ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03370822Updated May 2, 2018

A Mixed Methods Study to Explore the Feasibility of a Novel Continuous Fetal Monitoring Device

An observational study in Fetal Distress and Fetal Heart Rate Disorder Nos, sponsored by University of Manchester. Completed at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 50 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-05-02.

Sponsored by University of Manchester · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
20
Ages
18 Years to 50 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

A stillbirth describes when a baby dies after 24 weeks of pregnancy and before being born. In the UK there are roughly 9 stillbirths every day. Normally, before a stillbirth occurs changes such as a slower heart rate and reduced movement take place. Fetal monitoring attempts to detect these changes so that babies can be delivered before they become severely ill. If a baby could be monitored continuously then these changes could be detected earlier. However, current forms of fetal monitoring, such as ultrasound, cannot be used for long periods of time and do not significantly reduce stillbirth rates. The Monica AN24 device is a continuous monitor which records the baby's heart rhythm using sensors placed on the mother's abdomen. As this is a new device there is little evidence about how well it works. In this project women will be asked how they feel about the device after wearing it. Doctors and midwives will also be asked about their views of the device. The effect of the mother's movement and the age of the baby on how well the Monica AN24 can record the baby's heart rhythm will also be assessed.

Read the detailed description

In the United Kingdom (UK) stillbirth is defined as the death of a fetus before birth and after 24 weeks gestation. The incidence of stillbirth in the UK was 4.6 per 1000 in 2014. The annual rate of reduction was 1.4%, a rate considerably lower than other high income countries, such as Poland (4.5%) and Netherlands (6.8%), demonstrating that more can be done to reduce stillbirth rates in the UK. Stillbirths are often preceded by a series of adaptive changes, including changes in fetal heart rate (FHR) and reduced fetal movement. Fetal monitoring serves, in part, to identify these changes so that appropriate intervention can be initiated and adverse outcomes prevented. However, currently used forms of fetal monitoring, including Doppler ultrasound and cardiotocography, cannot provide an objective, longitudinal view of fetal wellbeing and do not significantly reduce stillbirth rates. A continuous fetal monitor could identify signs of fetal compromise earlier.

A recent study found that 45.1% of surveyed clinicians thought that a continuous fetal monitor would be beneficial to their practice, although 81.7% also expressed concerns about the utility and clinical implementation of such a device. The Monica AN24 monitor is a novel continuous fetal monitoring device which records the fetal electrocardiogram (fECG) via trans-abdominal electrodes. Monica AN24 has been shown to have good recording quality though one study reported an association between recording quality and gestational age. The effect of the device on maternal anxiety is not known. All studies assessing acceptability of the device to women have focused on the intrapartum period or during induction of labor. Consequently, a prospective observational cohort study is needed to assess the acceptability of the Monica AN24 device in the context of antenatal care, as is further exploration of factors affecting recording quality of the Monica AN24 device.

02

Conditions studied

  • Fetal Distress
  • Fetal Heart Rate Disorder Nos

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Fetal monitoring
  • Acceptability
  • Fetal Heart Rate
03

In context

Fetal Distress

37 studies on the registry are indexed under Fetal Distress; 7 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 20 is below the median of 121 across 12 observational studies indexed under Fetal Distress.

Browse Fetal Distress studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Manchester is the lead sponsor of 201 studies on the registry; 44 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 50 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Women who have an uncomplicated pregnancy attending the Research Clinics at St Mary's Hospital, Manchester.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Women with singleton pregnancies attending St. Mary's Hospital, Manchester for antenatal care
  • No abnormality identified on ultrasound scan of fetal biometry and umbilical and fetal Doppler indices
  • Gestational age >24 weeks
  • Able to give

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Multiple pregnancies
  • Maternal age \<18 years
  • Individuals who do cannot speak or do not understand fluent English
  • Individuals unable to give
  • Women in active labour
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
20 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Study Participants

    Women who have continuous fetal monitoring using the MONICA AN24 device. The MONICA AN24 is a wearable monitor with five adhesive electrodes placed on the mother's abdomen. This records the fetal heart rate, maternal heart rate and uterine contractions.

    Device: MONICA AN24 device

Interventions

  • DeviceMONICA AN24 device

    Application of MONICA AN24 device and recording for the longest period of fetal heart rate recording possible (limited by battery life)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Mother's experience of wearing device

    Qualitative Interview conducted within 24 hours of wearing the AN24 device

    Time frame: Immediately following the period (usually 12-24 hours) of wearing MONICA AN24 device

  2. Change in Maternal Anxiety (GAD-2)

    Change in maternal anxiety as assessed by Generalised Anxiety Disorder 2 item (GAD-2)

    Time frame: Maternal completion of the GAD-2 questionnaire before wearing the MONICA AN24 device and immediately following the period of wearing the MONICA AN24 device.

  3. Change in Maternal Anxiety (Pregnancy Specific Anxiety Score)

    Change in maternal anxiety as assessed by Pregnancy Specific Anxiety Score

    Time frame: Maternal completion of the Pregnancy Specific Anxiety Score questionnaire before wearing the MONICA AN24 device and immediately following the period of wearing the MONICA AN24 device.

  4. Maternal Anxiety (STAI)

    Change in maternal anxiety as assessed by State Trait Anxiety Index.

    Time frame: Maternal completion of the STAI before wearing the MONICA AN24 device and immediately following the period of wearing the MONICA AN24 device.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Recording quality - defined as the percentage of time the device recorded the fetal heart rate

    The recording quality of the Monica AN24 device defined as the percentage of time the device recorded the fetal heart rate) with differing levels of maternal activity and differing gestational ages.

    Time frame: During the 12-24 hour recording period

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
    Manchester, M13 9WL, United Kingdom
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Jun 2016 to primary completion in Jul 2017, 13 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 24, 2017
First posted
Dec 12, 2017
StartActual
Jun 22, 2016
Primary completionActual
Jul 31, 2017
CompletionActual
Dec 31, 2017
Last update
May 2, 2018
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 2, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03370822
Responsible party
Dr Alexander Heazell (Professor of Obstetrics, University of Manchester) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 12, 2017
Start date
Jun 22, 2016
Primary completion
Jul 31, 2017
Completion
Dec 31, 2017
Last update
May 2, 2018

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion