ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03381560LASSYCUpdated Jun 28, 2019

A Study to Evaluate the Symptoms Over 24 Hours in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease - LASSYC Study

An observational study in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, sponsored by AstraZeneca. Completed at 8 sites in Brazil. Open to participants aged 40 Years to 130 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-06-28.

Sponsored by AstraZeneca · Observational

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
602
Ages
40 Years to 130 Years
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-14

Among 284 studies in Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive by AstraZeneca — 14 open to participants now, 15 under way, 4 of them phase 3. Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive · AstraZeneca.

Enrollment
59th of 89
602 · median 976
Started
2017
with 13 others
Observational
90 of 284
7 open now
Registered
213th of 284
by date

Among the 284 studies in Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive by AstraZeneca, this one is the 59th largest by enrollment of the 89 observational ones that give a count, is one of 14 that started in 2017, is one of 90 observational ones, and was the 213th registered.

Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

5,522 studies on the registry are indexed under Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; 857 are open to participants now.

Browse Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive studies →

Open to participants now

14 of the 284 studies in Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive by AstraZeneca are open now, in 12 countries. Recruiting first, the newest first:

9 more — sign in →

By country, each count listing its studies:

All 14 open studies →

Who these studies take

Of the 557 Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive studies recruiting now, 306 (55%) set no upper age limit and 82 (15%) stop at 75 or younger; 29 take children under 18; 89 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 40 Years to 130 Years · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 284 studies in Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive by AstraZeneca, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

No previous studies have evaluated the frequency and severity of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) symptoms over a period of 24 hours (early morning, daytime and nigth-time symptoms) in stable COPD patients seen in clinical practice in Brazil. COPD is a common disease seen by primary care physicians and one of the most common diseases referred and diagnosed by pulmonologists. According to previous studies, symptoms of COPD can have a substantial impact on patients' quality of life and present a considerable degree of variation for the same degree of airflow limitation.

The objective of this study is to learn more about the burden of symptoms in the real-world population of COPD patients in Brazil. With the real life data coming from this study, it will be possible to describe 24-hour COPD symptoms in Brazil and their impact on patients' quality of life and other PROs, the relationship with patients´ behaviour regarding adherence to respiratory medication and burden of COPD symptoms in terms of the impact on health economics.

In the present study, the investigators will assess and characterize COPD symptoms over a period of 24 hours, by collecting information about the respiratory symptoms experienced at different times of the day and night in patients with stable COPD under real clinical practice conditions. In addition, the investigators will evaluate the correlation between each of these symptoms and the GOLD classification, adherence to respiratory treatment, level of dyspnea, disease severity, comorbidities and physical activity. Finally, the investigators will assess the relationship between 24h symptoms and direct cost related to treatment and HRU in the previous year to assess the burden of COPD symptoms.

The present study is based on a similar protocol applied in Latin-American patients, the LASSYC Study. Extracted data will be used for a Brazilian analysis of these outcomes and may be used in future analyses combined with the results of LASSYC Study for a global view of Latin America.

Read the detailed description

Background

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is a preventable and treatable disease with some significant extrapulmonary effects that may contribute to the severity in individual patients. Its pulmonary component is characterized by airflow limitation that is not fully reversible. The airflow limitation is usually progressive and associated with an abnormal inflammatory response of the lung to noxious particles or gases (i). Although smoking is one of the major and most frequent causes of COPD, other factors may be associated with its development. The narrowing of the airways, which is one of the main features of COPD, results from a combination of small airway disease and parenchymal destruction, as well as structural changes from the chronic inflammatory process. For this reason bronchoconstriction is one of the key targets of pharmacological interventions in the management of COPD.

This disease affects globally around 15% of all adults older than 40 years, resulting in pulmonary and extrapulmonary comorbidities and significant mortality (1,ii). The worldwide prevalence in people aged over 40 years is 10.1% overall, 11.8% for men, and 8.5% for women, according to the BOLD Study (iii). It is the fourth leading cause of death in the world and its prevalence is projected to increase in the coming years due to continued exposure to COPD risk factors (1). Two Latin-American epidemiological studies, the PLATINO Project iv and PREPOCOL v, have provided information on the prevalence of COPD in this region. PLATINO is a study on prevalence of COPD in individuals ≥40 years, carried out in five Latin American cities: Mexico City (Mexico), São Paulo (Brazil), Montevideo (Uruguay), Santiago de Chile (Chile), and Caracas (Venezuela). Using as diagnostic criteria post-BD FEV1/FVC ratio \<0.70, the overall prevalence of COPD in PLATINO is 14.3% (ranging from 7.8% in Mexico City to 19.7% in Montevideo) and in the city of São Paulo is 15.8 % (4,vi). Using the lower limit of normal criteria (LLN) of the post- BD FEV1/FVC ratio, the global COPD prevalence in PLATINO is 11.7%. This is even lower (9.5%) when using the post-BD FEV1/VEF6 \< LLN ratio (vii). PREPOCOL (5) assessed the prevalence in five cities in Colombia and reported an overall prevalence of 8.9% (from 6.2% in Barranquilla to 13,5% in Medellin).

Symptoms of COPD - including progressive dyspnea, chronic cough, excessive sputum production and decreased exercise tolerance - may considerably affect the patients' daily activities and quality of life (1,viii,ix). COPD symptoms have been reported to be worse at night and in the early morning (x,xi), which may be reflected in disturbed sleep and limitations on morning activities.

Moreover, the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is being recognized as an important outcome when evaluating patients with COPD and several studies have demonstrated that those patients in more severe disease stages presented worse HRQoL and it varied greatly within each stage of disease severity (xii).

From the patient´s point of view, dyspnea is one of the major symptoms that affect their quality of life (xiii). However, dyspnea varies considerably for the same degree of airflow limitation.

It is reported that poor patient's adherence to inhaled medication is shared by COPD and asthma patients (xiv). Non-adherence to inhaled therapy is associated with inadequate symptom control, higher healthcare utilization and costs, as well as decreases in health-related quality of life (12- 14). In practice guidelines of the Global Initiative for Asthma Management [GINA) (xv) and Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) (1)] is now specifically recommended evaluation and follow-up of the patient's adherence to inhaler devices.

Previous studies (xvi, xvii, xviii, xix) have shown that physical activity in COPD is associated with a better quality of life and less morbidity and mortality. In addition, comorbid conditions such as cardiovascular disease, anxiety and depressive disorders, lung cancer and osteoporosis are frequently observed in COPD patients and may affect COPD outcomes (xx). Sleep disorder is also common in COPD patients. In epidemiologic studies, more than 50% of patients with COPD complained of difficulty to maintain and initiate sleep, and 25% complained of excessive daytime sleepiness (xxi). The COTE Index establishes the relationship between these main comorbidities and the risk of death over a median of 51 months. This is a simple, disease-specific comorbidity index that helps assess the risk of mortality in patients with COPD (xxii).

It has been recently published the ASSESS Study (xxiii) regarding a cohort of 727 European patients. This observational study assessed the prevalence, severity and relationship between nighttime, early morning and daytime COPD symptoms and explored the relationship between 24-hour symptoms and other results reported by DPOC patients. It was shown that more than half of patients experienced COPD symptoms throughout the whole 24-hour period, and there was a significant relationship between them and the worse patient-reported outcome, suggesting that improving 24- hour symptoms should be an important consideration in the management of COPD.

COPD is associated with a substantial economic burden due to direct healthcare costs e.g. unplanned medical visits and hospitalization due to exacerbations (1,xxiv). More frequent exacerbations are associated with: more frequent/longer hospital stays; increased mortality risk; reduced quality of life (xxv); as well as indirect/societal costs due to loss of productivity and premature death in patients with COPD further increasing the economic burden of this disease (1,24-xxvi).

Rationale

No previous studies have evaluated the frequency and severity of COPD symptoms over a period of 24 hours (nighttime, early morning and daytime symptoms) in stable COPD patients seen in clinical practice in Brazil. COPD is a common disorder seen by primary care physicians and one of the most common diseases referred and diagnosed by pulmonologists. According to studies, COPD symptoms can have a substantial impact on patients' quality of daily life and present a considerable degree of variation for the same degree of airflow limitation.

This study aims to learn more about the burden of symptoms in the real-world population of COPD patients in Brazil. With the real life data from this study, it will be possible to describe 24-hour COPD symptoms and their impact on patients' quality of life and other PRO, the relationship with patients' behaviour regarding adherence to respiratory medication and the burden of COPD symptoms in terms of the impact on health economics in Brazil.

In the present study, the investigators will assess and characterize COPD symptoms over a period of 24 hours, by collecting information about the respiratory symptoms experienced at different times of the day and night-time in patients with stable COPD under real clinical practice conditions. In addition, the investigators will evaluate the correlation between each of these symptoms and the 2013 GOLD classification, adherence to respiratory treatment, level of dyspnea, disease severity, comorbidities and physical activity. Finally, the investigators will assess the relationship between 24h symptoms and direct cost related to treatment and HRU in the previous year to assess the burden of COPD symptoms.

03

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Keywords

  • LASSYC; COPD symptoms.
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years to 130 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients of 40 years and older, smokers or ex smokers of >= 10 pack/years with previous COPD diagnosis, attending outpatient specialists consults in Brazil.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Patients will only be included in the study if they meet all of the following criteria:

  1. Male or female patients aged 40 years or older.
  2. Patient diagnosed with for 1 year or more.
  3. Patient presenting at least one spirometry with COPD criteria, /FVC fixed ratio \<0.70 post BD, in the last 12 months.
  4. Patient is a current smoker or an ex-smoker with a smoking history of ≥ 10 pack- years.
  5. Stable patients, as stated in medical records or patient reports during visit, defined as: without treatment due to exacerbation at study visit or within the previous 2 months, and without changes in maintenance COPD treatment regimen over the preceding 2 months (avoid first-time patient from participating in the study).
  6. Patients must be able and willing to read and understand written instructions, and understand and complete the questionnaires required by the protocol.
  7. After receiving full explanation, patients must have signed an document indicating that they understand the purpose of and the procedures required for the study and are willing to participate in the study.

Exclusion criteria

EXCLUSION CRITERIA

Patients who meet any of the following criteria will not be eligible to participate in the study:

  1. Patient with a diagnosis of sleep apnea syndrome or other chronic respiratory disease different from chronic obstructive diseases.
  2. An acute or chronic condition that, in the investigator's opinion, would limit patient's ability to complete the questionnaires or participate in this study.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

COPD

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: long-term lung disease that makes it hard to breathe out, including emphysema and chronic bronchitis.

FEV1

From a breathing test (spirometry): how much air you can blow out in the first second. Often given as a percentage of what is expected for your age, height and sex.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
602 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Frequency of COPD-related nighttime symptoms

    Time frame: 24 hours

  2. Mean severity of COPD-related nighttime symptoms

    Time frame: 24 hours

  3. Frequency of COPD-related daytime symptoms

    Time frame: 24 hours

  4. Mean severity of COPD-related daytime symptoms

    Time frame: 24 hours

  5. Frequency of COPD-related early morning symptoms

    Time frame: 24 hours

  6. Mean severity of COPD-related early morning symptoms

    Time frame: 24 hours

  7. Interrelationship between early morning, day and nighttime symptoms

    Time frame: 24 hours

Secondary outcomes

  1. Relationship between early morning, day and nighttime symptoms and adherence to respiratory medication.

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. Relationship between early morning, day and nighttime symptoms and disease classification (GOLD 2013)

    Time frame: 6 months

  3. Relationship between early morning, day and nighttime symptoms and disease severity and prognostic assessment (BODEx)

    Time frame: 6 months

  4. Relationship between early morning, day and nighttime symptoms and level of dyspnea (mMRC)

    Time frame: 6 months

  5. Relationship between early morning, day and nighttime symptoms and HRQoL (CAT)

    Time frame: 6 months

  6. Relationship between early morning, day and nighttime symptoms and presence of comorbidities (COTE)

    Time frame: 6 months

  7. Relationship between early morning, day and nighttime symptoms and history of exacerbations within the past 12 months

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Study locations

8 sites
  • Research Site
    Blumenau, 89030-101, Brazil
  • Research Site
    Botucatu, 18618970, Brazil
  • Research Site
    Campinas, 13083, Brazil
  • Research Site
    Porto Alegre, 90035-074, Brazil
  • Research Site
    Rio de Janeiro, 20551-030, Brazil
  • Research Site
    Sao Bernardo do Campo, 09750-420, Brazil
  • Research Site
    Sao Paulo, 04023-062, Brazil
  • Research Site
    São Paulo, 5403000, Brazil
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Cukier A, Godoy I, Costa CHD, Rubin AS, Gregorio MG, Albuquerque Neto AA, Lima MA, Pereira MC, Tanni SE, Athanazio RA, Bessa EJC, Wehrmeister FC, Lourenco CB, Menezes AMB. Symptom variability over the course of the day in patients with stable COPD in Brazil: a real-world observational study. J Bras Pneumol. 2019 Dec 20;46(3):e20190223. doi: 10.36416/1806-3756/e20190223. eCollection 2020. PubMed 31859705 ↗

Related links

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Nov 2017 to primary completion in Jun 2018, 7 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 18, 2017
First posted
Dec 22, 2017
StartActual
Nov 7, 2017
Primary completionActual
Jun 30, 2018
CompletionActual
Jun 30, 2018
Last update
Jun 28, 2019
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 28, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03381560
Lead sponsor
AstraZeneca
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 22, 2017
Start date
Nov 7, 2017
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2018
Completion
Jun 30, 2018
Last update
Jun 28, 2019

Study contacts

Alberto Cukier
principal investigator · Instituto do Coração do Hospital das Clínicas da FMUSP
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion