ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT03369496MoNNET-HAUpdated Jan 11, 2019

The Montreal Neighbourhood Networks and Healthy Aging Panel

An observational study in Obesity, Depression and Physical Activity, sponsored by Queen's University. Status unknown. Open to participants aged 25 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-01-11.

Sponsored by Queen's University · Observational

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Jan 2019), so the status shown — last known as Active, not recruiting — may be out of date.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
2,707
Ages
25 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Social networks, social capital, i.e., network-accessed resources, and neighbourhood environments have been shown associated with a range of health behaviours and conditions, including obesity, physical activity, nutrition, and mental health. Research on social capital and health in Montreal has shown the importance of network social capital for a person's subjective health status, sense of control, self-reported physical activity, and obesity. Research has also shown high social capital to reduce health service use, mental health service use, and improve the management of chronic illnesses. Despite advances in the understanding of social capital and its link to health and health service use, most research on social capital is cross sectional and is unable to identify the causal pathways linking social networks and capital to health and health care use. Longitudinal research would strengthen the evidence base for designing interventions to prevent or delay the use of health services, particularly in older adults.

This research has three main objectives: (1) transform the original sample of Montreal Neighbourhood Networks and Healthy Aging (MoNNET-HA) households (n=2707) into a panel study, (2) link the MoNNET-HA participant data to their Quebec Health Insurance Registry (Régie de l'assurance maladie (RAMQ)) information, and (3) assess the feasibility of extending the MoNNET-HA panel by one wave to include participant's core network members. Unique about the original MoNNET-HA sample is that it purposefully oversampled older adults (> 64 years old) but remains representative of Montreal adults at various ages and income levels. In addition, MoNNET-HA data is integrated into a GIS database which allows researchers to examine the effects of neighbourhood environmental characteristics on health. By linking MoNNET-HA data to RAMQ, researchers will be able to examine patterns of diagnosed health conditions, (e.g., fractures, depression), pharmaceutical use and adherence, and formal health care use over time. Transforming the cross-sectional study into a panel study would also allow researchers to examine longitudinally the dynamics of health and health care utilization among Panel participants over the life course, and the causal pathways linking neighbourhoods and networks to health and health care use.

02

Conditions studied

  • Obesity
  • Depression
  • Physical Activity
  • Hypertension
  • Health Behavior
  • Subjective Health

Keywords

  • Social Capital
  • Social Support
  • Neighborhood
  • Population Health
  • Healthy Aging
  • Adult
  • Canada
03

In context

Obesity

11,522 studies on the registry are indexed under Obesity; 2,033 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 2,707 is above the median of 114 across 2,154 observational studies indexed under Obesity.

Browse Obesity studies →

Lead sponsor

Queen's University is the lead sponsor of 207 studies on the registry; 16 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
25 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Population-based sample of adults randomly selected using a 2-stage stratified cluster sampling strategy.

  1. In the first stage, 862 Montreal Metropolitan Area census tracts were stratified using the census-tract median income into tertile of high, medium and low income census tract areas. From each tertile, 100 census tracts were selected at random from each census-tract group for a total of 300 tracts.
  2. Within each selected census tract, three respondents were selected at random using from the 25-44 years age category, three respondents from the 45-64 years age category, and three respondents from the age group 65 years and older. This resulted in a total of 9 respondents per census tract and a total of 2707 respondents the MoNNET Panel.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults 25 years and older,
  • Residents of the Montreal Metropolitan Area, Canada,
  • Had to reside at current residence for at least one year

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Non- French or English-speaking households
  • Institutionalized
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
2,707 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • MoNNET-HA Panel

    Adults 25 years and older residing in the Montreal Metropolitan Area

    Other: Social capital; Neighborhood environment

Interventions

  • OtherSocial capital; Neighborhood environment

    Observational study examining the relationship among neighborhood environment, social capital and health among Montreal adults

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Obesity

    Self-reported height and weight converted to BMI with obesity =\>30

    Time frame: Change from wave one obesity at wave two (2010) and wave three (2013)

  2. Change in Depression

    Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression 10-item Binary Scale; Depression was =\>4

    Time frame: Change from wave one depression at wave two (2010) and wave three (2013)

  3. Change in Physical inactivity

    International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) was used to measure a person's metabolic equivalent of task (MET) over a one-week period; Physical inactivity was defined as having a MET of less than 600.

    Time frame: Change from wave one physical inactivity at wave two (2010) and wave three (2013)

  4. Change in Hypertension

    Self-reported doctor-diagnosed hypertension

    Time frame: Change from wave one hypertension at wave two (2010) and wave three (2013)

  5. Change in Subjective Health

    Self-reported health: 5 response options: Excellent, Very Good, Good, Fair, Poor

    Time frame: Change from wave one subjective health at wave two (2010) and wave three (2013)

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Moore S, Bockenholt U, Daniel M, Frohlich K, Kestens Y, Richard L. Social capital and core network ties: a validation study of individual-level social capital measures and their association with extra- and intra-neighborhood ties, and self-rated health. Health Place. 2011 Mar;17(2):536-44. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2010.12.010. Epub 2010 Dec 16. PubMed 21208822 ↗
  • Leroux JS, Moore S, Richard L, Gauvin L. Physical inactivity mediates the association between the perceived exercising behavior of social network members and obesity: a cross-sectional study. PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e46558. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0046558. Epub 2012 Oct 2. PubMed 23056343 ↗
  • Legh-Jones H, Moore S. Network social capital, social participation, and physical inactivity in an urban adult population. Soc Sci Med. 2012 May;74(9):1362-7. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.01.005. Epub 2012 Feb 22. PubMed 22410270 ↗
  • Bassett E, Moore S. Gender differences in the social pathways linking neighborhood disadvantage to depressive symptoms in adults. PLoS One. 2013 Oct 17;8(10):e76554. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076554. eCollection 2013. PubMed 24146888 ↗
  • Bassett E, Moore S. Social capital and depressive symptoms: the association of psychosocial and network dimensions of social capital with depressive symptoms in Montreal, Canada. Soc Sci Med. 2013 Jun;86:96-102. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.03.005. Epub 2013 Mar 19. PubMed 23608098 ↗
  • Moore S, Stewart S, Teixeira A. Decomposing social capital inequalities in health. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2014 Mar;68(3):233-8. doi: 10.1136/jech-2013-202996. Epub 2013 Nov 20. PubMed 24258198 ↗
  • Bassett E, Moore S. Neighbourhood disadvantage, network capital and restless sleep: is the association moderated by gender in urban-dwelling adults? Soc Sci Med. 2014 May;108:185-93. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.02.029. Epub 2014 Feb 19. PubMed 24650740 ↗
  • Moore S, Teixeira A, Stewart S. Effect of network social capital on the chances of smoking relapse: a two-year follow-up study of urban-dwelling adults. Am J Public Health. 2014 Dec;104(12):e72-6. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302239. Epub 2014 Oct 16. PubMed 25320891 ↗
  • Moore S, Buckeridge DL, Dube L. Cohort Profile: The Montreal Neighbourhood Networks and Healthy Aging (MoNNET-HA) study. Int J Epidemiol. 2016 Feb;45(1):45-53. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyu137. Epub 2014 Jul 1. PubMed 24984955 ↗
  • Child S, Stewart S, Moore S. Perceived control moderates the relationship between social capital and binge drinking: longitudinal findings from the Montreal Neighborhood Networks and Health Aging (MoNNET-HA) panel. Ann Epidemiol. 2017 Feb;27(2):128-134. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2016.11.010. Epub 2016 Dec 9. PubMed 28027881 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — Discussions currently taking place.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Jul 2007 to primary completion in Aug 2008, 13 months.

Of 791 non-industry observational studies under Obesity, half reached primary completion within 40 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 17 and three quarters within 106. This study's 13 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 836 studies reached it within 39 months; a quarter within 17 and three quarters within 96.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 1, 2017
First posted
Dec 12, 2017
StartActual
Jul 1, 2007
Primary completionActual
Aug 15, 2008
CompletionEst.
Jan 1, 2020
Last update
Jan 11, 2019
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 11, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03369496
Lead sponsor
Queen's University
Responsible party
Dr. Spencer Moore (Associate Professor, Queen's University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 12, 2017
Start date
Jul 1, 2007
Primary completion
Aug 15, 2008
Completion
Jan 1, 2020 (estimated)
Last update
Jan 11, 2019

Study contacts

Spencer Moore, PhD
principal investigator · Queen's University (at time of study)

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Jan 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion