CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03342183Updated Oct 18, 2022

Reducing Hemodialysis Induced Recurrent Brain Injury to Improve Patients' Lives

An interventional study of Intervention Arm and Control Arm in Chronic Kidney Disease, sponsored by London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's. Completed at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-10-18.

Sponsored by London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
25
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Patients who receive dialysis for kidney failure suffer severe cognitive impairment. Hemodialysis causes circulatory stress and ischemia, which causes severe brain injury. It has been demonstrated that a procedure known as Remote Ischemic Preconditioning(RIPC), which involves wrapping a blood pressure cuff around a patient's leg and inflating has the potential of protecting many organs, such as the heart from the effects of dialysis. Our study aims to investigate this phenomenon to determine the extent to which it provides protection to a dialysis patient's brain.

Read the detailed description

Hemodialysis patients suffer severe cognitive impairment: Abnormalities of cognitive impairment (predominately sub-cortical defects in executive decision making) are almost universal in hemodialysis (HD) patients and appear early after starting dialysis. Around 75% of patients exhibit mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and a high proportion (˜15%) have dementia. Mechanisms of injury: It has been demonstrated that HD associated circulatory stress and recurrent regional ischemia drives brain injury. The extent of injury is determined by the degree of BP instability during HD. Peritoneal dialysis patients are not subject to the same stress and retain cognitive abilities. The injury is multifactorial, and amenable to HD based intervention. Optimizing dialysis to minimize harm requires understanding the wide range of potential of pathophysiological processes contributing to this injury. Putative components of pathophysiology that might be amenable to intervention include: a) Direct reduction in tissue perfusion is the characteristic consequence of HD driven multi-organ injury. The investigators have directly visualized this in multiple organ beds during dialysis (heart, gut and kidney), and have inferred it in the brain from the development of ischemic based white matter (WM) injury. b) Inflammation drives WM injury.Endotoxin (derived from gut bacteria) is profoundly pro- inflammatory and translocates from intestinal lumen into the circulation during HD treatment directly causing WM inflammation. Daily HD (gentler fluid removal) normalizes endotoxemia and markers of inflammation. c) Release of the excitotoxic neurotransmitter, glutamate, produces injury in ischemia. Plasma levels are lower in HD patients with less ongoing brain injury. Removal of glutamate by dialysis significantly reduces ischemic injury severity and functional consequences. Previous success in protecting the brain during dialysis: The Investigator recently completed a successful multi- centre RCT of cooled dialysis fluid to abrogate WM progressive injury- strongly supporting the integral role that the HD process plays in brain injury. Hemodialysis patients have specific patterns of progressive brain injury: Currently the problem of dialysis induced functionally significant brain injury is typically not well recognized or a focus of care. Leukoaraiosis describes rarefaction of brain WM, typically associated with vascular cognitive impairment. It is universally present in HD patients (even when correcting for BP). Severity of reduction in cognitive function is proportional to the amount of WM injury, with a predominant loss of subcortical functions (executive functioning). The Investigators have previously demonstrated that the signature of the change in fractional anisotropy in dialysis patients was entirely explained by changes in radial diffusivity, rather than axial diffusivity- pathognomonic of a vascular etiology. Urgent need to develop additional interventions: Although dialysis fluid cooling appears to be effective in helping to protect against WM injury, there are limitations. The degree of cooling that can be applied is limited in some patients by cold symptom tolerability and effectiveness has only been tested in patients new to HD. Patients with more established injury may require additional therapies. These need to be suitable for combination with other emerging dialysis based therapies. Ideally they will be universally applicable, independent of dialysis machine type, low-cost, safe, well tolerated, and simple-requiring few healthcare resources to apply. Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC): Ischemic conditioning occurs when a transient non-lethal episode of ischemia reduces the effect of a subsequent larger insult. Similar levels of protection can be achieved by applying brief episodes of ischemia (with a BP cuff on a limb) remote from a target organ. Successful clinical studies using RIPC have been performed to provide protection against ischemia in many organs, including acute stroke, and can prevent leukoaraiosis in animal models. RIPC provides protection against HD-induced acute myocardial injury: The investigators have recently completed a pilot RCT demonstrating a RIPC intervention reduced HD-induced acute cardiac injury by 50%, after only a single application. This effect was maintained over a period of 28 days. RIPC was effective, safe and well tolerated. The investigators are currently engaged in a larger Canadian based study to refine the optimum RIPC regime to provide protection against HD-induced cardiac injury. Interim analysis of this study has confirmed similar levels of efficacy in a Canadian population and allowed us to select the maximally effective RIPC regime, for use in the current proposed study. Clear translational pathway: This project is conceived in an integrated framework of new therapeutic target discovery, intervention development and sequential testing of safety and efficacy. The investigators will use clinically relevant surrogate imaging endpoints for rapid evaluation and refinement of candidate intervention, prior to large-scale testing with survival-based endpoints. The Investigators have already developed a prototype phase III equivalent study. MY-TEMP is an Ontario based cluster randomized study of individualized dialysate cooling (trials registration NCT 02628366), funded in partnership by the Heart and Stroke Foundation, Ontario Ministry of Health and US based large dialysis provider organizations. All 7000 patients will be randomized in Q3 2016. Impact: HD patients characteristically suffer from cognitive impairment. Understanding the mechanisms behind this will allow the development of therapies integrated into dialysis treatment delivery (anti-ischemic, but potentially also directed at issues such as inflammation and dialyzable injury factors), helping patients maintain cognitive vitality, independence and maximize quality of life.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Kidney Disease

Keywords

  • Dialysis
  • Hemodialysis
  • Remote Ischemic Preconditioning
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Male or Female
  • Having hemodialysis treatment at least three times per week
  • Must be 18 years old or older.
  • Ability to speak and understand English

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Exposure to hemodialysis for less than 90 days prior to recruitment
  • Established severe cognitive impairment (Montreal Cognitive Assessment test (MoCA) of less than 18 or with a formal diagnosis of dementia)
  • Previous clinical stroke
  • Taking drugs to blunt response to RIPC (e.g. ciclosporin, ATP-sensitive potassium channel directed drugs)
  • Dialysing using lower limb vascular access
  • Pregnancy, breastfeeding, or intending pregnancy
  • Unable to give consent or understand written information
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
25 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intervention Arm

    RIPC stimulus will be applied prior to the first intervention visit, using a previously validated (for cardiac protection in HD patients) standard dose (four cycles of cuff inflation to the lower limb of the patient and inflating at 200mmHg for five minutes, with five minutes' deflation). To be administered on a monthly basis from the baseline visit to the year 1 visit.

    Other: Intervention Arm

  • Sham comparator
    Control Arm

    Sham procedure in which the blood pressure cuff will be applied to the lower limb and inflated to 40mmHg for five minutes and deflated for five minutes with the cycle repeated a total of four times prior to dialysis. To be administered on a monthly basis from the baseline visit to the year 1 visit.

    Other: Control Arm

Interventions

  • OtherIntervention Arm

    RIPC stimulus will be applied prior to the first intervention visit, using a previously validated (for cardiac protection in HD patients) standard dose (four cycles of cuff inflation to the lower limb of the patient and inflating at 200mmHg for five minutes, with five minutes' deflation).

  • OtherControl Arm

    Sham procedure in which the blood pressure cuff will be applied to the lower limb and inflated to 40mmHg for five minutes and deflated for five minutes with the cycle repeated a total of four times prior to dialysis. To be administered on a monthly basis from the baseline visit to the year 1 visit.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Neuro-protection against functionally significant new brain injury

    Change from baseline in brain damage as observed by progressive ultrastructural white matter changes on MRI imaging.

    Time frame: 1 year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Brain Perfusion

    Change of brain perfusion from baseline MRI.

    Time frame: 1 year

  2. Excitotoxic neurotransmitter release

    Change in Exitotoxic neurotransmitter release from baseline as seen on the combined MRI.

    Time frame: 1 year

  3. Microglial Inflammation

    Change in microglial Inflammation from baseline as seen on the combined MRI.

    Time frame: 1 year

  4. Neurological impact

    Compare observed brain injury, as determined by MRI, to results on neurocognitive test.

    Time frame: 1 year

  5. Depression scoring

    Compare observed brain injury, as determined by MRI, to results on depression scoring test.We will be utilizing the PHQ-9(Patient Health Questionnaire) which is used for screening, diagnosing, monitoring, and measuring the severity of depression. This test consists of 9 questions regarding symptoms which factor into the scoring severity index. Each question is given a score from 0-3, which represents responses such as: not at all(0), several days(1), more than half the days (2), and nearly everyday(3). The scores can be interpreted as follows: 5-9 (minimal symptoms), 10-14 (Minor depression, mild), 15-19 (major depression, moderately severe), and \>20 (major depression, severe).

    Time frame: 1 year

  6. Daily activities

    Compare observed brain injury, as determined by MRI, to results on evaluation of activities of daily living survey.

    Time frame: 1 year

  7. Blood work- blood count

    1 year results will be compared to baseline.

    Time frame: 1 year

  8. Blood work-urea

    1 year results will be compared to baseline.

    Time frame: 1 year

  9. Blood work-microparticles

    1 year results will be compared to baseline.

    Time frame: 1 year

  10. Blood work-Cardiac biomarkers (Troponin T, nTproBNP)

    1 year results will be compared to baseline.

    Time frame: 1 year

  11. Blood work-CRP (C-Reactive Protein)

    1 year results will be compared to baseline.

    Time frame: 1 year

  12. Blood work-glucose

    1 year results will be compared to baseline.

    Time frame: 1 year

  13. Blood work- lactate

    1 year results will be compared to baseline.

    Time frame: 1 year

  14. Blood work- electrolytes

    1 year results will be compared to baseline.

    Time frame: 1 year

  15. Echocardiogram

    Correlated to brain perfusion as well as circulatory stress outputs obtained by the CVInsight devices.

    Time frame: 1 year

  16. CVInsight

    Help us to understand if the CVInsight® Patient Monitoring \& Informatics System can be a predictor of organ perfusion

    Time frame: 1 year

06

Study locations

1 site
  • London Health Sciences Centre
    London, Ontario N6A 5W9, Canada
07

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03342183
Lead sponsor
London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's
Responsible party
Chris McIntyre (Director of Kidney Clinical Research Unit, London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 14, 2017
Start date
Jan 8, 2018
Primary completion
Oct 3, 2022
Completion
Oct 12, 2022
Last update
Oct 18, 2022

Study contacts

Christopher McIntyre, MD
principal investigator · London Health Sciences Centre

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion