ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT03341416Updated Nov 17, 2017

Effects of Deep Brain Stimulation of the Dentate Nucleus on Cerebellar Ataxia

An interventional study of deep brain stimulation on stimulation - active and deep brain stimulation off stimulation - sham in Cerebellar Ataxia, sponsored by University of Sao Paulo General Hospital. Status unknown at 1 site in Brazil. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-11-17.

Sponsored by University of Sao Paulo General Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Nov 2017), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
10
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Cerebellar ataxias are a group of disorders caused by cerebellar affections, for which currently no specific treatment is available. Some limited studies verified the effects of cerebellar transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) on ataxic symptoms, with good results. The hypothesis is that cerebellar TMS could improve ataxic symptoms in some patients and in these patients, chronic cerebellar stimulation through deep brain stimulation could be a therapeutic option. The rationale is to stimulate the dentate nucleus of the cerebellum in order to balance the functional asymmetry observed between both motor cortices after chronic cerebellar lesions.

Read the detailed description

Ten patients with cerebellar ataxia will be included in our protocol. Ataxia might be due to several aetiologies, from degenerative to genetic and vascular diseases. The initial focus is vascular and spinal cerebellar ataxias. The participants will be submitted to a neuronavigation protocol for the precise location of the dentate nucleus contralateral to the most symptomatic side. After that, the participants will be randomly assigned to 5 active or 5 placebo sessions of 1Hz TMS over the located area. After the first 5 sessions and a period of at least 4 weeks washout, the participants will cross over and receive other 5 sessions, active or sham. Clinical and video evaluations will be conducted before and after active and sham cluster of sessions. The good responders, i.e., with over than 30% of improvement after the active section will be eligible to bilateral dentate nucleus DBS. After that, again, a cross-over double blind on-off stimulation will be performed. Each period (on or 0ff-stimulation) will last 4 weeks.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cerebellar Ataxia

Keywords

  • cerebellar ataxia
  • stroke
  • Spinocerebellar ataxia
  • deep brain stimulation
  • dentate nucleus
03

In context

Cerebellar Ataxia

72 studies on the registry are indexed under Cerebellar Ataxia; 16 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 10 is below the median of 25 across 55 interventional studies indexed under Cerebellar Ataxia.

Browse Cerebellar Ataxia studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Sao Paulo General Hospital is the lead sponsor of 611 studies on the registry; 98 are open to participants now.

Of its 8 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Patients with diagnosis of chronic cerebellar ataxia (> 6 months);
  2. Age ≥18 years;
  3. Be able to understand study protocol;
  4. Signed, written (approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee) obtained prior to any study procedure;
  5. symptoms response to first, second and pharmacological treatment;
  6. Daily living activities impaired because the ataxia;
  7. Be able to undergo surgery procedures.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Abuse of alcohol, drugs
  2. Known psychiatric conditions
  3. to DBS
  4. Heart failure or cardiac disease that contraindicates surgery procedures;
  5. Pacemaker or other stimulators implanted active;
  6. Positive blood ß-HCG test for women;
  7. Other medical conditions demand hospitalization; Participation in other clinical studies at the same time;
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Relapsed and refractory

Relapsed: the illness came back after treatment had worked. Refractory: it did not respond to treatment, or stopped responding while still on it.

Line of therapy

A line of therapy is one course of treatment, which may combine several drugs. First-line is the first course given; second-line follows when that stops working or is not tolerated.

“Two prior lines” means two courses that count separately under the study’s rules — not simply two drugs. Ask the study team if you are unsure how yours are counted.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
10 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Device - deep brain stimulation ON

    Intervention type: device (deep brain stimulation of the dentate nucleus in cerebellum). The intervention is a device called deep brain stimulation bilaterally placed in the sub thalamic nucleus. The stimulation will remained turned ON during 3 months - phase 1 - blinded and continuous during the open-label phase

    Device: deep brain stimulation on stimulation - active

  • Sham comparator
    Device - deep brain stimulation Sham

    Sham stimulation: device (deep brain stimulation of the dentate nucleus in cerebellum). Intervention type: device (deep brain stimulation of the dentate nucleus in cerebellum). The intervention is a device called deep brain stimulation bilaterally placed in the sub thalamic nucleus. During the sham stimulation the intervention will remained turned OFF during 3 months

    Device: deep brain stimulation off stimulation - sham

Interventions

  • Devicedeep brain stimulation on stimulation - active

    bilateral deep brain stimulation reaching the dentate nucleus turned ON - phase active

  • Devicedeep brain stimulation off stimulation - sham

    bilateral deep brain stimulation reaching the dentate nucleus turned OFF - phase sham

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Primary outcome - change in Scale for the assessment and rating of ataxia - SARA

    To evaluate prospectively the effect of DN-DBS in ataxia. The primary outcome is the change between the Scale for the assessment and rating of ataxia (SARA, ranging from 0-40, higher scores mean more severe ataxia) at baseline and after surgery during the active DBS-ON phase

    Time frame: change in the SARA score between the baseline versus after surgery during ON-stimulation deep brain stimulation phase. This phase lasts 1 month, so the evaluation will be performed 01 months after the stimulation is turned on.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Secondary outcome - change in tremor score using the Fahn Tolosa Marin Scale

    To evaluate prospectively the effect of DN-DBS on tremor. The secondary outcome is the change between the Fahn Tolosa Marin Scale (ranging from 0-40, higher scores mean worse tremor) at baseline and after surgery during the active DBS-ON phase

    Time frame: change in the Fahn Tolosa Marin Scale score between the baseline versus after surgery during ON-stimulation deep brain stimulation phase. This phase lasts 1 month, so the evaluation will be performed 01 months after the stimulation is turned on.

  2. Secondary outcome - quality of life

    To evaluate prospectively the effect of DN-DBS on quality of life. The secondary outcome is the change between the World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL-bref, 26 items, which measure the following broad domains: physical health, psychological health, social relationships, and environment, higher scores mean better quality of life) at baseline and after surgery during the active DBS-ON phase

    Time frame: change in the WHOQOL-bref score between the baseline versus after surgery during ON-stimulation deep brain stimulation phase. This phase lasts 1 month, so the evaluation will be performed 01 months after the stimulation is turned on.

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Rubens Cury
    São Paulo, SP, Brazil
    Recruiting
    • Rubens Cury, MD PhD · Contactrubens_cury@usp.br · 5511972838184
    • carina franca, MD · Contact1131590293
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Sep 2017 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jul 2018, 10 months after the start.

Of 30 interventional studies with no phase under Cerebellar Ataxia, half reached primary completion within 24 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 12. This study's planned 10 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 30, 2017
First posted
Nov 14, 2017
StartActual
Sep 1, 2017
Primary completionEst.
Jul 1, 2018
CompletionEst.
Jan 1, 2019
Last update
Nov 17, 2017
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 17, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03341416
Responsible party
Rubens Gisbert Cury (Medical Assistant, Movement Disorders Unit. Principal Investigator. MD, PhD, University of Sao Paulo General Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 14, 2017
Start date
Sep 1, 2017
Primary completion
Jul 1, 2018 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 1, 2019 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 17, 2017

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Nov 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion