CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03349632Updated Feb 22, 2019Results posted

Clinical Comparison of 4 Daily Disposable Soft Contact Lenses

An interventional study of verofilcon A contact lenses and senofilcon A contact lenses in Refractive Error, sponsored by Alcon Research. Completed at 3 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-02-22.

Sponsored by Alcon Research · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
68
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to obtain on-eye performance data to inform contact lens product development and to further evaluate product performance in the intended population.

Read the detailed description

The expected duration of subject participation in the study is approximately 20 days with 3 scheduled visits. Each subject will evaluate the test contact lenses compared to 1 of 3 commercially available contact lenses.

02

Conditions studied

  • Refractive Error

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Contact lenses
  • Myopia
  • Near-sighted
  • Daily disposable
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Able to understand and must sign an approved Informed Consent Form
  • Successfully wears daily disposable spherical soft contact lenses in both eyes for a minimum of 5 days per week and 8 hours per day during the past 3 months
  • Best Corrected Visual Acuity of 20/25 Snellen or better in each eye
  • Willing to stop wearing habitual contact lenses for the duration of study participation
  • Other protocol-defined inclusion criteria may apply

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any eye condition, surgery, disease, or use of medication that contraindicates contact lens wear, as determined by the Investigator.
  • Routinely sleeps in habitual contact lenses
  • Currently wears Oasys 1-Day, MyDay, or Moist contact lenses
  • Other protocol-defined exclusion criteria may apply
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
68 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    DD T2/Oasys 1-Day

    Verofilcon A contact lenses and senofilcon A contact lenses worn in both eyes, each product, for 1 week on a daily wear basis, as randomized

    Device: verofilcon A contact lenses · Device: senofilcon A contact lenses

  • Other
    DD T2/MyDay

    Verofilcon A contact lenses and stenfilcon A contact lenses worn in both eyes, each product, for 1 week on a daily disposable basis, as randomized

    Device: verofilcon A contact lenses · Device: stenfilcon A contact lenses

  • Other
    DD T2/Moist

    Verofilcon A contact lenses and etafilcon A contact lenses worn in both eyes, each product, for 1 week on a daily disposable basis, as randomized

    Device: verofilcon A contact lenses · Device: etafilcon A contact lenses

Interventions

  • Deviceverofilcon A contact lenses

    Investigational spherical silicone hydrogel contact lenses for daily disposable wear

    Also known as: DDT2

  • Devicesenofilcon A contact lenses

    Commercially available spherical silicone hydrogel contact lenses for daily disposable wear

    Also known as: ACUVUE OASYS® 1-Day with HydraLuxe™ Technology, Oasys 1-Day

  • Devicestenfilcon A contact lenses

    Commercially available spherical silicone hydrogel contact lenses for daily disposable wear

    Also known as: MyDay®, MyDay

  • Deviceetafilcon A contact lenses

    Commercially available spherical silicone hydrogel contact lenses for daily disposable wear

    Also known as: 1-Day ACUVUE® MOIST, Moist

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Overall Quality of Vision

    Overall quality of vision was collected binocularly and rated on a 10-point scale with 1 = poor to 10 = excellent. Subjects were asked "Thinking back over the last week, please rate our study lenses. Rate eyes together." No formal hypotheses was conducted; hence no inferential testing was performed.

    Time frame: Day 8, each product

06

Results

Posted Feb 22, 2019

Participant flow

Subjects were recruited from 3 investigational sites located in the United States.

Period 1, First Week of Wear
Participant flow — Period 1, First Week of Wear
MilestoneDD T2/Oasys 1-Day (Sequence 1)Oasys 1-Day/DD T2 (Sequence 2)DD T2/MyDay (Sequence 3)MyDay/DD T2 (Sequence 4)DD T2/Moist (Sequence 5)Moist/DD T2 (Sequence 6)
Started111111111111
Completed111111111111
Not completed000000
Period 2, Second Week of Wear
Participant flow — Period 2, Second Week of Wear
MilestoneDD T2/Oasys 1-Day (Sequence 1)Oasys 1-Day/DD T2 (Sequence 2)DD T2/MyDay (Sequence 3)MyDay/DD T2 (Sequence 4)DD T2/Moist (Sequence 5)Moist/DD T2 (Sequence 6)
Started111111111111
Completed111111111111
Not completed000000

Outcome measures

PrimaryOverall Quality of Vision

Overall quality of vision was collected binocularly and rated on a 10-point scale with 1 = poor to 10 = excellent. Subjects were asked "Thinking back over the last week, please rate our study lenses. Rate eyes together." No formal hypotheses was conducted; hence no inferential testing was performed.

Time frame:
Day 8, each product
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Overall Quality of Vision
units on a scaleDD T2 (Sequence 1 and 2)Oasys 1-Day (Sequence 1 and 2)DD T2 (Sequence 3 and 4)MyDay (Sequence 3 and 4)DD T2 (Sequence 5 and 6)Moist (Sequence 5 and 6)
Overall Quality of Vision8.5 ± 1.49.2 ± 1.38.8 ± 1.89.4 ± 0.89.2 ± 1.18.8 ± 1.7

Adverse events

Collected over Dispense through study completion, an average of 2 weeks. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
DD T2 (Sequence 1 and 2)0/22 (0%)0/22 (0%)0/22 (0%)
Oasys 1- Day (Sequence 1 and 2)0/22 (0%)0/22 (0%)0/22 (0%)
DD T2 (Sequence 3 and 4)0/22 (0%)0/22 (0%)0/22 (0%)
MyDay (Sequence 3 and 4)0/22 (0%)0/22 (0%)0/22 (0%)
DD T2 (Sequence 5 and 6)0/22 (0%)0/22 (0%)0/22 (0%)
Moist (Sequence 5 and 6)0/22 (0%)0/22 (0%)0/22 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

This analysis population includes all subjects/eyes exposed to any study lenses evaluated in this study (Safety Analysis Set).

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Overall
Mean32.9 ± 9.1
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Overall
Female46
Male20
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Overall
White56
Black or African American6
American Indian or Alaska Native0
Asian4
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
07

Study locations

3 sites
  • Alcon Investigative Site
    Maitland, Florida 32751, United States
  • Alcon Investigative Site
    Pensacola, Florida 32503, United States
  • Alcon Investigative Site
    Johns Creek, Georgia 30097, United States
08

References and documents

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Nov 2, 2017
  • Statistical analysis plan · Nov 17, 2017

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03349632
Lead sponsor
Alcon Research
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 21, 2017
Start date
Jan 10, 2018
Primary completion
Feb 16, 2018
Completion
Feb 16, 2018
Results posted
Feb 22, 2019
Last update
Feb 22, 2019

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion