ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT03385772Updated Dec 28, 2017

The Sphenopalatine Ganglion Block for Post-dural Puncture Headache

An interventional study of Sphenopalatine ganglion block in Post-Dural Puncture Headache, sponsored by Brigham and Women's Hospital. Status unknown. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 50 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-12-28.

Sponsored by Brigham and Women's Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Dec 2017), so the status shown — last known as Not yet recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years to 50 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This study aims to determine the efficacy of the sphenopalatine ganglion block in the treatment of post-dural puncture headache in post-partum women at the Brigham and Women's Hospital by measuring VAS scores at times between 0 and 24 hours after the block. We hypothesize that there will be at least a 50% reduction in VAS scores at 4 hours after performing the sphenopalatine block as compared to baseline VAS scores.

Read the detailed description

Post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) is a major cause of morbidity in postpartum patients who received neuraxial anesthesia for labor analgesia or cesarean delivery. The headache in PDPH is thought to be due to loss of cerebrospinal fluid causing downward traction on the meninges with parasympathetic ally mediated reflex vasodilation of the meningeal vessels. The epidural blood patch is currently the gold-standard treatment for postdural puncture headache, however it is an invasive procedure with possible risks and complications including bleeding, infection, pain, hematoma, neurologic complications, and repeat dural puncture. Patients are often offered conservative treatment including medications, bed rest, abdominal binders, and fluids for at least 24 hours prior to being offered an epidural blood patch. Once the decision is made to proceed with a blood patch, it may take several hours before the procedure is performed due to staffing issues. We propose that the sphenopalatine ganglion block, a relatively noninvasive procedure which has been used by neurologists as a treatment for a variety of types of headaches, may play a role in the treatment of postdural puncture headache in the obstetric population.The sphenopalatine ganglion is a parasympathetic ganglion located in the pterygopalatine fossa which can be accessed topically through the nose. The proposed mechanism of the sphenopalatine ganglion block is parasympathetic blockade preventing the profound vasodilation associated with the headache after a dural puncture, thus providing the patient with symptomatic relief. While the sphenopalatine ganglion block has been used by neurologists for the treatment of migraines and cluster headaches for years, little is known about its effectiveness in the treatment of post-dural puncture headache in post-partum women. A small case series by Kent et al demonstrated that offering the sphenopalatine ganglion block as a first-line treatment for post-dural puncture headache provided symptomatic relief and reduced the need for epidural blood patch. If the sphenopalatine ganglion block is found to be an effective treatment for post-dural puncture headache in the obstetric population, the block could be offered to patients as a firstline treatment as a way to improve VAS scores, reduce the need for medications with potential side effects, and possibly reduce the need for epidural blood patch.The primary outcome will be change in VAS scores at 4 hours after the sphenopalatine ganglion block. Secondary outcomes will include time to first Fioricet dose after the sphenopalatine ganglion block, presence of nausea at 4 hours, presence of neck pain at 4 hours, presence of visual changes at 4 hours, change in VAS scores at 12 hours, change in VAS scores at 24 hours, and need for epidural blood patch.

02

Conditions studied

  • Post-Dural Puncture Headache

Keywords

  • sphenopalatine block
03

In context

Post-Dural Puncture Headache

122 studies on the registry are indexed under Post-Dural Puncture Headache; 27 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 20 is below the median of 80 across 79 interventional studies indexed under Post-Dural Puncture Headache.

Browse Post-Dural Puncture Headache studies →

Lead sponsor

Brigham and Women's Hospital is the lead sponsor of 1,267 studies on the registry; 228 are open to participants now.

Of its 116 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 65 (56%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 50 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • All postpartum women aged 18-50 who received neuraxial anesthesia for labor or cesarean delivery and are diagnosed with a post-dural puncture headache within 72 hours post-partum will be eligible to participate.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with a history of migraines, chronic headaches, chronic narcotic use, chronic neurological disorder, bleeding disorder, deformity of nasal septum, allergy to local anesthetics, nasal polyps, frequent nosebleeds, those with a diagnosis of pregnancy induced hypertension or pre-eclampsia in the most recent pregnancy, and those with nasal or sinus surgery within the past year will be ineligible to participate.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
20 participants (estimated)

Interventions

  • ProcedureSphenopalatine ganglion block

    The patient will be placed supine, with head in sniffing position. Two long cotton-tipped applicators will be soaked in 4% lidocaine for 30 seconds. An anesthesia provider, after visually inspecting each nostril for any sign of deformity or blockage, will perform the block. A cotton tipped applicator will be inserted into one nostril at an angle perpendicular to the face, and will be advanced to the back of the nasopharynx until resistance is met. The procedure will be repeated in the other nostril. If the patient experiences any pain or discomfort, the physician will stop and redirect the applicator. The applicators will be left in place for 10 minutes, and then removed by the anesthesia provider.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in VAS scores for headache at 4 hours after the sphenopalatine ganglion block.

    measured VAS for headache

    Time frame: 4 h post-intervention

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time to first request of medication for symptom control after the sphenopalatine ganglion block,

    Time frame: 24 h

  2. Need for blood patch

    performance of epidural blood patch for treatment of PDPH

    Time frame: 24 h

  3. Presence of nausea, neck pain, visual changes post-intervention

    yes/no questions

    Time frame: periodic questioning over 24h

  4. Symptomatic relief of headache after the block

    VAS scores at different time points via pain diaries

    Time frame: 24 h

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Kent S, Mehaffey G. Transnasal sphenopalatine ganglion block for the treatment of postdural puncture headache in obstetric patients. J Clin Anesth. 2016 Nov;34:194-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.04.009. Epub 2016 May 11. PubMed 27687372 ↗
  • Nair AS, Rayani BK. Sphenopalatine ganglion block for relieving postdural puncture headache: technique and mechanism of action of block with a narrative review of efficacy. Korean J Pain. 2017 Apr;30(2):93-97. doi: 10.3344/kjp.2017.30.2.93. Epub 2017 Mar 31. PubMed 28416992 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — All data obtained during this study, both clinical and other data including pain diaries, will be kept confidential. Participants will be de-identified using codes so that the names of the study participants will be known only to the study investigators. No information about the identity of individual subjects will be used for publication. The pain diaries and consent forms will be kept in a locked file cabinet. All study data will be kept on a password-protected computer and only the research investigators will have access to the database.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Jan 2018; primary completion for Dec 2018, 11 months later.

Of 33 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Post-Dural Puncture Headache, half reached primary completion within 9 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 4 and three quarters within 32. This study's planned 11 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 34 studies reached it within 9 months; a quarter within 4 and three quarters within 32.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 21, 2017
First posted
Dec 28, 2017
StartEst.
Jan 2018
Primary completionEst.
Dec 2018
CompletionEst.
Apr 2019
Last update
Dec 28, 2017
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 28, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03385772
Responsible party
Mihaela Podovei (Instructor, Harvard Medical School, Staff Anesthesiologist, Department of Anesthesia, Brigham and Women's Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 28, 2017
Start date
Jan 2018 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 2018 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 2019 (estimated)
Last update
Dec 28, 2017

Study contacts

Mihaela Podovei, MD
Contact
mpodovei@bwh.harvard.edu
6176715012
Jessica Wrobel, MD
Contact
jwrobel@bwh.harvard.edu

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Dec 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion