An interventional study of Induction of Implemental Mindset and Induction of Deliberative Mindset in Alcohol Drinking in College, sponsored by University of Konstanz. Terminated at 1 site in Germany. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-03-25.
Sponsored by University of Konstanz · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention
Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →
Brief Interventions (BI) based on Motivational Interviewing are effective to reduce alcohol use. In this study the investigators test the hypothesis that that an open Mindset increases the positive effects of BI.
University students take part in a voluntary screened for risky alcohol use. All students with risky alcohol use are eligible to the study and all receive the WHO's ASSIST-linked BI.
Participants receive a brief Mindset induction prior to receiving BI. They are are randomly assigned to either the induction of an open or a closed mindset according to the Mindset theory of action phases (Gollwitzer \& Keller (2016). Mindset Theory. In: V. Zeigler-Hill, T.K. Shackelford (eds.), Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences. New York: Springer).
The investigators measure the change in alcohol-related risk perception, treatment motivation and real alcohol drinking after the Brief Intervention in relation to the mindset induced before receiving the intervention.
38 studies on the registry are indexed under Alcohol Drinking in College; 8 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 64 is below the median of 258 across 36 interventional studies indexed under Alcohol Drinking in College.
Browse Alcohol Drinking in College studies →University of Konstanz is the lead sponsor of 51 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Psychological Intervention. Participants are asked to work on a brief paper-and-pencil task that has been shown to induce an Implemental Mindset according to the Mindset theory of action phases (Gollwitzer \& Keller (2016). Mindset Theory. In: V. Zeigler-Hill, T.K. Shackelford (eds.), Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences. New York: Springer).
Behavioral: Induction of Implemental Mindset
Psychological Intervention. Participants are asked to work on a brief paper-and-pencil task that has been shown to induce a Deliberative Mindset according to the Mindset theory of action phases (Gollwitzer \& Keller (2016). Mindset Theory. In: V. Zeigler-Hill, T.K. Shackelford (eds.), Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences. New York: Springer).
Behavioral: Induction of Deliberative Mindset
Participants will revive no induction of any mindset.
This induction of a psychological state was extensively studied in basic cognitive science. Gollwitzer \& Keller (2016, p.3): "The implemental mindset is evoked by asking participants to think of a personal project for which they have already made the decision to act but did not initiate any action yet. Subsequently, participants are asked to list the steps necessary for successful goal attainment and to plan out in detail when, where, and how they intend to act on each of these steps."
This induction of a psychological state was extensively studied in basic cognitive science. Gollwitzer \& Keller (2016, p.3): "The deliberative mindset is evoked by asking participants to (a) name an unresolved, important personal problem that is causing rumination but for which they have not made a decision yet and (b) reflect on whether to take action or not. Further, to enhance the depth of reflection, participants are requested to list a number of positive and negative, short- and long-term consequences of both deciding to act and deciding not to act; indicating the probability of the occurrence of each of these consequences is required."
Questionnaire on Alcohol-related Risk Perception
Self-Report Measure that is filled out by the participant. This German questionnaire was developed by Klepper, Odenwald \& Rockstroh (2016).
Time frame: 4 weeks
Alcohol Time-line Follow Back
Self-reported amount of standard alcohol units consumed. The assessment is made with the calendar method developed by Sobell \& Sobell (1995)
Time frame: 4 weeks
SOCRATES
Questionnaire: The Stages of Change Readiness and Treatment Eagerness Scale (SOCRATES, Miller, W. R., \& Tonigan, J. S. (1996). Assessing drinkers' motivation for change: The Stages of Change Readiness and Treatment Eagerness Scale (SOCRATES). Psychology of Addictive Behaviors 10, 81-89.
Time frame: 4 weeks
Plan to share: Undecided
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
Ran from Nov 2017 to primary completion in Oct 2018, 11 months.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is terminated, as verified in Mar 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
University of Konstanz