ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03382717Updated Mar 15, 2024

Efficacy and Safety of a Medical Device for the Treatment of Toenail Onychomycosis

An interventional study of Excilor Forte and Loceryl 5% in Onychomycosis of Toenail, sponsored by Oystershell NV. Completed at 2 sites in Tunisia. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-03-15.

Sponsored by Oystershell NV · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 1 month after the study started (first participant enrolled Oct 2016, registered Dec 2017).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
102
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study evaluates the effect of the medical device "Excilor® Forte" in the treatment of toenail onychomycosis. Half of the participants will receive the tested product and the other half will receive a comparator (Amorolfin 5%). Patients will be followed during 6 months.

Read the detailed description

Subjects with a great toenail, affected by onychomycosis, were treated with the test medical device or reference product, respectively. After 180 days, blind assessment of the % of healthy surface (primary end point) of the great toenail was performed to compare the effect of both treatments, and to evaluate improvement versus baseline (day 0), respectively. Additionally, blind assessment of the percentage of healthy surface of the great toenail was performed at all other visits (D30, D60, D120) to evaluate changes from baseline between both treatment groups. For this purpose, digital macrophotographs were analysed by a blinded investigator using Adobe Photoshop software.

02

Conditions studied

  • Onychomycosis of Toenail

Browse trials for

03

In context

Onychomycosis

158 studies on the registry are indexed under Onychomycosis; 16 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 102 is above the median of 60 across 143 interventional studies indexed under Onychomycosis.

Browse Onychomycosis studies →

Lead sponsor

Oystershell NV is the lead sponsor of 18 studies on the registry; 6 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Subject having given her/his informed, written consent.

    • Subject cooperative and aware of the modalities of use and the necessity and duration of the controls so that perfect adhesion to the protocol can be expected.
    • Subject being psychologically able to understand information and to give their/his/her consent.
    • Age: more than 18 years.
    • Subject with superficial onychomycosis on at least one great toenail or light to moderate disto-lateral onychomycosis (without matrix involvement and involvement \<2/3 of the tablet).
    • Subject with positive KOH staining.
    • Subject having stopped any systemic antifungal treatment since at least 6 months before inclusion and/or any topical antifungal treatment since at least 3 months before inclusion.
    • Female subjects of should use an accepted regimen since at least 12 weeks before the beginning of the study, during all the study and at least 1 month after study end.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subject considered by the Investigator likely to be non-compliant with the protocol.
  • Patient enrolled in another clinical trial during the test period.

    • Woman being pregnant, nursing or planning a pregnancy during the course of this study.
  • Subject having a known allergy to one of the constituents of the tested products.
  • Patient suffering from serious or progressive diseases (to investigator's discretion) such as uncontrolled diabetes, peripheral circulatory disease, , psoriasis, lichen planus, pathology...
  • Subject with cutaneous pathology on studied zone (other than onychomycosis like angioma, dermatitis...).
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
102 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Excilor Forte

    One application of the MD daily (at same time point), preferably after showering/bathing, during the complete study period.

    Device: Excilor Forte

  • Active comparator
    Loceryl 5%

    One application per week of the positive control Loceryl 5% during the whole study period.

    Drug: Loceryl 5%

Interventions

  • DeviceExcilor Forte

    1 application per day during 6 months

  • 1 application per week during 6 months

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Variation of the percentage of healthy surface after 30, 60, 120, and 180 days between both treatments, and versus baseline. Evaluation is done by digital analysis of photographs of the great, infected toenail

    Subjects with a great toenail, affected by onychomycosis, were treated with the test medical device or reference product, respectively. After 180 days, blind assessment of the percentage of healthy surface (primary efficacy endpoint) of the great toenail was performed to evaluate changes from baseline between both treatment groups. Additionally, blind assessment of the percentage of healthy surface of the great toenail will be performed at all other visits (day 30, 60, and 120, respectively) to evaluate changes from baseline between both treatment groups

    Time frame: After 30, 60, 120 and 180 days of treatment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Evaluation of clinical efficacy by the investigator, assessing the following parameters: onychomycosis evolution, onycholysis, dystrophy, discoloration, and nail thickening, following treatment with test medical device versus reference product.

    Onycholysis, nail distrophy, nail discoloration, and nail thickening was evaluated by a blinded investigator, using the following scores: 0 = none, 1 = very slight, 2 = slight, 3 = moderate, and 4 = severe. Onychomycosis evolution was scored as follows: 1 = failure (aggravation, increase total infected area), 2 = status quo, 3 = improvement (decrease of total infected area), 4 = success: disappearance of the total infected area. In order to compare changes in nail dystrophy, discoloration, and nail thickening between baseline and day 180, five categories were reduced to two categories (none to slight versus moderate to severe). The Mc Nemar test for paired data was used to test if there was a change in nail dystrophy, discoloration, and nail thickening between baseline and day 180. A chi-square test test was performed to compare changes between both treatments in onychomycosis evolution. Note: scores are used and for this reason, no units of measure can be assigned.

    Time frame: After 30, 60, 120 and 180 days of treatment

  2. Evaluation of microbiological efficacy of the product, using KOH staining and fungal culture on D0 and D180 versus reference product.

    Patients with positive KOH staining were included in the study. In addition, a fungal culture was performed to identify the involved species. At day 180, a new KOH staining and fungal culture was performed to evaluate the impact of each treatment on both microbiological parameters.

    Time frame: At baseline (day 0) and after 180 days of treatment

  3. Evaluation of product tolerance at each visit during the trial, assessed by the investigator by clinical evaluation and subject interrogatory.

    The investigator assigned a score from 0 (bad tolerance) to 3 (very good tolerance).

    Time frame: After 30, 60, 120 and 180 days of treatment

  4. Evaluation of the quality of life of the subjects using a validated questionnaire (NailQoL) before (baseline), after 60 and 180 days of treatment with test product, versus comparator.

    A NailQol global score of 0 corresponds with a quality of life never altered by onychomycosis, whereas a score of 100 corresponds to a quality of life that is always affected by onychomycosis.

    Time frame: After 60 and 180 days of treatment

  5. Subject evaluation using an evaluation questionnaire, performed at each visit.

    A questionnaire was included to evaluate product usability and functionality of Excilor Forte. The questionnaire was completed at each evaluation point (day 30, 60, 120, and 180, respectively). General questions were asked regarding the cosmetic effect (e.g. smoothening, brightening effect, conventional packaging..), overall satisfaction (e.g. smell, fits daily routine ...), product application (e.g. ease of application, drying time, stress-resistance, combination with top coat...), purchase intent and tolerance were asked. Subjects needed to score as follows: strongly agree, agree, neutral, disagree, strongly disagree, not concerned. Data were summarized in frequencies.

    Time frame: After 30, 60, 120 and 180 days of treatment

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • Hospital Habib Thameur
    Tunis, Tunisia
  • Principal instruction military hospital
    Tunis, Tunisia
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Eertmans F, Doss N, Rossel B, Adriaens E. Daily Application of an Aqueous, Acidifying, Peelable Nail Polish versus Weekly Amorolfine for Topical Onychomycosis Treatment: A Prospective, Randomized, Blinded Trial. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2018 Sep;8(3):463-473. doi: 10.1007/s13555-018-0254-1. Epub 2018 Jul 26. PubMed 30051298 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 15, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03382717
Lead sponsor
Oystershell NV
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 26, 2017
Start date
Oct 26, 2016
Primary completion
Aug 26, 2017
Completion
Aug 26, 2017
Last update
Mar 15, 2024

Study contacts

Nejib Doss, MD
principal investigator · Principal Instruction military hospital of Tunis

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion