19 pandemic occurred during follow-up after enrollment of all subjects. Events were analyzed through March 13, 2020 for pre-COVID-19 (median follow-up: 8.4 months) and after March 13, 2020 for during COVID-19 (median follow-up: 5.2 months).

  3. (Randomized Arm) Composite Outcome of (1) HFHs and (2) Intravenous Diuretic Visits [Subject Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis)

    The composite outcome of: 1. The number of recurrent heart failure hospitalizations (HFHs) 2. The number of emergency department/hospital outpatient observation visits (ED/OP) for intravenous diuretic therapy added together with equal weighting into a total number of events

    Time frame: 12 Months Post Implantation

  4. (Randomized Arm) Composite Outcome of (1) HFHs and (2) Intravenous Diuretic Visits [Event Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis)

    The composite outcome of: 1. The number of recurrent heart failure hospitalizations (HFHs) 2. The number of emergency department/hospital outpatient observation visits (ED/OP) for intravenous diuretic therapy added together with equal weighting into a total number of events

    Time frame: 12 Months Post Implantation

  5. (Randomized Arm) HFHs

    The number of recurrent HFHs

    Time frame: 12 months post-implantation

  6. (Randomized Arm) HFHs [Follow-up Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]

    The number of recurrent HFHs

    Time frame: The COVID-19 pandemic occurred during follow-up after enrollment of all subjects. Events were analyzed through March 13, 2020 for pre-COVID-19 (median follow-up: 8.4 months) and after March 13, 2020 for during COVID-19 (median follow-up: 5.2 months).

  7. (Randomized Arm) HFHs [Subject Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]

    The number of recurrent HFHs

    Time frame: 12 Months Post-Implantation

  8. (Randomized Arm) HFHs [Event Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]

    The number of recurrent HFHs

    Time frame: 12 Months Post Implantation

  9. (Randomized Arm) Intravenous Diuretic Visits

    The number of emergency department/hospital outpatient observation visits for intravenous diuretic therapy

    Time frame: 12 months post-implantation

  10. (Randomized Arm) Intravenous Diuretic Visits [Follow-up Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]

    The number of emergency department/hospital outpatient observation visits for intravenous diuretic therapy

    Time frame: The COVID-19 pandemic occurred during follow-up after enrollment of all subjects. Events were analyzed through March 13, 2020 for pre-COVID-19 (median follow-up: 8.4 months) and after March 13, 2020 for during COVID-19 (median follow-up: 5.2 months).

  11. (Randomized Arm) Intravenous Diuretic Visits [Subject Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]

    The number of emergency department/hospital outpatient observation visits for intravenous diuretic therapy

    Time frame: 12 Months Post Implantation

  12. (Randomized Arm) Intravenous Diuretic Visits [Event Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]

    The number of emergency department/hospital outpatient observation visits for intravenous diuretic therapy

    Time frame: 12 Months Post-Implantation

  13. (Randomized Arm) All-cause Mortality

    The number of deaths of any cause

    Time frame: 12 months post-implantation

  14. (Randomized Arm) All-cause Mortality [Follow-up Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]

    The number of deaths of any cause

    Time frame: The COVID-19 pandemic occurred during follow-up after enrollment of all subjects. Events were analyzed through March 13, 2020 for pre-COVID-19 (median follow-up: 8.4 months) and after March 13, 2020 for during COVID-19 (median follow-up: 5.2 months).

  15. (Randomized Arm) All-cause Mortality [Subject Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]

    The number of deaths of any cause

    Time frame: 12 Months Post-Implantation

  16. (Randomized Arm) All-cause Mortality [Event Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]

    The number of deaths of any cause

    Time frame: 12 Months Post-Implantation

  17. (Randomized Arm) KCCQ-12

    Health status as assessed by the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ-12) The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ-12) is a validated health-related quality of life measure for heart failure and was qualified by the FDA as a medical device development tool in 2017. The KCCQ-12 quantifies physical function, symptoms (frequency, severity and recent change), social function, self-efficacy and knowledge, and quality of life over a scale from 0 to 100. An overall summary score (OSS) is derived by averaging scores from each domain, with a higher score reflecting a better health status. Change from baseline KCCQ-12 scores were evaluated at 6 and 12-month visits.

    Time frame: Baseline, 6, and 12 months post-implantation

  18. (Randomized Arm) KCCQ-12 (Subject Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis)

    Health status as assessed by the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ-12) The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ-12) is a validated health-related quality of life measure for heart failure and was qualified by the FDA as a medical device development tool in 2017. The KCCQ-12 quantifies physical function, symptoms (frequency, severity and recent change), social function, self-efficacy and knowledge, and quality of life over a scale from 0 to 100. An overall summary score (OSS) is derived by averaging scores from each domain, with a higher score reflecting a better health status. Descriptive statistics of KCCQ-12 scores at baseline, 6 and 12-month visits were reported.

    Time frame: Baseline, 6, and 12 months post-implantation

  19. (Randomized Arm) EQ-5D-5L

    Health status as assessed by the EuroQol 5-Dimension, 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) Questionnaire The EQ-5D-5L Questionnaire is a standardized measure of health status that consists of a descriptive system and a visual analog score (VAS). The VAS records the subject's self-rated health status which ranges from a score of 0 (worst health you can imagine) to 100 (best health you can imagine). A higher VAS score represents a better quality of life.

    Time frame: Baseline, 6, and 12 months post-implantation

  20. (Randomized Arm) EQ-5D-5L (Subject Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis)

    Health status as assessed by the EuroQol 5-Dimension, 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) Questionnaire The EQ-5D-5L Questionnaire is a standardized measure of health status that consists of a descriptive system and a visual analog score (VAS). The VAS records the subject's self-rated health status which ranges from a score of 0 (worst health you can imagine) to 100 (best health you can imagine). A higher VAS score represents a better quality of life.

    Time frame: Baseline, 6, and 12 months post-implantation

  21. (Randomized Arm) 6MHW Test

    Six Minute Hall Walk (6MHW) Test Distance

    Time frame: Baseline, 6, and 12 months post-implantation

  22. (Randomized Arm) 6MHW Test (Subject Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis)

    Six Minute Hall Walk (6MHW) Test Distance

    Time frame: Baseline, 6, and 12 months post-implantation

  23. (Randomized Arm) Safety: Freedom From DSRCs

    Freedom from device/system related complications (DSRCs)

    Time frame: 12 months post-implantation

  24. (Single Arm) Composite Outcome of (1) HFHs and (2) Intravenous Diuretic Visits

    The composite outcome of: 1. The number of recurrent HFHs 2. The number of emergency department/hospital outpatient observation visits for intravenous diuretic therapy added together with equal weighting into a total number of events

    Time frame: 12 months post-implantation

  25. (Single Arm) Composite Outcome of (1) HFHs and (2) Intravenous Diuretic Visits [Follow-up Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]

    The composite outcome of: 1. The number of recurrent HFHs 2. The number of emergency department/hospital outpatient observation visits for intravenous diuretic therapy added together with equal weighting into a total number of events

    Time frame: Events were analyzed through March 13, 2020 for pre-COVID-19 analysis (median follow-up: 5.4 months) and from March 13, 2020 through the end of subject's follow-up for during COVID-19 analysis (median follow-up: 11.2 months).

  26. (Single Arm) Composite Outcome of (1) HFHs and (2) Intravenous Diuretic Visits [Subject Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]

    The composite outcome of: 1. The number of recurrent HFHs 2. The number of emergency department/hospital outpatient observation visits for intravenous diuretic therapy added together with equal weighting into a total number of events

    Time frame: 12 Months Post Implantation

  27. (Single Arm) Composite Outcome of (1) HFHs and (2) Intravenous Diuretic Visits [Event Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]

    The composite outcome of: 1. The number of recurrent HFHs 2. The number of emergency department/hospital outpatient observation visits for intravenous diuretic therapy added together with equal weighting into a total number of events

    Time frame: 12 Months Post Implantation

  28. (Single Arm) Intravenous Diuretic Visits

    The number of emergency department/hospital outpatient observation (ED/OP) visits for intravenous diuretic therapy

    Time frame: 12 months post-implantation

  29. (Single Arm) Intravenous Diuretic Visits [Follow-up Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]

    The number of emergency department/hospital outpatient observation (ED/OP) visits for intravenous diuretic therapy

    Time frame: Events were analyzed through March 13, 2020 for pre-COVID-19 analysis (median follow-up: 5.4 months) and from March 13, 2020 through the end of subject's follow-up for during COVID-19 analysis (median follow-up: 11.2 months).

  30. (Single Arm) Intravenous Diuretic Visits [Subject Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]

    The number of emergency department/hospital outpatient observation (ED/OP) visits for intravenous diuretic therapy

    Time frame: 12 months post-implantation

  31. (Single Arm) Intravenous Diuretic Visits [Event Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]

    The number of emergency department/hospital outpatient observation (ED/OP) visits for intravenous diuretic therapy

    Time frame: 12 Months Post Implantation

  32. (Single Arm) HFHs

    The number of HFHs

    Time frame: 12 months post-implantation

  33. (Single Arm) HFHs [Follow-Up Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]

    The number of heart failure hospitalizations (HFHs)

    Time frame: Events were analyzed through March 13, 2020 for pre-COVID-19 analysis (median follow-up: 5.4 months) and from March 13, 2020 through the end of subject's follow-up for during COVID-19 analysis (median follow-up: 11.2 months).

  34. (Single Arm) HFHs [Subject Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]

    The number of heart failure hospitalizations (HFHs)

    Time frame: 12 Months Post Implantation

  35. (Single Arm) HFHs [Event Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]

    The number of heart failure hospitalizations (HFHs)

    Time frame: 12 Months Post Implantation

  36. (Single Arm) All-cause Mortality

    The number of deaths of any cause

    Time frame: 12 months post-implantation

  37. (Single Arm) All-cause Mortality [Follow-Up Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]

    The number of deaths of any cause

    Time frame: Events were analyzed through March 13, 2020 for pre-COVID-19 analysis (median follow-up: 5.4 months) and from March 13, 2020 through the end of subject's follow-up for during COVID-19 analysis (median follow-up: 11.2 months).

  38. (Single Arm) All-cause Mortality [Subject Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]

    The number of deaths of any cause

    Time frame: 12 Months Post Implantation

  39. (Single Arm) All-cause Mortality [Event Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]

    The number of deaths of any cause

    Time frame: 12 Months Post Implantation

  40. (Single Arm) Safety: Freedom From DSRCs

    Proportion of subjects with freedom from device/system related complications (DSRCs)

    Time frame: 12 months post-implantation

  41. (Single Arm) HFHs Post- vs. Pre-implantation [Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP Only Group]

    The number of HFHs at 12 months post-implantation compared to the number of HFHs in the 12 months prior to implantation

    Time frame: 12 months post-implantation vs 12 months pre-implantation

  42. (Single Arm) HFHs Post- vs. Pre-implantation [Previous HF Hospitalization Only Group]

    The number of HFHs at 12 months post-implantation compared to the number of HFHs in the 12 months prior to implantation

    Time frame: 12 months post-implantation vs 12 months pre-implantation

  43. (Single Arm) HFHs Post- vs. Pre-implantation [Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP and Previous HF Hospitalization Group]

    The number of HFHs at 12 months post-implantation compared to the number of HFHs in the 12 months prior to implantation

    Time frame: 12 months post-implantation vs 12 months pre-implantation

Other outcomes

  1. (Randomized Arm) Cardiovascular Mortality

    The number of deaths with cardiovascular cause

    Time frame: 12 months post-implantation

  2. (Randomized Arm) All-cause Hospitalizations

    The number of hospitalizations of any cause

    Time frame: 12 months post-implantation

  3. (Randomized Arm) Frequency of Subject PA Pressure Uploads

    The frequency of subject uploads of PA pressure

    Time frame: 12 months post-implantation

  4. (Randomized Arm) HF Medication Changes

    The number of changes in HF medications

    Time frame: 12 months post-implantation

  5. (Randomized Arm) PA Pressure Measurements [Mixed Model Analysis]

    Changes in PA pressure relative to baseline for systolic, diastolic, and mean PA pressures analyzed using a mixed linear model at fixed time points (Baseline, 6 months, and 12 months) producing least-squares means.

    Time frame: Baseline through 12 months post-implantation

  6. (Randomized Arm) PA Pressure Measurements [AUC Analysis]

    Changes in PA pressure relative to baseline for systolic, diastolic, and mean PA pressures analyzed using an area under the curve (AUC) analysis of change from baseline on all PA pressure readings through 12 months.

    Time frame: Baseline through 12 months post-implantation

  7. (Randomized Arm) BNP

    Change in BNP measurements from baseline

    Time frame: 6 months post-implantation

  8. (Randomized Arm) BNP

    Change in BNP measurements from baseline

    Time frame: 12 months post-implantation

  9. (Randomized Arm) NT-proBNP

    Change in NT-proBNP measurements from baseline

    Time frame: 6 months post-implantation

  10. (Randomized Arm) NT-proBNP

    Change in NT-proBNP measurements from baseline

    Time frame: 12 months post-implantation

  11. (Randomized Arm) HFHs Post- vs. Pre-implantation [Treatment Group]

    The number of HFHs at 12 months post-implantation compared to the number of HFHs in the 12 months prior to implantation in the Treatment group

    Time frame: 12 months post-implantation vs 12 months pre-implantation

  12. (Randomized Arm) HFHs Post- vs. Pre-implantation [Control Group]

    The number of HFHs at 12 months post-implantation compared to the number of HFHs in the 12 months prior to implantation

    Time frame: 12 months post-implantation vs 12 months pre-implantation

  13. (Single Arm) KCCQ-12 [Mixed Model Analysis]

    Health status as assessed by the KCCQ-12 The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ-12) is a validated health-related quality of life measure for heart failure and was qualified by the FDA as a medical device development tool in 2017. The KCCQ-12 quantifies physical function, symptoms (frequency, severity, and recent change), social function, self-efficacy and knowledge, and quality of life on a scale from 0 to 100. An overall summary score (OSS) is derived by averaging scores from each domain, with a higher score reflecting a better health status.

    Time frame: 6 months post-implantation

  14. (Single Arm) KCCQ-12 [Mixed Model Analysis]

    Health status as assessed by the KCCQ-12 The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ-12) is a validated health-related quality of life measure for heart failure and was qualified by the FDA as a medical device development tool in 2017. The KCCQ-12 quantifies physical function, symptoms (frequency, severity, and recent change), social function, self-efficacy and knowledge, and quality of life on a scale from 0 to 100. An overall summary score (OSS) is derived by averaging scores from each domain, with a higher score reflecting a better health status.

    Time frame: 12 months post-implantation

  15. (Single Arm) EQ-5D-5L [Mixed Model Analysis]

    Health status as assessed by the EQ-5D-5L Questionnaire. The data represents the EQ Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) subscale. The VAS records the subject's self-rated health status which ranges from a score of 0 (worst health you can imagine) to 100 (best health you can imagine). A higher VAS score for represents a better quality of life.

    Time frame: 6 months post-implantation

  16. (Single Arm) EQ-5D-5L [Mixed Model Analysis]

    Health status as assessed by the EQ-5D-5L Questionnaire. The data represents the EQ Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) subscale. The VAS records the subject's self-rated health status which ranges from a score of 0 (worst health you can imagine) to 100 (best health you can imagine). A higher VAS score for represents a better quality of life.

    Time frame: 12 months post-implantation

  17. (Single Arm) 6MHW Test [Mixed Model Analysis]

    6MHW Test Distance

    Time frame: 6 months post-implantation

  18. (Single Arm) 6MHW Test [Mixed Model Analysis]

    6MHW Test Distance

    Time frame: 12 months post-implantation

  19. (Single Arm) Cardiovascular Mortality

    The number of deaths of cardiovascular cause

    Time frame: 12 months post-implantation

  20. (Single Arm) All-cause Hospitalizations

    The number of hospitalizations of any cause

    Time frame: 12 months post-implantation

  21. (Single Arm) Frequency of Subject PA Pressure Uploads - Daily Compliance

    The frequency of subject uploads of PA pressure

    Time frame: 12 months post-implantation

  22. (Single Arm) Frequency of Subject PA Pressure Uploads - Weekly Compliance

    The frequency of subject uploads of PA pressure

    Time frame: 12 months post-implantation

  23. (Single Arm) HF Medication Changes

    The number of changes in HF medications

    Time frame: 12 months post-implantation

  24. (Single Arm) PA Pressure Measurements [Mixed Model Analysis]

    Changes in PA pressure relative to baseline for systolic, diastolic, and mean PA pressures analyzed using a mixed linear model at fixed time points (Baseline, 6 months, and 12 months) producing least-squares means.

    Time frame: Baseline through 12 months post-implantation

  25. (Single Arm) PA Pressure Measurements [AUC Analysis]

    Changes in PA pressure relative to baseline for systolic, diastolic, and mean PA pressures analyzed using area under the curve (AUC) analysis of PA pressure across the full follow-up period

    Time frame: Baseline through 12 months post-implantation

  26. (Single Arm) NT-proBNP (or BNP) [Mixed Model Analysis]

    Either change in N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) or Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) measurements at 6 months visits from baseline.

    Time frame: 6 months post-implantation

  27. (Single Arm) NT-proBNP (or BNP) [Mixed Model Analysis]

    Either change in N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) or Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) measurements at 6 months and 12 months visits from baseline.

    Time frame: 12 months post-implantation

07

Results

Posted Aug 7, 2025
Limitations and caveats
The COVID-19 pandemic affected the GUIDE-HF Randomized Arm study. The impact of COVID-19 on the primary endpoint and components was addressed through sensitivity analyses. Single Arm Total Efficacy Population includes implanted subjects not belonging to a qualifying criteria group.

Participant flow

Randomized Arm enrolled 1022 subjects across 118 sites, of which 1000 are endpoint-contributing (successfully implanted and randomized). Subject enrollment took place between March 2018 and December 2019, with the last follow-up completed in January 2021. Single Arm enrolled 1401 subjects across 119 sites, of which 1358 are endpoint-contributing (successfully implanted). Subject enrollment took place between March 2018 and April 2022, with the last follow-up completed in May 2023.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneRandomized Arm - Treatment GroupRandomized Arm - Control GroupSingle Arm
Started4975031358
Complete 6 month follow-up4674691238
Completed4324221076
Not completed6581282
Withdrew: Death4037190
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject91932
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up3915
Withdrew: Non-compliance6631
Withdrew: Subject in hospice/relocated/severe covid-19/on transplant list/pi discretion71014

Outcome measures

Primary(Randomized Arm) Composite Outcome of (1) HFHs, (2) Intravenous Diuretic Visits, and (3) All-cause Mortality

The composite of: 1. The number of recurrent heart failure hospitalizations (HFHs) 2. The number of heart failure (HF) emergency department/hospital outpatient observation visits for intravenous diuretic therapy (ED/OP) 3. The number of deaths of any cause added together with equal weighting into a total number of events

Time frame:
12 months post-implantation (395 days after implant date)
Reported as:
Number · events per patient-year
(Randomized Arm) Composite Outcome of (1) HFHs, (2) Intravenous Diuretic Visits, and (3) All-cause Mortality
events per patient-yearRandomized Arm - Treatment GroupRandomized Arm - Control Group
(Randomized Arm) Composite Outcome of (1) HFHs, (2) Intravenous Diuretic Visits, and (3) All-cause Mortality0.5630.640
Statistical analysis
  • Randomized Arm - Treatment Group vs Randomized Arm - Control Group · Anderson-Gill model (robust sandwich) · p = 0.1624 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.88 · 95% CI 0.74 to 1.05
Primary(Randomized Arm) Composite Outcome of (1) HFHs, (2) Intravenous Diuretic Visits, and (3) All-cause Mortality [Follow-up Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]

The composite of: 1. The number of recurrent heart failure hospitalizations (HFHs) 2. The number of heart failure (HF) emergency department/hospital outpatient observation visits for intravenous diuretic therapy (ED/OP) 3. The number of deaths of any cause added together with equal weighting into a total number of events.

Time frame:
The COVID-19 pandemic occurred during follow-up after enrollment of all subjects. Events were analyzed through March 13, 2020 for pre-COVID-19 (median follow-up: 8.4 months) and after March 13, 2020 for during COVID-19 (median follow-up: 5.2 months).
Reported as:
Number · events per patient-year
(Randomized Arm) Composite Outcome of (1) HFHs, (2) Intravenous Diuretic Visits, and (3) All-cause Mortality [Follow-up Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]
events per patient-yearRandomized Arm - Treatment Group [Pre-COVID-19]Randomized Arm - Control Group [Pre-COVID-19]Randomized Arm - Treatment Group [During COVID-19]Randomized Arm - Control Group [During COVID-19]
(Randomized Arm) Composite Outcome of (1) HFHs, (2) Intravenous Diuretic Visits, and (3) All-cause Mortality [Follow-up Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]0.5530.6820.5970.536
Primary(Randomized Arm) Composite Outcome of (1) HFHs, (2) Intravenous Diuretic Visits, and (3) All-cause Mortality [Subject Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]

The composite of: 1. The number of recurrent heart failure hospitalizations (HFHs) 2. The number of heart failure (HF) emergency department/hospital outpatient observation visits for intravenous diuretic therapy (ED/OP) 3. The number of deaths of any cause added together with equal weighting into a total number of events.

Time frame:
12 Months Post Implantation
Reported as:
Number · events per patient-year
(Randomized Arm) Composite Outcome of (1) HFHs, (2) Intravenous Diuretic Visits, and (3) All-cause Mortality [Subject Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]
events per patient-yearRandomized Arm - Treatment Group (Pre-COVID-19)Randomized Arm - Control Group (Pre-COVID-19)Randomized Arm - Treatment Group (During COVID-19)Randomized Arm - Control Arm (During COVID-19)
(Randomized Arm) Composite Outcome of (1) HFHs, (2) Intravenous Diuretic Visits, and (3) All-cause Mortality [Subject Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]0.7100.8640.5080.539
Primary(Randomized Arm) Composite Outcome of (1) HFHs, (2) Intravenous Diuretic Visits, and (3) All-cause Mortality [Event Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]

The composite of: 1. The number of recurrent heart failure hospitalizations (HFHs) 2. The number of heart failure (HF) emergency department/hospital outpatient observation visits for intravenous diuretic therapy (ED/OP) 3. The number of deaths of any cause added together with equal weighting into a total number of events.

Time frame:
12 Months Post-Implantation
Reported as:
Number · events per patient-year
(Randomized Arm) Composite Outcome of (1) HFHs, (2) Intravenous Diuretic Visits, and (3) All-cause Mortality [Event Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]
events per patient-yearRandomized Arm - Treatment Group [Excluding COVID-19 Related Events]Randomized Arm - Control Group [Excluding COVID-19 Related Events]Randomized Arm - Treatment Group [Excluding COVID-19 Related or Possibly Related Events]Randomized Arm - Control Group [Excluding COVID-19 Related or Possibly Related Events]
(Randomized Arm) Composite Outcome of (1) HFHs, (2) Intravenous Diuretic Visits, and (3) All-cause Mortality [Event Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]0.5630.6330.5580.619
Primary(Single Arm) Composite Outcome of (1) HFHs, (2) Intravenous Diuretic Visits, and (3) All-cause Mortality

The composite outcome of: 1. The number of recurrent heart failure hospitalizations (HFHs) 2. The number of emergency department/hospital outpatient observation visits for intravenous diuretic therapy 3. The number of deaths of any cause added together with equal weighting into a total number of events

Time frame:
12 months post-implantation (395 days after implant date)
Reported as:
Number · events per patient-year
(Single Arm) Composite Outcome of (1) HFHs, (2) Intravenous Diuretic Visits, and (3) All-cause Mortality
events per patient-yearSingle Arm - Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP OnlySingle Arm - Previous HF Hospitalization Only
(Single Arm) Composite Outcome of (1) HFHs, (2) Intravenous Diuretic Visits, and (3) All-cause Mortality0.3940.771
Statistical analysis
  • Single Arm - Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP Only vs Single Arm - Previous HF Hospitalization Only · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.51 · 90% CI 0.44 to 0.60
Primary(Single Arm) Composite Outcome of (1) HFHs, (2) Intravenous Diuretic Visits, and (3) All-cause Mortality [Follow-up Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]

The composite outcome of: 1. The number of recurrent heart failure hospitalizations (HFHs) 2. The number of emergency department/hospital outpatient observation visits for intravenous diuretic therapy 3. The number of deaths of any cause added together with equal weighting into a total number of events

Time frame:
Events were analyzed through March 13, 2020 for pre-COVID-19 analysis (median follow-up: 5.4 months) and from March 13, 2020 through the end of subject's follow-up for during COVID-19 analysis (median follow-up: 11.2 months).
Reported as:
Number · events per patient-year
(Single Arm) Composite Outcome of (1) HFHs, (2) Intravenous Diuretic Visits, and (3) All-cause Mortality [Follow-up Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]
events per patient-yearSingle Arm - Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP Only [Prior to COVID-19]Single Arm - Previous HF Hospitalization Only [Prior to COVID-19]Single Arm - Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP Only [During COVID-19]Single Arm - Previous HF Hospitalization Only [During COVID-19]
(Single Arm) Composite Outcome of (1) HFHs, (2) Intravenous Diuretic Visits, and (3) All-cause Mortality [Follow-up Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]0.2630.8610.4180.744
Primary(Single Arm) Composite Outcome of (1) HFHs, (2) Intravenous Diuretic Visits, and (3) All-cause Mortality [Subject Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]

The composite outcome of: 1. The number of recurrent heart failure hospitalizations (HFHs) 2. The number of emergency department/hospital outpatient observation visits for intravenous diuretic therapy 3. The number of deaths of any cause added together with equal weighting into a total number of events

Time frame:
12 Months Post Implantation
Reported as:
Number · events per patient-year
(Single Arm) Composite Outcome of (1) HFHs, (2) Intravenous Diuretic Visits, and (3) All-cause Mortality [Subject Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]
events per patient-yearSingle Arm - Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP Only (Pre-COVID-19)Single Arm - Previous HF Hospitalization Only (Pre-COVID-19)Single Arm - Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP Only (During COVID-19)Single Arm - Previous HF Hospitalization Only (During COVID-19)
(Single Arm) Composite Outcome of (1) HFHs, (2) Intravenous Diuretic Visits, and (3) All-cause Mortality [Subject Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]0.5821.8530.3910.698
Primary(Single Arm) Composite Outcome of (1) HFHs, (2) Intravenous Diuretic Visits, and (3) All-cause Mortality [Event Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]

The composite outcome of: 1. The number of recurrent heart failure hospitalizations (HFHs) 2. The number of emergency department/hospital outpatient observation visits for intravenous diuretic therapy 3. The number of deaths of any cause added together with equal weighting into a total number of events

Time frame:
12 Months Post Implantation
Reported as:
Number · events per patient-year
(Single Arm) Composite Outcome of (1) HFHs, (2) Intravenous Diuretic Visits, and (3) All-cause Mortality [Event Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]
events per patient-yearSingle Arm - Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP Only [Exclude COVID-19 Related Events]Single Arm - Previous HF Hospitalization Only [Exclude COVID-19 Related Events]Single Arm - Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP Only [Exclude COVID-19 Related or Possibly Related Events]Single Arm - Previous HF Hospitalization Only [Exclude COVID-19 Related or Possibly Related Events]
(Single Arm) Composite Outcome of (1) HFHs, (2) Intravenous Diuretic Visits, and (3) All-cause Mortality [Event Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]0.3810.7460.3770.737
Secondary(Randomized Arm) Composite Outcome of (1) HFHs and (2) Intravenous Diuretic Visits

The composite outcome of: 1. The number of recurrent heart failure hospitalizations (HFHs) 2. The number of emergency department/hospital outpatient observation visits (ED/OP) for intravenous diuretic therapy added together with equal weighting into a total number of events

Time frame:
12 months post-implantation
Reported as:
Number · events per patient-year
(Randomized Arm) Composite Outcome of (1) HFHs and (2) Intravenous Diuretic Visits
events per patient-yearRandomized Arm - Treatment GroupRandomized Arm - Control Group
(Randomized Arm) Composite Outcome of (1) HFHs and (2) Intravenous Diuretic Visits0.4740.557
Statistical analysis
  • Randomized Arm - Treatment Group vs Randomized Arm - Control Group · Anderson-Gill model (robust sandwich) · p = 0.0958 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.85 · 95% CI 0.70 to 1.03
Secondary(Randomized Arm) Composite Outcome of (1) HFHs and (2) Intravenous Diuretic Visits [Follow-up Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis)

The composite outcome of: 1. The number of recurrent heart failure hospitalizations (HFHs) 2. The number of emergency department/hospital outpatient observation visits (ED/OP) for intravenous diuretic therapy added together with equal weighting into a total number of events

Time frame:
The COVID-19 pandemic occurred during follow-up after enrollment of all subjects. Events were analyzed through March 13, 2020 for pre-COVID-19 (median follow-up: 8.4 months) and after March 13, 2020 for during COVID-19 (median follow-up: 5.2 months).
Reported as:
Number · events per patient-year
(Randomized Arm) Composite Outcome of (1) HFHs and (2) Intravenous Diuretic Visits [Follow-up Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis)
events per patient-yearRandomized Arm - Treatment Group [Pre-COVID-19]Randomized Arm - Control Group [Pre-COVID-19]Randomized Arm - Treatment Group [During COVID-19]Randomized Arm - Control Group [During COVID-19]
(Randomized Arm) Composite Outcome of (1) HFHs and (2) Intravenous Diuretic Visits [Follow-up Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis)0.4500.5950.5390.455
Secondary(Randomized Arm) Composite Outcome of (1) HFHs and (2) Intravenous Diuretic Visits [Subject Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis)

The composite outcome of: 1. The number of recurrent heart failure hospitalizations (HFHs) 2. The number of emergency department/hospital outpatient observation visits (ED/OP) for intravenous diuretic therapy added together with equal weighting into a total number of events

Time frame:
12 Months Post Implantation
Reported as:
Number · events per patient-year
(Randomized Arm) Composite Outcome of (1) HFHs and (2) Intravenous Diuretic Visits [Subject Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis)
events per patient-yearRandomized Arm - Treatment Group (Pre-COVID-19)Randomized Arm - Control Group (Pre-COVID-19)Randomized Arm - Treatment Group (During COVID-19)Randomized Arm - Control Arm (During COVID-19)
(Randomized Arm) Composite Outcome of (1) HFHs and (2) Intravenous Diuretic Visits [Subject Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis)0.5290.7290.4650.488
Secondary(Randomized Arm) Composite Outcome of (1) HFHs and (2) Intravenous Diuretic Visits [Event Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis)

The composite outcome of: 1. The number of recurrent heart failure hospitalizations (HFHs) 2. The number of emergency department/hospital outpatient observation visits (ED/OP) for intravenous diuretic therapy added together with equal weighting into a total number of events

Time frame:
12 Months Post Implantation
Reported as:
Number · events per patient-year
(Randomized Arm) Composite Outcome of (1) HFHs and (2) Intravenous Diuretic Visits [Event Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis)
events per patient-yearRandomized Arm - Treatment Group [Excluding COVID-19 Related Events]Randomized Arm - Control Group [Excluding COVID-19 Related Events]Randomized Arm - Treatment Group [Excluding COVID-19 Related or Possibly Related Events]Randomized Arm - Control Group [Excluding COVID-19 Related or Possibly Related Events]
(Randomized Arm) Composite Outcome of (1) HFHs and (2) Intravenous Diuretic Visits [Event Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis)0.4740.5510.4720.545
Secondary(Randomized Arm) HFHs

The number of recurrent HFHs

Time frame:
12 months post-implantation
Reported as:
Number · events per patient-year
(Randomized Arm) HFHs
events per patient-yearRandomized Arm - Treatment GroupRandomized Arm - Control Group
(Randomized Arm) HFHs0.4100.497
Statistical analysis
  • Randomized Arm - Treatment Group vs Randomized Arm - Control Group · Anderson-Gill model (robust sandwich) · p = 0.0644 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.83 · 95% CI 0.68 to 1.01
Secondary(Randomized Arm) HFHs [Follow-up Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]

The number of recurrent HFHs

Time frame:
The COVID-19 pandemic occurred during follow-up after enrollment of all subjects. Events were analyzed through March 13, 2020 for pre-COVID-19 (median follow-up: 8.4 months) and after March 13, 2020 for during COVID-19 (median follow-up: 5.2 months).
Reported as:
Number · events per patient-year
(Randomized Arm) HFHs [Follow-up Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]
events per patient-yearRandomized Arm - Treatment Group [Pre-COVID]Randomized Arm - Control Group [Pre-COVID]Randomized Arm - Treatment Group [During COVID-19]Randomized Arm - Control Group [During COVID-19]
(Randomized Arm) HFHs [Follow-up Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]0.3800.5250.4900.414
Secondary(Randomized Arm) HFHs [Subject Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]

The number of recurrent HFHs

Time frame:
12 Months Post-Implantation
Reported as:
Number · events per patient-year
(Randomized Arm) HFHs [Subject Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]
events per patient-yearRandomized Arm - Treatment Group (Pre-COVID-19)Randomized Arm - Control Group (Pre-COVID-19)Randomized Arm - Treatment Group (During COVID-19)Randomized Arm - Control Arm (During COVID-19)
(Randomized Arm) HFHs [Subject Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]0.4670.6660.3990.428
Secondary(Randomized Arm) HFHs [Event Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]

The number of recurrent HFHs

Time frame:
12 Months Post Implantation
Reported as:
Number · events per patient-year
(Randomized Arm) HFHs [Event Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]
events per patient-yearRandomized Arm - Treatment Group [Excluding COVID-19 Related Events]Randomized Arm - Control Group [Excluding COVID-19 Related Events]Randomized Arm - Treatment Group [Excluding COVID-19 Related or Possibly Related Events]Randomized Arm - Control Group [Excluding COVID-19 Related or Possibly Related Events]
(Randomized Arm) HFHs [Event Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]0.4110.4900.4090.484
Secondary(Randomized Arm) Intravenous Diuretic Visits

The number of emergency department/hospital outpatient observation visits for intravenous diuretic therapy

Time frame:
12 months post-implantation
Reported as:
Number · events per patient-year
(Randomized Arm) Intravenous Diuretic Visits
events per patient-yearRandomized Arm - Treatment GroupRandomized Arm - Control Group
(Randomized Arm) Intravenous Diuretic Visits0.0650.063
Statistical analysis
  • Randomized Arm - Treatment Group vs Randomized Arm - Control Group · Anderson-Gill model (robust sandwich) · p = 0.8867 · Hazard ratio (hr): 1.04 · 95% CI 0.61 to 1.77
Secondary(Randomized Arm) Intravenous Diuretic Visits [Follow-up Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]

The number of emergency department/hospital outpatient observation visits for intravenous diuretic therapy

Time frame:
The COVID-19 pandemic occurred during follow-up after enrollment of all subjects. Events were analyzed through March 13, 2020 for pre-COVID-19 (median follow-up: 8.4 months) and after March 13, 2020 for during COVID-19 (median follow-up: 5.2 months).
Reported as:
Number · events per patient-year
(Randomized Arm) Intravenous Diuretic Visits [Follow-up Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]
events per patient-yearRandomized Arm - Treatment Group [Pre-COVID]Randomized Arm - Control Group [Pre-COVID]Randomized Arm - Treatment Group [During COVID-19]Randomized Arm - Control Group [During COVID-19]
(Randomized Arm) Intravenous Diuretic Visits [Follow-up Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]0.0740.0730.0480.041
Secondary(Randomized Arm) Intravenous Diuretic Visits [Subject Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]

The number of emergency department/hospital outpatient observation visits for intravenous diuretic therapy

Time frame:
12 Months Post Implantation
Reported as:
Number · events per patient-year
(Randomized Arm) Intravenous Diuretic Visits [Subject Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]
events per patient-yearRandomized Arm - Treatment Group (Pre-COVID-19)Randomized Arm - Control Group (Pre-COVID-19)Randomized Arm - Treatment Group (During COVID-19)Randomized Arm - Control Arm (During COVID-19)
(Randomized Arm) Intravenous Diuretic Visits [Subject Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]0.0670.0710.0670.060
Secondary(Randomized Arm) Intravenous Diuretic Visits [Event Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]

The number of emergency department/hospital outpatient observation visits for intravenous diuretic therapy

Time frame:
12 Months Post-Implantation
Reported as:
Number · events per patient-year
(Randomized Arm) Intravenous Diuretic Visits [Event Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]
events per patient-yearRandomized Arm - Treatment Group [Excluding COVID-19 Related Events]Randomized Arm - Control Group [Excluding COVID-19 Related Events]Randomized Arm - Treatment Group [Excluding COVID-19 Related or Possibly Related Events]Randomized Arm - Control Group [Excluding COVID-19 Related or Possibly Related Events]
(Randomized Arm) Intravenous Diuretic Visits [Event Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]0.0650.0630.0650.063
Secondary(Randomized Arm) All-cause Mortality

The number of deaths of any cause

Time frame:
12 months post-implantation
Reported as:
Number · events per patient-year
(Randomized Arm) All-cause Mortality
events per patient-yearRandomized Arm - Treatment GroupRandomized Arm - Control Group
(Randomized Arm) All-cause Mortality0.0940.086
Statistical analysis
  • Randomized Arm - Treatment Group vs Randomized Arm - Control Group · Anderson-Gill model (robust sandwich) · p = 0.7119 · Hazard ratio (hr): 1.09 · 95% CI 0.70 to 1.70
Secondary(Randomized Arm) All-cause Mortality [Follow-up Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]

The number of deaths of any cause

Time frame:
The COVID-19 pandemic occurred during follow-up after enrollment of all subjects. Events were analyzed through March 13, 2020 for pre-COVID-19 (median follow-up: 8.4 months) and after March 13, 2020 for during COVID-19 (median follow-up: 5.2 months).
Reported as:
Number · events per patient-year
(Randomized Arm) All-cause Mortality [Follow-up Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]
events per patient-yearRandomized Arm - Treatment Group [Pre-COVID]Randomized Arm - Control Group [Pre-COVID]Randomized Arm - Treatment Group [During COVID-19]Randomized Arm - Control Group [During COVID-19]
(Randomized Arm) All-cause Mortality [Follow-up Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]0.1100.0880.0670.085
Secondary(Randomized Arm) All-cause Mortality [Subject Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]

The number of deaths of any cause

Time frame:
12 Months Post-Implantation
Reported as:
Number · events per patient-year
(Randomized Arm) All-cause Mortality [Subject Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]
events per patient-yearRandomized Arm - Treatment Group (Pre-COVID-19)Randomized Arm - Control Group (Pre-COVID-19)Randomized Arm - Treatment Group (During COVID-19)Randomized Arm - Control Arm (During COVID-19)
(Randomized Arm) All-cause Mortality [Subject Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]0.2000.1610.0440.053
Secondary(Randomized Arm) All-cause Mortality [Event Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]

The number of deaths of any cause

Time frame:
12 Months Post-Implantation
Reported as:
Number · events per patient-year
(Randomized Arm) All-cause Mortality [Event Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]
events per patient-yearRandomized Arm - Treatment Group [Excluding COVID-19 Related Events]Randomized Arm - Control Group [Excluding COVID-19 Related Events]Randomized Arm - Treatment Group [Excluding COVID-19 Related or Possibly Related Events]Randomized Arm - Control Group [Excluding COVID-19 Related or Possibly Related Events]
(Randomized Arm) All-cause Mortality [Event Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]0.0940.0860.0900.079
Secondary(Randomized Arm) KCCQ-12

Health status as assessed by the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ-12) The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ-12) is a validated health-related quality of life measure for heart failure and was qualified by the FDA as a medical device development tool in 2017. The KCCQ-12 quantifies physical function, symptoms (frequency, severity and recent change), social function, self-efficacy and knowledge, and quality of life over a scale from 0 to 100. An overall summary score (OSS) is derived by averaging scores from each domain, with a higher score reflecting a better health status. Change from baseline KCCQ-12 scores were evaluated at 6 and 12-month visits.

Time frame:
Baseline, 6, and 12 months post-implantation
Reported as:
Least squares mean · scores on a scale
(Randomized Arm) KCCQ-12
scores on a scaleRandomized Arm - Treatment Group (6 Month)Randomized Arm - Control Group (6 Month)Randomized Arm - Treatment Group (12 Month)Randomized Arm - Control Group (12 Month)
(Randomized Arm) KCCQ-127.36 ± 1.016.01 ± 1.024.77 ± 1.034.14 ± 1.05
Statistical analysis
  • Randomized Arm - Treatment Group (6 Month) vs Randomized Arm - Control Group (6 Month) · t-test, 1 sided · p = 0.3484 · Mean difference (final values): -1.35 · 95% CI -4.16 to 1.47
  • Randomized Arm - Treatment Group (12 Month) vs Randomized Arm - Control Group (12 Month) · t-test, 1 sided · p = 0.6684 · Mean difference (final values): -0.63 · 95% CI -3.51 to 2.26
Secondary(Randomized Arm) KCCQ-12 (Subject Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis)

Health status as assessed by the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ-12) The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ-12) is a validated health-related quality of life measure for heart failure and was qualified by the FDA as a medical device development tool in 2017. The KCCQ-12 quantifies physical function, symptoms (frequency, severity and recent change), social function, self-efficacy and knowledge, and quality of life over a scale from 0 to 100. An overall summary score (OSS) is derived by averaging scores from each domain, with a higher score reflecting a better health status. Descriptive statistics of KCCQ-12 scores at baseline, 6 and 12-month visits were reported.

Time frame:
Baseline, 6, and 12 months post-implantation
Reported as:
Mean · scores on a scale
(Randomized Arm) KCCQ-12 (Subject Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis)
scores on a scaleRandomized Arm - Treatment Group (Baseline) [Pre-COVID-19]Randomized Arm - Control Group (Baseline) [Pre-COVID-19]Randomized Arm - Treatment Group (6 Month) [Pre-COVID-19]Randomized Arm - Control Group (6 Month) [Pre-COVID-19]Randomized Arm - Treatment Group (12 Month) [Pre-COVID-19]Randomized Arm - Control Group (12 Month) [Pre-COVID-19]Randomized Arm - Treatment Group (Baseline) [During COVID-19]Randomized Arm - Control Group (Baseline) [During COVID-19]Randomized Arm - Treatment Group (6 Month) [During COVID-19]Randomized Arm - Control Group (6 Month) [During COVID-19]Randomized Arm - Treatment Group (12 Month) [During COVID-19]Randomized Arm - Control Group (12 Month) [During COVID-19]
(Randomized Arm) KCCQ-12 (Subject Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis)54.8 ± 25.456.4 ± 23.965.1 ± 24.363.6 ± 24.662.0 ± 24.062.9 ± 22.255.0 ± 23.653.9 ± 23.662.5 ± 24.360.3 ± 24.761.3 ± 24.758.2 ± 24.7
Secondary(Randomized Arm) EQ-5D-5L

Health status as assessed by the EuroQol 5-Dimension, 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) Questionnaire The EQ-5D-5L Questionnaire is a standardized measure of health status that consists of a descriptive system and a visual analog score (VAS). The VAS records the subject's self-rated health status which ranges from a score of 0 (worst health you can imagine) to 100 (best health you can imagine). A higher VAS score represents a better quality of life.

Time frame:
Baseline, 6, and 12 months post-implantation
Reported as:
Least squares mean · scores on a scale
(Randomized Arm) EQ-5D-5L
scores on a scaleRandomized Arm - Treatment Group (6 Month)Randomized Arm - Control Group (6 Month)Randomized Arm - Treatment Group (12 Month)Randomized Arm - Control Group (12 Month)
(Randomized Arm) EQ-5D-5L3.18 ± 0.973.20 ± 0.971.02 ± 0.992.50 ± 1.00
Statistical analysis
  • Randomized Arm - Treatment Group (6 Month) vs Randomized Arm - Control Group (6 Month) · t-test, 1 sided · p = 0.9901 · Mean difference (final values): 0.02 · 95% CI -2.68 to 2.71
  • Randomized Arm - Treatment Group (12 Month) vs Randomized Arm - Control Group (12 Month) · t-test, 1 sided · p = 0.2947 · Mean difference (final values): 1.48 · 95% CI -1.29 to 4.24
Secondary(Randomized Arm) EQ-5D-5L (Subject Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis)

Health status as assessed by the EuroQol 5-Dimension, 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) Questionnaire The EQ-5D-5L Questionnaire is a standardized measure of health status that consists of a descriptive system and a visual analog score (VAS). The VAS records the subject's self-rated health status which ranges from a score of 0 (worst health you can imagine) to 100 (best health you can imagine). A higher VAS score represents a better quality of life.

Time frame:
Baseline, 6, and 12 months post-implantation
Reported as:
Mean · scores on a scale
(Randomized Arm) EQ-5D-5L (Subject Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis)
scores on a scaleRandomized Arm - Treatment Group (Baseline) [Pre-COVID-19]Randomized Arm - Control Group (Baseline) [Pre-COVID-19]Randomized Arm - Treatment Group (6 Month) [Pre-COVID-19]Randomized Arm - Control Group (6 Month) [Pre-COVID-19]Randomized Arm - Treatment Group (12 Month) [Pre-COVID-19]Randomized Arm - Control Group (12 Month) [Pre-COVID-19]Randomized Arm - Treatment Group (Baseline) [During COVID-19]Randomized Arm - Control Group (Baseline) [During COVID-19]Randomized Arm - Treatment Group (6 Month) [During COVID-19]Randomized Arm - Control Group (6 Month) [During COVID-19]Randomized Arm - Treatment Group (12 Month) [During COVID-19]Randomized Arm - Control Group (12 Month) [During COVID-19]
(Randomized Arm) EQ-5D-5L (Subject Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis)66.5 ± 20.367.3 ± 18.971.7 ± 18.371.2 ± 20.068.3 ± 20.971.5 ± 18.566.2 ± 18.163.4 ± 19.769.5 ± 19.267.1 ± 20.668.8 ± 19.866.4 ± 21.9
Secondary(Randomized Arm) 6MHW Test

Six Minute Hall Walk (6MHW) Test Distance

Time frame:
Baseline, 6, and 12 months post-implantation
Reported as:
Least squares mean · meters, m
(Randomized Arm) 6MHW Test
meters, mRandomized Arm - Treatment Group (6 Month)Randomized Arm - Control Group (6 Month)Randomized Arm - Treatment Group (12 Month)Randomized Arm - Control Group (12 Month)
(Randomized Arm) 6MHW Test-1.13 ± 5.253.01 ± 5.16-13.02 ± 5.54-10.09 ± 5.50
Statistical analysis
  • Randomized Arm - Treatment Group (6 Month) vs Randomized Arm - Control Group (6 Month) · t-test, 1 sided · p = 0.5741 · Mean difference (final values): 4.14 · 95% CI -10.32 to 18.60
  • Randomized Arm - Treatment Group (12 Month) vs Randomized Arm - Control Group (12 Month) · t-test, 1 sided · p = 0.7077 · Mean difference (final values): 2.93 · 95% CI -12.41 to 18.27
Secondary(Randomized Arm) 6MHW Test (Subject Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis)

Six Minute Hall Walk (6MHW) Test Distance

Time frame:
Baseline, 6, and 12 months post-implantation
Reported as:
Mean · meters, m
(Randomized Arm) 6MHW Test (Subject Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis)
meters, mRandomized Arm - Treatment Group (Baseline) [Pre-COVID-19]Randomized Arm - Control Group (Baseline) [Pre-COVID-19]Randomized Arm - Treatment Group (6 Month) [Pre-COVID-19]Randomized Arm - Control Group (6 Month) [Pre-COVID-19]Randomized Arm - Treatment Group (12 Month) [Pre-COVID-19]Randomized Arm - Control Group (12 Month) [Pre-COVID-19]Randomized Arm - Treatment Group (Baseline) [During COVID-19]Randomized Arm - Control Group (Baseline) [During COVID-19]Randomized Arm - Treatment Group (6 Month) [During COVID-19]Randomized Arm - Control Group (6 Month) [During COVID-19]Randomized Arm - Treatment Group (12 Month) [During COVID-19]Randomized Arm - Control Group (12 Month) [During COVID-19]
(Randomized Arm) 6MHW Test (Subject Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis)227 ± 117.8243.8 ± 124.7239.3 ± 123.5260.8 ± 120.8230.4 ± 133.2245.1 ± 136.1240.2 ± 121.5220.6 ± 121.3249.8 ± 129.1244.7 ± 135.6246.0 ± 130.0230.7 ± 135.3
Secondary(Randomized Arm) Safety: Freedom From DSRCs

Freedom from device/system related complications (DSRCs)

Time frame:
12 months post-implantation
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
(Randomized Arm) Safety: Freedom From DSRCs
ParticipantsRandomized Arm - Treatment GroupRandomized Arm - Control Group
(Randomized Arm) Safety: Freedom From DSRCs494498
Secondary(Single Arm) Composite Outcome of (1) HFHs and (2) Intravenous Diuretic Visits

The composite outcome of: 1. The number of recurrent HFHs 2. The number of emergency department/hospital outpatient observation visits for intravenous diuretic therapy added together with equal weighting into a total number of events

Time frame:
12 months post-implantation
Reported as:
Number · events per patient-year
(Single Arm) Composite Outcome of (1) HFHs and (2) Intravenous Diuretic Visits
events per patient-yearSingle Arm - Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP OnlySingle Arm - Previous HF Hospitalization Only
(Single Arm) Composite Outcome of (1) HFHs and (2) Intravenous Diuretic Visits0.2880.630
Statistical analysis
  • Single Arm - Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP Only vs Single Arm - Previous HF Hospitalization Only · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.46 · 90% CI 0.38 to 0.55
Secondary(Single Arm) Composite Outcome of (1) HFHs and (2) Intravenous Diuretic Visits [Follow-up Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]

The composite outcome of: 1. The number of recurrent HFHs 2. The number of emergency department/hospital outpatient observation visits for intravenous diuretic therapy added together with equal weighting into a total number of events

Time frame:
Events were analyzed through March 13, 2020 for pre-COVID-19 analysis (median follow-up: 5.4 months) and from March 13, 2020 through the end of subject's follow-up for during COVID-19 analysis (median follow-up: 11.2 months).
Reported as:
Number · events per patient-year
(Single Arm) Composite Outcome of (1) HFHs and (2) Intravenous Diuretic Visits [Follow-up Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]
events per patient-yearSingle Arm - Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP Only [Prior to COVID-19]Single Arm - Previous HF Hospitalization Only [Prior to COVID-19]Single Arm - Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP Only [During COVID-19]Single Arm - Previous HF Hospitalization Only [During COVID-19]
(Single Arm) Composite Outcome of (1) HFHs and (2) Intravenous Diuretic Visits [Follow-up Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]0.2110.6770.3030.616
Secondary(Single Arm) Composite Outcome of (1) HFHs and (2) Intravenous Diuretic Visits [Subject Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]

The composite outcome of: 1. The number of recurrent HFHs 2. The number of emergency department/hospital outpatient observation visits for intravenous diuretic therapy added together with equal weighting into a total number of events

Time frame:
12 Months Post Implantation
Reported as:
Number · events per patient-year
(Single Arm) Composite Outcome of (1) HFHs and (2) Intravenous Diuretic Visits [Subject Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]
events per patient-yearSingle Arm - Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP Only (Pre-COVID-19)Single Arm - Previous HF Hospitalization Only (Pre-COVID-19)Single Arm - Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP Only (During COVID-19)Single Arm - Previous HF Hospitalization Only (During COVID-19)
(Single Arm) Composite Outcome of (1) HFHs and (2) Intravenous Diuretic Visits [Subject Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]0.4361.5200.2860.583
Secondary(Single Arm) Composite Outcome of (1) HFHs and (2) Intravenous Diuretic Visits [Event Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]

The composite outcome of: 1. The number of recurrent HFHs 2. The number of emergency department/hospital outpatient observation visits for intravenous diuretic therapy added together with equal weighting into a total number of events

Time frame:
12 Months Post Implantation
Reported as:
Number · events per patient-year
(Single Arm) Composite Outcome of (1) HFHs and (2) Intravenous Diuretic Visits [Event Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]
events per patient-yearSingle Arm - Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP Only [Exclude COVID-19 Related Events]Single Arm - Previous HF Hospitalization Only [Exclude COVID-19 Related Events]Single Arm - Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP Only [Exclude COVID-19 Related or Possibly Related Events]Single Arm - Previous HF Hospitalization Only [Exclude COVID-19 Related or Possibly Related Events]
(Single Arm) Composite Outcome of (1) HFHs and (2) Intravenous Diuretic Visits [Event Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]0.2820.6240.2770.617
Secondary(Single Arm) Intravenous Diuretic Visits

The number of emergency department/hospital outpatient observation (ED/OP) visits for intravenous diuretic therapy

Time frame:
12 months post-implantation
Reported as:
Number · events per patient-year
(Single Arm) Intravenous Diuretic Visits
events per patient-yearSingle Arm - Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP OnlySingle Arm - Previous HF Hospitalization OnlySingle Arm - Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP and Previous HF Hospitalization
(Single Arm) Intravenous Diuretic Visits0.0270.0770.123
Statistical analysis
  • Single Arm - Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP Only vs Single Arm - Previous HF Hospitalization Only vs Single Arm - Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP and Previous HF Hospitalization · ANOVA · p = <0.0001
Secondary(Single Arm) Intravenous Diuretic Visits [Follow-up Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]

The number of emergency department/hospital outpatient observation (ED/OP) visits for intravenous diuretic therapy

Time frame:
Events were analyzed through March 13, 2020 for pre-COVID-19 analysis (median follow-up: 5.4 months) and from March 13, 2020 through the end of subject's follow-up for during COVID-19 analysis (median follow-up: 11.2 months).
Reported as:
Number · events per patient-year
(Single Arm) Intravenous Diuretic Visits [Follow-up Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]
events per patient-yearSingle Arm - Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP Only [Prior to COVID-19]Single Arm - Previous HF Hospitalization Only [Prior to COVID-19]Single Arm - Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP and Previous HF Hospitalization [Prior to COVID-19]Single Arm - Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP Only [During COVID-19]Single Arm - Previous HF Hospitalization Only [During COVID-19]Single Arm - Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP and Previous HF Hospitalization [During COVID-19]
(Single Arm) Intravenous Diuretic Visits [Follow-up Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]0.0550.0640.1990.0240.0880.114
Secondary(Single Arm) Intravenous Diuretic Visits [Subject Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]

The number of emergency department/hospital outpatient observation (ED/OP) visits for intravenous diuretic therapy

Time frame:
12 months post-implantation
Reported as:
Number · events per patient-year
(Single Arm) Intravenous Diuretic Visits [Subject Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]
events per patient-yearSingle Arm - Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP Only [Pre-COVID-19]Single Arm - Previous HF Hospitalization Only [Pre-COVID-19]Single Arm - Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP and Previous HF Hospitalization [Pre-COVID-19]Single Arm - Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP Only [During COVID-19]Single Arm - Previous HF Hospitalization Only [During COVID-19]Single Arm - Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP and Previous HF Hospitalization [During COVID-19]
(Single Arm) Intravenous Diuretic Visits [Subject Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]0.2130.0820.4220.0210.0800.101
Secondary(Single Arm) Intravenous Diuretic Visits [Event Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]

The number of emergency department/hospital outpatient observation (ED/OP) visits for intravenous diuretic therapy

Time frame:
12 Months Post Implantation
Reported as:
Number · events per patient-year
(Single Arm) Intravenous Diuretic Visits [Event Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]
events per patient-yearSingle Arm - Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP Only [Exclude COVID Related Events]Single Arm - Previous HF Hospitalization Only [Exclude COVID Related Events]Single Arm - Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP and Previous HF Hospitalization [Exclude COVID Related Events]Single Arm - Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP Only [Exclude COVID Related/Possibly Related Events]Single Arm - Previous HF Hospitalization Only [Exclude COVID Related/Possibly Related Events]Single Arm - Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP and Previous HFH [Exclude COVID Related/Possibly Related Events]
(Single Arm) Intravenous Diuretic Visits [Event Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]0.0270.0770.1230.0270.0750.119
Secondary(Single Arm) HFHs

The number of HFHs

Time frame:
12 months post-implantation
Reported as:
Number · events per patient-year
(Single Arm) HFHs
events per patient-yearSingle Arm - Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP OnlySingle Arm - Previous HF Hospitalization OnlySingle Arm - Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP and Previous HF Hospitalization
(Single Arm) HFHs0.2630.5570.797
Statistical analysis
  • Single Arm - Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP Only vs Single Arm - Previous HF Hospitalization Only vs Single Arm - Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP and Previous HF Hospitalization · ANOVA · p = <0.0001
Secondary(Single Arm) HFHs [Follow-Up Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]

The number of heart failure hospitalizations (HFHs)

Time frame:
Events were analyzed through March 13, 2020 for pre-COVID-19 analysis (median follow-up: 5.4 months) and from March 13, 2020 through the end of subject's follow-up for during COVID-19 analysis (median follow-up: 11.2 months).
Reported as:
Number · events per patient-year
(Single Arm) HFHs [Follow-Up Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]
events per patient-yearSingle Arm - Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP Only [Prior to COVID-19]Single Arm - Previous HF Hospitalization Only [Prior to COVID-19]Single Arm - Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP and Previous HF Hospitalization [Prior to COVID-19]Single Arm - Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP Only [During COVID-19]Single Arm - Previous HF Hospitalization Only [During COVID-19]Single Arm - Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP and Previous HF Hospitalization [During COVID-19]
(Single Arm) HFHs [Follow-Up Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]0.2140.8041.2110.2800.5290.732
Secondary(Single Arm) HFHs [Subject Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]

The number of heart failure hospitalizations (HFHs)

Time frame:
12 Months Post Implantation
Reported as:
Number · events per patient-year
(Single Arm) HFHs [Subject Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]
events per patient-yearSingle Arm - Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP Only [Pre-COVID-19]Single Arm - Previous HF Hospitalization Only [Pre-COVID-19]Single Arm - Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP and Previous HF Hospitalization [Pre-COVID-19]Single Arm - Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP Only [During COVID-19]Single Arm - Previous HF Hospitalization Only [During COVID-19]Single Arm - Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP and Previous HF Hospitalization [During COVID-19]
(Single Arm) HFHs [Subject Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]0.1751.1321.6600.2690.5100.719
Secondary(Single Arm) HFHs [Event Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]

The number of heart failure hospitalizations (HFHs)

Time frame:
12 Months Post Implantation
Reported as:
Number · events per patient-year
(Single Arm) HFHs [Event Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]
events per patient-yearSingle Arm - Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP Only [Exclude COVID Related Events]Single Arm - Previous HF Hospitalization Only [Exclude COVID Related Events]Single Arm - Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP and Previous HF Hospitalization [Exclude COVID Related Events]Single Arm - Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP Only [Exclude COVID Related/Possibly Related Events]Single Arm - Previous HF Hospitalization Only [Exclude COVID Related/Possibly Related Events]Single Arm - Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP and Previous HFH [Exclude COVID Related/Possibly Related Events]
(Single Arm) HFHs [Event Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]0.2570.5520.7900.2520.5450.749
Secondary(Single Arm) All-cause Mortality

The number of deaths of any cause

Time frame:
12 months post-implantation
Reported as:
Number · events per patient-year
(Single Arm) All-cause Mortality
events per patient-yearSingle Arm - Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP OnlySingle Arm - Previous HF Hospitalization OnlySingle Arm - Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP and Previous HF Hospitalization
(Single Arm) All-cause Mortality0.1130.1460.243
Statistical analysis
  • Single Arm - Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP Only vs Single Arm - Previous HF Hospitalization Only vs Single Arm - Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP and Previous HF Hospitalization · ANOVA · p = 0.0001
Secondary(Single Arm) All-cause Mortality [Follow-Up Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]

The number of deaths of any cause

Time frame:
Events were analyzed through March 13, 2020 for pre-COVID-19 analysis (median follow-up: 5.4 months) and from March 13, 2020 through the end of subject's follow-up for during COVID-19 analysis (median follow-up: 11.2 months).
Reported as:
Number · events per patient-year
(Single Arm) All-cause Mortality [Follow-Up Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]
events per patient-yearSingle Arm - Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP Only [Prior to COVID-19]Single Arm - Previous HF Hospitalization Only [Prior to COVID-19]Single Arm - Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP and Previous HF Hospitalization [Prior to COVID-19]Single Arm - Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP Only [During COVID-19]Single Arm - Previous HF Hospitalization Only [During COVID-19]Single Arm - Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP and Previous HF Hospitalization [During COVID-19]
(Single Arm) All-cause Mortality [Follow-Up Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]0.0500.1820.2720.1230.1350.233
Secondary(Single Arm) All-cause Mortality [Subject Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]

The number of deaths of any cause

Time frame:
12 Months Post Implantation
Reported as:
Number · events per patient-year
(Single Arm) All-cause Mortality [Subject Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]
events per patient-yearSingle Arm - Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP Only [Pre-COVID-19]Single Arm - Previous HF Hospitalization Only [Pre-COVID-19]Single Arm - Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP and Previous HF Hospitalization [Pre-COVID-19]Single Arm - Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP Only [During COVID-19]Single Arm - Previous HF Hospitalization Only [During COVID-19]Single Arm - Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP and Previous HF Hospitalization [During COVID-19]
(Single Arm) All-cause Mortality [Subject Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]0.1470.3840.5830.1130.1200.202
Secondary(Single Arm) All-cause Mortality [Event Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]

The number of deaths of any cause

Time frame:
12 Months Post Implantation
Reported as:
Number · events per patient-year
(Single Arm) All-cause Mortality [Event Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]
events per patient-yearSingle Arm - Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP Only [Exclude COVID Related Events]Single Arm - Previous HF Hospitalization Only [Exclude COVID Related Events]Single Arm - Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP and Previous HF Hospitalization [Exclude COVID Related Events]Single Arm - Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP Only [Exclude COVID Related/Possibly Related Events]Single Arm - Previous HF Hospitalization Only [Exclude COVID Related/Possibly Related Events]Single Arm - Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP and Previous HFH [Exclude COVID Related/Possibly Related Events]
(Single Arm) All-cause Mortality [Event Based COVID-19 Sensitivity Analysis]0.1050.1250.2310.1050.1230.227
Secondary(Single Arm) Safety: Freedom From DSRCs

Proportion of subjects with freedom from device/system related complications (DSRCs)

Time frame:
12 months post-implantation
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
(Single Arm) Safety: Freedom From DSRCs
ParticipantsSingle Arm - Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP OnlySingle Arm - Previous HF Hospitalization OnlySingle Arm - Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP and Previous HF Hospitalization
(Single Arm) Safety: Freedom From DSRCs451548342
Secondary(Single Arm) HFHs Post- vs. Pre-implantation [Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP Only Group]

The number of HFHs at 12 months post-implantation compared to the number of HFHs in the 12 months prior to implantation

Time frame:
12 months post-implantation vs 12 months pre-implantation
Reported as:
Number · events per patient-year
(Single Arm) HFHs Post- vs. Pre-implantation [Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP Only Group]
events per patient-yearSingle Arm - Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP Only (One Year Prior to Implant)Single Arm - Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP (One Year After Implant)
(Single Arm) HFHs Post- vs. Pre-implantation [Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP Only Group]00.265
Secondary(Single Arm) HFHs Post- vs. Pre-implantation [Previous HF Hospitalization Only Group]

The number of HFHs at 12 months post-implantation compared to the number of HFHs in the 12 months prior to implantation

Time frame:
12 months post-implantation vs 12 months pre-implantation
Reported as:
Number · events per patient-year
(Single Arm) HFHs Post- vs. Pre-implantation [Previous HF Hospitalization Only Group]
events per patient-yearSingle Arm - Previous HF Hospitalization Only (One Year Prior to Implant)Single Arm - Previous HF Hospitalization (One Year After Implant)
(Single Arm) HFHs Post- vs. Pre-implantation [Previous HF Hospitalization Only Group]1.1700.540
Statistical analysis
  • Single Arm - Previous HF Hospitalization Only (One Year Prior to Implant) vs Single Arm - Previous HF Hospitalization (One Year After Implant) · Anderson-Gill model (robust sandwich) · p = <0.0001 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.46 · 95% CI 0.39 to 0.54
Secondary(Single Arm) HFHs Post- vs. Pre-implantation [Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP and Previous HF Hospitalization Group]

The number of HFHs at 12 months post-implantation compared to the number of HFHs in the 12 months prior to implantation

Time frame:
12 months post-implantation vs 12 months pre-implantation
Reported as:
Number · events per patient-year
(Single Arm) HFHs Post- vs. Pre-implantation [Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP and Previous HF Hospitalization Group]
events per patient-yearSingle Arm - Previous HF Hospitalization Only (One Year Prior to Implant)Single Arm - Previous HF Hospitalization (One Year After Implant)
(Single Arm) HFHs Post- vs. Pre-implantation [Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP and Previous HF Hospitalization Group]1.3800.874
Statistical analysis
  • Single Arm - Previous HF Hospitalization Only (One Year Prior to Implant) vs Single Arm - Previous HF Hospitalization (One Year After Implant) · Anderson-Gill model (robust sandwich) · p = <0.001 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.63 · 95% CI 0.53 to 0.76
Other pre-specified(Randomized Arm) Cardiovascular Mortality

The number of deaths with cardiovascular cause

Time frame:
12 months post-implantation
Reported as:
Number · events per patient-year
(Randomized Arm) Cardiovascular Mortality
events per patient-yearRandomized Arm - Treatment GroupRandomized Arm - Control Group
(Randomized Arm) Cardiovascular Mortality0.0710.057
Other pre-specified(Randomized Arm) All-cause Hospitalizations

The number of hospitalizations of any cause

Time frame:
12 months post-implantation
Reported as:
Number · events per patient-year
(Randomized Arm) All-cause Hospitalizations
events per patient-yearRandomized Arm - Treatment GroupRandomized Arm - Control Group
(Randomized Arm) All-cause Hospitalizations0.9180.973
Other pre-specified(Randomized Arm) Frequency of Subject PA Pressure Uploads

The frequency of subject uploads of PA pressure

Time frame:
12 months post-implantation
Reported as:
Mean · Percentage
(Randomized Arm) Frequency of Subject PA Pressure Uploads
PercentageRandomized Arm - Treatment GroupRandomized Arm - Control Group
Daily compliance80.7 ± 20.473.8 ± 27.0
Weekly compliance95.1 ± 13.789.1 ± 21.7
Other pre-specified(Randomized Arm) HF Medication Changes

The number of changes in HF medications

Time frame:
12 months post-implantation
Reported as:
Number · Number of medication changes
(Randomized Arm) HF Medication Changes
Number of medication changesRandomized Arm - Treatment GroupRandomized Arm - Control Group
Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme (ACE) Inhibitors10976
Angiotensin Receptor Blocker (ARB)9480
Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibitor (ARNi)194120
Beta Blockers370339
Aldosterone Antagonists323190
Diuretics39612064
Nitrates169101
Vasodilators14683
SGLT2 Inhibitor96
Calcium Channel Blockers7765
Digoxin2436
Sinus Node If Channel Inhibitors124
Other pre-specified(Randomized Arm) PA Pressure Measurements [Mixed Model Analysis]

Changes in PA pressure relative to baseline for systolic, diastolic, and mean PA pressures analyzed using a mixed linear model at fixed time points (Baseline, 6 months, and 12 months) producing least-squares means.

Time frame:
Baseline through 12 months post-implantation
Reported as:
Least squares mean · mmHg
(Randomized Arm) PA Pressure Measurements [Mixed Model Analysis]
mmHgRandomized Arm - Treatment Group (6 Month)Randomized Arm - Control Group (6 Month)Randomized Arm - Treatment Group (12 Month)Randomized Arm - Control Group (12 Month)
PA Systolic Pressure-3.41 ± 0.44-1.87 ± 0.46-3.33 ± 0.46-2.70 ± 0.47
PA Diastolic pressure-2.52 ± 0.27-1.73 ± 0.28-2.49 ± 0.28-2.29 ± 0.29
PA Mean Pressure-2.90 ± 0.34-1.77 ± 0.35-2.80 ± 0.35-2.40 ± 0.36
Statistical analysis
  • Randomized Arm - Treatment Group (6 Month) vs Randomized Arm - Control Group (6 Month) · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0160 · Least square means difference (t vs c): 1.53 · 95% CI 0.29 to 2.78
  • Randomized Arm - Treatment Group (6 Month) vs Randomized Arm - Control Group (6 Month) · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0427 · Least square means difference (t vs c): 0.79 · 95% CI 0.03 to 1.56
  • Randomized Arm - Treatment Group (6 Month) vs Randomized Arm - Control Group (6 Month) · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0188 · Least square means difference (t vs c): 1.13 · 95% CI 0.19 to 2.08
  • Randomized Arm - Treatment Group (12 Month) vs Randomized Arm - Control Group (12 Month) · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.3405 · Least square means difference (t vs c): 0.63 · 95% CI -0.66 to 1.92
  • Randomized Arm - Treatment Group (12 Month) vs Randomized Arm - Control Group (12 Month) · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.6174 · Least square means difference (t vs c): 0.20 · 95% CI -0.59 to 0.99
  • Randomized Arm - Treatment Group (12 Month) vs Randomized Arm - Control Group (12 Month) · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.4231 · Least square means difference (t vs c): 0.40 · 95% CI -0.58 to 1.38
Other pre-specified(Randomized Arm) PA Pressure Measurements [AUC Analysis]

Changes in PA pressure relative to baseline for systolic, diastolic, and mean PA pressures analyzed using an area under the curve (AUC) analysis of change from baseline on all PA pressure readings through 12 months.

Time frame:
Baseline through 12 months post-implantation
Reported as:
Mean · mmHg*Days
(Randomized Arm) PA Pressure Measurements [AUC Analysis]
mmHg*DaysRandomized Arm - Treatment GroupRandomized Arm - Control Group
PA Systolic Pressure-945.0 ± 2328.9-621.2 ± 2242.3
PA Diastolic pressure-690.5 ± 1405.1-566.1 ± 1360.6
PA Mean Pressure-792.7 ± 1767.0-582.9 ± 1698.1
Statistical analysis
  • Randomized Arm - Treatment Group vs Randomized Arm - Control Group · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.0214
  • Randomized Arm - Treatment Group vs Randomized Arm - Control Group · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.1002
  • Randomized Arm - Treatment Group vs Randomized Arm - Control Group · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.0402
Other pre-specified(Randomized Arm) BNP

Change in BNP measurements from baseline

Time frame:
6 months post-implantation
Reported as:
Least squares mean · pg/mL
(Randomized Arm) BNP
pg/mLRandomized Arm - Treatment GroupRandomized Arm - Control Group
(Randomized Arm) BNP-72.16 ± 52.46-34.96 ± 54.33
Statistical analysis
  • Randomized Arm - Treatment Group vs Randomized Arm - Control Group · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.6227 · Least square means difference (t vs c): 37.19 · 95% CI -111.38 to 185.77
Other pre-specified(Randomized Arm) BNP

Change in BNP measurements from baseline

Time frame:
12 months post-implantation
Reported as:
Least squares mean · pg/mL
(Randomized Arm) BNP
pg/mLRandomized Arm - Treatment GroupRandomized Arm - Control Group
(Randomized Arm) BNP-80.61 ± 53.17-20.82 ± 55.51
Statistical analysis
  • Randomized Arm - Treatment Group vs Randomized Arm - Control Group · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.4373 · Least square means difference (t vs c): 59.78 · 95% CI -91.44 to 211.01
Other pre-specified(Randomized Arm) NT-proBNP

Change in NT-proBNP measurements from baseline

Time frame:
6 months post-implantation
Reported as:
Least squares mean · pg/mL
(Randomized Arm) NT-proBNP
pg/mLRandomized Arm - Treatment GroupRandomized Arm - Control Group
(Randomized Arm) NT-proBNP-169.94 ± 183.37298.16 ± 179.58
Statistical analysis
  • Randomized Arm - Treatment Group vs Randomized Arm - Control Group · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0692 · Least square means difference (t vs c): 468.10 · 95% CI -37.09 to 973.30
Other pre-specified(Randomized Arm) NT-proBNP

Change in NT-proBNP measurements from baseline

Time frame:
12 months post-implantation
Reported as:
Least squares mean · pg/mL
(Randomized Arm) NT-proBNP
pg/mLRandomized Arm - Treatment Group (12 Month)Randomized Arm - Control Group (12 Month)
(Randomized Arm) NT-proBNP217.23 ± 190.28501.90 ± 189.74
Statistical analysis
  • Randomized Arm - Treatment Group (12 Month) vs Randomized Arm - Control Group (12 Month) · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.2903 · Least square means difference (t vs c): 284.67 · 95% CI -244.27 to 813.60
Other pre-specified(Randomized Arm) HFHs Post- vs. Pre-implantation [Treatment Group]

The number of HFHs at 12 months post-implantation compared to the number of HFHs in the 12 months prior to implantation in the Treatment group

Time frame:
12 months post-implantation vs 12 months pre-implantation
Reported as:
Number · events per patient-year
(Randomized Arm) HFHs Post- vs. Pre-implantation [Treatment Group]
events per patient-yearRandomized Arm - Treatment Group (One Year Prior to Implant)Randomized Arm - Treatment Group (One Year After Implant)
(Randomized Arm) HFHs Post- vs. Pre-implantation [Treatment Group]0.6430.415
Statistical analysis
  • Randomized Arm - Treatment Group (One Year Prior to Implant) vs Randomized Arm - Treatment Group (One Year After Implant) · Anderson-Gill model (robust sandwich) · p = <0.0001 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.65 · 95% CI 0.53 to 0.78
Other pre-specified(Randomized Arm) HFHs Post- vs. Pre-implantation [Control Group]

The number of HFHs at 12 months post-implantation compared to the number of HFHs in the 12 months prior to implantation

Time frame:
12 months post-implantation vs 12 months pre-implantation
Reported as:
Number · events per patient-year
(Randomized Arm) HFHs Post- vs. Pre-implantation [Control Group]
events per patient-yearRandomized Arm - Control Group (One Year Prior to Implant)Randomized Arm - Control Group (One Year After Implant)
(Randomized Arm) HFHs Post- vs. Pre-implantation [Control Group]0.7100.483
Statistical analysis
  • Randomized Arm - Control Group (One Year Prior to Implant) vs Randomized Arm - Control Group (One Year After Implant) · Anderson-Gill model (robust sandwich) · p = <0.0001 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.68 · 95% CI 0.57 to 0.81
Other pre-specified(Single Arm) KCCQ-12 [Mixed Model Analysis]

Health status as assessed by the KCCQ-12 The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ-12) is a validated health-related quality of life measure for heart failure and was qualified by the FDA as a medical device development tool in 2017. The KCCQ-12 quantifies physical function, symptoms (frequency, severity, and recent change), social function, self-efficacy and knowledge, and quality of life on a scale from 0 to 100. An overall summary score (OSS) is derived by averaging scores from each domain, with a higher score reflecting a better health status.

Time frame:
6 months post-implantation
Reported as:
Least squares mean · scores on a scale
(Single Arm) KCCQ-12 [Mixed Model Analysis]
scores on a scaleSingle Arm - Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP OnlySingle Arm - Previous HF Hospitalization OnlySingle Arm - Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP and Previous HF Hospitalization
(Single Arm) KCCQ-12 [Mixed Model Analysis]6.19 ± 0.985.47 ± 0.9010.70 ± 1.18
Other pre-specified(Single Arm) KCCQ-12 [Mixed Model Analysis]

Health status as assessed by the KCCQ-12 The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ-12) is a validated health-related quality of life measure for heart failure and was qualified by the FDA as a medical device development tool in 2017. The KCCQ-12 quantifies physical function, symptoms (frequency, severity, and recent change), social function, self-efficacy and knowledge, and quality of life on a scale from 0 to 100. An overall summary score (OSS) is derived by averaging scores from each domain, with a higher score reflecting a better health status.

Time frame:
12 months post-implantation
Reported as:
Least squares mean · scores on a scale
(Single Arm) KCCQ-12 [Mixed Model Analysis]
scores on a scaleSingle Arm - Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP OnlySingle Arm - Previous HF Hospitalization OnlySingle Arm - Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP and Previous HF Hospitalization
(Single Arm) KCCQ-12 [Mixed Model Analysis]6.53 ± 1.075.00 ± 0.9911.85 ± 1.32
Other pre-specified(Single Arm) EQ-5D-5L [Mixed Model Analysis]

Health status as assessed by the EQ-5D-5L Questionnaire. The data represents the EQ Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) subscale. The VAS records the subject's self-rated health status which ranges from a score of 0 (worst health you can imagine) to 100 (best health you can imagine). A higher VAS score for represents a better quality of life.

Time frame:
6 months post-implantation
Reported as:
Least squares mean · scores on a scale
(Single Arm) EQ-5D-5L [Mixed Model Analysis]
scores on a scaleSingle Arm - Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP OnlySingle Arm - Previous HF Hospitalization OnlySingle Arm - Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP and Previous HF Hospitalization
(Single Arm) EQ-5D-5L [Mixed Model Analysis]3.86 ± 0.913.05 ± 0.832.41 ± 1.09
Other pre-specified(Single Arm) EQ-5D-5L [Mixed Model Analysis]

Health status as assessed by the EQ-5D-5L Questionnaire. The data represents the EQ Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) subscale. The VAS records the subject's self-rated health status which ranges from a score of 0 (worst health you can imagine) to 100 (best health you can imagine). A higher VAS score for represents a better quality of life.

Time frame:
12 months post-implantation
Reported as:
Least squares mean · scores on a scale
(Single Arm) EQ-5D-5L [Mixed Model Analysis]
scores on a scaleSingle Arm - Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP OnlySingle Arm - Previous HF Hospitalization OnlySingle Arm - Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP and Previous HF Hospitalization
(Single Arm) EQ-5D-5L [Mixed Model Analysis]3.42 ± 0.940.83 ± 0.884.93 ± 1.16
Other pre-specified(Single Arm) 6MHW Test [Mixed Model Analysis]

6MHW Test Distance

Time frame:
6 months post-implantation
Reported as:
Least squares mean · meters, m
(Single Arm) 6MHW Test [Mixed Model Analysis]
meters, mSingle Arm - Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP Only [6 Month]Single Arm - Previous HF Hospitalization Only [6 Month]Single Arm - Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP and Previous HF Hospitalization [6 Month]
(Single Arm) 6MHW Test [Mixed Model Analysis]5.25 ± 5.400.67 ± 5.1320.11 ± 6.62
Other pre-specified(Single Arm) 6MHW Test [Mixed Model Analysis]

6MHW Test Distance

Time frame:
12 months post-implantation
Reported as:
Least squares mean · meters, m
(Single Arm) 6MHW Test [Mixed Model Analysis]
meters, mSingle Arm - Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP Only [12 Month]Single Arm - Previous HF Hospitalization Only [12 Month]Single Arm - Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP and Previous HF Hospitalization [12 Month]
(Single Arm) 6MHW Test [Mixed Model Analysis]-3.80 ± 5.90-5.56 ± 5.9920.18 ± 7.67
Other pre-specified(Single Arm) Cardiovascular Mortality

The number of deaths of cardiovascular cause

Time frame:
12 months post-implantation
Reported as:
Number · events per patient-year
(Single Arm) Cardiovascular Mortality
events per patient-yearSingle Arm - Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP OnlySingle Arm - Previous HF Hospitalization OnlySingle Arm - Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP and Previous HF Hospitalization
(Single Arm) Cardiovascular Mortality0.0730.0900.163
Other pre-specified(Single Arm) All-cause Hospitalizations

The number of hospitalizations of any cause

Time frame:
12 months post-implantation
Reported as:
Number · events per patient-year
(Single Arm) All-cause Hospitalizations
events per patient-yearSingle Arm - Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP OnlySingle Arm - Previous HF Hospitalization OnlySingle Arm - Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP and Previous HF Hospitalization
(Single Arm) All-cause Hospitalizations0.801.2161.503
Other pre-specified(Single Arm) Frequency of Subject PA Pressure Uploads - Daily Compliance

The frequency of subject uploads of PA pressure

Time frame:
12 months post-implantation
Reported as:
Mean · Percentage
(Single Arm) Frequency of Subject PA Pressure Uploads - Daily Compliance
PercentageSingle Arm - Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP OnlySingle Arm - Previous HF Hospitalization OnlySingle Arm - Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP and Previous HF Hospitalization
(Single Arm) Frequency of Subject PA Pressure Uploads - Daily Compliance79 ± 2272 ± 2774 ± 25
Other pre-specified(Single Arm) Frequency of Subject PA Pressure Uploads - Weekly Compliance

The frequency of subject uploads of PA pressure

Time frame:
12 months post-implantation
Reported as:
Mean · Percentage
(Single Arm) Frequency of Subject PA Pressure Uploads - Weekly Compliance
PercentageSingle Arm - Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP OnlySingle Arm - Previous HF Hospitalization OnlySingle Arm - Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP and Previous HF Hospitalization
(Single Arm) Frequency of Subject PA Pressure Uploads - Weekly Compliance0.94 ± 0.140.90 ± 0.200.91 ± 0.17
Other pre-specified(Single Arm) HF Medication Changes

The number of changes in HF medications

Time frame:
12 months post-implantation
Reported as:
Number · Number of events
(Single Arm) HF Medication Changes
Number of eventsSingle Arm - Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP OnlySingle Arm - Previous HF Hospitalization OnlySingle Arm - Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP and Previous HF Hospitalization
Diuretics302645732630
Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme (ACE) Inhibitors506942
Angiotensin Receptor Blocker (ARB)6112757
Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibitor (ARNi)12213598
Beta Blockers285358239
Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonist238409216
SGLT2 Inhibitor736646
Nitrates688868
Hydralazine/Other Vasodilators93121102
Calcium Channel Blockers488248
Digoxin372318
Sinus Node If Channel Inhibitors231
Other pre-specified(Single Arm) PA Pressure Measurements [Mixed Model Analysis]

Changes in PA pressure relative to baseline for systolic, diastolic, and mean PA pressures analyzed using a mixed linear model at fixed time points (Baseline, 6 months, and 12 months) producing least-squares means.

Time frame:
Baseline through 12 months post-implantation
Reported as:
Least squares mean · mmHg
(Single Arm) PA Pressure Measurements [Mixed Model Analysis]
mmHgSingle Arm - Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP Only [6 Month]Single Arm - Previous HF Hospitalization Only [6 Month]Single Arm - Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP and Previous HF Hospitalization [6 Month]Single Arm - Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP Only [12 Month]Single Arm - Previous HF Hospitalization Only [12 Month]Single Arm - Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP and Previous HF Hospitalization [12 Month]
Change in PA Systolic Pressure-3.79 ± 0.43-3.32 ± 0.39-3.86 ± 0.52-3.49 ± 0.49-3.34 ± 0.46-4.32 ± 0.60
Change in PA Diastolic Pressure-2.93 ± 0.26-2.34 ± 0.24-2.66 ± 0.31-2.71 ± 0.29-2.57 ± 0.27-3.17 ± 0.36
Change in PA Mean Pressure-3.22 ± 0.32-2.73 ± 0.29-3.07 ± 0.39-2.92 ± 0.36-2.84 ± 0.34-3.60 ± 0.44
Other pre-specified(Single Arm) PA Pressure Measurements [AUC Analysis]

Changes in PA pressure relative to baseline for systolic, diastolic, and mean PA pressures analyzed using area under the curve (AUC) analysis of PA pressure across the full follow-up period

Time frame:
Baseline through 12 months post-implantation
Reported as:
Mean · mmHg*Days
(Single Arm) PA Pressure Measurements [AUC Analysis]
mmHg*DaysSingle Arm - Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP OnlySingle Arm - Previous HF Hospitalization OnlySingle Arm - Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP and Previous HF Hospitalization
PA Systolic Pressure-1033.79 ± 2457.95-1021.13 ± 2374.17-1179.42 ± 2588.90
PA Diastolic Pressure-868.16 ± 1410.07-723.29 ± 1529.73-847.94 ± 1489.96
PA Mean Pressure-929.39 ± 1794.20-832.21 ± 1832.20-973.97 ± 1904.05
Other pre-specified(Single Arm) NT-proBNP (or BNP) [Mixed Model Analysis]

Either change in N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) or Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) measurements at 6 months visits from baseline.

Time frame:
6 months post-implantation
Reported as:
Least squares mean · pg/mL
(Single Arm) NT-proBNP (or BNP) [Mixed Model Analysis]
pg/mLSingle Arm - Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP OnlySingle Arm - Previous HF Hospitalization OnlySingle Arm - Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP and Previous HF Hospitalization
BNP40.81 ± 38.50-103.33 ± 32.91-6.45 ± 41.50
NT-proBNP-55.40 ± 153.36-174.83 ± 151.97-102.91 ± 194.87
Other pre-specified(Single Arm) NT-proBNP (or BNP) [Mixed Model Analysis]

Either change in N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) or Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) measurements at 6 months and 12 months visits from baseline.

Time frame:
12 months post-implantation
Reported as:
Least squares mean · pg/mL
(Single Arm) NT-proBNP (or BNP) [Mixed Model Analysis]
pg/mLSingle Arm - Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP OnlySingle Arm - Previous HF Hospitalization OnlySingle Arm - Elevated NT-proBNP/BNP and Previous HF Hospitalization
BNP-11.23 ± 37.73-79.01 ± 32.23-17.71 ± 41.92
NT-proBNP-15.17 ± 206.01348.49 ± 214.19259.33 ± 279.57

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse device effects (ADEs), serious adverse device effects (SADEs), serious adverse events (SAEs), and unanticipated adverse device effects (UADEs) were summarized for subjects enrolled in this trial as number of events, the number and percentage of subjects with events and event rate as number of events/subject-month. Adverse event data were collected during the 1-year follow-up period.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Randomized Arm - Treatment Group40/497 (8%)283/497 (56.9%)15/497 (3%)
Randomized Arm - Control Group37/503 (7.4%)272/503 (54.1%)20/503 (4%)
Single Arm190/1,358 (14%)820/1,358 (60.4%)33/1,358 (2.4%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 397
Most frequent serious events
EventRandomized Arm - Treatment GroupRandomized Arm - Control GroupSingle Arm
Cardiac Failure CongestiveCardiac disorders130/497155/503454/1358
ArrhythmiaCardiac disorders47/49746/503138/1358
InfectionInfections and infestations27/49734/503103/1358
Renal Failure AcuteRenal and urinary disorders18/49728/50381/1358
PneumoniaInfections and infestations24/49729/50371/1358
Chest PainGeneral disorders27/49723/50332/1358
Gastrointestinal HemorrhageGastrointestinal disorders9/49716/50352/1358
SepsisInfections and infestations17/49710/50348/1358
Blood Creatinine IncreasedInjury, poisoning and procedural complications17/49713/50343/1358
Myocardial InfarctionCardiac disorders10/49716/50330/1358
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 21
Most frequent other events
EventRandomized Arm - Treatment GroupRandomized Arm - Control GroupSingle Arm
Catheter Site HemorrhageGeneral disorders4/4976/50310/1358
HemoptysisRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders3/4970/5032/1358
Catheter Site HematomaGeneral disorders2/4973/5032/1358
Device DislocationGeneral disorders0/4973/5037/1358
Device Information Output IssueGeneral disorders2/4972/5030/1358
ArrhythmiaCardiac disorders0/4972/5033/1358
Vessel Puncture Site PainGeneral disorders1/4971/5030/1358
Arterial InjuryInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/4970/5030/1358
LacerationInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/4970/5030/1358
PresyncopeNervous system disorders1/4970/5031/1358

Baseline characteristics

The endpoint-contributing population consists of patients who were successfully implanted.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Randomized Arm - Treatment GroupRandomized Arm - Control GroupSingle ArmTotal
Mean69.2 ± 11.169.2 ± 11.070.5 ± 10.969.9 ± 11.0
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Randomized Arm - Treatment GroupRandomized Arm - Control GroupSingle ArmTotal
Female187188584959
Male3103157741399
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Randomized Arm - Treatment GroupRandomized Arm - Control GroupSingle ArmTotal
Hispanic or Latino16176194
Not Hispanic or Latino47748312832243
Unknown or Not Reported431421
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Randomized Arm - Treatment GroupRandomized Arm - Control GroupSingle ArmTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native1146
Asian011213
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0033
Black or African American8693188367
White40340411251932
More than one race1135
Unknown or Not Reported632332
Body Mass Index
Body Mass Index(kg/m2)Randomized Arm - Treatment GroupRandomized Arm - Control GroupSingle ArmTotal
Mean32.9 ± 8.333.8 ± 8.434.0 ± 8.833.8 ± 8.7
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class(Participants)Randomized Arm - Treatment GroupRandomized Arm - Control GroupSingle ArmTotal
Class II1461500296
Class III32232813562006
Class IV2925155
Medical History - Ischemic etiology
Medical History - Ischemic etiology(Participants)Randomized Arm - Treatment GroupRandomized Arm - Control GroupSingle ArmTotal
Count of participants207190489886
Medical History - Previous myocardial infarction
Medical History - Previous myocardial infarction(Participants)Randomized Arm - Treatment GroupRandomized Arm - Control GroupSingle ArmTotal
Count of participants144158359661

37 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

129 sites
  • Banner-University Medical Center Phoenix
    Phoenix, Arizona 85006, United States
  • Arizona Cardiovascular Research Center
    Phoenix, Arizona 85016, United States
  • Phoenix Cardiovascular Research Group
    Phoenix, Arizona 85018, United States
  • University of Arizona
    Tucson, Arizona 85719, United States
  • Washington Regional Medical Center
    Fayetteville, Arkansas 72703, United States
  • Baptist Health Medical Center
    Little Rock, Arkansas 72205, United States
  • Arkansas Heart Hospital
    Little Rock, Arkansas 72211, United States
  • John Muir Medical Center
    Concord, California 94520, United States
  • Adventist Health St. Helena
    Deer Park, California 94574, United States
  • Scripps Health
    La Jolla, California 92037, United States
  • University of California at San Diego (UCSD) Medical Center
    La Jolla, California 92037, United States
  • USC University Hospital
    Los Angeles, California 90033, United States
  • Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center
    Los Angeles, California 90095, United States
  • Eisenhower Medical Center
    Rancho Mirage, California 92270, United States
  • Sutter Medical Center, Sacramento
    Sacramento, California 95816, United States
  • Mercy Medical Group - Cardiology
    Sacramento, California 95819, United States
  • San Diego Cardiac Center
    San Diego, California 92123, United States
  • California Pacific Medical Center - Van Ness Campus
    San Francisco, California 94109, United States
  • Ventura Cardiology Consultants
    Ventura, California 93003, United States
  • University of Colorado Hospital
    Aurora, Colorado 80045, United States
  • North Colorado Medical Center
    Greeley, Colorado 80631, United States
  • South Denver Cardiology Associates PC
    Littleton, Colorado 80120, United States
  • Hartford Hospital
    Hartford, Connecticut 06106, United States
  • Yale New Haven Hospital
    New Haven, Connecticut 06510, United States
  • George Washington University Hospital
    Washington D.C., District of Columbia 20037, United States
  • Bethesda Memorial Hospital
    Boynton Beach, Florida 33466, United States
  • Morton Plant Hospital
    Clearwater, Florida 33756, United States
  • Memorial Regional Hospital
    Hollywood, Florida 33020, United States
  • First Coast Cardiovascular Institute
    Jacksonville, Florida 32216, United States
  • Memorial Hospital Jacksonville
    Jacksonville, Florida 32216, United States
  • Advent Health Orlando
    Orlando, Florida 32803, United States
  • Tampa General Hospital
    Tampa, Florida 33606, United States
  • Piedmont Athens Regional Medical Center
    Athens, Georgia 30606, United States
  • University Hospital
    Augusta, Georgia 30901, United States
  • WellStar Kennestone Hospital
    Marietta, Georgia 30060, United States
  • Northshore University HealthSystem
    Evanston, Illinois 60201, United States
  • Advocate Health and Hospitals Corporation
    Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois 60181, United States
  • St. Vincent Hospital
    Indianapolis, Indiana 46240, United States
  • Heart Center of Lake County
    Merrillville, Indiana 46410, United States
  • Iowa Heart Center
    West Des Moines, Iowa 50266, United States
  • Kansas University Medical Center
    Kansas City, Kansas 66160, United States
  • Cardiovascular Research Institute of Kansas
    Wichita, Kansas 67226, United States
  • Our Lady of the Lake Hospital
    Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70808, United States
  • Cardiovascular Institute of the South
    Houma, Louisiana 70361, United States
  • Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center
    New Orleans, Louisiana 70112, United States
  • Ochsner Medical Center
    New Orleans, Louisiana 70121, United States
  • Advanced Cardiovascular Specialists
    Shreveport, Louisiana 71105, United States
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital
    Boston, Massachusetts 02115, United States
  • University of Massachusetts
    Worcester, Massachusetts 01655, United States
  • University of Michigan
    Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104, United States
  • McLaren Health Care Corporation
    Auburn Hills, Michigan 48326, United States
  • Henry Ford Hospital
    Detroit, Michigan 48202, United States
  • MidMichigan Medical Center-Midland
    Midland, Michigan 48640, United States
  • Providence Hospital
    Southfield, Michigan 48075, United States
  • Minneapolis Heart Institute
    Minneapolis, Minnesota 55407, United States
  • University of Minnesota Medical Center Fairview
    Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, United States
  • Mayo Clinic
    Rochester, Minnesota 55905, United States
  • St. Cloud Hospital
    Saint Cloud, Minnesota 56303, United States
  • St. Luke's Hospital
    Kansas City, Missouri 64111, United States
  • North Kansas City Hospital
    North Kansas City, Missouri 64116, United States
  • Mercy Hospital St. Louis
    St Louis, Missouri 63141, United States
  • BryanLGH Heart Institute
    Lincoln, Nebraska 68506, United States
  • University of Nebraska Medical Center
    Omaha, Nebraska 68198, United States
  • Renown Regional Medical Center
    Reno, Nevada 89502, United States
  • Catholic Medical Center
    Manchester, New Hampshire 03102, United States
  • Deborah Heart and Lung Center
    Browns Mills, New Jersey 08015, United States
  • Saint Barnabas Medical Center
    Livingston, New Jersey 07039, United States
  • Lourdes Cardiology Services
    Voorhees Township, New Jersey 08043, United States
  • New Mexico Heart Institute
    Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102, United States
  • New York University Hospital
    New York, New York 10016, United States
  • Mount Sinai Hospital
    New York, New York 10019, United States
  • New York-Presbyterian/Columbia University
    New York, New York 10032, United States
  • Hudson Valley Cardiovascular Practice, P.C.
    Poughkeepsie, New York 12601, United States
  • Rochester General Hospital
    Rochester, New York 14621, United States
  • St. Francis Hospital
    Roslyn, New York 11576, United States
  • Carolinas Medical Center
    Charlotte, North Carolina 28203, United States
  • Vidant Medical Center
    Greenville, North Carolina 27835, United States
  • NC Heart and Vascular Research
    Raleigh, North Carolina 27607, United States
  • WakeMed Hospital
    Raleigh, North Carolina 27610, United States
  • Akron City Hospital
    Akron, Ohio 44309, United States
  • University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
    Cleveland, Ohio 44106, United States
  • The Cleveland Clinic Foundation
    Cleveland, Ohio 44195, United States
  • Ohio State University
    Columbus, Ohio 43210, United States
  • Ohio Health Research Institute
    Columbus, Ohio 43214, United States
  • St. Elizabeth Health Center
    Youngstown, Ohio 44501, United States
  • Integris Baptist Medical Center
    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73112, United States
  • Oklahoma Heart Hospital South
    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73135, United States
  • Oklahoma Heart Institute at Utica
    Tulsa, Oklahoma 74133, United States
  • Providence Heart and Vascular
    Portland, Oregon 97225, United States
  • Abington Memorial Hospital
    Abington, Pennsylvania 19001, United States
  • Pinnacle Health System
    Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17105, United States
  • Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
    Hershey, Pennsylvania 17033, United States
  • Lancaster General Hospital
    Lancaster, Pennsylvania 17603, United States
  • Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States
  • Albert Einstein Medical Center
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19141, United States
  • Allegheny General Hospital - ASRI
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15212, United States
  • The Reading Hospital and Medical Center
    West Reading, Pennsylvania 19611, United States
  • Main Line Health Center/Lankenau Hospital
    Wynnewood, Pennsylvania 19096, United States
  • Rhode Island Hospital
    Providence, Rhode Island 02903, United States
  • Prisma Health-Midlands
    Columbia, South Carolina 29203, United States

Showing the first 100 of 129 sites across 2 countries. Choose a country and city above to see the rest.

09

References and documents

Publications

  • Desai AS, Zile MR, Ducharme A, Mehra MR, Maisel AS, Sears SF, Costanzo MR, Smart FW, Chien CV, Jonsson O, Hall S, Nie H, Lee FS, Lindenfeld J. Changes in Pulmonary Artery Pressure Following Initiation of Guideline-Directed Medical Therapies in Patients With Heart Failure: Insights From GUIDE-HF. Circ Heart Fail. 2026 Jun;19(6):e013877. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.125.013877. Epub 2026 May 28. PubMed 42206402 ↗
  • Zile MR, Abraham WT, Stevenson LW, Costanzo MR, Angermann CE, Mehra MR, Desai AS, Ducharme A, Johnson N, Henderson J, Lindenfeld J. Relationship Between Remote, Ambulatory Pulmonary Artery Pressures, and All-Cause Mortality in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure. Circ Heart Fail. 2025 Jun;18(6):e012754. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.124.012754. Epub 2025 Apr 14. PubMed 40223608 ↗
  • Desai AS, Maisel A, Mehra MR, Zile MR, Ducharme A, Paul S, Sears SF, Smart F, Bhatt K, Krim S, Henderson J, Johnson N, Adamson PB, Costanzo MR, Lindenfeld J; GUIDE-HF Investigators. Hemodynamic-Guided Heart Failure Management in Patients With Either Prior HF Hospitalization or Elevated Natriuretic Peptides. JACC Heart Fail. 2023 Jun;11(6):691-698. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2023.01.007. Epub 2023 Apr 12. PubMed 37286262 ↗
  • Zile MR, Mehra MR, Ducharme A, Sears SF, Desai AS, Maisel A, Paul S, Smart F, Grafton G, Kumar S, Nossuli TO, Johnson N, Henderson J, Adamson PB, Costanzo MR, Lindenfeld J. Hemodynamically-Guided Management of Heart Failure Across the Ejection Fraction Spectrum: The GUIDE-HF Trial. JACC Heart Fail. 2022 Dec;10(12):931-944. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2022.08.012. Epub 2022 Oct 12. PubMed 36456066 ↗
  • Zile MR, Desai AS, Costanzo MR, Ducharme A, Maisel A, Mehra MR, Paul S, Sears SF, Smart F, Chien C, Guha A, Guichard JL, Hall S, Jonsson O, Johnson N, Sood P, Henderson J, Adamson PB, Lindenfeld J. The GUIDE-HF trial of pulmonary artery pressure monitoring in heart failure: impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Eur Heart J. 2022 Jul 14;43(27):2603-2618. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac114. PubMed 35266003 ↗
  • Lindenfeld J, Zile MR, Desai AS, Bhatt K, Ducharme A, Horstmanshof D, Krim SR, Maisel A, Mehra MR, Paul S, Sears SF, Sauer AJ, Smart F, Zughaib M, Castaneda P, Kelly J, Johnson N, Sood P, Ginn G, Henderson J, Adamson PB, Costanzo MR. Haemodynamic-guided management of heart failure (GUIDE-HF): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2021 Sep 11;398(10304):991-1001. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01754-2. Epub 2021 Aug 27. PubMed 34461042 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Mar 2018 to primary completion in May 2023, 62 months.

Results were first posted in Aug 2025, 2 years 2 months after primary completion.

Of 236 industry-sponsored interventional studies with no phase under Heart Failure, half reached primary completion within 34 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 18 and three quarters within 62. This study's 62 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 1,354 studies reached it within 31 months; a quarter within 16 and three quarters within 52.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 12, 2017
First posted
Jan 2, 2018
StartActual
Mar 15, 2018
Primary completionActual
May 17, 2023
CompletionActual
May 17, 2023
Results first posted
Aug 7, 2025
Last update
Aug 7, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 7, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03387813
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 2, 2018
Start date
Mar 15, 2018
Primary completion
May 17, 2023
Completion
May 17, 2023
Results posted
Aug 7, 2025
Last update
Aug 7, 2025

Study contacts

Nessa Johnson, PhD
study director · Abbott

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion