ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03367585Updated Apr 24, 2020

Effects of Vitamin D Supplementation in Muscle Strength and Balance Training

An interventional study of Physical exercise + Vitamin D3 and Physical exercise in Osteoporosis, Osteopenia and Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal, sponsored by University of Sao Paulo General Hospital. Completed at 1 site in Brazil. Open to female participants aged 60 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-04-24.

Primary conditionOsteoporosis, PostmenopausalRegistry: OsteoporosisReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Osteoporosis — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal
Why
  1. The study's listed conditions name Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal, a narrower term within Osteoporosis.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by University of Sao Paulo General Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
46
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
60 Years to 75 Years
Sex
Female
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 11 studies in Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal with a site in Brazil — none open to participants now, none under way, none of them phase 3. Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal · Brazil.

Enrollment
11th of 11
46 · median 1,294
Started
2018
the only one that year
No phase
Only one
of the 11
Registered
11th of 11
by date
Lead sponsor
1 of 11
University of Sao Paulo General Hospital

Among the 11 studies in Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal with a site in Brazil, this one is the 11th largest by enrollment, is the only one that started in 2018, is the only one with no phase, and was the 11th registered.

Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal

334 studies on the registry are indexed under Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal; 28 are open to participants now.

Browse Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal studies →

Open to participants now

None of the 11 studies in Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal with a site in Brazil is open now.

Who these studies take

Of the 19 Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal studies recruiting now, 8 (42%) set no upper age limit and 7 (37%) stop at 75 or younger; 1 take children under 18; 7 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 60 Years to 75 Years · female · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Download CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: the 11 studies in Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal with a site in Brazil as a file.
02

Study summary

Introduction: In Brazil, a person who is sixty years old or more is considered elderly. The incidence of osteoporosis and osteopenia has been increasing, as have fractures resulting from falls. Vitamin D deficiency can cause muscular atrophy in type II fibers (fast contraction and strength), which can increase the risk of falls. The aging process produces reduction in the ability of postural control system to maintain postural balance, which may increase postural instability and consequently increase the elderly risk to falls. Objective: To evaluate if vitamin D supplementation associated with regular exercise in vulnerable older women improves muscle strength and postural balance in 12 weeks. Methods: This will be a randomized prospective clinical trial, double blind, placebo-controlled intervention. Will be part of the study 40 elderly women vulnerable, who meet the inclusion criteria and that will be coming from the community through calls made by radio and social network. The volunteer will undergoing to blood test, body composition and bone mineral density, Mini Mental State Examination, Geriatric Depressive Scale, Falls Efficacy Scale, WHOQOL-OLD and WHOQOL-BREF instruments, functional capacity tests (MiniBEST, Time up and Go, Chair Rising Test, Six-minute walk test), muscular strength assessment (isokinetic dynamometry, handgrip and 1RM test) and postural balance (AccSway force platform for static postural balance and NeuroCom's Balance Master for dynamic postural balance) before and after 12 weeks of intervention with vitamin D supplementation and resistance and postural balance exercise. The intervention that will be perform during the 12 weeks with a progressive resistance training program.

03

Conditions studied

  • Osteoporosis, Osteopenia
  • Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal

Keywords

  • Supplementary Feeding
  • vitamin D
  • Muscle Strength
  • postural balance
  • exercise
  • aged
04

In context

Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal Reclassified

334 studies on the registry are indexed under Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal; 28 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 46 is below the median of 119 across 264 interventional studies indexed under Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal.

Browse Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Sao Paulo General Hospital is the lead sponsor of 611 studies on the registry; 98 are open to participants now.

Of its 8 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Compared within Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Osteoporosis. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

05

Who can participate

Ages eligible
60 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age > 60 years;
  2. Osteoporosis or osteopenia (bone mineral density lower than -1.5 standard deviations of the T-score);
  3. Present hypovitaminosis D (\<30 nmol / L);
  4. Do not practice regular resistance exercise;
  5. Can not have an injury in lower limbs at least on the last three months,;
  6. Be able to perform independent gait without climbing for at least 100 meters;
  7. Be independent in your daily life activities;
  8. Do not present restrictions for the practice of resistance exercises, including having performed a recent exercise test (maximum 6 months);
  9. Do not use medications such as estrogen's, diuretics, to improve bone mass;
  10. Do not use dietary supplements with vitamin D;
  11. Do not present hyperparathyroidism, diabetes, uncontrolled hypertension, hyperprolactinemia, hypercalciuria, renal lithiasis or elevated serum calcium.
06

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
46 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Experimental

    The experimental group, which will supplement vitamin D3 50,000 IU / week, being in two capsules (25,000 IU / week each),

    Dietary Supplement: Physical exercise + Vitamin D3

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    The placebo group will inject two capsules of equal size, volume and coloration, composed of lactose, without the vitamin D3 supplement.

    Other: Physical exercise

Interventions

  • Dietary supplementPhysical exercise + Vitamin D3

    Strength exercise + Supplementation of vitamin D3 50,000 IU / week

  • OtherPhysical exercise

    Strength exercise

07

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Postural balance - semi static - change

    Evaluation of postural balance - AccSway force platform for semi static postural. The arithmetic mean of the results was calculated from the three tests conducted under each condition, and was processed using the Balance Clinic software. The following parameters were used to measure the stability of the participants: medial-lateral and anteroposterior amplitude (cm), the mean velocity calculated from the total displacement of the center of pressure (COP) in all directions (cm/s), and the elliptical area encompassing 95% of the displacement from the COP (cm2). The following parameters were used to measure the stability of the participants: medial-lateral and anteroposterior amplitude (cm), the mean velocity calculated from the total displacement of the center of pressure (COP) in all directions (cm/s).

    Time frame: This measure will be performing before; after the innervation (12 weeks strength and postural balance exercise) and six months after the intervention (six months follow up).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Postural balance - dynamic - change

    Evaluation of dynamic postural balance - The postural balance assessment (posturography) will be perform on the NeuroCom Balance Master® force platform system (NeuroCom International, Inc., Clackamas, OR, USA). The variables will be the mean sway speed (cm/s) on a stable surface and an unstable surface; and the mean sway in the anteropoterior direction and mediolateral (cm) direction at the same conditions. The variables will be the mean weight transfer index (%), mean movement time (s) and mean impact index.

    Time frame: This measure will be performing before; after the innervation (12 weeks strength and postural balance exercise) and six months after the intervention (six months follow up).

  2. Muscular strength - Hand Grip - change

    Evaluation of muscular strength improvement- hand grip strength (HGS). HGS assessment was performed using a Jamar hand dynamometer, measured in kilograms (kg), which is adopted by the American Society of Hand Therapists (ASHT).

    Time frame: This measure will be perform before and after the intervation (12 weeks strenght and potural balance exercise).

  3. Muscular strength - Isokinetic dynamometry - change

    Evaluation of muscular strength improvement - Isokinetic dynamometry will be use to determine knee extension and flexion strength using the Biodex Multi-Joint System 3 (Biodex MedicalTM, Shirley, NY, USA). The isokinetic variables used were maximum peak torque corrected for body weight (%), and total work (J).

    Time frame: This measure will be performing before; after the innervation (12 weeks strength and postural balance exercise) and six months after the intervention (six months follow up).

  4. Muscular strength - 1 maximal repetition (RM)- change

    Evaluation of muscular strength improvement - 1RM test. One-repetition maximum in weight training is the maximum amount of force that can be generated in one maximal contraction (kg).

    Time frame: This measure will be performing before; after the innervation (12 weeks strength and postural balance exercise) and six months after the intervention (six months follow up).

  5. Body composition and bone mineral density - change

    Evaluation of body composition (area=cm2; BMC=g and BMD=g/cm2) and bone mineral density (BMD=g/cm2; T-score)

    Time frame: This measure will be performing before; after the innervation (12 weeks strength and postural balance exercise) and six months after the intervention (six months follow up).

08

Study locations

1 site
  • Julia Maria DÀndrea Greve
    São Paulo, 04503-010, Brazil
09

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Feb 2018 to primary completion in Dec 2018, 10 months.

Of 47 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal, half reached primary completion within 16 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 34. This study's 10 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 50 studies reached it within 17 months; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 34.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 4, 2017
First posted
Dec 8, 2017
StartActual
Feb 1, 2018
Primary completionActual
Dec 1, 2018
CompletionActual
Apr 22, 2020
Last update
Apr 24, 2020
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 24, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03367585
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 8, 2017
Start date
Feb 1, 2018
Primary completion
Dec 1, 2018
Completion
Apr 22, 2020
Last update
Apr 24, 2020

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion