ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03373799Updated Dec 14, 2017

Effectiveness of Video-Based Rehabilitation Program on Pain, Functionality and Quality of Life in the Treatment of Rotator Cuff Tears

An interventional study of Video-Based Rehabilitation Program and Physiotherapist-Supervised Rehabilitation Program in Rotator Cuff Tear and Pain, Shoulder, sponsored by Istanbul University. Completed at 1 site in Turkey. Open to participants aged 40 Years to 60 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-12-14.

Sponsored by Istanbul University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 5 months after the study started (first participant enrolled May 2016, registered Nov 2017).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
40 Years to 60 Years
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 85 studies in Rotator Cuff Injuries with a site in Turkey — 19 open to participants now, 23 under way, none of them phase 3. Rotator Cuff Injuries · Turkey.

Enrollment
56th of 63
30 · median 44
Started
2016
the only one that year
No phase
63 of 85
11 open now
Registered
2nd of 85
by date

Among the 85 studies in Rotator Cuff Injuries with a site in Turkey, this one is the 56th largest by enrollment of the 63 interventional ones that give a count, is the only one that started in 2016, is one of 63 with no phase, and was the 2nd registered.

Rotator Cuff Injuries

631 studies on the registry are indexed under Rotator Cuff Injuries; 156 are open to participants now.

Browse Rotator Cuff Injuries studies →

Open to participants now

19 of the 85 studies in Rotator Cuff Injuries with a site in Turkey are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

14 more — sign in →

All 19 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in Turkey have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in Turkey →

Who these studies take

Of the 100 Rotator Cuff Injuries studies recruiting now, 40 (40%) set no upper age limit and 41 (41%) stop at 75 or younger; 9 take children under 18; 10 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 40 Years to 60 Years · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 85 studies in Rotator Cuff Injuries with a site in Turkey, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of the video-based rehabilitation program on pain, functionality and quality of life in the conservative treatment of partial tears of the rotator cuff whether it was as successful as the physiotherapist-supervised rehabilitation program.

Read the detailed description

In our study a common exercise program, which can be used in conservative treatment of a partial rotator cuff tear, is applied with two different methods; a video-based rehabilitation program and physiotherapist-supervised rehabilitation program. Video-based rehabilitation program was developed to investigate whether this program is effective on pain, functionality and quality of life and as successful as a physiotherapist-supervised rehabilitation program.

03

Conditions studied

  • Rotator Cuff Tear
  • Pain, Shoulder

Keywords

  • rotator cuff
  • physiotherapy
  • video-based rehabilitation
  • exercise
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Forty years of age or older patients that had been diagnosed for a partial rotator cuff tear that was unrelated to trauma by a specialist orthopedist with MRI and physical examination and no other shoulder problems on the diagnosed shoulder were included into this study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients that had been diagnosed for a full-thickness or massive rotator cuff tear, operated previously, had frozen shoulder or glenohumeral instability
  • Younger than 40-year-old, and athletic patients with acute tear symptom were excluded from this study.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
30 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Group 1

    Video-Based Rehabilitation Group

    Other: Video-Based Rehabilitation Program

  • Active comparator
    Group 2

    Physiotherapist-Supervised Rehabilitation Group

    Other: Physiotherapist-Supervised Rehabilitation Program

Interventions

  • OtherVideo-Based Rehabilitation Program

    In both groups, a program consisting of exercises used in conservative treatment of rotator cuff tears was performed. A video record was made by the physiotherapist to a patient where each exercise was described in detail and the patient correctly performed the exercises according to the verbal and visual commands of the physiotherapist. This video record watched by the patients who come to the clinic and patients were asked to do the exercises in the video. Patients did the exercises under control of the physiotherapist in the clinic.

  • OtherPhysiotherapist-Supervised Rehabilitation Program

    In both groups, a program consisting of exercises used in conservative treatment of rotator cuff tears was performed. Program was carried out by teaching the same exercises individually by the physiotherapist.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Shoulder Range of Motion (ROM)

    The shoulder flexion, abduction, internal and external rotation ROM were evaluated with goniometer while the patient was in supine position.

    Time frame: Shoulder range of motion evaluation was performed first time at baseline and second time after 6 weeks rehabilitation program. After treatment "change" was assessed.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

    The levels of pain felt at rest / activity / night were measured using visual analogue scale (VAS).

    Time frame: Evaluation was performed before treatment and after 6 weeks rehabilitation program. Patients were asked to evaluate their pain status with a 10-point scale and high scores are positively correlated with pain.

  2. ASES (The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment) Form

    ASES is an assessment form prepared by shoulder and elbow surgeons with objective and subjective sections. The total score is at least 0 and at most 100, and the high scores are positively correlated with the normal function.

    Time frame: Evaluation was performed before treatment and after 6 weeks rehabilitation program.

  3. Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Questionnaire

    DASH questionnaire inquires about the activities of a person in daily life, the degree of participation in recreational activities, the symptom and psychosocial state that affects their pain, emotional state and sleep quality. The total score is at least 0 and at most 100, and the high scores are positively correlated with the increased functional impairment.

    Time frame: Evaluation was performed before treatment and after 6 weeks rehabilitation program.

  4. Short Form 12 (SF-12)

    SF-12 was used to assess physical and mental health-related quality of life. The total score is at least 0 and at most 100, and the high scores are positively correlated with high quality of life.

    Time frame: Evaluation was performed before treatment and after 6 weeks rehabilitation program.

  5. Global Rating of Change (GRC) Scale

    Global Rating of Change (GRC) scale was used to assess the overall satisfaction levels of the patients. Patients were asked to evaluate their post-treatment status with a 5-point likert scale and high scores are positively correlated with satisfaction.

    Time frame: Evaluation was performed after 6 weeks rehabilitation program.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Istanbul University
    Istanbul, Bakırkoy 34147, Turkey
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from May 2016 to primary completion in Mar 2017, 10 months.

Of 228 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Rotator Cuff Injuries, half reached primary completion within 19 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 39. This study's 10 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 252 studies reached it within 23 months; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 44.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 25, 2017
First posted
Dec 14, 2017
StartActual
May 30, 2016
Primary completionActual
Mar 30, 2017
CompletionActual
Mar 30, 2017
Last update
Dec 14, 2017
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 14, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03373799
Responsible party
Ezgi Türkmen (Research Assistant, Istanbul University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 14, 2017
Start date
May 30, 2016
Primary completion
Mar 30, 2017
Completion
Mar 30, 2017
Last update
Dec 14, 2017

Study contacts

Ezgi Türkmen
principal investigator · Istanbul University

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion