ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07244523Updated Nov 24, 2025

Efficacy and Safetyof a Medical Device With a Physical Mode of Action (X92001919) Versus Paranix Anti-lice Shampoo.

An interventional study of Pulverize (X92001919) and Paranix Anti-Lice Shampoo in Lice; Head Lice, sponsored by Oystershell NV. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 2 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-11-24.

Sponsored by Oystershell NV · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Mar 2026, 8 months ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
34
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
2 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Comparison of the efficacy of a new medical device with a physical mode of action to Paranix anti-lice shampoo in the treatment of head lice infestation.

Read the detailed description

Pediculosis capitis or head lice infestation is a human medical condition caused by the infestation of the hair by the parasitic insect Pediculus humanus capitis (human head lice). When lice feed, they inject saliva into the scalp. The saliva is an anticoagulant which keeps blood from clotting making their feeding process easier. Many individuals experience an allergic reaction to the saliva, causing up to 50% of the population with head lice to itch. For this reason, the most common symptom of infestation is pruritus (itching) on the head. The bite reaction is very mild and it can be rarely seen between the hairs. In rare cases, the itch scratch cycle can lead to secondary infection. Swelling of the local lymph nodes and fever are rare.

There are a range of interventions available for the management of head lice. The main stay of therapy has been largely dependent on insecticidal-based approaches for several decades. However, the accumulating evidence with resistance to frontline insecticidal treatments like pyrethrins, permethrin and malathion has led to a growing incentive to develop newer and more effective treatments to treat the condition safely [3]. Over the past couple of decades, alternative candidates have been introduced into the market, including products with a physical mode of action that works via dehydration and suffocation of the lice [4-8].

The tested product has been developed with the ambition to offer a complete and safe head lice treatment, highly effective against head lice and eggs, whilst also offering ultimate convenience in use - making treatment of head lice infestation easy, and effective in few minutes. This is a medical device, not yet on the market, with a physical mode of action of suffocation and dehydration. The comparator product, Paranix® Anti-Lice Shampoo, is a reference product with a physical mode of action, available on the market in Europe as a class I medical device.

The main objective of the current study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety on head lice treatment of the device X92001919 versus Paranix® Anti-Lice Shampoo comparator.

02

Conditions studied

  • Lice; Head Lice

Browse trials for

03

In context

Lice Infestations

43 studies on the registry are indexed under Lice Infestations; 4 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 34 is below the median of 105 across 42 interventional studies indexed under Lice Infestations.

Browse Lice Infestations studies →

Lead sponsor

Oystershell NV is the lead sponsor of 18 studies on the registry; 6 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
2 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Healthy subject (except head lice infestation) based on medical history;
  • Gender: male or female;
  • Age: 2 years and above at the time of enrolment ;
  • Subject with a slight to moderate lice infestation (according to EU norms)
  • Subjects with various hair type (from 1 to 3C in the hair scale below) and hair length (from short to mid length hair, not exceeding shoulder)
  • Documented oral for all subjects, including minors, given freely and expressly before the start of the study
  • Written informed consent for subjects ≥18 years or legal guardian for subjects \< 18 years given freely and expressly before start of the study;
  • Written assent for subjects ≥12 to \<18 years.
  • Subject/Subject's legal guardian is psychologically able to understand the study related information and to give written informed consent;
  • Females of must have a negative pregnancy test before the beginning of the study and agree to use a reliable method of during the study.
  • Subject agrees not to cut or chemically treat their hair while participating in the study.
  • Subjects agrees not to use any other anti-lice treatment or medicated hair grooming products for the duration of the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • In terms of population

    1. Pregnant (confirmed by pregnancy test at D0 for women of ) or nursing woman or planning a pregnancy during the study;
    2. Subject who had been deprived of their freedom by administrative or legal decision or adult subject who is under guardianship;
    3. Subject in a social or sanitary establishment;
    4. Subject in an exclusion period from a previous study or who is currently participating in another study on hair/scalp or who participated to another clinical study on hair/scalp within 3 months before first visit.
    5. Subject suspected to be non-compliant according to the Investigator's judgment.
    6. Subject with curly or frizzy hair (from 4A to 4C in the hair type scale above).
    7. Subject with hair length below the shoulder.
    8. Subjects with more than 24 lice on the head.
  • In terms of associated pathology 9. Subject suffering from a severe or progressive disease or any other pathology that may interfere with the evaluation of the study results.

    10. Subject with a cutaneous disease on the studied zone (scalp and hair). 11. Subject with severe scratches or open wounds/skin damages on the scalp (lice bites allowed however).

    12. Subject with a known or suspected allergy to any of the components/materials of the products, anti-lice comb or post- treatment shampoo.

    13. Subject who has diabetes (type 1 or 2). 14. Subject with known or suspected immune deficiency or disease.

  • Relating to previous or ongoing treatment 15. Subject undergoing a topical treatment on the test area or a systemic treatment with:

    • anti-inflammatory medication and/or anti-histamines during the previous 2 weeks and during the study;
    • during the 2 previous weeks and during the study;
    • retinoids and/or immunosuppressors during the 3 previous months and during the study;
    • any medication stabilized for less than one month. 16. Subject who received an anti-lice treatment in the previous 2 months.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(6)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

Autoimmune disease

A condition in which the immune system attacks the body’s own tissues, such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, psoriasis, type 1 diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease.

Immunotherapy studies often leave out active autoimmune disease, and some name exceptions, such as thyroid disease on replacement hormone. Check the exceptions this study lists.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
34 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Pulverize (X92001919)

    Treatment with product Pulverize at Visit 1 (Day 0),Visit 2 (Day 3) and Visit 3 (Day 7). Counting alive lice and nymphs in the hair at Visit 1 (Day 0), Visit 2 (Day 3), Visit 3 (Day 7) and Visit 4 (Day 10).

    Device: Pulverize (X92001919)

  • Active comparator
    Paranix Anti-Lice Shampoo

    Treatment with product Paranix Anti-Lice Shampoo at Visit 1 (Day 0) and Visit 3 (Day 7). Counting alive lice and nymphs in the hair at Visit 1 (Day 0), Visit 2 (Day 3), Visit 3 (Day 7) and Visit 4 (Day 10).

    Device: Paranix Anti-Lice Shampoo

Interventions

  • DevicePulverize (X92001919)

    Treatment at Day 0, Day 3 and Day 7 with the Pulverize Dry Shampoo formulation (X92001919)

  • DeviceParanix Anti-Lice Shampoo

    Treatment at Day 0 and Day 7 with the Paranix Anti-Lice Shampoo

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Efficacy of Pulverize (X92001919) compared to the comparator Paranix Anti-Lice Shampo.

    Evaluate the efficacy of Pulverize (X92001919) compared to the comparator Paranix Anti-Lice Shampoo on the treatment of head lice infestation, after one treatment consisting of 3 applications. Efficacy of the treatment will be defined as the cure rate at the end of day 10, corrected for re-infestation.

    Time frame: 10 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Efficacy comparison (uncorrected for re-infestation)

    Evaluate and compare the efficacy for both products. (cure rate at the end of day 10, uncorrected for re-infestation).

    Time frame: 10 days

  2. Cure rate on day 3 and day 7

    Evaluation of the cure rate on day 3 and day 7 in both separate groups, and comparison of both product effect after only one (on day 3) or two applications (day 7 for Pulverize versus day 10 for Paranix).

    Time frame: day 3 for cure rate of first application day 7/day 10 for second application (depending on treatment).

  3. Indirect efficacy on eggs and evaluate potential re-infestation

    Presence of live lice and nymphs, for both groups and between groups, without combing on hair and close to scalp on day 0 (prior to treatment to assess severity of the infestation), day 3, day 7, and day 10. These evaluations will assess indirect efficacy on eggs and evaluate potential re-infestation.

    Time frame: Treatment time (day 0 - day 10

  4. General well-being of subject (Esthetical effect)

    Analysis of subject's (or subject's parents/guardians) questionnaire at day 0 and day 7 to evaluate esthetical effect of the product. A comparison of the answers will be performed between the two products.

    Time frame: Day 0 and day 7 of the study

  5. Safety by Adverse Events (AEs)

    Number and evaluation of Adverse Events (AEs) reported during the study.

    Time frame: Duration of the study (day 0 - day 10)

  6. Local tolerability on 5-point scales

    For both products, evaluation of local tolerability by the dermatologist on 5-point scales including dandruff state, greasy scalp, erythema, desquamation dryness, burning sensation, paraesthesia and pruritus and on 4 point-scales including skin irritation and eye irritation, on D0 (before and after product application), D3 (before and after application), D7 (before and after product application) and D10.

    Time frame: Duration of study (day 0- day 10)

  7. Global tolerability

    For both products, assessment of global tolerability by the dermatologist on day 10 on a 4-point scale.

    Time frame: Day 10

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 24, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07244523
Lead sponsor
Oystershell NV
Collaborators
Eurofins Dermscan Pharmascan
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 24, 2025
Start date
Feb 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Mar 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 24, 2025

Study contacts

Aslham Doarika, Dr.
Contact
dr@insight-research.com
+2304670231

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Nov 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion