ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT03367221TRANS-NAVAUpdated Dec 8, 2017

Physiological Response in Lung Transplant Recipients Undergoing Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist

An interventional study of NAVA ventilation in Work of Breathing, Lung Transplant; Complications and Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist, sponsored by Policlinico Hospital. Status unknown at 2 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-12-08.

Sponsored by Policlinico Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Dec 2017), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-14

Among 12 studies in Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury with a site in Italy — 3 open to participants now, 3 under way, none of them phase 3. Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury · Italy.

Started
2017
the only one that year
No phase
6 of 12
2 open now
Registered
3rd of 12
by date
Lead sponsor
2 of 12
Policlinico Hospital

Among the 12 studies in Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury with a site in Italy, this one is the only one that started in 2017, is one of 6 with no phase, and was the 3rd registered.

Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury

121 studies on the registry are indexed under Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury; 39 are open to participants now.

Browse Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury studies →

Open to participants now

3 of the 12 studies in Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury with a site in Italy are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

All 3 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in Italy have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in Italy →

Who these studies take

Of the 22 Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury studies recruiting now, 15 (68%) set no upper age limit and 5 (23%) stop at 75 or younger; 5 take children under 18; 1 takes healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years and older · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 12 studies in Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury with a site in Italy, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

Primary Graft Dysfunction (PGD) respresents the leading cause of mortality in early post-operative period of Lung Tranplantation (LTx). Protective ventilatory strategy could potentially reduce the risk of PGD in these patients. Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist (NAVA) is an assisted ventilation mode that could allow to adopt this strategy. Aim of the study is to assess the feasibility of NAVA in the early post-LTx phase and to describe the breathing pattern and the physiological relationship between neural respiratory drive and different levels of ventilatory assist, in the absence of pulmonary vagal afferent feedback.

Read the detailed description

Lung transplantation (LTx) is an important treatment option for select patients with end-stage pulmonary disease. Primary Graft Dysfunction (PGD) is the main cause of death; in the early period following LTx a protective ventilatory strategy (tidal volume - Vt of 6 mL/Kg + Positive End Expiratory Pressure) could potentially reduce the risk of PGD in these patients. Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist (NAVA) is an assisted ventilation mode in which neural inspiratory activity is monitored through the continuous recording of electrical activity of the diaphragm (EAdi). Actually, Guidelines about the adoption of a protective ventilatory strategy in the early post-opeartive period are lacking.

NAVA, because of its intrinsic properties (proportionality between respiratory drive and level of assist, prevention of diaphragm atrophy), could allow to reach the afore mentioned ventilatory strategy. So, aim of the study, is the evaluation of patients' neural breathing pattern during NAVA, in early post-operative period of LTx

03

Conditions studied

  • Work of Breathing
  • Lung Transplant; Complications
  • Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist
  • Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age > 18 y.o.
  • Admission to ICU for post-operative monitoring after LTx
  • Presence of spontaneous breathing activity
  • Sedation titrated to a target RASS between 0 and -2
  • Written obtained

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • to nasogastric tube insertion (gastroesophageal surgery in the previous 3 months, gastroesophageal bleeding in the previous 30 days, history of esophageal varices, facial trauma)
  • Increased risk of bleeding with nasogastric tube insertion, due to severe coagulation disorders and severe thrombocytopenia ( i.e., > 2 and count \< 70.000/mm3)
  • Severe hemodynamic instability (noradenaline > 0.3 μg/kg/min and/or use of vasopressin)
  • Postoperative extracorporeal respiratory support (ECMO)
  • Pre-operative reconditioning of the transplanted lungs by means of ex-vivo lung perfusion (EVLP)
  • Lung retransplantation
  • Failure to obtain a stable EAdi signal
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

INR, PT and aPTT (clotting tests)

Blood tests of how long blood takes to clot. The INR is the prothrombin time (PT) put on a common scale; about 1 is usual for someone not taking a blood thinner.

Criteria often make an exception for people on a blood thinner such as warfarin, whose INR is raised on purpose.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
20 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    NAVA group

    NAVA ventilation

    Device: NAVA ventilation

Interventions

  • DeviceNAVA ventilation

    Assisted Ventilation Mode, synchronized, through EAdi catheter, with patient's inspiratory effort and proportional to respiratory drive

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Evaluation of the variations of Electrical Activity of the Diaphragm in response to different levels of ventilatory assist at different degrees of lung inflation (different Positive End Expiratory Pressure values)

    Electrical Activity of the Diaphragm (EAdi) (microVolt)

    Time frame: One hour after the recovery of spontaneous breathing

  2. Evaluation of the variations of Neuro-Mechanical Coupling (expressed as microVolt of EAdi /cmH2O of airway pressure Ratio) in response to different levels of ventilatory assist at different degrees of lung inflation

    Neuro-Mechanical Coupling (NMC) (microvolt/cmH2O)

    Time frame: One hour after the recovery of spontaneous breathing

  3. Evaluation of the variations of Neuro-ventilatory Efficiency (expressed as microvolt of EAdi / mL of Tidal Volume Ratio) in response to different levels of ventilatory assist at different degree of lung inflation

    Neuro-Ventilatory Efficiency (NVE) (microvolt/mL)

    Time frame: One hour after the recovery of spontaneous breathing

  4. Evaluation of the changes in the patient's neural breathing pattern (expressed as mL of Tidal Volume) at different levels of ventilatory assist

    Tidal Volume (mL)

    Time frame: One hour after the recovery of spontaneous breathing

  5. Evaluation of the changes in the patient's neural breathing pattern (expressed as respiratory rate) at different levels of ventilatory assist

    Respiratory rate (Breaths/min)

    Time frame: One hour after the recovery of spontaneous breathing

Secondary outcomes

  1. Evaluation of the feasibility of Plateau Pressure during NAVA

    Plateau Pressure (Pplat)

    Time frame: One hour after the recovery of spontaneous breathing, with inspiratory hold manoeuvres

  2. Ultrasound assessment of the changes of Diaphragm's Thickening Fraction at different levels of Positive End Expiratory Pressure and at different NAVA gains

    Diaphragm's Thickening Fraction (TF)

    Time frame: One hour after the recovery of spontaneous breathing

  3. Assesment of the total asynchrony index (double triggering + missed efforts + inspiratory trigger delay +short cycling + prolonged cycling)

    Total Asinchrony Index

    Time frame: One hour after the recovery of spontaneous breathing

07

Study locations

2 of 2 sites recruiting
  • Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico
    Milan, 20122, Italy
    Recruiting
  • University Hospital of Lausanne
    Lausanne, 10111, Switzerland
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Grasselli G, Castagna L, Abbruzzese C, Corcione N, Bottino N, Guzzardella A, Colombo SM, Carlesso E, Mauri T, Rossetti V, Palleschi A, Scaravilli V, Zanella A, Pesenti A. Pulmonary volume-feedback and ventilatory pattern after bilateral lung transplantation using neurally adjusted ventilatory assist ventilation. Br J Anaesth. 2021 Jul;127(1):143-152. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2021.03.010. Epub 2021 Apr 21. PubMed 33892948 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Nov 2017 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Nov 2019, 24 months after the start.

Of 40 interventional studies with no phase under Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury, half reached primary completion within 29 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 13 and three quarters within 54. This study's planned 24 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 24, 2017
First posted
Dec 8, 2017
StartActual
Nov 23, 2017
Primary completionEst.
Nov 2019
CompletionEst.
Nov 2019
Last update
Dec 8, 2017
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 8, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03367221
Lead sponsor
Policlinico Hospital
Responsible party
Giacomo Grasselli (Prof, Policlinico Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 8, 2017
Start date
Nov 23, 2017
Primary completion
Nov 2019 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 2019 (estimated)
Last update
Dec 8, 2017

Study contacts

Giacomo Grasselli, Prof
Contact
giacomo.grasselli@unimi.it
0255033258
Chiara Abbruzzese, MD
principal investigator · Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico
Luigi Castagna, MD
principal investigator · Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico
Nicola Bottino, MD
principal investigator · Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico
Alberto Zanella, MD
principal investigator · University of Milan
Nadia Corcione, MD
principal investigator · Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda
Antonio Pesenti, Prof
principal investigator · University of Milan

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Dec 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion