ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT03348774Updated Nov 21, 2017

Scrutinizing the Heterogeneity of SLE: Defining Phenotypes

An observational study in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, sponsored by University Health Network, Toronto. Status unknown at 1 site in Canada. Open to female participants. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-11-21.

Sponsored by University Health Network, Toronto · Observational

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Nov 2017), so the status shown — last known as Enrolling by invitation — may be out of date.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
950
Sex
Female
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 93 studies in Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic with a site in Canada — 19 open to participants now, 30 under way, 14 of them phase 3. Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic · Canada.

Planned enrollment
5th of 18
950 · median 402
Started
2017
with 7 others
Observational
18 of 93
5 open now
Registered
42nd of 93
by date
Lead sponsor
5 of 93
University Health Network, Toronto

Among the 93 studies in Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic with a site in Canada, this one is the 5th largest by planned enrollment of the 18 observational ones that give a count, is one of 8 that started in 2017, is one of 18 observational ones, and was the 42nd registered.

Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic

1,207 studies on the registry are indexed under Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic; 405 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 950 is above the median of 151 across 280 observational studies indexed under Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic.

Browse Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic studies →

Open to participants now

19 of the 93 studies in Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic with a site in Canada are open now.

All 19 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in Canada have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in Canada →

Who these studies take

Of the 284 Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic studies recruiting now, 92 (32%) set no upper age limit and 162 (57%) stop at 75 or younger; 54 take children under 18; 34 take healthy volunteers.

This study: female · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →
Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 93 studies in Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic with a site in Canada, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

SLE disease course is characterized by unpredictable relapses and remissions in the majority of patients. However, in a small proportion (approximately 5%), SLE presents with a monophasic pattern, meaning that these patients have active disease before and immediately after diagnosis and after some time they achieve prolonged remission (for 12 years on average). Interestingly, about half of these patients do so and require no medications. On the other end of the clinical spectrum, approximately 50% of the patients demonstrate persistent disease activity and usually have the highest risk for developing co-morbidities and irreversible damage. A major goal of clinical research in SLE is to improve disease management based on disease course. By better characterizing SLE disease course we hope to better identify patients early in the disease course for targeted therapies to prevent and or reduce future SLE complications.

The overall objective of our project is to define distinct phenotypes of SLE based on disease course, clinical features, pathogenic mechanisms, genetic factors and relevant biomarkers.

Read the detailed description

Specific aims of this study are:

  1. To test the clinical impression of the disease courses by modeling the course of the disease in each of three sub-populations of patients where it is anticipated that one sub-population will experience relapsing and remitting disease activity, one will experience persistently active disease and another will exhibit a monophasic pattern.
  2. To develop predictive models for group membership to enhance the accuracy of prognosis.
  3. To test these models in the inception cohort of SLE patients within the Toronto Lupus Cohort.

Study Design: Retrospective longitudinal observational cohort

Patients will be categorised into three disease courses:

I. Relapsing-remitting II. Persistently active III. Monophasic Relapsing/remitting is defined as periods of disease activity SLEDAI-2K of 4 or more, (but if only 4 cannot be from serology alone) less than 50% of the time alternating with periods of inactivity (SLEDAI-2K \<4) over the course of follow-up.

Persistently active disease is defined as SLEDAI-2K of 4 or more, (but if only 4 cannot be from serology alone), in greater than 80% of the visits, or no 2 consecutive visits with SLEDAI-2K \< 4.

Monophasic course is defined as disease activity SLEDAI-2K of 4 or more, (but if only 4 cannot be from serology alone) for an initial period of less than 3 years followed by resolution and inactive disease (SLEDAI-2K of 0 excluding serology) for at least 5 years.

Clinical and laboratory characteristics, therapies and outcomes for each subgroup will be described. Identification of all clinical and laboratory features of lupus contained in the CRF will be compared for each group, as well as the medications prescribed.

03

Conditions studied

  • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Keywords

  • Disease Course
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Patients with SLE have been followed prospectively at the University of Toronto Lupus Clinic since 1970. All patients ≥4 or more of the 1997 ACR criteria for SLE, or have 3 criteria and a typical lesion of SLE on renal or skin biopsy. Patients are evaluated at 2-6 month intervals according to a standard protocol which includes a detailed clinical history, physical examination, and laboratory evaluation . It includes all information necessary to calculate disease activity and damage indices, as well as comorbidities. Disease activity is assessed by the SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) , and accumulated damage by the SLICC/ACR damage index (SDI) .

To date there are 1767 patients with 2 or more visits registered in the Lupus Clinic Database, with 43079 assessments recorded. Their characteristics are shown in Table 1.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Patients enrolled in the study for aims 1 and 2 must meet the following inclusion criteria:

  1. ≥4 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria or 3 ACR criteria plus a typical histological lesion of SLE on renal or skin .
  2. Patients must have a minimum of 2 assessment visits.

Patients enrolled in the study for aim 3 must meet the following criteria:

  1. Must be inception patients seen within one year of diagnosis of SLE
  2. ≥4 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria or 3 ACR criteria plus a typical histological lesion of SLE on renal or skin biopsy.
  3. Patients must have a minimum of 6 assessment visits to ensure categorization into one of the disease courses derived in aims 1 and 2

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients who have not had 2 assessment visits for aims 1 and 2
  2. Patients who have not had 6 assessments for aim 3.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Biopsy and archival tissue

A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.

Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
950 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Disease Course Patterns

    All 49,000 visits within the Toronto Lupus Cohort will be probed for patterns of disease activity using SLEDAI-2K measurements on each assessment. A finite mixture model will be fitted to the data to accommodate for three sub-populations of patients. Disease course for each sub-populations will be defined in terms of multistate model where the states reflected meaningfully different degrees of disease activity as measured by the SLEDAI-2K scores.

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University Health Network
    Toronto, Ontario M5T2S8, Canada
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — No IPD data will be shared with other researchers

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Feb 2017 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jun 2018, 16 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 24, 2017
First posted
Nov 21, 2017
StartActual
Feb 9, 2017
Primary completionEst.
Jun 30, 2018
CompletionEst.
Jul 30, 2018
Last update
Nov 21, 2017
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 21, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03348774
Collaborators
GlaxoSmithKline
Responsible party
Murray B Urowitz, MD FRCP(C) (Priniple Investigator, University Health Network, Toronto) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 21, 2017
Start date
Feb 9, 2017
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2018 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 30, 2018 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 21, 2017

Study contacts

Murray Urowitz
principal investigator · University Health Network and University of Toronto

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Nov 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion