ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03353701Updated Sep 3, 2024

30-to-90 Day Challenge: Effects of Alcohol Cessation on Health Outcomes

An interventional study of Contingency Management (CM) in Alcohol Drinking, Chronic Inflammation and Neurocognitive Dysfunction, sponsored by University of Florida. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 50 Years to 75 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-09-03.

Primary conditionAlcohol Drinking(the registry's first term)UnverifiedIs this wrong?Alcohol Drinking is a broad heading, used only when no more specific condition is named. No better condition is named, so the registry's term is kept.

Sponsored by University of Florida · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
57
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
50 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The objective for this project is to determine whether how certain behavioral and health functions change in persons with heavy drinking when they stop (or reduce) drinking for 30 days, and whether changes continue for up to 90 days. The study will also identify barriers and facilitators related to drinking reduction. The project will focus on clinical comorbidities including HIV disease control, cognitive and brain function, liver abnormalities, and chronic inflammation. The study teams propose to enroll 140 HIV+ and 40 HIV- adults with heavy drinking, and then use Contingency Management (CM) with financial incentives to encourage participants to maximally reduce alcohol consumption for 30 days. Participants will be required to wear an ankle biosensor (SCRAM monitor) at all times, which is used to monitor participants' drinking behavior. At 30 days, participants will complete a full day of follow-up, including cognitive testing, neuroimaging, blood testing, liver Fibroscan, and questionnaires. Many participants will also provide a stool sample for gut microbiome assessment at each time point. At 30 days, participants will participate in a motivational interview to discuss perceived benefits and obstacles to drinking reduction, and most participants will continue CM to 90 days (but can opt out at this point). Participants will complete another full-day assessment at 90 days, at which point persons may choose to drink or not on their own (no more CM). A final assessment will be conducted at 12 months. This A-B-A design will enable us to clearly identify whether alcohol effects on cognition and brain function are reversible in the context of HIV, and analyze specific cerebral and systemic pathophysiological factors contributing to these effects. The inclusion of HIV- adults will enable subgroup comparisons of alcohol reduction effects in the context of HIV vs. no-HIV. These HIV-negative participants will be recruited from the same settings as our HIV+ participants, and will include a similar proportion by age, race, and gender as the HIV+ participants. The study team will use information from the MI data and our other assessments to elucidate factors that predict both short term (during CM) and long-term (1-year) alcohol reductions, and study how changes in alcohol consumption affect important HIV clinical outcomes that will be monitored over time.

Read the detailed description

This proposed study continues a line of research by Doctors Cohen, Cook, Kahler, and colleagues on heavy alcohol use, HIV-associated brain dysfunction, and long-term HIV outcomes. The study will build on our past findings to determine the extent to which marked reductions in alcohol consumption at 30 days and again at 90 days via contingency management (CM) improves cognitive-behavioral performance, underlying brain functions and pathophysiology, and HIV-associated health outcomes. This feature in itself is a novel contribution and has rarely been done, but more importantly, it reflects the mission of the collaboration to develop actionable data on clinical trajectories in HIV infected heavy drinkers over age 50 that will instill high confidence in guiding next therapeutic steps. The study team will obtain a better understanding of how persons with HIV stop drinking, and what factors influence long-term drinking changes. These important clinical and scientific questions need resolution for successful treatment and management of HIV+ adults. This study is motivated by evidence that HIV-associated neurocognitive dysfunction continues despite effective combined anti-retroviral therapies (cART). Even mild cognitive impairments have detrimental functional effects and health outcomes that worsen as HIV+ people age. Heavy alcohol consumption is common among HIV+ adults, and contributes to functional brain disturbances directly or indirectly via systemic metabolic or inflammatory disturbances. However, our past findings indicate that current alcohol use is more strongly associated with cognitive and brain dysfunction among HIV+ adults than lifetime consumption; and that adverse brain effects occur primarily with heavy drinking. Our overarching hypothesis is that the impact of ongoing heavy alcohol use on the brain and cognition may be reversible, providing a strong impetus for the proposed study. The study team will conduct our research in Florida, which has the highest number of new HIV infections in the US, as well as an increasingly diverse population with HIV+, 50% of whom are now aged 50 years or over in the state.

Our research will seek to modify alcohol consumption by using contingency management (CM) and measure for changes in brain pathophysiology and function, as well as changes in systemic inflammation, and gut and liver pathologies which are hypothesized pathways by which alcohol may increase brain dysfunction. The study team will also measure neurocognitive functioning related to learning, attention-executive functions, working memory, and processing speed, domains in which HIV+ persons experience persistent impairment. the study team will use Motivational Interviewing (MI) to learn more about how persons with and without HIV reduce drinking, what factors are associated with long-term drinking changes, and how these drinking changes influence HIV clinical health behavior and outcomes. If the impact of alcohol on systemic and cerebral inflammation is temporary, then reducing or eliminating alcohol consumption could dramatically improve cognitive function and indices of brain health, even among people who have consumed alcohol for many years in the past. Our research will directly test hypotheses that ongoing heavy alcohol consumption is associated with brain pathophysiology and inflammation that impairs both functioning and cognitive processing, and that the inflammation and its sequelae are reversible in most HIV+ persons with alcohol cessation. The proposed sample will be 140 adults with HIV infection and 40 adults without HIV infection (at least 25% female; age >50 years). Participants will be recruited from heavy drinkers (>=14 drinks/week women, >=21 drinks/week men) with HIV infection identified from our ongoing Florida Cohort. HIV- participants will be recruited from community medical clinics where flyers will be posted.

02

Conditions studied

  • Alcohol Drinking
  • Chronic Inflammation
  • Neurocognitive Dysfunction
  • Liver Diseases
  • HIV Infections
03

In context

Alcohol Drinking Unverified

701 studies on the registry are indexed under Alcohol Drinking; 133 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 57 is below the median of 122 across 607 interventional studies indexed under Alcohol Drinking.

Browse Alcohol Drinking studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Florida is the lead sponsor of 1,287 studies on the registry; 199 are open to participants now.

Of its 180 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 143 (79%) have results posted.

Compared within Alcohol Drinking, the registry's first condition term, which may not be this study's main condition. Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
50 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Men and women;
  2. Age: 50-75 yrs.;
  3. 140 participants will have confirmed (confirmed via baseline bloodwork) and 40 participants will be HIV negative
  4. English speaking (will have protocol ready in Spanish in 2017);
  5. Physically mobile;
  6. Willing to participate in CM to reduce alcohol consumption, and to wear the alcohol biosensor for at least 30 days. All participants will be current, heavy drinkers (>=14 drinks/week women, >=21 drinks/week men), confirmed by baseline timeline follow-back, and by having evidence of at least 3 drinking episodes on the alcohol biosensor prior to baseline). Must blow a "zero" on breathalyzer at time of

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Neurological disorders (e.g., dementia, stroke, seizures, traumatic brain injury).
  2. Evidence of dementia (MOCA \< 17).
  3. Past opportunistic brain infection
  4. Major psychiatric illness (schizophrenia, intractable affective disorder, current substance dependence diagnosis).
  5. Current major psychiatric disturbance, including severe major depression.
  6. Unstable medical conditions (e.g., cancer).
  7. MRI (e.g., pregnancy, severe claustrophobia, metal implants).
  8. Physical impairment precluding motor response or lying still.
  9. Significant history of alcohol withdrawal as indicated by an Alcohol Withdrawal Symptom Checklist score ≥ 23 (within past year).
  10. Unable to correctly answer a set of questions that demonstrate understanding of key aspects of the study, including the voluntary nature of the study, the purpose of the study, what participants are being asked to do as part of the study, and what are the risks related to participating in the study.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
57 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    Adults with or without HIV infection

    Participants will be asked to stop drinking for at least 30 and up to 90 days. The study will use Contingency Management (CM) with financial incentives to encourage participants to maximally reduce alcohol consumption.

    Behavioral: Contingency Management (CM)

Interventions

  • BehavioralContingency Management (CM)

    A reinforcement delivery method that involves financial incentive to participants for sustained alcohol abstinence. CM will start after the participants complete the baseline measures and last for at least 30 days and up to 90 days.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Neurocognitive Functions

    Change in cognitive performance from baseline to 30-day follow-up. NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery is administered by a research assistant and consists of seven tests assessing memory, attention, cognitive flexibility, processing speed, and executive functioning. Summary scores will be calculated.

    Time frame: Baseline, 30 Days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Neuroinflammation

    Change in brain inflammation from baseline to 30-day follow-ups. Neuroinflammation is measured by cerebral metabolic neuroinflammatory markers, which include Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) metabolite concentrations (Cho and Myo-Inositol) and extracellular free water from Diffusor Tension Imaging sequences (DTI-FW).

    Time frame: Baseline, 30 Days

  2. Change in Brain Function

    Change in Brain Function from baseline to 30-day follow-up. Brain function is measured by mean signal intensity for specific task-dependent brain regions from functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI).

    Time frame: Baseline, 30 Days

  3. Change in markers of systemic Inflammation

    Blood testing for biomarkers of systemic inflammation such as cytokines, ceramides, FIB-4, and marker of abnormal liver function.

    Time frame: 30 Days

  4. Change in liver Status

    Evidence of liver fibrosis, fatty liver, and liver inflammation as measured by fibroscan

    Time frame: 30 Days

  5. Change in Drinks/week in the Past 30 Days

    Change in number of standard drinks per week in the past 30 days from baseline to 1 year follow-up, calculated from Timeline Follow Back (TLFB) interview.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 Year

  6. Change in gut microbiome

    Change in the ratio of Firmicutes: Bacteriodetes ratio, and change in the relative abundance of Proteobacteria

    Time frame: Baseline, 30-days, 90-days, 1 year

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Miami
    Miami, Florida 33136, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Limited and de-identified datasets will be available to researchers after signing a data-use agreement with the University of Florida.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form

Time frame: Our documents can be shared once the study begins. Data sharing will be an option for at least 5 years after the study is completed.

Access criteria: Contact the principal investigator. In the future, information about how to request data will be on a public website

Data sharing details ↗ · sharc-research.org

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Dec 2017 to primary completion in Aug 2022, 55 months.

Of 328 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Alcohol Drinking, half reached primary completion within 24 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 45. This study's 55 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 336 studies reached it within 24 months; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 45.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 3, 2017
First posted
Nov 27, 2017
StartActual
Dec 11, 2017
Primary completionActual
Aug 1, 2022
CompletionActual
Jan 1, 2024
Last update
Sep 3, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 3, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03353701
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 27, 2017
Start date
Dec 11, 2017
Primary completion
Aug 1, 2022
Completion
Jan 1, 2024
Last update
Sep 3, 2024

Study contacts

Robert Cook
principal investigator · University of Florida
Ronald Cohen
principal investigator · University of Florida

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion