ClinicalTrials.gg
WithdrawnNCT03351465Updated Sep 26, 2019

CALM for Pregnant and Post-Partum Women

An interventional study of Coordinated Anxiety Learning and Management in Anxiety, Depression and Depression, Postpartum, sponsored by University of California, Los Angeles. Withdrawn at 1 site in United States. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-09-26.

Primary conditionDepressionRegistry: Anxiety DisordersReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Anxiety Disorders — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Depression
Why
  1. The registry often attaches Anxiety Disorders to studies about something else, and this study's title and listed conditions do not name it.
  2. The study's listed conditions name Depression.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by University of California, Los Angeles · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was withdrawn
Trial was suspended due unanticipated funding issues.

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
0
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-13

Among 81 studies in Depression by University of California, Los Angeles — 12 open to participants now, 12 under way, none of them phase 3. Depression · University of California, Los Angeles.

Enrollment
72nd of 74
0 · median 76
Started
2020
with 3 others
No phase
45 of 81
7 open now
Registered
42nd of 81
by date

Among the 81 studies in Depression by University of California, Los Angeles, this one is the 72nd largest by enrollment of the 74 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 4 that started in 2020, is one of 45 with no phase, and was the 42nd registered.

Depression

8,582 studies on the registry are indexed under Depression; 1,723 are open to participants now.

Browse Depression studies →

Open to participants now

12 of the 81 studies in Depression by University of California, Los Angeles are open now, in 1 country. Recruiting first, the newest first:

7 more — sign in →

By country, each count listing its studies:

All 12 open studies →

Where they have run

Who these studies take

Of the 1,089 Depression studies recruiting now, 470 (43%) set no upper age limit and 519 (48%) stop at 75 or younger; 203 take children under 18; 311 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years and older · female · healthy volunteers too.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 81 studies in Depression by University of California, Los Angeles, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

Anxiety and depression is common along pregnant mothers and has been found to increase risk for negative outcomes in both mothers and infants. These risks can include low infant birth weight, negative mother-infant interactions, and delayed developmental outcomes. Evidenced-based interventions to support pregnant women experiencing symptoms of depression or anxiety are not well studied or widely available, particularly for low-income women of color. These women may not have access to the type of healthcare that would best support their needs and/or they may not be familiar with or trust clinicians who deliver mental health interventions. The current randomized-controlled trial (RCT) aims to address these gaps in the literature by testing the feasibility and efficacy of a doula-supported, computer-assisted delivery of a cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) intervention designed to reduce pregnancy-related anxiety, depression, and prevent perinatal mood disorders. The 120 participants in the study (60 Black women and 60 Hispanic/Latina women) will be randomized to either receive the Coordinated Anxiety Learning and Management (CALM) intervention (n=60) or treatment as usual (n=60). Participants assigned to the intervention will complete 6-8 sessions of CALM with a language and ethnically/racially-matched doula who has been trained as a CALM specialist in order to increase participant comfort and reduce the stigma associated with mental health services. Women in both groups will complete assessments of their pregnancy-related anxiety, general anxiety, depressive symptoms, and satisfaction with treatment (CALM or treatment as usual) at baseline, 12-weeks post-baseline, and 10-weeks post-birth. It is hypothesized that women assigned to the CALM intervention will have significantly less anxiety and depressive symptoms post-treatment and post-partum compared to the women assigned to treatment as usual. The results of the current RCT will be used to test the efficacy of the CALM intervention for pregnant women or color and to inform efforts for potential future scalability.

Read the detailed description

Setting and Sample Women will be recruited from six clinics in Alameda County that provide prenatal care. In clinic settings, women will be approached by a trained and culturally sensitive research graduate student researchers (GSRs) to determine their interest and eligibility for CALM participation based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. A standard screening form will be used.

Second, participants who remain eligible on the above criteria will be screened at the same time for pregnancy anxiety, depressive and anxiety symptoms using standardized screening instruments. Participants will be asked to complete the measures on a computer/tablet. Their responses will be scored and they will be informed via a phone call if they are eligible for the study. Those who score above population cutoffs for risk of disorders on The Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale (OASIS), Edinburgh Perinatal Depression Scale (EPDS), the Pregnancy-Specific Anxiety Scale (PSAS) and/or the Pregnancy-Related Anxiety Scale (PRAS) are eligible for the study. Cutoffs are as follows:

  1. Pregnancy Specific Anxiety 4 items Scale (cut off 15 or higher)
  2. Pregnancy-Related Anxiety Scale (cut off 30 or higher)

b) OASIS (cut off of 8 or greater for positive screen for anxiety symptoms) c) EPDS if not obtained as normal procedures in clinic at that time (cut off of 12 or greater for positive screen for depression)

Third, a home visit (or visit in their location of preference) is then arranged for participants who remain eligible for research staff to do the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview in order to exclude any women with history of bipolar, psychosis, current addiction or current suicidality. CALM web-based CBT is not recommended for individuals with severe mental illness (e.g. bipolar disorder and psychosis) who need additional services and will be given referrals. If not excluded on this basis research staff will consent women into the RCT study, conduct a baseline assessment, and randomized to treatment (CALM intervention) or control (Treatment as Usual) at the same home visit. Randomization will be programmed within the RedCap system after participants completed their baseline assessment. The computerized randomization schema will use blocked-randomization to ensure that too many participants are not assigned to the CALM intervention at once. Participants will be provided with remuneration at the end of the home visit, regardless of whether they are found eligible and/or consent to participate in the study.

CALM Intervention (Treatment) Each CALM-trained doula (referred to in study as "CALM specialist") will be assigned to a single participant for the entirety of their participation in the RCT. Study participants randomized to CALM will be visited weekly or biweekly in their home or location of preference by a CALM specialist between 6 and 8 times prenatally. Sessions may extend into postpartum if needed as determined by the CALM specialist in conjunction with their supervisor. Additional visits will vary based on continuing assessment of symptoms.

The CALM program is interactive, with individualized data entered session by session (e.g., symptom scales, homework completion, fear hierarchies, response to exercises in session), that is sometimes retrieved at later points throughout the program (e.g., fear hierarchies). The interactive data entry provides a tool for objectively monitoring progress throughout the program and a method for assessing symptom improvement from one visit to the next. In addition, video vignettes are embedded throughout to demonstrate a therapist and patient working together on a specific skill or component of treatment. To reinforce what was learned in session, printouts of the session material (including patient's individualized information that is entered) are given to participants at the completion of each session, providing them with an individualized workbook that cumulates as they progress through the program. Participants can also access the program through a patient portal to obtain more education, guidance and forms. Also, each module ends with an assessment section in which patients rate their understanding of the material and answer quiz questions, and clinicians rate the patient's proficiency in implementing the specific cognitive behavioral skill. This assessment information guides the participant and CALM specialist as to whether to repeat the module or not.

During the intervention, the CALM specialist will sit side by side with the patient as they both view the program on screen (see CALM Tools for Living Video, www.chammp.org). The program provides a structure to guide the content of each visit, thereby enhancing the integrity with which cognitive and behavioral strategies are presented and implemented in the hands of novice clinicians. The CALM specialist guides the participants to read or talk about material on the screen, following the general outline of module presentation described above. Participants can read the information and then talk with the CALM specialist about what was read, and/or or they can summarize the information that is presented on screen to the participant, and then help them apply the information to their own situation.

In addition, the program prompts CALM specialists to engage in specific tasks repeatedly throughout each module. These tasks include (1) stating the goals of each visit (2) entering participant data (e.g., number of homework practices completed) (3) choosing which links to select based on relevance to the participant's target problem (e.g., link for how to apply cognitive restructuring to social anxiety versus depression) (4) instruction in and demonstration of skills of breathing and cognitive restructuring (5) designing home work practices between visits (5) reviewing and problem solving home work practices and (6) summarizing the information from each section of the program. CALM Specialists will have portable printers to leave a copy of the homework for the participants in the CALM group, regardless of whether they have internet access to do it online.

The CALM specialist is trained in advance to use the program skillfully, so that they can direct participants to which sections of the computerized treatment are most relevant to them; inquire about and assess the patient's understanding of the material; summarize and rephrase sections of the text as necessary to provide clarification; assist in the application of CBT principles to the participants' idiosyncratic thoughts and behaviors; and reinforce in-session skills practice and between-session assignment practice. Also, CALM specialists may choose to skip some modules and advance to other modules based on the needs of a given participant. CALM specialists will meet weekly by phone with a licensed clinical psychologist (Co-I) for supervision and to ensure optimal care.

Study participants in the treatment group will also complete assessments at baseline, 12-week post-baseline, and 10-week postpartum follow-ups.

Treatment as Usual (Control) Currently, participants who screen high on any of the anxiety or depression measures are referred to behavioral and/or mental health services in Alameda County using a public health department (ACPHD) generated list of providers. For the purposes of this study, this procedure will remain the treatment as usual. Study participants not randomized to CALM will receive treatment as usual (TAU) and will complete baseline, 12-week post-baseline, and 10-week postpartum follow-up assessments only.

Measures Several measures in addition to the scores on the OASIS, EPDS, PSAS, and PRAS will be used to describe the sample, examine treatment effects, and to evaluate the participant satisfaction with the CALM program. First, a screening survey will be completed in the clinic (OASIS, EPDS, PSAS, and PRAS). Next participant assessments will be administered at baseline, 12 weeks post-baseline, and 10 weeks postpartum for all participants. The baseline assessment will be conducted in the home (or location of preference) as described above). The two follow-up assessments will either be completed online or over the phone with a GSR, depending on the participant's preference. Remuneration will be sent after completion of each assessment.

03

Conditions studied

  • Anxiety
  • Depression
  • Depression, Postpartum
  • Pregnancy Related
  • CBT

Browse trials for

04

In context

Depression Reclassified

8,582 studies on the registry are indexed under Depression; 1,723 are open to participants now.

Browse Depression studies →

Lead sponsor

University of California, Los Angeles is the lead sponsor of 1,170 studies on the registry; 195 are open to participants now.

Of its 95 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 70 (74%) have results posted.

Compared within Depression, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Anxiety Disorders. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

05

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • English or Spanish speaking
  • Black or Hispanic/Latina women
  • Over the age of 18
  • Live or work in Oakland, CA.

CALM eligibility is based on two levels of screening. First, participants who score above clinical cutoffs on Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale (OASIS) or on the Edinburgh Perinatal Depression Scale (EPDS), or on the Pregnancy Stress and Anxiety Scale (PSAS) are eligible . A second screen using the (MMSE) is required , as CALM and CBT are only effective in specific conditions and is not recommended for individuals with severe mental illness (e.g. bipolar disorder and psychosis) or cognitive impairment.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Multiple gestation
  • Serving as birth surrogate
  • Used reproductive technology

Women will also be excluded if they do not meet the above criteria (i.e., they do not exceed the clinical cutoffs) or if they have a history of bipolar disorder or psychosis (treated within the past year).

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

MMSE and MoCA

Short tests of memory and thinking, each scored out of 30. Lower scores suggest more difficulty; criteria give a range, either to include people with memory problems or to leave them out.

06

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
0 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    CALM

    The intervention for this study, CALM Tools for Living-Il, is a computer-assisted cognitive-behavioral therapy for anxiety and depression that guides both the patient and CALM specialist. It is a reformulation of CALM Tools for Living that directly incorporates our previously optional modules for depression into the main program. The computerized/internet format is designed to retain the fidelity of CBT when delivered by novice clinicians. The program is intended to be delivered in 6 to 8 sessions, although flexibility is allowed. Participants in the intervention group will be visited by the calm specialist weekly between 6 and 8 times prenatally;postpartum visits will vary based on continuing assessment of symptoms.

    Behavioral: Coordinated Anxiety Learning and Management

  • No intervention
    Treatment as Usual

    Participants will receive pre-natal care as usual, and will be visited at 4 time points by the graduate student researchers: baseline, 12 weeks post baseline, and 10 weeks postpartum.

Interventions

  • BehavioralCoordinated Anxiety Learning and Management

    The intervention for this study, CALM Tools for Living-Il, is a computer-assisted cognitive behavioral therapy for anxiety and depression that guides both the patient and CALM specialist. It is a reformulation of CALM Tools for Living42 that directly incorporates our previously optional modules for depression into the main program. The computerized internet format is designed to retain the fidelity of CBT when delivered by novice clinicians. The program is intended to be delivered in 6 to 8 sessions, although flexibility is allowed.

07

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Pregnancy Related Anxiety (composite will be created with anxiety and depression measures)

    14 item Pregnancy Stress and Anxiety Scale (PSAS) that measures pregnancy related stress and anxiety

    Time frame: at baseline, 12-weeks post-baseline, at 10 weeks postpartum

  2. Change in General Anxiety (composite will be created with anxiety and depression measures)

    14 items from the Anxiety and Stress subscales of the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS)

    Time frame: at baseline, 12-weeks post-baseline, at 10 weeks postpartum

  3. Change in Depression (composite will be created with anxiety and depression measures)

    10 items from the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) that measures postnatal depressive symptoms

    Time frame: at baseline, 12-weeks post-baseline, at 10 weeks postpartum

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Functional Impairment

    5 item Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) that measures functional impairment in school/ work, social, and family life (0-10 with higher scores indicating more impairment) and 2 items assessing number of days in one week participant felt were lost or unproductive due to symptoms of anxiety or depression (1-7).

    Time frame: at baseline, 12-weeks post-baseline, and at 10 weeks postpartum

  2. Treatment Satisfaction

    5 item Client Satisfaction questionnaire that measures a participants' satisfaction with the treatment they've been delivered

    Time frame: 12-weeks post-baseline

08

Study locations

1 site
  • University of California, San Francisco
    Oakland, California 94612, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Dunkel Schetter C. Psychological science on pregnancy: stress processes, biopsychosocial models, and emerging research issues. Annu Rev Psychol. 2011;62:531-58. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.031809.130727. PubMed 21126184 ↗
  • Huizink AC, Mulder EJ, Buitelaar JK. Prenatal stress and risk for psychopathology: specific effects or induction of general susceptibility? Psychol Bull. 2004 Jan;130(1):115-42. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.130.1.115. PubMed 14717652 ↗
  • Dole N, Savitz DA, Hertz-Picciotto I, Siega-Riz AM, McMahon MJ, Buekens P. Maternal stress and preterm birth. Am J Epidemiol. 2003 Jan 1;157(1):14-24. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwf176. PubMed 12505886 ↗
  • Kramer MS, Lydon J, Seguin L, Goulet L, Kahn SR, McNamara H, Genest J, Dassa C, Chen MF, Sharma S, Meaney MJ, Thomson S, Van Uum S, Koren G, Dahhou M, Lamoureux J, Platt RW. Stress pathways to spontaneous preterm birth: the role of stressors, psychological distress, and stress hormones. Am J Epidemiol. 2009 Jun 1;169(11):1319-26. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwp061. Epub 2009 Apr 10. PubMed 19363098 ↗
  • Orr ST, Reiter JP, Blazer DG, James SA. Maternal prenatal pregnancy-related anxiety and spontaneous preterm birth in Baltimore, Maryland. Psychosom Med. 2007 Jul-Aug;69(6):566-70. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0b013e3180cac25d. Epub 2007 Jul 16. PubMed 17636150 ↗
  • Andersson L, Sundstrom-Poromaa I, Bixo M, Wulff M, Bondestam K, aStrom M. Point prevalence of psychiatric disorders during the second trimester of pregnancy: a population-based study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Jul;189(1):148-54. doi: 10.1067/mob.2003.336. PubMed 12861154 ↗
  • Ross LE, McLean LM. Anxiety disorders during pregnancy and the postpartum period: A systematic review. J Clin Psychiatry. 2006 Aug;67(8):1285-98. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v67n0818. PubMed 16965210 ↗
  • Lee AM, Lam SK, Sze Mun Lau SM, Chong CS, Chui HW, Fong DY. Prevalence, course, and risk factors for antenatal anxiety and depression. Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Nov;110(5):1102-12. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000287065.59491.70. PubMed 17978126 ↗
  • Teixeira C, Figueiredo B, Conde A, Pacheco A, Costa R. Anxiety and depression during pregnancy in women and men. J Affect Disord. 2009 Dec;119(1-3):142-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2009.03.005. Epub 2009 Apr 5. PubMed 19346001 ↗
  • Woods SM, Melville JL, Guo Y, Fan MY, Gavin A. Psychosocial stress during pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Jan;202(1):61.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.07.041. Epub 2009 Sep 20. PubMed 19766975 ↗
  • Gavin NI, Gaynes BN, Lohr KN, Meltzer-Brody S, Gartlehner G, Swinson T. Perinatal depression: a systematic review of prevalence and incidence. Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Nov;106(5 Pt 1):1071-83. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000183597.31630.db. PubMed 16260528 ↗
  • Goodman SH. Depression in mothers. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2007;3:107-35. doi: 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.091401. PubMed 17716050 ↗
  • Bener A, Gerber LM, Sheikh J. Prevalence of psychiatric disorders and associated risk factors in women during their postpartum period: a major public health problem and global comparison. Int J Womens Health. 2012;4:191-200. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S29380. Epub 2012 May 10. PubMed 22654524 ↗
  • Matthey S, Barnett B, Howie P, Kavanagh DJ. Diagnosing postpartum depression in mothers and fathers: whatever happened to anxiety? J Affect Disord. 2003 Apr;74(2):139-47. doi: 10.1016/s0165-0327(02)00012-5. PubMed 12706515 ↗
  • Yelland J, Sutherland G, Brown SJ. Postpartum anxiety, depression and social health: findings from a population-based survey of Australian women. BMC Public Health. 2010 Dec 20;10:771. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-771. PubMed 21167078 ↗
  • Murray L, de Rosnay M, Pearson J, Bergeron C, Schofield E, Royal-Lawson M, Cooper PJ. Intergenerational transmission of social anxiety: the role of social referencing processes in infancy. Child Dev. 2008 Jul-Aug;79(4):1049-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01175.x. PubMed 18717906 ↗
  • Stein A, Craske MG, Lehtonen A, Harvey A, Savage-McGlynn E, Davies B, Goodwin J, Murray L, Cortina-Borja M, Counsell N. Maternal cognitions and mother-infant interaction in postnatal depression and generalized anxiety disorder. J Abnorm Psychol. 2012 Nov;121(4):795-809. doi: 10.1037/a0026847. Epub 2012 Jan 30. PubMed 22288906 ↗
  • Dunkel Schetter C, Tanner L. Anxiety, depression and stress in pregnancy: implications for mothers, children, research, and practice. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2012 Mar;25(2):141-8. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0b013e3283503680. PubMed 22262028 ↗
  • Lu Q, Lu MC, Schetter CD. Learning from success and failure in psychosocial intervention: an evaluation of low birth weight prevention trials. J Health Psychol. 2005 Mar;10(2):185-95. doi: 10.1177/1359105305049763. PubMed 15723889 ↗
  • Stevens-Simon C, Orleans M. Low-birthweight prevention programs: the enigma of failure. Birth. 1999 Sep;26(3):184-91. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-536x.1999.00184.x. PubMed 10655819 ↗
  • Butler AC, Chapman JE, Forman EM, Beck AT. The empirical status of cognitive-behavioral therapy: a review of meta-analyses. Clin Psychol Rev. 2006 Jan;26(1):17-31. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2005.07.003. Epub 2005 Sep 30. PubMed 16199119 ↗
  • Tolin DF. Is cognitive-behavioral therapy more effective than other therapies? A meta-analytic review. Clin Psychol Rev. 2010 Aug;30(6):710-20. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2010.05.003. Epub 2010 May 25. PubMed 20547435 ↗
  • Hodnett ED, Fredericks S, Weston J. Support during pregnancy for women at increased risk of low birthweight babies. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Jun 16;(6):CD000198. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000198.pub2. PubMed 20556746 ↗
  • Sockol LE, Epperson CN, Barber JP. A meta-analysis of treatments for perinatal depression. Clin Psychol Rev. 2011 Jul;31(5):839-49. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2011.03.009. Epub 2011 Mar 27. PubMed 21545782 ↗
  • O'Mahen H, Himle JA, Fedock G, Henshaw E, Flynn H. A pilot randomized controlled trial of cognitive behavioral therapy for perinatal depression adapted for women with low incomes. Depress Anxiety. 2013 Jul;30(7):679-87. doi: 10.1002/da.22050. Epub 2013 Jan 14. PubMed 23319454 ↗
  • Andrews G, Cuijpers P, Craske MG, McEvoy P, Titov N. Computer therapy for the anxiety and depressive disorders is effective, acceptable and practical health care: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2010 Oct 13;5(10):e13196. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013196. PubMed 20967242 ↗
  • Craske MG, Rose RD, Lang A, Welch SS, Campbell-Sills L, Sullivan G, Sherbourne C, Bystritsky A, Stein MB, Roy-Byrne PP. Computer-assisted delivery of cognitive behavioral therapy for anxiety disorders in primary-care settings. Depress Anxiety. 2009;26(3):235-42. doi: 10.1002/da.20542. PubMed 19212970 ↗
  • Roy-Byrne P, Craske MG, Sullivan G, Rose RD, Edlund MJ, Lang AJ, Bystritsky A, Welch SS, Chavira DA, Golinelli D, Campbell-Sills L, Sherbourne CD, Stein MB. Delivery of evidence-based treatment for multiple anxiety disorders in primary care: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2010 May 19;303(19):1921-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.608. PubMed 20483968 ↗
  • Craske MG, Stein MB, Sullivan G, Sherbourne C, Bystritsky A, Rose RD, Lang AJ, Welch S, Campbell-Sills L, Golinelli D, Roy-Byrne P. Disorder-specific impact of coordinated anxiety learning and management treatment for anxiety disorders in primary care. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2011 Apr;68(4):378-88. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.25. PubMed 21464362 ↗
  • Sullivan G, Sherbourne C, Chavira DA, Craske MG, Gollineli D, Han X, Rose RD, Bystritsky A, Stein MB, Roy-Byrne P. Does a quality improvement intervention for anxiety result in differential outcomes for lower-income patients? Am J Psychiatry. 2013 Feb;170(2):218-25. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2012.12030375. PubMed 23377641 ↗
  • Joesch JM, Sherbourne CD, Sullivan G, Stein MB, Craske MG, Roy-Byrne P. Incremental benefits and cost of coordinated anxiety learning and management for anxiety treatment in primary care. Psychol Med. 2012 Sep;42(9):1937-48. doi: 10.1017/S0033291711002893. Epub 2011 Dec 13. PubMed 22152230 ↗
  • Stanley D, Sata N, Oparah JC, McLemore MR. Evaluation of the East Bay Community Birth Support Project, a Community-Based Program to Decrease Recidivism in Previously Incarcerated Women. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2015 Nov-Dec;44(6):743-50. doi: 10.1111/1552-6909.12760. Epub 2015 Oct 15. PubMed 26469292 ↗
  • Hodnett ED, Gates S, Hofmeyr GJ, Sakala C, Weston J. Continuous support for women during childbirth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Feb 16;(2):CD003766. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003766.pub3. PubMed 21328263 ↗
  • Kozhimannil KB, Hardeman RR, Attanasio LB, Blauer-Peterson C, O'Brien M. Doula care, birth outcomes, and costs among Medicaid beneficiaries. Am J Public Health. 2013 Apr;103(4):e113-21. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.301201. Epub 2013 Feb 14. PubMed 23409910 ↗
  • Rose RD, Lang AJ, Welch SS, Campbell-Sills L, Chavira DA, Sullivan G, Sherbourne C, Bystritsky A, Stein MB, Roy-Byrne PP, Craske MG. Training primary care staff to deliver a computer-assisted cognitive-behavioral therapy program for anxiety disorders. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2011 Jul-Aug;33(4):336-42. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2011.04.011. Epub 2011 Jun 8. PubMed 21762829 ↗
  • Brown LA, Craske MG, Glenn DE, Stein MB, Sullivan G, Sherbourne C, Bystritsky A, Welch SS, Campbell-Sills L, Lang A, Roy-Byrne P, Rose RD. CBT competence in novice therapists improves anxiety outcomes. Depress Anxiety. 2013 Feb;30(2):97-115. doi: 10.1002/da.22027. Epub 2012 Dec 5. PubMed 23225338 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Jan 2020; primary completion for Jun 2020, 5 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 17, 2017
First posted
Nov 22, 2017
StartEst.
Jan 1, 2020
Primary completionEst.
Jun 30, 2020
CompletionEst.
Jun 30, 2020
Last update
Sep 26, 2019
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 26, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03351465
Responsible party
Christine Dunkel Schetter, PhD (Principal Investigator, University of California, Los Angeles) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 22, 2017
Start date
Jan 1, 2020 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2020 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 30, 2020 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 26, 2019

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is withdrawn, as verified in Sep 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion