ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03378271Updated Feb 29, 2024

Accuracy and Treatment Experience of Two Glucose Monitoring Systems Tested in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes and Renal Impairment

An interventional study of Simultanious CGM/FGM in Diabetes Mellitus Complication and Renal Impairment, sponsored by Vastra Gotaland Region. Completed at 1 site in Sweden. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 79 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-02-29.

Sponsored by Vastra Gotaland Region · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 7 months after the study started (first participant enrolled May 2016, registered Dec 2017).

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 79 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The study aims to evaluate the accuracy of two commercial glucose monitoring systems in patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes and renal impairment, including patients with or without dialysis. Patients treatment experience will even be evaluated.

Read the detailed description

Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) and Flash glucose monitoring (FGM) are tools today mainly used in the treatment of patients with type 1 diabetes. Both glucose monitors are subcutaneous tissue sensors, which provide a tissue fluid glucose measurement every 1 to 5 minutes. The real-time glucose sensor trend data can help patients with diabetes better manage their insulin needs with meals and exercise. The following glucose monitoring systems are two of the most current sensor technologies available for clinical use the Dexcom G5 (Dexcom Corporation), and the FGM (Abbot Freestyle Libre).

High glucose levels in patients with type 1 or 2-diabetes lead to increased risks of micro- and macrovascular complications, while low glucose levels may lead to unconsciousness. Therefore, it is important for patients to manage glucose levels as close to normal (4-7 mmol/l) as possible. This is generally performed by appropriate dosage of different insulins, calculated from the preprandial glucose level, carbohydrate intake, and physical activity. In spite of careful dosage, glucose levels often become too low or too high.

CGM is a novel tool to detect low and high glucose levels, and it is capable of sounding an alarm for low and high glucose levels. CGM has been available in clinical practice in Sweden for approximately 5 years. FGM is as CGM also a novel tool to detect low and high glucose levels, but is not capable of sounding an alarm for low and high glucose levels. FGM has been available in clinical practice in Sweden since late 2014.

Since both CGM and FGM measure the glucose level by a sensor in subcutaneous tissue, there is uncertainty in the estimation of blood glucose levels. The accuracy of a certain CGM or FGM system can be assessed by comparing the glucose levels estimated by the glucose monitors with measured glucose levels in capillary blood samples. To our knowledge there are no studies comparing the accuracy of the Dexcom G5 sensor with the Freestyle Libre sensor. In the current study, we will compare the accuracy and treatment experience of these two glucose monitoring sensors available on the market for clinical use in patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes and renal impairment with an eGFR\<30 ml/min both in and not in dialysis.

02

Conditions studied

  • Diabetes Mellitus Complication
  • Renal Impairment

Keywords

  • Continuous Glucose Monitoring
  • Flash glucose Monitoring
  • Renal Impairment
  • Type 1 Diabetes
  • Type 2 Diabetes
03

In context

Diabetes Complications

267 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetes Complications; 54 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 40 is below the median of 72 across 171 interventional studies indexed under Diabetes Complications.

Browse Diabetes Complications studies →

Lead sponsor

Vastra Gotaland Region is the lead sponsor of 276 studies on the registry; 110 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 79 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Type 1 or type 2 diabetes with renal impairment and \<30 ml/min measured within the last three months.
  2. Adult patients, age 18 or older and \<80 years.
  3. Written

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

  1. Pregnancy
  2. Patients with severe cognitive dysfunction or other disease which makes glucose monitoring use difficult.
  3. Patients requiring continuous use of paracetamol. Paracetamol must not have been used the week before the study and shall not be used during the duration because it disturbs the interpretation of blood glucose levels estimated by the Dexcom G5. However, other pain killers can be used throughout the study period.
  4. Current CGM or FGM use.
  5. History of allergic reaction to any of the CGM or FGM materials or adhesives in contact with the skin.
  6. History of allergic reaction to chlorhexidine or alcohol anti-septic solution.
  7. Abnormal skin at the anticipated glucose sensor attachment sites (excessive hair, burn, inflammation, infection, rash, and/or tattoo).
  8. Patients with renal impairment and greater or equal to 30 ml/min estimated by the MDRD formula.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
40 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    FGM/CGM

    each patient will have a CGM and a FGM, subcutaneous glucose sensors, the data will be compared to the time-matched reference blood glucose measurements. Each ambulatory patient will sample capillary blood with the HemoCue meter and measure the concentration of glucose minimum 3 times per day for 14 days. The concentration of finger-stick capillary blood glucose will be measured using the self-monitoring blood glucose (SMBG) hemocue meter in their daily living. The subjects will record SMBG, in a written diary. Subjects will dose insulin according to their routine methods throughout the 14 day study

    Device: Simultanious CGM/FGM

Interventions

  • DeviceSimultanious CGM/FGM

    Patients will use both CGM and FGM and document their values as well as documenting a capillary blood glucose value.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Accuracy of CGM and FGM

    Evaluation of accuracy in estimating capillary glucose levels of two commercial glucose monitoring systems (CGM and FGM), Dexcom G5 system (Dexcom sensor) and the Abbot Freestyle Libre sensor, in ambulatory patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes and renal impairment with an eGFR\<30 ml/min both in and not in dialysis.

    Time frame: The whole study period Day 1-14

Secondary outcomes

  1. The evaluation of the accuracy of the 2 glucose monitoring systems during each studied time interval (day 1-3 and day 4-6)

    The evaluation of the accuracy of the 2 glucose monitoring systems for various glucose intervals (hypo, normo- and hyperglycaemia)

    Time frame: Day 1-6 of study period

  2. The evaluation of the accuracy of the 2 glucose monitoring systems for various glucose intervals (hypo, normo- and hyperglycaemia)

    Time frame: The whole study period Day 1-14

  3. The evaluation of the accuracy of the 2 glucose monitoring systems during dialysis and not in dialysis

    Time frame: The whole study period Day 1-14

  4. The evaluation of patients preferences and experience of the two glucose monitoring systems.

    Patients will answer questionnaires on both systems to see which system they prefer to use and find more user friendly. the questionnaire will be in the form of a Lickert scale from 0-10.

    Time frame: The whole study period Day 1-14

07

Study locations

1 site
  • NU-Hospital Group
    Uddevalla, 45180, Sweden
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from May 2016 to primary completion in Dec 2019, 43 months.

Of 62 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Diabetes Complications, half reached primary completion within 27 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 41. This study's 43 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 69 studies reached it within 28 months; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 41.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 11, 2017
First posted
Dec 19, 2017
StartActual
May 5, 2016
Primary completionActual
Dec 30, 2019
CompletionActual
Dec 31, 2022
Last update
Feb 29, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 29, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03378271
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 19, 2017
Start date
May 5, 2016
Primary completion
Dec 30, 2019
Completion
Dec 31, 2022
Last update
Feb 29, 2024

Study contacts

Marcus Lind, PhD
principal investigator · Gothenburgh University

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion