An observational study in Cardiac Output, Low and Surgery, sponsored by University of Aarhus. Completed at 1 site in Denmark. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-07-18.
Sponsored by University of Aarhus · Observational
Automated software analysis now allows for quick estimation of cardiac output from the echocardiographic 5-chamber view. This study will validate the automated software method against pulmonary artery thermodilution and against conventional cardiac output measurement with echocardiography.
Postoperative cardiac surgery patients
Exclusion Criteria:
Accuracy of cardiac output measurement
Mean bias with limits of agreement for cardiac output measurement between automated cardiac output measurement and pulmonary artery thermodilution
Time frame: 10 minutes
Trending ability
Trending ability for cardiac output measurement for automated cardiac output measurement compared to pulmonary artery thermodilution
Time frame: 120 minutes
Accuracy of cardiac output measurement
Mean bias with limits of agreement for cardiac output measurement between automated cardiac output measurement and conventional echocardiographic cardiac output measurement
Time frame: 10 minutes
Trending ability
Trending ability for cardiac output measurement for automated cardiac output measurement compared to traditional echocardiographic cardiac output measurement
Time frame: 120 minutes
Accuracy of cardiac output measurement
Mean bias with limits of agreement for cardiac output measurement between traditional cardiac output measurement and pulmonary artery thermodilution
Time frame: 10 minutes
Trending ability
Trending ability for cardiac output measurement for traditional echocardiographic cardiac output compared to pulmonary artery thermodilution
Time frame: 120 minutes
Plan to share: Yes
This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
University of Aarhus