ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT03349177Updated Nov 21, 2017

Pathological Complete Response Rate in Locally Advanced Breast Cancer With FEC, EC-T, or TC as Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

A Phase 2/3 interventional study of Epirubicin and Fluorouracil in Breast Cancer, Pathological Complete Response and Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy, sponsored by Zhiyong Yu. Status unknown. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-11-21.

Sponsored by Zhiyong Yu · Phase 2/3, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Nov 2017), so the status shown — last known as Not yet recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Phase 2/3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
200
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has become the standard therapy for both locally advanced and early-stage breast cancer in recent years for the improvement breast conserving surgery rate and the evaluation of treatment response in vivo. Pathological complete response (pCR) is an independent prognostic factor irrespective of breast cancer intrinsic subtypes after NAC. The trial is designed to compare effectiveness between anthracycline and/or taxane as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for operable advanced breast cancer in different molecular typing. In this trial the investigators will randomly assign 200 primary breast cancer patients to receive six cycles of fluorourcil, epirubicin,and cyclophosphamide(FEC), or four cycles of epirubicin and cyclophosphamide (EC) followed by four cycles of docetaxel(T), or six cycles of docetaxel and cyclophosphamide (TC). Trasuzumab was recommended combining docetaxel to patients if HER-2 positive.The effectiveness of therapy will be estimated after every two cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Surgery will be performed after completing designated full cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The primary endpoint is to assess pathologic complete response (pCR, ypT0/is ypN0) rate in different regiments. The secondary endpoint is to assess the relationship between pCR rate with molecular typing in different regiments, so that the investigators could optimize neoadjuvant chemotherapy regiment according to molecular typing.

Read the detailed description

The trial is designed to compare effectiveness between anthracycline and/or taxane as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for operable advanced breast cancer in different molecular typing. In this trial the investigators will randomly assign 200 primary breast cancer patients to receive six cycles of fluorourcil, epirubicin,and cyclophosphamide(FEC), or four cycles of epirubicin and cyclophosphamide (EC) followed by four cycles of docetaxel(T), or six cycles of docetaxel and cyclophosphamide (TC). Trasuzumab was recommended combining docetaxel to patients if HER-2 positive.The effectiveness of therapy will be estimated after every two cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Surgery will be performed after completing designated full cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The primary endpoint is to assess pathologic complete response (pCR, ypT0/is ypN0) rate in different regiments. The secondary endpoint is to assess the relationship between pCR rate with molecular typing in different regiments, so that the investigators could optimize neoadjuvant chemotherapy regiment according to molecular typing.

02

Conditions studied

  • Breast Cancer
  • Pathological Complete Response
  • Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

Browse trials for

03

In context

Breast Neoplasms

14,825 studies on the registry are indexed under Breast Neoplasms; 3,319 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 200 is above the median of 72 across 10,896 interventional studies indexed under Breast Neoplasms.

Browse Breast Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Zhiyong Yu is the lead sponsor of 7 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • All patients were required to give written .
  • Patients present with operable breast cancers that were diagnosed by histopathology and have no distant .
  • Have no history of anti-cancer therapies including chemotherapy, radiation therapy, hormone therapy and surgical therapy.
  • Have normal cardiac functions by echocardiography.
  • scores are ≤ 0-1.
  • Patients are disposed to practice during the whole trial.
  • The results of patients' blood tests are as follows:

≥ 90 g/L WBC ≥ 3.0×109/L Plt ≥ 100×109/L Neutrophils ≥ 1.5×109/L and AST ≤ 2.5 times of normal upper limit. ≤ 1.5 times of normal upper limit. Creatinine ≤ 1.5 times of normal upper limit.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Have other cancers at the same time or have the history of other cancers in recent five years, excluding the controlled skin basal cell carcinoma or skin squamous cell carcinoma or carcinoma in situ of cervix.
  • Active infections
  • Severe non-cancerous diseases.
  • The patients are undergoing current administration of anti-cancer therapies, or are attending some other clinical trails.
  • Inflammatory breast cancer.
  • Pregnant or lactational, or patients refuse to practice during the whole trial.
  • The patients are in some special conditions that they can't understand the written , such as they are demented or hawkish.
  • Have allergic history of the chemotherapeutic agents.
  • Bilateral breast cancers.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(7)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

ECOG performance status

A scale of how much an illness limits everyday activity. For people being assessed to join a study, scores run from 0 (fully active) to 4; lower is more active.

0
Fully active, no restrictions.
1
Limited in strenuous activity, but walking and able to do light work, such as housework or office work.
2
Walking and able to look after yourself, but unable to work; up and about more than half of waking hours.
3
Able to look after yourself only in part; in bed or a chair more than half of waking hours.
4
Unable to look after yourself at all; in bed or a chair all day.

Studies most often ask for 0–1 or 0–2. Your doctor gives the score; the WHO scale uses the same steps. The full scale also has 5, which records death.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Hemoglobin (Hb)

The protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen. A low level is anaemia, which can cause tiredness and breathlessness. Measured in g/dL or g/L (9 g/dL is 90 g/L).

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

Bilirubin

A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.

Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
200 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    FEC group

    Fluorouracil 500mg/m2 on day 1, epirubicin 100mg/m2 on day 1 and cyclophosphamide 500mg/m2 on day 1 every 3 weeks for six cycles

    Drug: Epirubicin · Drug: Fluorouracil · Drug: Cyclophosphamide

  • Experimental
    EC-T group

    Epirubicin 100mg/m2 on day 1 cyclophosphamide 600mg/m2 on day1 every 2 weeks for four cycles followed by docetaxel 100mg/m2 on day 1 every 3 weeks for four cycles

    Drug: Epirubicin · Drug: Docetaxel · Drug: Cyclophosphamide

  • Experimental
    TC group

    Docetaxel 75mg/m2 on day 1 and cyclophosphamide 600mg/m2 on day 1 every 3 weeks for six cycles

    Drug: Docetaxel · Drug: Cyclophosphamide

Interventions

  • 100mg/m2

    Also known as: Adriacin

  • 500mg/m2

    Also known as: Fluorouracil injection

  • 75mg/m2(TC), 100mg/m2(EC-T)

    Also known as: Docetaxel injection

  • 500mg/m2(FEC), 600mg/m2(EC-T and TC)

    Also known as: Cyclophosphamide injection

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With Pathological Complete Response (pCR)

    Participants were evaluated following eight cycles of treatment and after surgery to assess for pCR. pCR was defined as no invasive or in situ residual tumor masses in the breast and lymph nodes according to pathologist examination. The percentage of participants with pCR was reported, and the 95% CI for one-sample binomial was constructed using the Pearson-Clopper method.

    Time frame: 2 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. The relation between pCR rate, molecular subtypes, and different regiments.

    The correlations were calculated using the Spearman rank correlation coefficient. The criteria for judging the size of the correlation coefficient were applied: correlations\<0.30 are considered minor, correlations between 0.3-0.49 are considered medium, and ≥0.5 are considered strong. Cohen's kappa statistic was used to determine inter-examiner agreement. According to Altman's guidelines, it is poor when kappa scores ≤0.20, fair when kappa between 0.21-0.40, moderate when kappa between 0.41-0.60, good when kappa 0.61-0.80, and very good when kappa ≥0.80.

    Time frame: 2 years

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Nov 2017; primary completion for Nov 2019, 24 months later.

Of 43 non-industry phase 2/3 interventional studies under Breast Neoplasms, half reached primary completion within 57 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 31 and three quarters within 91. This study's planned 24 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 56 studies reached it within 57 months; a quarter within 32 and three quarters within 88.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 14, 2017
First posted
Nov 21, 2017
StartEst.
Nov 27, 2017
Primary completionEst.
Nov 27, 2019
CompletionEst.
Nov 27, 2019
Last update
Nov 21, 2017
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 21, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03349177
Lead sponsor
Zhiyong Yu
Responsible party
Zhiyong Yu (Director of the Breast Surgery Ⅰ, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Nov 21, 2017
Start date
Nov 27, 2017 (estimated)
Primary completion
Nov 27, 2019 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 27, 2019 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 21, 2017

Study contacts

Zhiyong Yu, PhD
Contact
drzhiyongyu@aliyun.com
86-13355312277
Xiaoshan Cao, MD
Contact
caoxiaoshan2009@163.com
86-15154181183
Zhiyong Yu, PhD
study chair · Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute
Xiaoshan Cao, MD
principal investigator · Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Nov 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drugs tested here: Epirubicin · Docetaxel

Start the discussion