ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07828184MICKAELUpdated Sep 22, 2026

URGO MICKAEL Filmogel, Topical Treatment of Onychomycosis

An interventional study of URGO MICKAEL Filmogel in Onychomycosis of Toenail, sponsored by CEN Biotech. Recruiting at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 85 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-22.

Sponsored by CEN Biotech · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 7 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jan 2026, registered Sep 2026).
  • Started Jan 2026; still recruiting 9 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
54
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 85 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The objective of this clinical study is to evaluate the performance of URGO MICKAEL Filmogel as a topical treatment for mild to moderate onychomycosis

Read the detailed description

Patients with a positive dermatophyte/fungal culture from a toenail sample are eligible for inclusion in the study. Patients apply the device under investigation daily to the affected toenails.

Patients are followed for up to 6 months, or until a negative fungal culture is obtained and the clinical appearance of the treated nails indicates resolution and significant improvement of the onychomycosis.

Four visits will be organized at the investigation site under the supervision of the principal investigator:

  • Baseline / Inclusion visit (V0)
  • 3 follow-up visits (V1, V2 and final V3) carried out 1, 3 and 6 months after the initiation of the treatment.
02

Conditions studied

  • Onychomycosis of Toenail

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Onychomycosis
  • URGO MICKAEL Filmogel
  • damaged toenail
03

In context

Onychomycosis

158 studies on the registry are indexed under Onychomycosis; 16 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 54 is close to the median of 60 across 143 interventional studies indexed under Onychomycosis.

Browse Onychomycosis studies →

Lead sponsor

CEN Biotech is the lead sponsor of 18 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 85 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. With 1 or 2 big toenail(s) damaged, which the clinical appearance of at least one great toenail is suggestive of onychomycosis.
  2. Big toenails with distal mild to moderate subungual onychomycosis (OSI Score \< 16, no proximal or lunula involvement, and ≤50% nail involvement).
  3. Able to understand and comply with protocol requirements and instructions, including applying the device.
  4. Affiliated to a French Health insurance scheme.
  5. Having signed an .

8. With 1 or 2 big toenail(s) damaged by onychomycosis confirmed by positive culture for dermatophytes / fungi on at least one big toenail.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Having a known allergy or or to one of the constituents of UOA.
  2. The toenail(s) to be included in the study present(s) severe onychomycosis (which should be treated by systemic drug), or is/are unstructured, has/have severe microcracking or severe onycholysis, or the nail(s) or nail(s) contour has/have severe lesions.
  3. Having used any systemic antifungal treatment in the last 6 months before Baseline/pre-inclusion visit V0.
  4. Having used any topical antifungal treatment in the last 3 months before Baseline/pre-inclusion visit V0.
  5. With cutaneous pathology on studied zone (onychogryphosis, congenital ungual deformation, toe deformation or of the foot, hallux valgus, hallux rigidus, hallux extensus, toe claws or other pathologies than onychomycosis like angioma, dermatitis…).
  6. With a condition or receiving medication which, according to the investigator's judgment, could jeopardize the safety of the subject.
  7. Suffering from serious or progressive diseases (to investigator's discretion) such as uncontrolled diabetes, peripheral circulatory disease, lichen planus, pathology, chronic venous insufficiency, Peripheral Arterial Obstructive Disease, delay, or lack of ungual growth etc.
  8. May not respect the constraints imposed by the protocol.
  9. Enrolled in another clinical trial or being in a period of exclusion from a previous clinical trial.
  10. Woman of childbearing age (except menopausal, hysterectomised, sterilized) not using effective (oral contraceptives, intra-uterine device, contraceptive implant, or condoms).
  11. Person belonging to a population referred to in articles 64 (incapacitated subjects), 65 (minors), 66 (pregnant or breastfeeding women), 67 (persons performing mandatory military service, persons deprived of liberty, persons who, due to a judicial decision) and 68 (patients in emergency) of the MDR.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(5)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
54 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    URGO MICKAEL Filmogel

    Local treatment of big toenails with positive culture

    Device: URGO MICKAEL Filmogel

Interventions

  • DeviceURGO MICKAEL Filmogel

    The device is used daily on 1 or 2 big toenails for up to 6 months The investigator may decide to discontinue treatment at after 1 or 3 months if the studied toenail(s) meet all the following criteria: 1. Negative dermatophyte/fungal culture. 2. Healthy appearance of the studied toenail(s), defined by a score of 0 ("none") for all the following items: onycholysis, nail dystrophy, nail discoloration, and nail thickening.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Mycological cure rate evaluated at 6 months

    Mycological cure is defined by a negative culture for dermatophytes/fungi from the big toenail under study. A direct microscopic examination is performed after dissolving and staining the toenail sample using MYCETCOLOR® (Mycol60). The potassium hydroxide (KOH) test indicates the presence or absence of fungal elements. However, it does not provide information on the viability or etiology of any fungal elements detected. Therefore, the samples are also placed on a suitable culture medium and incubated at a controlled temperature for several days to several weeks. Fungal growth is monitored, and any colonies that appear are identified microscopically to determine the specific fungal species involved.

    Time frame: 180 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mycological cure rate evaluated at 1 month

    A direct microscopic examination is performed after dissolving and staining the toenail sample using MYCETCOLOR® (Mycol60). The potassium hydroxide (KOH) test indicates the presence or absence of fungal elements. However, it does not provide information on the viability or etiology of any fungal elements detected. Therefore, the samples are also placed on a suitable culture medium and incubated at a controlled temperature for several days to several weeks. Fungal growth is monitored, and any colonies that appear are identified microscopically to determine the specific fungal species involved.

    Time frame: 30 days

  2. Mycological cure rate evaluated at 3 months

    Mycological cure is defined by a negative culture for dermatophytes/fungi from the big toenail under study. A direct microscopic examination is performed after dissolving and staining the toenail sample using MYCETCOLOR® (Mycol60). The potassium hydroxide (KOH) test indicates the presence or absence of fungal elements. However, it does not provide information on the viability or etiology of any fungal elements detected. Therefore, the samples are also placed on a suitable culture medium and incubated at a controlled temperature for several days to several weeks. Fungal growth is monitored, and any colonies that appear are identified microscopically to determine the specific fungal species involved.

    Time frame: 90 days

  3. Change from baseline in onychomycosis severity at 1 month

    The severity of onychomycosis, assessed by a trained investigator, and using the global score of Onychomycosis Severity Index or OSI. It provides a numerical score ranging from 0 (normal nail) to 35 (total dystrophy with full matrix involvement), based on three components: * Nail Involvement Area (1-5 points): percentage of the nail plate affected by onychomycosis estimated visually (0, \[1-10\], \[11-25\], \[26-50\], \[51-75\], \[76-100\]) and translated into a score; * Disease proximity to matrix from distal edge (\<1/4, \[1/4 to 1/2\], \[1/2 to 3/4\], \>3/4). The area score is then multiplied based on the location of the infection (x1 if the involvement is distal and/or lateral only; x2 if the involvement extends proximally and/or reaches the nail matrix); * Additional Points for Nail Features: +10 points if presence of hyperkeratosis ≥2 mm or dermatophytoma (i.e., longitudinal streak or patch).

    Time frame: 30 days

  4. Change from baseline in onychomycosis severity at 3 months

    The severity of onychomycosis, assessed by a trained investigator, and using the global score of Onychomycosis Severity Index or OSI. It provides a numerical score ranging from 0 (normal nail) to 35 (total dystrophy with full matrix involvement), based on three components: * Nail Involvement Area (1-5 points): percentage of the nail plate affected by onychomycosis estimated visually (0, \[1-10\], \[11-25\], \[26-50\], \[51-75\], \[76-100\]) and translated into a score; * Disease proximity to matrix from distal edge (\<1/4, \[1/4 to 1/2\], \[1/2 to 3/4\], \>3/4). The area score is then multiplied based on the location of the infection (x1 if the involvement is distal and/or lateral only; x2 if the involvement extends proximally and/or reaches the nail matrix); * Additional Points for Nail Features: +10 points if presence of hyperkeratosis ≥2 mm or dermatophytoma (i.e., longitudinal streak or patch).

    Time frame: 90 days

  5. Change from baseline in onychomycosis severity at 6 months

    The severity of onychomycosis, assessed by a trained investigator, and using the global score of Onychomycosis Severity Index or OSI. It provides a numerical score ranging from 0 (normal nail) to 35 (total dystrophy with full matrix involvement), based on three components: * Nail Involvement Area (1-5 points): percentage of the nail plate affected by onychomycosis estimated visually (0, \[1-10\], \[11-25\], \[26-50\], \[51-75\], \[76-100\]) and translated into a score; * Disease proximity to matrix from distal edge (\<1/4, \[1/4 to 1/2\], \[1/2 to 3/4\], \>3/4). The area score is then multiplied based on the location of the infection (x1 if the involvement is distal and/or lateral only; x2 if the involvement extends proximally and/or reaches the nail matrix); * Additional Points for Nail Features: +10 points if presence of hyperkeratosis ≥2 mm or dermatophytoma (i.e., longitudinal streak or patch).

    Time frame: 180 days

  6. Change from baseline in toenail condition at 1 month

    Onycholysis, nail dystrophy, nail discoloration, and nail thickening assessed using the following scores: 0 = none, 1 = very slight, 2 = slight, 3 = moderate, and 4 = severe.

    Time frame: 30 days

  7. Change from baseline in toenail condition at 3 months

    Onycholysis, nail dystrophy, nail discoloration, and nail thickening assessed using the following scores: 0 = none, 1 = very slight, 2 = slight, 3 = moderate, and 4 = severe.

    Time frame: 90 days

  8. Change from baseline in toenail condition at 6 months

    Onycholysis, nail dystrophy, nail discoloration, and nail thickening assessed using the following scores: 0 = none, 1 = very slight, 2 = slight, 3 = moderate, and 4 = severe.

    Time frame: 180 days

  9. Clear toenail area in toenail with negative culture at 6 months

    Percentage of clear toenail area in toenail with negative culture.

    Time frame: 180 days

  10. Investigator's opinion on treatment efficacy at 1 month

    Opinion is addressed using the Investigator's Global Impression of change with 7 modalities from "very much worse" to "very much improved", to respond to: What is your opinion regarding the improvement of the treated toenail?

    Time frame: 30 days

  11. Investigator's opinion on treatment efficacy at 3 months

    Opinion is addressed using the Investigator's Global Impression of change with 7 modalities from "very much worse" to "very much improved", to respond to: What is your opinion regarding the improvement of the treated toenail?

    Time frame: 90 days

  12. Investigator's opinion on treatment efficacy at 6 months

    Opinion is addressed using the Investigator's Global Impression of change with 7 modalities from "very much worse" to "very much improved", to respond to: What is your opinion regarding the improvement of the treated toenail?

    Time frame: 180 days

  13. Investigator's opinion on toenail appearance at 1 month

    Opinion is addressed using the Investigator's Global Impression of change with 7 modalities from "very much worse" to "very much improved", to respond to: What is your opinion regarding the appearance of the treated toenail?

    Time frame: 30 days

  14. Investigator's opinion on toenail appearance at 3 months

    Opinion is addressed using the Investigator's Global Impression of change with 7 modalities from "very much worse" to "very much improved", to respond to: What is your opinion regarding the appearance of the treated toenail?

    Time frame: 90 days

  15. Investigator's opinion on toenail appearance at 6 months

    Opinion is addressed using the Investigator's Global Impression of change with 7 modalities from "very much worse" to "very much improved", to respond to: What is your opinion regarding the appearance of the treated toenail?

    Time frame: 180 days

  16. Patient's satisfaction with the treatment effectiveness at 1 month

    Opinion is addressed using questions with 5 modalities from "Not at all satisfied" to "Very satisfied", to respond to: What is your opinion regarding the appearance of the treated toenail?

    Time frame: 30 days

  17. Patient's satisfaction with the treatment effectiveness at 3 months

    Opinion is addressed using questions with 5 modalities from "Not at all satisfied" to "Very satisfied", to respond to: What is your opinion regarding the appearance of the treated toenail?

    Time frame: 90 days

  18. Patient's satisfaction with the treatment effectiveness at 6 months

    Opinion is addressed using questions with 5 modalities from "Not at all satisfied" to "Very satisfied", to respond to: What is your opinion regarding the appearance of the treated toenail?

    Time frame: 180 days

Other outcomes

  1. Occurrence of device deficiencies at 6 months

    Percentage of patients reporting device deficiencies defined as any inadequacy in the identity, quality, durability, reliability, inadequacy of information provided by the manufacturer, including labeling.

    Time frame: 180 days

  2. Occurrence of adverse events at 6 months

    Adverse events are coded using the MedDRA dictionary. Adverse events are classified according to their seriousness, their relationship to the device, and for adverse device effects, whether they are expected or unexpected.

    Time frame: 180 days

  3. Improvement in quality of life at 6 months

    Quality of life is assessed using a questionnaire composed of the following three scales: Nail Distress Scale: Subjects indicate how often they experience nail-related distress during the past week using a 5-point scale (4 = strongly disagree; 3 = disagree; 2 = neither agree nor disagree; 1 = agree; 0 = strongly agree). Nail Symptoms Scale: Subjects indicate how concerned they have been about their nail condition during the past week using a 5-point scale (4 = not at all; 3 = a little; 2 = somewhat; 1 = very; 0 = extremely). Physical Scale: Subjects indicate how their nail condition interferes with their activities during the past week using a 5-point scale (4 = never; 3 = rarely; 2 = sometimes; 1 = often; 0 = always). The raw scores each scale are added together to produce a total raw score which is converted to a score ranging from 0 (worst) to 100 (best), with higher scores indicating better outcomes.

    Time frame: 180 days

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — The informed consent obtained from participants does not include provisions for sharing individual participant data with external researchers

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jan 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2026, 11 months after the start.

Of 21 interventional studies with no phase under Onychomycosis, half reached primary completion within 13 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 7 and three quarters within 18. This study's planned 11 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 14, 2026
First posted
Sep 18, 2026
StartActual
Jan 28, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Dec 31, 2026
CompletionEst.
Jun 30, 2027
Last update
Sep 22, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 22, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07828184
Lead sponsor
CEN Biotech
Collaborators
URGO RECHERCHE INNOVATION & DEVELOPPEMENT
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 18, 2026
Start date
Jan 28, 2026
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 30, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 22, 2026

Study contacts

Amandine Fry
Contact
amandine.fry@groupecen.com
+33380680508
Carole Perrin, MD
principal investigator · CEN

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion