An observational study in Cardiac Output, Low and Surgery, sponsored by University of Aarhus. Completed at 1 site in Denmark. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-07-18.
Sponsored by University of Aarhus · Observational
Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →
Automated software analysis now allows for quick estimation of cardiac output from the echocardiographic 5-chamber view. This study will validate the automated software method against pulmonary artery thermodilution and against conventional cardiac output measurement with echocardiography.
99 studies on the registry are indexed under Cardiac Output, Low; 15 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 50 is below the median of 66 across 48 observational studies indexed under Cardiac Output, Low.
Browse Cardiac Output, Low studies →University of Aarhus is the lead sponsor of 1,300 studies on the registry; 189 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Postoperative cardiac surgery patients
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Accuracy of cardiac output measurement
Mean bias with limits of agreement for cardiac output measurement between automated cardiac output measurement and pulmonary artery thermodilution
Time frame: 10 minutes
Trending ability
Trending ability for cardiac output measurement for automated cardiac output measurement compared to pulmonary artery thermodilution
Time frame: 120 minutes
Accuracy of cardiac output measurement
Mean bias with limits of agreement for cardiac output measurement between automated cardiac output measurement and conventional echocardiographic cardiac output measurement
Time frame: 10 minutes
Trending ability
Trending ability for cardiac output measurement for automated cardiac output measurement compared to traditional echocardiographic cardiac output measurement
Time frame: 120 minutes
Accuracy of cardiac output measurement
Mean bias with limits of agreement for cardiac output measurement between traditional cardiac output measurement and pulmonary artery thermodilution
Time frame: 10 minutes
Trending ability
Trending ability for cardiac output measurement for traditional echocardiographic cardiac output compared to pulmonary artery thermodilution
Time frame: 120 minutes
Plan to share: Yes
Ran from Dec 2017 to primary completion in Mar 2018, 3 months.
Of 22 observational studies under Cardiac Output, Low, half reached primary completion within 22 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 34. This study's 3 months is below that.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.