An observational study in Fabry, sponsored by University Hospital, Caen. Status unknown. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-12-05.
Sponsored by University Hospital, Caen · Observational
Cardiac complications occur in 78% of patients with Fabry disease and are mainly characterized by a high frequency of left ventricular hypertrophy resulting from an accumulation of GL3 in cardiomyocytes. Apart from family screening, left ventricular hypertrophy is an important factor in the diagnosis of Fabry disease. This left ventricular hypertrophy is more often concentric and homogeneous, but it can also be asymmetric and mimic the patterns seen in so-called familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathies caused by mutations in the sarcomere protein genes. Electrocardiogram has been suggested as a screening tool for Fabry disease. Analysis of the PQ interval would be of interest. An algorithm has even been proposed to differentiate Fabry disease from amyloidosis with excellent sensitivity and specificity. The only criterion of left ventricular hypertrophy used in all studies is the Sokolov-Lyon index, but this index has many limitations and does not appear to be discriminatory for Fabry disease. Other validated criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy, such as the Cornell, Lewis, Gubner index or the Romhilt-Estes point score, have never been tested in Fabry disease. The primary objective of our study is to evaluate the diagnostic value of different electrocardiographic scores of left ventricular hypertrophy in Fabry disease.
Patients aged > 18 years, with genetically confirmed Fabry disease complicated by LVH.
Patients aged > 18 years, with sarcomeric hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
Exclusion Criteria:
Analysis of the PQ interval with a new algorithm
Determine whether electrocardiographic criteria of left ventricular hypertrophy allow to distinguish between Fabry disease and sarcomeric hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
Time frame: baseline
No study locations are listed for this record.
This study is status unknown, as verified in Nov 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
University Hospital, Caen