ClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT03338309INTERPRETUpdated Mar 14, 2025

INsTantenous wavE-Free Ratio-guided PCI Versus Fractional Flow REserve-Guided PCI in rouTine Clinical Practice, Prospective, Multicenter Registry

An observational study in Stable Angina, Non ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction, sponsored by Samsung Medical Center. Active, not recruiting at 4 sites in Korea, Republic of. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-03-14.

Sponsored by Samsung Medical Center · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Dec 2025, 11 months ago, but the record still lists the study as active, not recruiting.

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
1,200
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-13

Among 30 studies in Angina, Stable with a site in Korea, Republic of — 1 open to participants now, 5 under way, none of them phase 3. Angina, Stable · Korea, Republic of.

Started
2017
with 2 others
Observational
6 of 30
none open now
Registered
22nd of 30
by date
Lead sponsor
3 of 30
Samsung Medical Center

Among the 30 studies in Angina, Stable with a site in Korea, Republic of, this one is one of 3 that started in 2017, is one of 6 observational ones, and was the 22nd registered.

Angina, Stable

343 studies on the registry are indexed under Angina, Stable; 56 are open to participants now.

Browse Angina, Stable studies →

Open to participants now

1 of the 30 studies in Angina, Stable with a site in Korea, Republic of is open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

A study can be open while its sites in Korea, Republic of have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in Korea, Republic of →

Who these studies take

Of the 39 Angina, Stable studies recruiting now, 33 (85%) set no upper age limit and 2 (5%) stop at 75 or younger; 2 take children under 18; 1 takes healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years and older · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 30 studies in Angina, Stable with a site in Korea, Republic of, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

The current study sought to evaluate the clinical relevance of iFR-guided strategy in real world clinical practice using unrestricted study population from stable angina to acute coronary syndrome including acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Previous abundant historical data of FFR-guided strategy will be also included as historical control to validate the iFR-guided strategy.

Read the detailed description

In this study, the investigators will validate the clinical relevance of instantaneous wave free ratio (iFR)-guided strategy in real world clinical practice in Korea. The 1,200 patients who underwent iFR measurement will be prospectively enrolled at 5 centers in Republic of Korea. In patients who were indicated revascularization after iFR measurement (iFR\<0.90), iFR pullback system (iFR Scout) and post-revascularization iFR measurement will be routinely performed. The primary hypothesis will be tested for non-inferiority of iFR-guided strategy, compared with FFR-guided strategy in terms of 2-year clinical outcomes. For the clinical outcome data following FFR-guided strategy will be used from the pooled data of the DEFER-DES trial, the 3V FFR FRIENDS registry (NCT01621438), and Korean 4-center FFR registry. Using those data, 1200 patients will be selected from the pooled data. In addition, routine application of iFR Scout and post-revascularization iFR measurement will enable us to validate the clinical relevance of iFR-based prediction of acute procedural results and to compare FFR-pullback methods.

Primary Hypothesis: The iFR-guided strategy will be non-inferior regarding patient-oriented composite outcomes (a composite of any death, any MI, any revascularization) at 2-year, compared with FFR-guided strategy.

Primary Outcome:

1] Patient-oriented composite outcome (POCO), defined as a composite of any death, any myocardial infarction (MI) or any revascularization at 2-year after index procedure according to the ARC consensus [2] Difference between Predicted post-PCI iFR value from iFR Scout and Actual post-PCI iFR measurement

Sample Size 1,200 patients with suspected ischemic heart disease including stable angina, or acute coronary syndrome including unstable angina, non ST-segment elevation MI, or ST-segment elevation MI with non-culprit stenosis enrolled at 5 centers in Republic of Korea.

  1. Inclusion Criteria

    ① Subject must be ≥18 years

    ② Patients suspected with ischemic heart disease

    ③ Patients with coronary artery stenosis with intermediate degree of stenosis (40-70% stenosis by visual estimation) in major epicardial coronary artery amenable to stent implantation or vessel size≥2.5 mm without definitive previous evidence of myocardial ischemia.

    ④ Subject is able to verbally confirm understandings of risks, benefits and treatment alternatives of receiving invasive physiologic evaluation and he/she or his/her legally authorized representative provides

  2. Exclusion criteria

    • Cardiogenic shock (systolic blood pressure \< 90mmHg or requiring inotropics to maintain blood pressure > 90mmHg) ② Patients with a known hypersensitivity or contraindication to any of the following medications: statin, ezetimibe, heparin, aspirin, clopidogrel, prasugrel, ticagrelor

      • Non-cardiac co-morbid conditions are present with life expectancy \<2 year (per site investigator's medical judgment).

        • History of bleeding diathesis, known coagulopathy (including heparin-induced thrombocytopenia) ⑤ Patients with active pathologic bleeding ⑥ Gastrointestinal or genitourinary major bleeding within the prior 3 months. ⑦ Target lesion located in coronary arterial bypass graft
03

Conditions studied

  • Stable Angina
  • Non ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
  • ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
  • Silent Myocardial Ischemia
  • Unstable Angina

Keywords

  • Fractional flow reserve
  • Instantaneous wave-free ratio
  • Ischemic heart disease
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

1,200 patients with suspected ischemic heart disease including stable angina, or acute coronary syndrome including unstable angina, non ST-segment elevation MI, or ST-segment elevation MI with non-culprit stenosis who underwent iFR measurement and enrolled at 5 centers in Republic of Korea.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Subject must be ≥18 years

    • Patients suspected with ischemic heart disease ③ Patients with coronary artery stenosis with intermediate degree of stenosis (40-70% stenosis by visual estimation) in major epicardial coronary artery amenable to stent implantation or vessel size≥2.5 mm without definitive previous evidence of myocardial ischemia.

      • Subject is able to verbally confirm understandings of risks, benefits and treatment alternatives of receiving invasive physiologic evaluation and he/she or his/her legally authorized representative provides

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cardiogenic shock (systolic blood pressure \< 90mmHg or requiring inotropics to maintain blood pressure > 90mmHg)

    • Patients with a known or to any of the following medications: statin, ezetimibe, heparin, aspirin, clopidogrel, prasugrel, ticagrelor ③ Non-cardiac co-morbid conditions are present with \<2 year (per site investigator's medical judgment).

      • History of bleeding diathesis, known coagulopathy (including heparin-induced thrombocytopenia)

        • Patients with active pathologic bleeding ⑥ Gastrointestinal or genitourinary major bleeding within the prior 3 months. ⑦ Target lesion located in coronary arterial bypass graft
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
1,200 participants (actual)
Target follow-up
2 Years
Patient registry
Yes

Groups and cohorts

  • iFR-guied strategy group

    1,200 patients with suspected ischemic heart disease including stable angina, or acute coronary syndrome including unstable angina, non ST-segment elevation MI, or ST-segment elevation MI with non-culprit stenosis who underwent iFR measurement and enrolled at 5 centers in Republic of Korea.

    Other: Instantaneous wave-free ratio measurement

Interventions

  • OtherInstantaneous wave-free ratio measurement

    Instantaneous wave-free ratio measurement in order to evaluate functional significance of epicardial stenosis

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Patient-oriented composite outcome (POCO)

    a composite of any death, any myocardial infarction (MI) or any revascularization according to the ARC consensus

    Time frame: at 2-year after index procedure

Secondary outcomes

  1. Difference between Predicted post-PCI iFR value from iFR Scout and Actual post-PCI iFR measurement

    Difference between Predicted post-PCI iFR value from iFR Scout and Actual post-PCI iFR measurement

    Time frame: Immediate after post revascularization

07

Study locations

4 sites
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — Data will be shared upon request after thorough discussion in steering committee

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Nov 2017 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2025, 97 months after the start.

Of 52 observational studies under Angina, Stable, half reached primary completion within 47 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 27 and three quarters within 79. This study's planned 97 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 7, 2017
First posted
Nov 9, 2017
StartActual
Nov 1, 2017
Primary completionEst.
Dec 1, 2025
CompletionEst.
Dec 1, 2025
Last update
Mar 14, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 14, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03338309
Responsible party
Joo Myung Lee (Assistant Professor, Samsung Medical Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 9, 2017
Start date
Nov 1, 2017
Primary completion
Dec 1, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 1, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 14, 2025

Study contacts

Bon-Kwon Koo, MD, PhD
study chair · Seoul National University Hospital
Bon-Kwon Koo, MD, PhD
study director · Seoul National University Hospital
Bon-Kwon Koo, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Seoul National University Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Mar 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion